31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Congestion <strong>and</strong> Road Pricing 93<br />

<strong>The</strong> difficulty with elasticity measurements, <strong>of</strong> course, is that<br />

they are not constants which exist in nature, equivalent, for<br />

example, to the fixed coefficient <strong>of</strong> gravity. On the contrary, they<br />

are highly dubious attempts to measure the response <strong>of</strong> one<br />

group <strong>of</strong> people, in one city, on one day, to an elimination <strong>of</strong> fares.<br />

If the experiment were carried on in a different city, or for different<br />

people, or on a different day, or at a different time <strong>of</strong> the day,<br />

while holding all other conditions constant, the results would be<br />

different. Elasticity, then, is a very weak foundation indeed upon<br />

which to erect any public policy. Nevertheless, this criticism<br />

seems to have effectively demoted free transportation as a highway<br />

congestion cleanser to a secondary role. Instead, upgrading<br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> mass transit has been urged in its place. 72<br />

Furthermore, although collection costs would be virtually<br />

eliminated, these costs themselves only amount to 8 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

total operating expenses. 73<br />

Free-fares, moreover, are a denial <strong>of</strong> the price system. If there<br />

is no payment for riding, there can be said to be no price system<br />

in operation. Free fares, then, are undesirable in that they make it<br />

impossible to retain the usual benefits associated with prices.<br />

With free fares, there will be “no rational method <strong>of</strong> determining<br />

the proportion <strong>of</strong> national resources that should be spent,” 74<br />

since it is through the price system that such allocations are<br />

made. Without fares, such allocation decisions will have to be<br />

arbitrary.<br />

by auto.” See Gerald Kraft <strong>and</strong> Thomas A. Domencich, “Free Transit,” presented<br />

at the Transportation <strong>and</strong> Poverty Conference. Brookline, Mass.:<br />

American Academy <strong>of</strong> Arts <strong>and</strong> Sciences, 1968. Cited in Lewis M. Schneider,<br />

“<strong>The</strong> Fallacy <strong>of</strong> Free Transportation,” Harvard Business Review 47 (January–February<br />

1969): 84.<br />

72See Smerk, Urban Transportation, p. 231.<br />

73See Vickrey, “<strong>The</strong> Revision <strong>of</strong> the Rapid Transit Fare Structure in the<br />

City <strong>of</strong> New York.”<br />

74See Roth, Paying for <strong>Roads</strong>, p. 18, for this <strong>and</strong> other criticisms <strong>of</strong><br />

unpriced road use.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!