30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster<br />

Topic: Trauma - Humerus<br />

Abstract number: 25711<br />

REVISIONAL OSTEOSYNTHESIS OF LONG TUBULAR BONES WITH LOCKING<br />

IMPLANTS<br />

Victor VOLOSHIN, Gennadiy ONOPRIENKO, Vladimir ZUBIKOV, Konstantin<br />

SHEVYREV, Saravanan ARUMUGAM<br />

M.F. Vladimirskiy Moscow regional clinical research institute, Moscow (RUSSIA)<br />

Aim: Using locking implants during revisional osteosynthesis of long tubular<br />

bones.Materials and methods: The data of 87 patients who underwent revisional<br />

ostesynthesis of long tubular bones were analyzed. The age ranged from 20 to 71<br />

years. Locking plates were used in 56 patients, and in 31 we used intramedullary<br />

locking nails. The segments we divided were following: Clavicle 8, Humerus 26,<br />

Forearm bones 10, Femur ? 23, Leg bones 20. The bone defects were filled with<br />

several materials in 70% of patients.Results: The post operative follow-up time was<br />

vaeied up to 3 years. 72 patients achieved full consolidation after revisional<br />

ostesynthesis. In one patient we observed postoperative infection of the wound which<br />

was successfully treated conservatively. The others are now in under observation<br />

with good signs for fracture union radiologically.Summary: In our point of view, the<br />

existing opinion of changing conventional type to the same new metal construction<br />

(eg. Intramedullary nail to intramedullary nail) is debatable. On the basis of our short<br />

term results, we can make a decision that using the locking implants is better than<br />

the conventional one for revisional osteosynthesis. And it allows us to mobilize the<br />

patients with osteoporosis, especially in intra-and juxta-articular fractures.<br />

574

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!