Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Surgery - Hip Abstract number: 24122 TRANEXAMIC ACIDS REDUCE BLOOD LOSS IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE THA Tsuyoshi NAKAI 1 , Keiichi FUJIMOTO 2 , Masaaki KAKIUCHI 2 1 Itami City Hospital, Itami (JAPAN), 2 Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka (JAPAN) Tranexamic acid has been reported to reduce intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. To our knowledge, however, there have been no reports describing the effects of tranexamic acid on blood loss during and following minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (MIS-THA). We investigated the effects of tranexamic acid in 81 patients who underwent MIS-THA without cement for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip. There were 20 men and 61 women. The mean age at the time of surgery was 66 years, and the mean BMI was 24.1. ±1000 mg of tranexamic acid was administered intravenously five minutes before the skin incision and just before the skin closure, dependently. Baseline hemoglobin and hematocrit values were obtained three weeks before operation. Postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit values were obtained at one day, one week, and two weeks. Operative time averaged 80 minutes, and average intraoperative blood loss was 340 ml. We use no suction drain in all cases. The greatest reduction in the level of hemoglobin and hematocrit values during the postoperative period was observed in one week after operation. We needed neither autologous nor allogeneic blood transfusion postoperatively. There was no evidence of deep vein thrombosis or event of any infections, and haematoma. The use of tranexamic acids in MIS-THA could be an effective and safe means to reduce blood loss and the need for blood transfusion requirements. 320
Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Surgery - Hip Abstract number: 26152 TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING TWO-INCISION TECHNIQUE Young-Yool CHUNG, Sung-Chan KI Kwangju Christian Hospital, Gwangju (KOREA) Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of the minimal invasive surgery (MIS) total hip Arthroplasty (THA) using the two-incision technique as described by mears compared to posterolateral one-incision MIS-THA. Materials and methods: January 2003 to December 2006, sixty patients underwent total hip arthroplasty using two-incision and one-incision MIS by one surgeon. Group I 34 patients were used one-incision technique and Group II 26 patients were used two-incision thechnique. There was no difference in age, gender and cuauses of THA between two groups. The mean follow-up duration was longer in one-incision group than two-incision group. We evaluated operation time, bleeding amount, incision length, ambulation, hospital stay and complications between two groups. Results: There was no difference in bleeding amount between two groups. Operation time was longer in two-incision group than one-incision group. Operation time of the two-incision technique could be reduced after 15 cases. Patients started ambulation early after operation and hospital stay was shorter in two-incision group than one-incision group. There was no difference in clinical results between two groups. There was no difference in components position of the acetabular cup and femoral stem between two groups. Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture occurred in 4 cases (15%) in two-incision technique. There was no dislocation in two groups. Conclusion: Two-incision THA has the advantage of rapid recovery and shorter hospital stay. However, longer operation time and high complication rate compared to one-incision are problems to solve in this technique. We don’t use two-incision technique anymore in our hospital. 321
- Page 269 and 270: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 271 and 272: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 273 and 274: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 275 and 276: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 277 and 278: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 279 and 280: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 281 and 282: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 283 and 284: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 285 and 286: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 287 and 288: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 289 and 290: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 291 and 292: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 293 and 294: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 295 and 296: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 297 and 298: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 299 and 300: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 301 and 302: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 303 and 304: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 305 and 306: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 307 and 308: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 309 and 310: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 311 and 312: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 313 and 314: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 315 and 316: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 317 and 318: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 319: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 323 and 324: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 325 and 326: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 327 and 328: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 329 and 330: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 331 and 332: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 333 and 334: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 335 and 336: Poster Topic: Navigation Abstract n
- Page 337 and 338: Poster Topic: Navigation Abstract n
- Page 339 and 340: Poster Topic: Navigation Abstract n
- Page 341 and 342: Poster Topic: Navigation Abstract n
- Page 343 and 344: Poster Topic: Navigation Abstract n
- Page 345 and 346: Poster Topic: Navigation Abstract n
- Page 347 and 348: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 349 and 350: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 351 and 352: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 353 and 354: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 355 and 356: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 357 and 358: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 359 and 360: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 361 and 362: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 363 and 364: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 365 and 366: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 367 and 368: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
- Page 369 and 370: Poster Topic: Paediatrics Abstract
Poster<br />
Topic: Minimally Invasive Surgery - Hip<br />
Abstract number: 26152<br />
TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING TWO-INCISION TECHNIQUE<br />
Young-Yool CHUNG, Sung-Chan KI<br />
Kwangju Christian Hospital, Gwangju (KOREA)<br />
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of the minimal invasive surgery (MIS) total hip<br />
Arthroplasty (THA) using the two-incision technique as described by mears compared<br />
to posterolateral one-incision MIS-THA. Materials and methods: January 2003 to<br />
December 2006, sixty patients underwent total hip arthroplasty using two-incision<br />
and one-incision MIS by one surgeon. Group I 34 patients were used one-incision<br />
technique and Group II 26 patients were used two-incision thechnique. There was no<br />
difference in age, gender and cuauses of THA between two groups. The mean<br />
follow-up duration was longer in one-incision group than two-incision group. We<br />
evaluated operation time, bleeding amount, incision length, ambulation, hospital stay<br />
and complications between two groups. Results: There was no difference in bleeding<br />
amount between two groups. Operation time was longer in two-incision group than<br />
one-incision group. Operation time of the two-incision technique could be reduced<br />
after 15 cases. Patients started ambulation early after operation and hospital stay<br />
was shorter in two-incision group than one-incision group. There was no difference in<br />
clinical results between two groups. There was no difference in components position<br />
of the acetabular cup and femoral stem between two groups. Intraoperative<br />
periprosthetic fracture occurred in 4 cases (15%) in two-incision technique. There<br />
was no dislocation in two groups. Conclusion: Two-incision THA has the advantage<br />
of rapid recovery and shorter hospital stay. However, longer operation time and high<br />
complication rate compared to one-incision are problems to solve in this technique.<br />
We don’t use two-incision technique anymore in our hospital.<br />
321