30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster<br />

Topic: Navigation<br />

Abstract number: 23679<br />

COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY: INTEREST ON TKR. PROSPECTIVE AND<br />

COMPARATIVE STUDY.<br />

Ana TORRES 1 , Eduardo SOLIS 1 , Angel TORRES 2 , Antonio MURCIA 1<br />

1 Hospital De Cabueñes, Gijon (SPAIN), 2 University of Bournemouth (UNITED<br />

KINGDOM)<br />

The goal of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results of total knee<br />

arthroplasty (TKA) implanted with or without computer assistance. Methods and<br />

materials: We present a prospective study, 105 patients (mean 71.5 years) divided<br />

into two groups: TKA computer assisted surgery (n=55) and classic (n=50). All the<br />

patients were operated by the same surgeon and had the same implant design. The<br />

clinical and radiographic parameters were analysed preoperatively and<br />

postoperatively (2, 6, 12 months) by one observer. A statistically analysed was done<br />

with a p0, 05). The implant positioning was comparable (angle computer<br />

surgery HKA = 179 ± 1.58° versus 176° ± 3.6). The a ctive flexion, at 6 months<br />

postoperative, was significantly better in the classic TKR (107 º versus 101º,<br />

p=0.016). Discussion – Conclusion: This study didn’t show a significant difference<br />

between the TKR performed with or without computer assistance. This technique<br />

allows a better positioning of the implants and improves the reproducibility of the<br />

technique, but when the surgeon has a skilled experience the difference between<br />

isn’t significant.<br />

338

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!