31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Compromising the Uncompromisable:<br />

Speed Limits, Parades, Cigarettes 205<br />

advocated by one side, adding them to the other, <strong>and</strong> perhaps,<br />

dividing by two. 7<br />

This privatization compromise is the only one compatible<br />

with the libertarian perspective on rights. 8 In that view, government<br />

nationalization <strong>of</strong> private property is tantamount to a taking,<br />

9 or, more accurately, theft. 10 For the only legitimate role <strong>of</strong><br />

government11 is to protect persons <strong>and</strong> their property from<br />

aggression, <strong>and</strong> while courts, armies <strong>and</strong> police are at least relevant<br />

to this task, highways are not.<br />

7Any such procedure, moreover, would encourage “strategic” behavior:<br />

each side would have an incentive to exaggerate its real goal, so as to bring<br />

the judgment closer in conformity to its own wishes.<br />

8See on this Bruce L. Benson, “L<strong>and</strong> Use Regulation: A Supply <strong>and</strong><br />

Dem<strong>and</strong> Analysis <strong>of</strong> Changing Property Rights,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Libertarian Studies<br />

5, no. 4 (Fall, 1981); Antony Flew, “Could <strong>The</strong>re Be Universal Natural<br />

Rights?” Journal <strong>of</strong> Libertarian Studies 6, nos. 3/4 (Summer/Fall, 1982):<br />

277–88; Tibor Machan, ed., “Against Nonlibertarian Natural Rights,” Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Libertarian Studies 2, no. 3 (Fall, 1978): 233–38; Douglas B. Rasmussen,<br />

“A Groundwork for Rights: Man’s Natural End,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Libertarian Studies<br />

6, no. 1 (Winter, 1980): 65–76.<br />

9 Richard Epstein, Takings: Private Property <strong>and</strong> the Power <strong>of</strong> Eminent<br />

Domain (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985).<br />

10Lys<strong>and</strong>er Spooner, No Treason (Larkspur, Colo.: Pine Tree Press, [1870]<br />

1966).<br />

11If indeed it has one. For support <strong>of</strong> this contention, see Robert Nozick,<br />

Anarchy, State, <strong>and</strong> Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974). See Epstein, Takings;<br />

for a critique see Rothbard, For a New Liberty; Hans-Hermann Hoppe,<br />

A <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> Socialism <strong>and</strong> Capitalism: Economics, Politics <strong>and</strong> Ethics (Boston:<br />

Dordrecht, 1989); idem, <strong>The</strong> Economics <strong>and</strong> Ethics <strong>of</strong> Private Property: Studies<br />

in Political Economy <strong>and</strong> Philosophy (Boston: Kluwer, 1993); David Friedman,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Machinery <strong>of</strong> Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism, 2nd ed. (La Salle, Ill.:<br />

Open Court, 1989); Bruce Benson, “Enforcement <strong>of</strong> Private Property Rights<br />

in Primitive Societies: Law Without Government,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Libertarian<br />

Studies 9, no. 1 (Winter, 1989).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!