Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number: 24509 THE EARLY RESULTS OF VEPTR INSTRUMENTATION FOR SEVERE CHEST WALL DEFORMITY Mehmet BALIOGLU, Mehmet KAYGUSUZ, Ali ONER Baltalimani Bone Disease Teaching Hospital, Istanbul (TURKEY) INTRODUCTION: Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) is generally diagnosed after birth and often occurs with congenital vertebra anomalies and severe deformities in the chest wall. Chest wall deformity can lead to a reduction in lung capacity and affect respiratory functions. A VEPTR (Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib) implant is designed to correct chest wall deformity in young patients whose lung capacity is at critical stage of development. PURPOSE: To evaluate the early results of VEPTR instrumentation in three EOS patients with severe chest wall deformity. METHODS: 3 EOS patients (2 female, 1 male) with severe chest wall deformity and congenital vertebra and rib anomalies received VEPTR implants. Mean age at the time of operation was 39 months (20 - 45). Patients with substantially reduced single or bilateral lung capacity, extreme scoliotic deformities and coronal imbalance were chosen for the operation. Postoperatively cobb angle, coronal balance and SAL were evaluated. Distractions were scheduled every 6 months following the operation. RESULTS: Preoperative AP thorasic cobb angle was 79.75° (65-97), early postop angle was 60° (46-62). A significant improvement in coronal balance and SAL were recorded. Patient compliance was good. CONCLUSIONS: For infantile patients with severe chest wall deformity it is important to correct the deformity at an early age when lung capacity is rapidly developing. The early results of VEPTR implants showed a significant correction in chest wall deformity, increased SAL and the beginning of a reduction in spinal deformity. 420
Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number: 24522 DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF SYMPTOM SCALE OF A LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS Miho SEKIGUCHI 1 , Takafumi WAKITA 2 , Koji OTANI 1 , Yoshihiro ONISHI 3 , Shunichi FUKUHARA 4 , Shin-ichi KIKUCHI 1 , Shin-ichi KONNO 1 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima (JAPAN), 2 Department of Sociology, Kansai University, Fukita (JAPAN), 3 Institute for Health Outcomes & Process Evaluation Research (iHope International), Kyoto (JAPAN), 4 Department of Epidemiology and Healthcare Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto (JAPAN) Introduction: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common spinal disorder. In assessing the effectiveness of treatment for LSS, severity of LSS-related symptoms is considered to be one of the most relevant for an outcome. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and valid instrument to measure symptom severity of the patients with LSS. Methods: First, in order to derive categories of the LSS-related symptoms, focus group interviews were conducted and the data was analyzed using qualitative method. This analysis extracted ten domains (symptom at rest and in certain posture, difficulty in walking, sleep disturbance, etc) and also created an item pool. One hundred and eighty nine patients with LSS answered this LSS scale questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the construct validity and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated. The criterion-related validity used pain, numbness, and walking capacity as external criteria. The test-retest reliability was analyzed in 163 patients. Results: Qualitative study extracted ten domains and also created a pool of 36 items with 5 categorys Likert type scale. With factor analysis, items with factor loading less than 0.35 were excluded and 25 items in eight domains were selected. The Cronbach’s alpha of these items was 0.929. Coefficient of the test-retest reliability was 0.807. Pain, numbness, and walking capacity were significantly correlated with the score of the LSS symptom scale. Discussion: A 25 item LSS symptom scale was developed and its reliability and validity was confirmed. 421
- Page 369 and 370: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 371 and 372: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 373 and 374: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 375 and 376: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 377 and 378: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 379 and 380: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 381 and 382: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 383 and 384: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 385 and 386: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 387 and 388: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 389 and 390: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 391 and 392: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 393 and 394: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 395 and 396: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 397 and 398: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 399 and 400: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 401 and 402: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 403 and 404: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 405 and 406: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 407 and 408: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 409 and 410: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 411 and 412: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 413 and 414: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 415 and 416: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 417 and 418: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 419: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 423 and 424: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 425 and 426: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 427 and 428: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 429 and 430: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 431 and 432: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 433 and 434: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 435 and 436: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 437 and 438: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 439 and 440: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 441 and 442: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 443 and 444: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 445 and 446: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 447 and 448: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 449 and 450: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 451 and 452: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 453 and 454: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 455 and 456: Poster Topic: Spine Abstract number
- Page 457 and 458: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Ank
- Page 459 and 460: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Ank
- Page 461 and 462: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Elb
- Page 463 and 464: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Han
- Page 465 and 466: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Hip
- Page 467 and 468: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Hip
- Page 469 and 470: Poster Topic: Sports Medicine - Kne
Poster<br />
Topic: Spine<br />
Abstract number: 24509<br />
THE EARLY RESULTS OF VEPTR INSTRUMENTATION FOR SEVERE CHEST<br />
WALL DEFORMITY<br />
Mehmet BALIOGLU, Mehmet KAYGUSUZ, Ali ONER<br />
Baltalimani Bone Disease Teaching Hospital, Istanbul (TURKEY)<br />
INTRODUCTION: Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) is generally diagnosed after birth and<br />
often occurs with congenital vertebra anomalies and severe deformities in the chest<br />
wall. Chest wall deformity can lead to a reduction in lung capacity and affect<br />
respiratory functions. A VEPTR (Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib) implant<br />
is designed to correct chest wall deformity in young patients whose lung capacity is<br />
at critical stage of development. PURPOSE: To evaluate the early results of VEPTR<br />
instrumentation in three EOS patients with severe chest wall deformity. METHODS: 3<br />
EOS patients (2 female, 1 male) with severe chest wall deformity and congenital<br />
vertebra and rib anomalies received VEPTR implants. Mean age at the time of<br />
operation was 39 months (20 - 45). Patients with substantially reduced single or<br />
bilateral lung capacity, extreme scoliotic deformities and coronal imbalance were<br />
chosen for the operation. Postoperatively cobb angle, coronal balance and SAL were<br />
evaluated. Distractions were scheduled every 6 months following the operation.<br />
RESULTS: Preoperative AP thorasic cobb angle was 79.75° (65-97), early postop<br />
angle was 60° (46-62). A significant improvement in coronal balance and SAL were<br />
recorded. Patient compliance was good. CONCLUSIONS: For infantile patients with<br />
severe chest wall deformity it is important to correct the deformity at an early age<br />
when lung capacity is rapidly developing. The early results of VEPTR implants<br />
showed a significant correction in chest wall deformity, increased SAL and the<br />
beginning of a reduction in spinal deformity.<br />
420