31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

106 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Peterson seems unable to carry through<br />

his own logic. In the sentence omitted from the above quote, he<br />

states: “But if, as in the case <strong>of</strong> the American merchant marine,<br />

the ordinary dem<strong>and</strong> is not believed to bring forth what some<br />

collective purpose requires, additional investment on the latter<br />

account is indicated.” He thus denies practically everything he<br />

stated before, for there will always be some “collective purpose”<br />

which “requires” additional investment on the part <strong>of</strong> the state<br />

because <strong>of</strong> externalities. If additional state investments in the<br />

American merchant marine are indeed indicated for “collective<br />

purposes,” even though it is now as large as voluntary payments<br />

from satisfied customers would make it, then why is not a governmental<br />

takeover <strong>of</strong> the food <strong>and</strong> housing industries warranted?<br />

After all, there is no question, as Peterson himself has<br />

pointed out, that food <strong>and</strong> housing are imbued with the public,<br />

collective interest.<br />

William Baumol is one who does not seem to be aware <strong>of</strong> this<br />

problem. In fact, he carries the externality argument to almost ludicrous<br />

lengths in contending that population growth, <strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> by<br />

itself, is a justification for increasing the scope <strong>of</strong> government operations<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the neighborhood effects it brings in its wake.<br />

Thus, increasing population adds to the significance <strong>and</strong> degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> diffusion <strong>of</strong> the external effects <strong>of</strong> the actions <strong>of</strong> all inhabitants<br />

<strong>of</strong> the metropolis, <strong>and</strong> thereby requires increasing intervention<br />

by the public sector to assure that social wants are supplied<br />

<strong>and</strong> that externalities do not lead to extremely adverse<br />

effects on the community’s welfare.<br />

Indeed, the very growth <strong>of</strong> population itself involves external<br />

effects. New residents usually require the provision <strong>of</strong> additional<br />

services <strong>and</strong> facilities—water, sewage, disposal, road<br />

paving, etc., <strong>and</strong> this is likely to be paid for in part out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

general municipal budget. 11<br />

11 William J. Baumol, “Urban Services: Interactions <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>and</strong> Private<br />

Decisions,” in Howard G. Schaller, ed., Public Expenditure Decisions in the<br />

Urban Community (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press, 1963), p. 8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!