31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

204 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

75–80 mph, this will actually be safer than if some proceed at 40<br />

mph (the typical minimum highway requirement) <strong>and</strong> others,<br />

cheek by jowl, at 65 mph (policemen rarely ticket anyone for<br />

excessive speed <strong>of</strong> only 10 mph).<br />

What is the libertarian compromise between these two<br />

incompatible positions? <strong>The</strong> solution is to privatize all highways.<br />

6 With all highways, by-ways, streets, roads, thorough fares<br />

<strong>and</strong> other traffic arteries in the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> private entrepreneurs,<br />

there would be no need for government to decide upon any<br />

speed regime. Just as the state now plays no role whatsoever<br />

regarding the color <strong>of</strong> cars, or cloths, or crayons, <strong>and</strong> thus there<br />

is no need for any public “decision” regarding these choices, the<br />

public sector would entirely absent itself from the decision concerning<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> motorists. Just as there is now no U.S. government<br />

cloth or crayon “policy,” so, too, would there be no speed<br />

limit “policy.” <strong>Privatization</strong> is the only true compromise. Any<br />

other “solution” would be arbitrary, merely taking the limits<br />

6 For answers to objections that this is impossible, would create chaos,<br />

would not work, would be an abomination, or would be akin to Solomon’s<br />

decision to cut the baby in half <strong>and</strong> give each part to two contending mothers,<br />

see Walter Block, “Free Market Transportation: Denationalizing the<br />

<strong>Roads</strong>,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Libertarian Studies 3, no. 2 (Summer 1979); Daniel Klein,<br />

“<strong>The</strong> Voluntary Provision <strong>of</strong> Public Goods? <strong>The</strong> Turnpike Companies <strong>of</strong><br />

Early America,” Economic Inquiry (October): 788–812; Dan Klein, John<br />

Majewski, <strong>and</strong> Christopher Baer, “Economy, Community <strong>and</strong> the Law: <strong>The</strong><br />

Turnpike Movement in New York, 1797–1845,” <strong>The</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Economic History<br />

(March 1993): 106–22; idem, “From Trunk to Branch: Toll <strong>Roads</strong> in New<br />

York, 1800–1860,” Essays in Economic <strong>and</strong> Business History 11 (1993): 191–209;<br />

Dan Klein, <strong>and</strong> G.J. Fielding, “Private Toll <strong>Roads</strong>: Learning From the Nineteenth<br />

Century,” Transportation Quarterly (July 1992): 321–41; “How to Franchise<br />

<strong>Highways</strong>,” Journal <strong>of</strong> Transport Economics <strong>and</strong> Policy (May 1993):<br />

113–30; idem, “High Occupancy/Toll Lanes: Phasing in Congestion Pricing<br />

a Lane at a Time,” Policy Study 170 (November 1993); Gabriel Roth, <strong>The</strong> Private<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> Public Services in Developing Countries (Oxford: Oxford University<br />

Press, 1987); Murray N. Rothbard, For a New Liberty (New York:<br />

Macmillan, 1973); William C. Wooldridge, Uncle Sam, <strong>The</strong> Monopoly Man<br />

(New Rochelle, N.Y.: Arlington House, 1970).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!