31.01.2013 Views

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

The Privatization of Roads and Highways - Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

84 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Privatization</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Roads</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Highways</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> usual reasons for this state <strong>of</strong> affairs, which is vexing<br />

transportation planners the world over, are the auto’s advantages<br />

vis à vis mass transit in terms <strong>of</strong>: privacy; package-carrying ability<br />

(especially for shopping); seating availability; safety; <strong>and</strong><br />

amenities. Furthermore, the automobile is supreme in flexibility—starting<br />

from <strong>and</strong> going to wherever the rider desires. It can<br />

be no accident that while mass or public transportation is almost<br />

wholly owned <strong>and</strong> operated by the government, only part <strong>of</strong><br />

automobile traffic is state-controlled: the roadbed, but not the<br />

vehicle.<br />

This does not mean that under private enterprise motor vehicles<br />

would never be prohibited or their use never restricted. 55<br />

<strong>The</strong> difference is that under private enterprise, the market would<br />

have a “voice” in the decision-making process, albeit indirectly.<br />

Assume, for example, that a road-owner decided to close <strong>of</strong>f his<br />

road to private automobiles. If his decision was wrong, his pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />

will decrease. Disappointed motorists will turn to other roadowners,<br />

willing <strong>and</strong> able to pay increased charges. <strong>The</strong> roadowner<br />

may, as a result, change his policy. If he does not, he may<br />

be driven toward bankruptcy, the better to encourage reorganization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the road-ownership, <strong>and</strong> the substitution <strong>of</strong> a more<br />

rational policy. Needless to say, citizens have nothing remotely<br />

resembling this degree <strong>of</strong> “power” over their governmentally<br />

placed transportation <strong>of</strong>ficials.<br />

(g) Special bus lanes. What about special advantages for buses?<br />

Most <strong>of</strong>ten, highway lanes reserved for the sole use <strong>of</strong> buses is<br />

the specific suggestion. 56 Although this privilege is only<br />

55Roth objects to banning because “restrictions <strong>of</strong> the kind required are<br />

unacceptable on the grounds that they conflict with freedom <strong>of</strong> choice”<br />

(Paying for <strong>Roads</strong>, p. 15). This may make good sense in an era <strong>of</strong> government<br />

ownership <strong>of</strong> the roads, but under a system <strong>of</strong> private enterprise, the<br />

right to restrict entry to one’s own property is the linchpin <strong>of</strong> the entire system.<br />

56See Owen, <strong>The</strong> Accessible City, p. 32; Noble, “Highway Design <strong>and</strong> Construction<br />

Related to Traffic Operations <strong>and</strong> Safety,” p. 547; Peter L. Watson<br />

<strong>and</strong> Edward P. Holl<strong>and</strong>, “Study <strong>of</strong> Traffic Restraints in Singapore,” World

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!