30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster<br />

Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip<br />

Abstract number: 25389<br />

ASSESSMENT OF PROXIMAL FIXATION FEMORAL STEMS FOR PRIMARY<br />

THR.<br />

Nikolai ZAGORODNIY, Inar SEIDOV, Kyrillos HADJICHARALAMBOUS, Denis<br />

ELKIN, Andrei KARDANOV, Levon MAKINYAN, Timofei SKIPENKO, Sergei<br />

BEZVERKHIY<br />

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Chair of Traumatology & Orthopaedics,<br />

Moscow (RUSSIA)<br />

Our study is based on the results of 147 patients, treated by THR, using 189 proximal<br />

fixation femoral components: 60 cases of Versys ET (Zimmer, USA), 43 - Versys FM<br />

(Zimmer, USA), 33 - Mallory Head (Biomet, USA) and 11 cases of Bicontact<br />

(Aesculap, Germany). Functional and statistical methods were applied to assess the<br />

condition of the operated joint. The Versys ET group included 19 women and 41<br />

men; Versys FM - 13 women and 30 men; Mallory Head - 16 women and 17 men<br />

and Bicontact - 3 women and 8 men. Mean age was: Versys ET -57,1 ±10,3 years;<br />

Versys FM - 56,7 ± 8,4; Mallory Head - 58,4 ± 11,9 and Bicontact - 57,1 ± 9,6. The<br />

indications for THR were: primary coxartrosis, dysplastic coxartrosis and AVN.After<br />

careful study of post-op X-Rays at the final follow up, we noted only 3 cases of<br />

proximal stress shielding. The possibility of micromotion at the distal end of the stem<br />

allows for more physiological distribution of loading in comparison with intermediate<br />

and distal fixation stems. There were no cases of radiographic or clinical<br />

manifestation of aseptic stem instability in any of the studied groups. The survival<br />

rate at 6 years for all groups was 100 % with stem revision as the end-point. In all<br />

groups with a maximum of 6 years follow up, we noted 95% good and excellent<br />

results.<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!