30.01.2013 Views

The SWIFT BAT Software Guide Version 6.3 30 ... - HEASARC - Nasa

The SWIFT BAT Software Guide Version 6.3 30 ... - HEASARC - Nasa

The SWIFT BAT Software Guide Version 6.3 30 ... - HEASARC - Nasa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26 CHAPTER 4. INTRODUCTION TO <strong>BAT</strong> ANALYSIS<br />

... per ... *illuminated* detector ... (correction ’pcode’)<br />

<strong>The</strong> ‘pcode’ correction normalizes the counts by the number of illuminated detectors. Since the<br />

<strong>BAT</strong> is a wide-field instrument it is possible, indeed likely, that sources will be at the edge of the<br />

field of view. This means that only a fraction of the detector array is illuminated by through mask,<br />

i.e. the source is partially coded, and thus will produce fewer counts. This correction normalizes<br />

the partial coding fraction to unity for all sources.<br />

... per *fully illuminated* detector ... (correction ’maskwt’)<br />

Even when detectors are illuminated by a source, most detectors are not 100% illuminated. In<br />

general, there is a distribution of detector illumination fractions, ranging from 0% (fully shadowed<br />

by the mask) to 100% (fully illuminated by the mask). <strong>The</strong> mask weighting technique used by the<br />

<strong>BAT</strong> software combines all events to produce background-subtracted counts in a “mean” fractionally<br />

illuminated detector. <strong>The</strong> ‘maskwt’ correction renormalizes the counts to be those received in<br />

a fully illuminated detector. This accounts for both the open fraction of the mask (50% for the<br />

<strong>BAT</strong>), plus the per-detector partial illumination.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ‘maskwt’ correction should be distinguished from the partial coding correction. <strong>The</strong> partial<br />

coding correction adjusts for the fractional number of detectors that a source could illuminate<br />

through the mask, regardless of which mask cells are blocked or open. <strong>The</strong> ‘maskwt’ correction<br />

adjusts for the partial illumination of each individual detector.<br />

... for an equivalent on-axis source* (correction ’flatfield’)<br />

Off-axis sources have a different count rate because the projected area of the <strong>BAT</strong> detectors is<br />

changed by projection effects. Generally, the effective area is reduced off-axis because of the “cosine<br />

effect.” However, the effective area increases slightly for mild off-axis angles because detector sides<br />

are illuminated. <strong>The</strong> ‘flatfield’ correction adjusts for these effects, to create a count rate for an<br />

effective on-axis source. In this manner, it will be more practical to compare detections of the same<br />

source at different positions in the field of view.<br />

It should be noted that this correction is primarily due to geometric effects. It is also understood<br />

that off-axis illumination changes the detector response in non-subtle ways, which is not corrected<br />

for by the ‘flatfield’ correction.<br />

4.7.2 Converting to a counts per area<br />

<strong>The</strong> area of a single <strong>BAT</strong> detector is 0.16 cm 2 . Thus, the conversion between “per unit area” and<br />

”per fully illuminated detector” is:<br />

counts_cm2 = counts_fully_illuminated_det / 0.16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!