31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

240 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

control. Again, we will not justify this perspective, but rather<br />

apply it to the case at h<strong>and</strong>. 6<br />

How would it work? First, if there were any case <strong>of</strong> a privately<br />

owned street seized from its legitimate owners <strong>and</strong><br />

brought into the public sector (e.g., nationalization, or, in this<br />

case, municipalization), those with first claim on it would be its<br />

former owners. 7 For example, in the New York City case, while<br />

there never were any private streets condemned by City Council,<br />

there were two other transportation modes which were: the Independent<br />

Rapid Transit Corporation (IRT), <strong>and</strong> the Brooklyn-<br />

Manhattan Transit Company (BMT). When these are privatized,<br />

they will be given back to their former owners, not to those that<br />

traveled on them, or lived next to them, or above or below them,<br />

nor, even, to those who owned such surrounding properties. Borrowing<br />

a leaf from this experience, then, the first claimants on<br />

public streets are the taxpayers who were forced to finance them.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are the real <strong>and</strong> rightful owners <strong>of</strong> the streets: those who<br />

paid for them.<br />

6Homesteading is the process <strong>of</strong> mixing human labor with l<strong>and</strong> by farming<br />

it, or using it, or, in our present case, building a road on it. <strong>The</strong> classical<br />

justification for this form <strong>of</strong> establishing ownership over virgin territory is<br />

John Locke, “An Essay Concerning the True Origin, Extent <strong>and</strong> End <strong>of</strong> Civil<br />

Government,” in Social Contract, E. Barker, ed. (New York: Oxford University<br />

Press, 1948). For improvements <strong>and</strong> refinements, see Rothbard, Reconstruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> Utility <strong>and</strong> Welfare Economics <strong>and</strong> <strong>The</strong> Ethics <strong>of</strong> Liberty <strong>and</strong> Hans-<br />

Hermann Hoppe, <strong>The</strong> Economics <strong>and</strong> Ethics <strong>of</strong> Private Property: Studies in<br />

Political Economy <strong>and</strong> Philosophy (Boston: Kluwer, 1993).<br />

7Seized means comm<strong>and</strong>eered, or taken over by eminent domain,<br />

whether or not this taking was in any way compensated. (If there were full<br />

compensation, presumably there would have been no need for the state to<br />

condemn the property. City governments purchase paper, pencils, etc., on<br />

free markets every day.) See Richard Epstein, Takings: Private Property <strong>and</strong><br />

the Power <strong>of</strong> Eminent Domain (Cambridge, Mass. <strong>and</strong> London: Harvard University<br />

Press, 1985).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!