Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

30.01.2013 Views

Poster Topic: Trauma - Systemic Abstract number: 26119 THE PROPOSAL OF NEW CLASSIFICATION AND TREATMENT PROTOCOL FOR SEGMENTAL DESTRUCTIVE LIMB INJURIES WITH INTACT DISTAL PART Cedomir VUCETIC, Goran TULIC, Borislav DULIC, Cedo VUCKOVIC, Aleksandar TODOROVIC Institute for orthopaedic surgery and traumatology, Belgrade (SERBIA) A segmental destructive limb injury with intact distal part represents quite a challenge for a surgeon if a limb salvage procedure is intended. We have encountered two major types and two subtypes of these injuries. Type A injuries are transversal destructions whilst type B are longitudinal segmental destructions. We divided these major two types in two additional subtypes each: A1-transverse segmental soft tissue destruction without any bone involvement; A2 transverse segmental destruction involving bone; B1 longitudinal segmental soft tissue destruction without bone involvement, and B2 longitudinal segmental destruction with bones involved. The rational concept for treatment protocol for type A injuries would be to debride soft tissues and shorten the bone as needed in order to achieve contact between preserved parts of the limb. Type B injuries require extensive debridement and reconstruction of soft tissue defect with composite flap while preserving the bone length if possible. If not, the bone may be shortened initially, with elongation procedures performed when the soft tissues sufficiently recover. This approach shorten now, elongate later should be reserved as salvage procedure only for the most severe injuries. In our experience shortening of up to 5 cm on forearm and upper arm does not significantly impair limb function and appearance, which makes a subsequent elongation optional. Treatment based on this classification and its rational enables improved limb survival, wound and fracture healing, better infection control and earlier rehabilitation. We feel that the functional and esthetic outcome in patients with these injuries completely justifies described approach. 600

Poster Topic: Trauma - Systemic Abstract number: 26269 THE EFFICACY OF INITIAL FRACTURE MANAGEMENT IN A LARGE ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA UNIT Saqib JAVED, George MCLAUCHLAN Royal Preston Hospital, Preston (UNITED KINGDOM) Introduction: Outpatient fracture care is dealt with by Accident and Emergency (A&E) and orthopaedics utilising A&E and fracture clinics. Current working time directive legislation has led to the use of more nurse practitioners instead of junior doctors in the initial assessment and management of these cases in A&E. We analysed the efficacy of this process.Methods: A retrospective patient note analysis was conducted for referrals to the fracture clinic of a large trauma hospital over a four week period. Information collected included A&E diagnosis and initial treatment, orthopaedic diagnosis, time from injury to appointment and appropriateness of fracture clinic referral. All referrals were evaluated by an orthopaedic consultant.Results: 400 referrals were identified (216 male, 184 female) over a four week period. The average age was 33 years (range 4 - 93). For only 12% of referrals was an orthopaedic opinion sought prior to referral. The majority (75%) of patients referred to fracture clinic were seen either by nurse practitioners or junior doctors. Fracture clinic referrals were skewed by region with 50% of referrals being made for hand and wrist injuries. Fifty per cent of fracture clinic referrals could have been managed between A&E and primary care. Conclusion: The management of musculoskeletal trauma remains suboptimal with inefficient use of orthopaedic services. The patient load could potentially be halved with further training of frontline A&E staff and timely orthopaedic input with targeted training of common hand, wrist, foot and ankle injuries taking precedence. 601

Poster<br />

Topic: Trauma - Systemic<br />

Abstract number: 26119<br />

THE PROPOSAL OF NEW CLASSIFICATION AND TREATMENT PROTOCOL<br />

FOR SEGMENTAL DESTRUCTIVE LIMB INJURIES WITH INTACT DISTAL PART<br />

Cedomir VUCETIC, Goran TULIC, Borislav DULIC, Cedo VUCKOVIC, Aleksandar<br />

TODOROVIC<br />

Institute for orthopaedic surgery and traumatology, Belgrade (SERBIA)<br />

A segmental destructive limb injury with intact distal part represents quite a challenge<br />

for a surgeon if a limb salvage procedure is intended. We have encountered two<br />

major types and two subtypes of these injuries. Type A injuries are transversal<br />

destructions whilst type B are longitudinal segmental destructions. We divided these<br />

major two types in two additional subtypes each: A1-transverse segmental soft tissue<br />

destruction without any bone involvement; A2 transverse segmental destruction<br />

involving bone; B1 longitudinal segmental soft tissue destruction without bone<br />

involvement, and B2 longitudinal segmental destruction with bones involved. The<br />

rational concept for treatment protocol for type A injuries would be to debride soft<br />

tissues and shorten the bone as needed in order to achieve contact between<br />

preserved parts of the limb. Type B injuries require extensive debridement and<br />

reconstruction of soft tissue defect with composite flap while preserving the bone<br />

length if possible. If not, the bone may be shortened initially, with elongation<br />

procedures performed when the soft tissues sufficiently recover. This approach<br />

shorten now, elongate later should be reserved as salvage procedure only for the<br />

most severe injuries. In our experience shortening of up to 5 cm on forearm and<br />

upper arm does not significantly impair limb function and appearance, which makes a<br />

subsequent elongation optional. Treatment based on this classification and its<br />

rational enables improved limb survival, wound and fracture healing, better infection<br />

control and earlier rehabilitation. We feel that the functional and esthetic outcome in<br />

patients with these injuries completely justifies described approach.<br />

600

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!