31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

148 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

that individual investment in roads would have to make way for<br />

societal or public investment, Wooldridge had this to say:<br />

Exactly the opposite situation prevailed for most <strong>of</strong> the important<br />

roads <strong>of</strong> the nineteenth century. From 1800 to 1830 private<br />

investment poured into thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> miles <strong>of</strong> turnpikes in the<br />

United States, notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing the miniscule return the capital<br />

earned, <strong>and</strong> hundreds <strong>of</strong> turnpike companies built roads that<br />

carried the rivers <strong>of</strong> emigration to the old Northwest <strong>and</strong> the<br />

products <strong>of</strong> the newly settled states back to the seaboard. For<br />

the first third <strong>of</strong> the century, constructing the roads that were<br />

the only means <strong>of</strong> transportation to <strong>and</strong> communication with<br />

most parts <strong>of</strong> the West remained a function <strong>of</strong> private capital.<br />

An occasional exception, like the famous National Road going<br />

west from Cumberl<strong>and</strong>, Maryl<strong>and</strong>, was a deviation from the<br />

norm.<br />

<strong>The</strong> history <strong>of</strong> the gr<strong>and</strong>father <strong>of</strong> all the turnpike companies,<br />

the Philadelphia <strong>and</strong> Lancaster Turnpike Corporation, chartered<br />

in 1792, has much in common with all the rest. Pennsylvania<br />

had no desire on principle to commit its program <strong>of</strong> road<br />

building to private enterprise, <strong>and</strong> in fact had resorted unsuccessfully<br />

to several other expedients before chartering its first<br />

turnpike company. That was the pattern in most <strong>of</strong> the states<br />

where the companies later flourished; in the late 1700’s, the<br />

states tried lotteries, forced road service from local l<strong>and</strong>owners,<br />

grants-in-aid to localities, <strong>and</strong> even <strong>of</strong>fers <strong>of</strong> large acreages to<br />

contractors if they would build roads to the interior. All these<br />

measures failed, as well as the routine expedient <strong>of</strong> levying<br />

taxes <strong>and</strong> spending them on the highways <strong>of</strong> the states. None<br />

<strong>of</strong> the states’ financing schemes could begin to supply the volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> capital necessary for the improvements the people were<br />

more <strong>and</strong> more vociferously dem<strong>and</strong>ing as they in ever larger<br />

numbers pushed to the West. An economist might have told the<br />

states that if the people needed roads that badly, it ought to be<br />

a simple matter to levy sufficient taxes to pay for them, but then<br />

as now political reality was not always conducive to economic<br />

models, particularly when the people using the roads were<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten using them to leave the states. In view <strong>of</strong> the durable consensus<br />

on the necessity <strong>of</strong> publicly financed roads that developed well

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!