30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster<br />

Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip<br />

Abstract number: 23225<br />

ROLE OF LARGE FEMORAL HEADS (≥36 MM) ON DISLOCATION RATES<br />

Chitranjan RANAWAT<br />

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York (UNITED STATES)<br />

Background: Hip dislocation still remains a common complication after Total Hip<br />

Replacement (THR) and a cause for a revision surgery. The outcomes for dislocated<br />

hips are substantially worse compared to non-dislocating hips. Advances in surgical<br />

techniques and implant designs have lowered the dislocation rates to 1-3%. Various<br />

implants such as constrained prosthesis, Tripolar Bearing Surfaces, and using large<br />

heads are available options to treat this condition. The purpose of this study was to<br />

assess incidence of dislocation in patients receiving a 36 mm head with a minimum<br />

of 1 yr follow-up. Methods: Two groups of patients (from 2004 to 2008) that<br />

underwent THR were enrolled in this study. First group included 188 patients with<br />

ceramic head component and high cross linked poly (HXLP) and second group was<br />

188 cases with metal head implant and HXLP. Both patients were followed for at<br />

least one year after surgical procedure. All patients had a posterior approach with<br />

repair of posterior capsule and proper myofascial tension. Rate of dislocation was<br />

noted at the time of follow-up.Results: First group (188 patients with ceramic on<br />

HXLP) included 139 males and 49 females. Mean age was 60.8 years old (range 34<br />

to 82). In all cases a ceramic head size of 36 mm was used. At the time of 1 year<br />

follow-up, we did not have any cases of dislocations.In second group (108 patients<br />

with metal on HXLP) that included 51 males and 57 females, mean age was 75.3<br />

years old (range 50 to 92). In all patients a metal head size of 36 mm of greater was<br />

used. At the 1 year follow-up, we had only one case of hip dislocation which was in<br />

an elderly patient and associated with dementia. Conclusion: Several studies have<br />

shown that large head size implants reduces the dislocation rate regardless of<br />

bearing type surfaces. This is due to the fact that a with large head size, a greater<br />

range of motion is needed before the femoral neck impinges on the acetabular<br />

component and start to sublux or dislocate. Although rate of hip dislocation with<br />

posterior approach is twice as anterior, our data on using a large head size of 36 mm<br />

or larger showed no dislocation with ceramic on HXLP and only 0.9% rate with metal<br />

on HXLP.Several key factors to reduce the dislocation rate include restoration of<br />

anatomic geometry and center of rotation, maintaining or increasing the offset,<br />

preventing leg length discrepancy and proper repair of posterior capsule. Large head<br />

sizes can not eliminate dislocations. Other issues such as dementia, non-compliancy<br />

and hypermotility should be considered as well.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!