31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

156 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

government bureau. A new core <strong>of</strong> bureaucrats would thus be<br />

born, whose job would be to h<strong>and</strong> out the actual incentive payments<br />

to the states that show the most improvement.<br />

Second, the consumer is not involved in the process. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />

not even a hint in this plan that the purchaser <strong>of</strong> road services<br />

could, through his or her consumption decisions, affect plans <strong>of</strong><br />

the highway managers. In the Kreml plan, the incentive payment<br />

goes to the state government, not to individuals. But can the<br />

prospect <strong>of</strong> the state government receiving the extra millions <strong>of</strong><br />

dollars raise the morale <strong>and</strong> support <strong>of</strong> those employees charged<br />

with highway safety to the degree necessary to make serious<br />

inroads on the death statistics?<br />

Third, why should the plan reward a reduction in the accident<br />

rate? Kreml specifically calls for a relation <strong>of</strong> incentive payments<br />

to safety improvement. This is far from the pattern that<br />

usually takes place in the market.<br />

<strong>The</strong> basic problem with the thinking <strong>of</strong> the road authorities is<br />

the approach that they have taken. <strong>The</strong>y ignore the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

employing the usual pr<strong>of</strong>it-<strong>and</strong>-loss business incentives to minimize<br />

highway accidents, <strong>and</strong> instead have an overwhelming concern<br />

with objective considerations. Unwilling to look at entrepreneurial<br />

potential because they see only government institutions<br />

as viable for highway management, the pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in the<br />

safety field concentrate on the physical means through which<br />

death rates can be lowered <strong>and</strong> not on the subjective elements<br />

necessary to mobilize objective factors for this purpose.<br />

A brief survey <strong>of</strong> the literature shows that these objective conditions<br />

are usually listed under three headings: the vehicle, the<br />

driver, <strong>and</strong> the road. For example, Campbell5 cites the driver, the<br />

road, <strong>and</strong> the vehicle as causes <strong>of</strong> accidents <strong>and</strong> implores that we<br />

“move on all three fronts.” Oi states the following:<br />

5 H.E. Campbell, “<strong>The</strong> Wet Pavement Accident Problem: Breaking<br />

Through,” Traffic Quarterly (April 1973): 210.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!