31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Public Goods <strong>and</strong> Externalities: <strong>The</strong> Case <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> 109<br />

a whole this is an unsatisfactory state <strong>of</strong> affairs, for the individual<br />

road user when making his decision does not—indeed he<br />

cannot—take into account the costs imposed by him on others.<br />

He assesses his private costs but ignores the road use, congestions<br />

<strong>and</strong> community costs. It follows that so long as the volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> traffic in conditions <strong>of</strong> congestion is determined by each<br />

road user considering only his own costs <strong>and</strong> benefits, traffic<br />

volumes will be larger, <strong>and</strong> costs higher, than is socially desirable.<br />

14<br />

And A.A. Walters expresses it this way:<br />

Under congested conditions an additional vehicle journey will<br />

add to the congestion. <strong>The</strong> vehicle will get in the way <strong>of</strong> other<br />

vehicles using the road <strong>and</strong> will cause their costs to increase as<br />

they waste more time in traffic jams <strong>and</strong> incur higher maintenance<br />

costs per mile in the dense traffic. Thus the decision by a<br />

vehicle owner to use a congested highway involves all other<br />

users in increased operating costs. 15<br />

Unquestionably, under present conditions motorists do<br />

indeed ignore the costs they impose on other drivers with respect<br />

to overcrowding. Frequently a driver takes account <strong>of</strong> congestion<br />

costs imposed on him by others in that he tries to avoid being<br />

ensnared in tie-ups if possible. But to suggest that a commuter<br />

would refrain from traveling out <strong>of</strong> fear <strong>of</strong> slowing down others<br />

14Roth, Paying for <strong>Roads</strong>, p. 34. Haveman, <strong>The</strong> Economics <strong>of</strong> the Public Sector,<br />

p. 34, writes the following:<br />

when the next semi-truck pulls onto the freeway with the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> delaying your arrival <strong>and</strong> that <strong>of</strong> all other freeway motorists,<br />

you <strong>and</strong> your fellow drivers are the objects <strong>of</strong> a spill over cost. It<br />

is characteristic that . . . the person harmed bears identifiable<br />

“costs” for which he is not compensated. Moreover, . . . this person<br />

would be willing to pay something to avoid bearing the spill<br />

over cost.<br />

15A.A. Walters, “<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>and</strong> Measurement <strong>of</strong> Private <strong>and</strong> Social<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> Highway Congestion,” Econometrica (October 1968): 11.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!