Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Poster Topic: Trauma - Femur Abstract number: 22834 REPEAT STRESS FRACTURE OF RECONSTRUCTION NAIL MANAGED BY REVISION STEM TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT (THR) Gautam TALAWADEKAR, Manju REDDY, Luc LOUETTE, Parthiban VINAYAKAM Qeqm Hospital, Margate, Margate (UNITED KINGDOM) Introduction: Subtrochanteric femur fractures have higher non-union rate than intertrochanteric & shaft fractures. One of the known complications reported with intramedullary fixation is implant failure, usually as a result of fracture non-union with incidence from 0.3-5%. We report a 66yr old lady who presented with subtrochanteric fracture with nail breakage 2 yrs after exchange nailing who then underwent revision stem THR with good function. Case report 66yr old rheumatoid lady sustained left hip injury. Radiographs revealed a left subtrochanteric fracture with hip arthritis. Patient bore full weight after fracture stabilization using Recon nail. Although radiographs at 3 months revealed ununited fracture patient denied having hip pain & declined surgical intervention. However, 2yrs later patient had acute onset left hip pain with inability to weight-bear without history of trauma. She underwent exchange nailing for the non-union. At follow up, fracture appeared united radiologically & clinically, evidenced by lack of hip pain & ability to fully weight bear. After another 2 yrs, patient presented with hip pain following a fall. Radiographs revealed broken nail. A revision stem THR using a long-stem femoral prosthesis was done. Discussion Fatigue fractures of recon-nails could be managed by repeat nailing, surface fixation or hemiarthroplasty. Initial nail failure followed by failure of repeat nailing, then managed by THR, makes our case unique. Surprisingly, patient remained asymptomatic for 2 yrs after the second nailing despite underlying nonunion, which was not evident on radiographs. Coincidentally, a similar fracture on the other side that was managed identically, healed after the first nailing. 520
Poster Topic: Trauma - Femur Abstract number: 23771 A NEW METHOD OF DETERMINING DISTAL FEMORAL DEFORMITY Irfan KHAN, Stephen NICOL, Roger ATKINS Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol (UNITED KINGDOM) Lower limb mal-alignment is a significant cause of degenerative change and dysfunction. The standard technique available to determine the centre of rotation of angulation (CORA), highlights it is difficult to assess and we found it to be inaccurate. We devised a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of distal femoral deformity, allowing accurate correction.Using standard leg alignment views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylized as a block. A line bisecting the axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to intersect the joint. The angle between the joint and the proximal femoral axis and the position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of the deformity, permitting accurate correction.We examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using 100 normal femora. -= 81 ± sd 2.5- As expected, correlated with femoral length (r=0.74). P (expressed as the percentage of the distance from the lateral edge of the joint block to the intersection) = 61% ± sd 8%. P was not correlated with Intra-and interobserver errors for these measurements are within acceptable limits and observations of 30-paired normal femora demonstrate similar values for and p on the two sides.We have found this technique to be universally applicable and reliable in a variety of distal femoral deformities. 521
- Page 469 and 470: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
- Page 471 and 472: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
- Page 473 and 474: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
- Page 475 and 476: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
- Page 477 and 478: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
- Page 479 and 480: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
- Page 481 and 482: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
- Page 483 and 484: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
- Page 485 and 486: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
- Page 487 and 488: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
- Page 489 and 490: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
- Page 491 and 492: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
- Page 493 and 494: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Sho
- Page 495 and 496: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Sho
- Page 497 and 498: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Spi
- Page 499 and 500: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Sys
- Page 501 and 502: Poster Topic: Trauma - Ankle / Foot
- Page 503 and 504: Poster Topic: Trauma - Ankle / Foot
- Page 505 and 506: Poster Topic: Trauma - Ankle / Foot
- Page 507 and 508: Poster Topic: Trauma - Ankle / Foot
- Page 509 and 510: Poster Topic: Trauma - Ankle / Foot
- Page 511 and 512: Poster Topic: Trauma - Ankle / Foot
- Page 513 and 514: Poster Topic: Trauma - Ankle / Foot
- Page 515 and 516: Poster Topic: Trauma - Elbow Abstra
- Page 517 and 518: Poster Topic: Trauma - Elbow Abstra
- Page 519: Poster Topic: Trauma - Elbow Abstra
- Page 523 and 524: Poster Topic: Trauma - Femur Abstra
- Page 525 and 526: Poster Topic: Trauma - Femur Abstra
- Page 527 and 528: Poster Topic: Trauma - Femur Abstra
- Page 529 and 530: Poster Topic: Trauma - Femur Abstra
- Page 531 and 532: Poster Topic: Trauma - Femur Abstra
- Page 533 and 534: Poster Topic: Trauma - Forearm Abst
- Page 535 and 536: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hand/Wrist A
- Page 537 and 538: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hand/Wrist A
- Page 539 and 540: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hand/Wrist A
- Page 541 and 542: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hand/Wrist A
- Page 543 and 544: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hand/Wrist A
- Page 545 and 546: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hand/Wrist A
- Page 547 and 548: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hand/Wrist A
- Page 549 and 550: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hand/Wrist A
- Page 551 and 552: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hand/Wrist A
- Page 553 and 554: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hip Abstract
- Page 555 and 556: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hip Abstract
- Page 557 and 558: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hip Abstract
- Page 559 and 560: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hip Abstract
- Page 561 and 562: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hip Abstract
- Page 563 and 564: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hip Abstract
- Page 565 and 566: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hip Abstract
- Page 567 and 568: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hip Abstract
- Page 569 and 570: Poster Topic: Trauma - Hip Abstract
Poster<br />
Topic: Trauma - Femur<br />
Abstract number: 23771<br />
A NEW METHOD OF DETERMINING DISTAL FEMORAL DEFORMITY<br />
Irfan KHAN, Stephen NICOL, Roger ATKINS<br />
Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol (UNITED KINGDOM)<br />
Lower limb mal-alignment is a significant cause of degenerative change and<br />
dysfunction. The standard technique available to determine the centre of rotation of<br />
angulation (CORA), highlights it is difficult to assess and we found it to be inaccurate.<br />
We devised a novel technique which accurately determines the CORA and extent of<br />
distal femoral deformity, allowing accurate correction.Using standard leg alignment<br />
views of the normal femur, the distal femoral metaphysis and joint line are stylized as<br />
a block. A line bisecting the axis of the proximal femur is then extended distally to<br />
intersect the joint. The angle between the joint and the proximal femoral axis and the<br />
position (p) where the extended proximal femoral axis intersects the joint line are<br />
calculated. These measurements can then be reproduced on the abnormal distal<br />
femur in order to calculate the CORA and extent of the deformity, permitting accurate<br />
correction.We examined the utility and reproducibility of the new method using 100<br />
normal femora. -= 81 ± sd 2.5- As expected, correlated with femoral length (r=0.74).<br />
P (expressed as the percentage of the distance from the lateral edge of the joint<br />
block to the intersection) = 61% ± sd 8%. P was not correlated with Intra-and interobserver<br />
errors for these measurements are within acceptable limits and<br />
observations of 30-paired normal femora demonstrate similar values for and p on the<br />
two sides.We have found this technique to be universally applicable and reliable in a<br />
variety of distal femoral deformities.<br />
521