30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster<br />

Topic: Spine<br />

Abstract number: 24043<br />

KINEMATIC EVALUATION OF THE ADJACENT SEGMENTS AFTER LUMBAR<br />

INSTRUMENTED SURGERY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN RIGID FUSION AND<br />

DYNAMIC NON-FUSION STABILIZATION<br />

Tsubasa SAKAI, Yuichiro MORISHITA, Hideki OHTA, Yoshiyuki MATSUMOTO,<br />

George HUANG, Yoshiharu TAKEMITSU, Hirotaka KIDA<br />

Oita Orthopaedic Hospital, Oita (JAPAN)<br />

Introduction: The aims of the current study were to evaluate changes in lumbar<br />

kinematics after lumbar instrumented surgery with rigid fusion and dynamic nonfusion<br />

stabilization. Methods: A total of 77 lumbar spinal stenosis patients with L4<br />

degenerative spondylolisthesis underwent L4-5 monosegmental posterior<br />

instrumented surgery. Of these, 36 patients were treated with rigid fusion (TLIF) and<br />

41 with dynamic stabilization (Segmental Spinal Correction System (SSCS)). The<br />

clinical outcomes were evaluated by JOA score. Lumbar kinematics were evaluated<br />

with functional radiographs preoperatively and at final follow-up postoperatively. We<br />

defined the contribution of each segmental mobility to the total lumbar mobility as the<br />

percent segmental mobility (sagittal angular motion of each segment in degrees) /<br />

(total sagittal angular motion in degrees) × 100). MRI was performed on all patients<br />

at 2-week and final follow-up postoperatively. The discs were classified into 5 grades<br />

based on the previously reported system. We defined the progress of disc<br />

degeneration as (grade at final follow-up) - (grade at 2 weeks postoperatively).<br />

Results: No significant kinematical differences were shown at any of the lumbar<br />

segments preoperatively; however, significant differences were observed at the L2-3,<br />

L4-5, and L5-S1 segments postoperatively between the groups. At final follow-up, all<br />

of the lumbar segments with rigid fusion demonstrated significantly greater disc<br />

degeneration than those with dynamic stabilization. Conclusions: Our results suggest<br />

that the SSCS preserved 14% of the kinematical operations at the instrumented<br />

segment. The SSCS may prevent excessive effects on adjacent segmental<br />

kinematics and may prevent the incidence of adjacent segment disorder.<br />

405

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!