The SWIFT BAT Software Guide Version 6.3 30 ... - HEASARC - Nasa
The SWIFT BAT Software Guide Version 6.3 30 ... - HEASARC - Nasa
The SWIFT BAT Software Guide Version 6.3 30 ... - HEASARC - Nasa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
26 CHAPTER 4. INTRODUCTION TO <strong>BAT</strong> ANALYSIS<br />
... per ... *illuminated* detector ... (correction ’pcode’)<br />
<strong>The</strong> ‘pcode’ correction normalizes the counts by the number of illuminated detectors. Since the<br />
<strong>BAT</strong> is a wide-field instrument it is possible, indeed likely, that sources will be at the edge of the<br />
field of view. This means that only a fraction of the detector array is illuminated by through mask,<br />
i.e. the source is partially coded, and thus will produce fewer counts. This correction normalizes<br />
the partial coding fraction to unity for all sources.<br />
... per *fully illuminated* detector ... (correction ’maskwt’)<br />
Even when detectors are illuminated by a source, most detectors are not 100% illuminated. In<br />
general, there is a distribution of detector illumination fractions, ranging from 0% (fully shadowed<br />
by the mask) to 100% (fully illuminated by the mask). <strong>The</strong> mask weighting technique used by the<br />
<strong>BAT</strong> software combines all events to produce background-subtracted counts in a “mean” fractionally<br />
illuminated detector. <strong>The</strong> ‘maskwt’ correction renormalizes the counts to be those received in<br />
a fully illuminated detector. This accounts for both the open fraction of the mask (50% for the<br />
<strong>BAT</strong>), plus the per-detector partial illumination.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ‘maskwt’ correction should be distinguished from the partial coding correction. <strong>The</strong> partial<br />
coding correction adjusts for the fractional number of detectors that a source could illuminate<br />
through the mask, regardless of which mask cells are blocked or open. <strong>The</strong> ‘maskwt’ correction<br />
adjusts for the partial illumination of each individual detector.<br />
... for an equivalent on-axis source* (correction ’flatfield’)<br />
Off-axis sources have a different count rate because the projected area of the <strong>BAT</strong> detectors is<br />
changed by projection effects. Generally, the effective area is reduced off-axis because of the “cosine<br />
effect.” However, the effective area increases slightly for mild off-axis angles because detector sides<br />
are illuminated. <strong>The</strong> ‘flatfield’ correction adjusts for these effects, to create a count rate for an<br />
effective on-axis source. In this manner, it will be more practical to compare detections of the same<br />
source at different positions in the field of view.<br />
It should be noted that this correction is primarily due to geometric effects. It is also understood<br />
that off-axis illumination changes the detector response in non-subtle ways, which is not corrected<br />
for by the ‘flatfield’ correction.<br />
4.7.2 Converting to a counts per area<br />
<strong>The</strong> area of a single <strong>BAT</strong> detector is 0.16 cm 2 . Thus, the conversion between “per unit area” and<br />
”per fully illuminated detector” is:<br />
counts_cm2 = counts_fully_illuminated_det / 0.16