30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster<br />

Topic: Spine<br />

Abstract number: 23991<br />

POST-OPERATIVE ORAL INTAKE REGIME FOLLOWING LUMBAR<br />

DECOMPRESSION-FUSION SURGERY<br />

Rajeshkumar KAKWANI, Yogesh PARASHAR, Shashi ROYSAM, Anthony CROSS<br />

Sunderland Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne (UNITED KINGDOM)<br />

Introduction: Lumbar decompression-fusion surgery involves extensive surgery in<br />

prone position and is associated with significant post-op ileus. We compared the<br />

post-operative oral intake regimes of our two spinal firms over a 6 months period.<br />

Methods and materials: The post operative oral intake was commenced as soon as<br />

the bowel sounds started in one firm. In the other firm, the oral intake was started<br />

only after the patient passed wind. There were 28 patients in the first group (bowel<br />

sounds) and 27 patients in the second group (passage of wind). The two groups<br />

were comparable for age and sex distribution. The average age was 69 yrs, and the<br />

male: female ratio was 1.2:1. Results: The bowel sounds were found to start on an<br />

average of 8.5 hours (6-16 hours) post-operatively. The average time between the<br />

operation and the patient passing wind was 26 hours (18-73 hours). The patients<br />

who were on Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) were found to have a delayed<br />

passage of wind. There was no significant correlation between the number of fusion<br />

levels or the operative time and commencement of bowel sounds/ passage of wind.<br />

Discussion: The patient satisfaction rate was much better when the oral intake was<br />

commenced as soon as the bowel sounds start, although they had more bloating of<br />

the abdomen. The incidence of nausea / vomiting was significantly less in the group<br />

in which the oral intake was commenced following patient passing wind.<br />

403

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!