31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Homesteading City Streets:<br />

An Exercise in Managerial <strong>The</strong>ory 239<br />

PRIVATIZATION<br />

What, then, is the best process for converting vehicular thoroughfares<br />

from the public to the private sector, stipulating if only<br />

for the sake <strong>of</strong> argument that this is not a quixotic quest, that it<br />

can work, if it is but implemented?<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are several choices. First, let us address the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

whether these resources should be given to the citizenry, or sold<br />

to it. <strong>The</strong> case for the former seems clear: it is the people whose<br />

resources went into the creation <strong>of</strong> the roads in the first place,<br />

not that <strong>of</strong> the government. True, the state was the proximate<br />

cause <strong>of</strong> the spending, but, ultimately, the money came from the<br />

long-suffering taxpayer. Indeed, the state has no money <strong>of</strong> its<br />

own, over <strong>and</strong> above that mulcted from the citizenry. Further, it<br />

is the government, if we are correct in our underlying analysis,<br />

which is responsible for the problems <strong>of</strong> road socialism in the<br />

first place. It would come with particular ill grace for the guilty<br />

institution to reap the fruits <strong>of</strong> correcting problems it itself created.<br />

<strong>The</strong> point is, if the roads are sold, the proceeds will be<br />

given to the city administration, the last group <strong>of</strong> people deserving<br />

<strong>of</strong> them.<br />

Given, then, that we reject sales, <strong>and</strong> favor giveaways, who<br />

are the worthy recipients? Several immediately come to mind:<br />

those who travel on the streets (or otherwise use them), those<br />

who live or work in the surrounding buildings, <strong>and</strong> those who<br />

own these edifices. How can the claims <strong>of</strong> these various c<strong>and</strong>idates<br />

be reconciled? How can they be ranked, so that those with<br />

a greater ones are given proportionately more ownership rights<br />

than those with lesser?<br />

Fortunately, there is a theory that can elucidate these problems.<br />

It may not give definitive answers to the nearest four decimal<br />

points, but at least it can point in a proper direction. <strong>The</strong> theory<br />

is that <strong>of</strong> libertarianism, based on private property rights <strong>and</strong><br />

homesteading; this may be readily used as a means <strong>of</strong> determining<br />

how un-owned resources can pass from that state into human

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!