30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster<br />

Topic: Trauma - Elbow<br />

Abstract number: 26474<br />

ANATOMICAL FIT OF SIX DIFFERENT RADIAL HEAD PLATES<br />

Klaus BURKHART, Yoon-Joo KIM, Tobias NOWAK, Pol ROMMENS, Lars MÜLER<br />

Department for Trauma Surgery of the Center for Musculosceletal Surgery, Johannes<br />

Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany, Mainz (GERMANY)<br />

Purpose: Bulky implants may lead to significant soft tissue irritation after plate<br />

osteosynthesis of radial head fractures. The purpose of our study was to determine<br />

the anatomical fit of so called precontoured radial head plates. Methods: Twentytwo<br />

embalmed radii of human cadaver were stripped of soft tissues. Six radial head<br />

and neck plates were investigated: 1. Medartis Radial-Head-Butress-Plate (MBP), 2.<br />

Medartis Radial-Head-Rim-Plate (MRP), 3. Synthes Radial-Head-Plate (SHP), 4.<br />

Synthes Radial-Neck-Plate (SNP), 5. Acumed Radial-Head-Plate (AHP) 6. Wright<br />

Radial-Head-Plate (WHP) Five parameters of anatomical fit were tested: 1.Plate-tobone<br />

contact: Plates were divided into 11 areas. Plate-to-bone distances were<br />

measured at each area with simultaneous consideration of plate thickness within the<br />

safe zone.2.Plate contact judged by 3 observers3. Pin- subchondral bone distance:<br />

Screw-contact/distance to the subchondral zone will be assessed in lateral<br />

radiographs.4.Plate-to-bone contact after adjustment of the plates.5.Reevaluation of<br />

the adjusted plate contacts by the same 3 observersResults Bone-to-plate distance<br />

for the MBP was 2,06 mm in mean (1,66-2,69), MRP 2,28 (1,83-3,14), SNP 2,51<br />

(2,08-3,47), AHP 2,70 (2,24-3,42), SHP 3,05 (2,46-4,19) and WHP 3,12 (2,7-3,9).<br />

The evaluations by the 3 observers showed clear differences. The more points one<br />

plate achieved the better the anatomic fit. MBP achieved 65, SNP 32, MRP -21, AHP<br />

-26, SHP -114, WHP -137 points.The study is not completes yet. Final results will be<br />

presented.<br />

519

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!