30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster<br />

Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip<br />

Abstract number: 25825<br />

DETECTION OF PERIACETABULAR OSTEOLYSIS AROUND UNCEMENTED<br />

CUPS COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY VS CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHIC<br />

EXAMINATION<br />

Buster SANDGREN, Joakim CRAFOORD, Henrik OLIVECRONA<br />

Karolinska Institute, Stockholm (SWEDEN)<br />

Pelvic osteolysis is a major concern after total hip replacement (THR). This is often<br />

an asymptomatic process leading to severe bone loss and complicated revisions.<br />

Radiographic examination is the standard method to follow these patients. Computed<br />

Tomography (CT) has been shown to be more sensitive in detection of osteolysis.We<br />

compared CT and conventional radiographic examination in asymptomatic patients<br />

operated with uncemented THR. We investigated 207 patients with uncemented cups<br />

with radiographic examination and CT scan and evaluated with a custom made<br />

protocol. The patients were selected from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registry.<br />

They were all asymptomatic, average age 53 years (19-67), time from operation 10<br />

years (7-14).The images were evaluated independently by one orthopaedic specialist<br />

and a radiologist. Kappa statistics was used to measure inters and intra observer<br />

reliability. Osteolytic lesions were found on radiographic examination in 14 of 207<br />

patients compared to 185 on the CT examinations. According to Landis & Koch<br />

evaluation for Kappa coefficients, inter reliability was good (K = 0.64) and intra<br />

reliability was very good (K = 0.81) In those cases where the two observers<br />

disagreed, the images were investigated again and discussed. We found that<br />

radiographs can both under- and over estimated osteolysis. The CT volumes could<br />

be severely distorted by the metal artefacts. We chose not to use any filters as the<br />

scanners have improved the last years and filters can destroy information in the<br />

volumes. In most cases, CT scans reveal much more information concerning<br />

osteolysis than plain radiographs.<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!