Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Poster Topic: Infections Abstract number: 25815 SURGICAL SITE INFECTION IN ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY. INCIDENCE RELATED TO SURGICAL PROCEDURE. 12 YEARS OF SURVEILLANCE. Carles ESTEVE, Ignacio GARCIA FORCADA, Petrea IFTIMIE, Gerard JORDA, Josep GINÉ Hospital Universitari De Tarragona Joan XXIII, Tarragona (SPAIN) Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSI) are related to a surgical procedure and affect the surgical wound or deeper tissues. In orthopaedic and trauma surgery there is a great variability of procedures with influence in each evolution. The aim of this study is to fix SSI incidence in relation of surgical procedure.MethodsThis report contains data of 19.948 procedures collected from 1996 to 2008 at a Specialist Orthopaedic Hospital. The SSI surveillance is focused on categories of surgical procedure (Hip arthroplasty, Knee arthroplasty, Spine surgery and Hip fracture) with each category containing a defined set of similar procedures. A basic of demographic data and details about operation itself are collected for each procedure. Patients are followed up throughout their hospital stay and after hospital discharge. We present the incidence of SSI by risk group and surgical procedure. SSI are categorized in type, moment of diagnosis, micro-organisms reported. Results: Rates of SSI are highest in hip hemiarthroplasty after fracture and in hip and knee revision procedures. Rates of SSI increase with the number of risk factors present in the patient, especially after fracture procedures. The most common infecting microorganism was coagulase-negative staphylococcus, followed by Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci and streptococci. 38% of the infections arise after one year of surveillance. Conclusions: Our results confirm difference in rates of SSI depending of surgical procedure in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. We believe that our decision to monitor infection with a long term follow up it’s the better way to avoid underreporting of infection. 308
Poster Topic: Infections Abstract number: 25967 NEW RESEARCH IN SAFETY VENTILATION EMPLOYED IN A MODULAR ULTRA CLEAN OPERATING THEATRE Ingrid EKENMAN 1 , Johan NORDENADLER 2 1 Karolinska Institut, Stockholm (SWEDEN), 2 Royal Institut of Technology, Building Science, Stockholm (SWEDEN) Results from three studies at Building Sciences, KTH have been employed in a modular operating theatre which gets emphasises in patient safety, cost-and energy effective installations and quality assurance Challenge tests (LR-method), microbiological tests and air velocity tests in field studies in three different operating rooms has been performed. Data from a KTH study on clothing system performace and data on the concentrations of viable particles in the operating rooms during ongoing operations from four county councils have been used in this study Results shows that supply air systems providingunidirectional air flow, often called LAFsystems, today often installedwith an air supply velocity below 0.3 m/s, the air flow pattern above theoperating table occurs in a disordered manner, which resembles that of atotal mixing air flow. This means that new, more cost-effective, air supplysystems can be used by using ordinary total mixing air flow in ortopaedicsurgery. A simple mathematical expression has been developed topredict the concentration of airborne viable particles present in theoperating room. This expression is based upon thedilution principle. New research in safety ventilation has made it possible to construct a modular, ISO-class, operating theatre with top patient safety and cost-effective ultra clean airflow for orthopaedic surgery. References: Ljungqvist, B., Reinmüller, B. (2006), Practical Safety Ventilation in Pharmaceutical and Biotech Cleanrooms, PDA, Bethesda, MD, DHI Publishing, LLC, River Grove, IL.Nordenadler, J, (2008), Skyddsventilation i operationsrum, Licentiatarbete i installationsteknik, meddelande nr 71, KTH, Stockholm. 309
- Page 257 and 258: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 259 and 260: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 261 and 262: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 263 and 264: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 265 and 266: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 267 and 268: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 269 and 270: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 271 and 272: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 273 and 274: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 275 and 276: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 277 and 278: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 279 and 280: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 281 and 282: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 283 and 284: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 285 and 286: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 287 and 288: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 289 and 290: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 291 and 292: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 293 and 294: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 295 and 296: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 297 and 298: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 299 and 300: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 301 and 302: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 303 and 304: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 305 and 306: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 307: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 311 and 312: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 313 and 314: Poster Topic: Infections Abstract n
- Page 315 and 316: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 317 and 318: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 319 and 320: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 321 and 322: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 323 and 324: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 325 and 326: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 327 and 328: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 329 and 330: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 331 and 332: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 333 and 334: Poster Topic: Minimally Invasive Su
- Page 335 and 336: Poster Topic: Navigation Abstract n
- Page 337 and 338: Poster Topic: Navigation Abstract n
- Page 339 and 340: Poster Topic: Navigation Abstract n
- Page 341 and 342: Poster Topic: Navigation Abstract n
- Page 343 and 344: Poster Topic: Navigation Abstract n
- Page 345 and 346: Poster Topic: Navigation Abstract n
- Page 347 and 348: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 349 and 350: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 351 and 352: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 353 and 354: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 355 and 356: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
- Page 357 and 358: Poster Topic: Osteoporosis Abstract
Poster<br />
Topic: Infections<br />
Abstract number: 25815<br />
SURGICAL SITE INFECTION IN ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY. INCIDENCE<br />
RELATED TO SURGICAL PROCEDURE. 12 YEARS OF SURVEILLANCE.<br />
Carles ESTEVE, Ignacio GARCIA FORCADA, Petrea IFTIMIE, Gerard JORDA,<br />
Josep GINÉ<br />
Hospital Universitari De Tarragona Joan XXIII, Tarragona (SPAIN)<br />
Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSI) are related to a surgical procedure and<br />
affect the surgical wound or deeper tissues. In orthopaedic and trauma surgery there<br />
is a great variability of procedures with influence in each evolution. The aim of this<br />
study is to fix SSI incidence in relation of surgical procedure.MethodsThis report<br />
contains data of 19.948 procedures collected from 1996 to 2008 at a Specialist<br />
Orthopaedic Hospital. The SSI surveillance is focused on categories of surgical<br />
procedure (Hip arthroplasty, Knee arthroplasty, Spine surgery and Hip fracture) with<br />
each category containing a defined set of similar procedures. A basic of demographic<br />
data and details about operation itself are collected for each procedure. Patients are<br />
followed up throughout their hospital stay and after hospital discharge. We present<br />
the incidence of SSI by risk group and surgical procedure. SSI are categorized in<br />
type, moment of diagnosis, micro-organisms reported. Results: Rates of SSI are<br />
highest in hip hemiarthroplasty after fracture and in hip and knee revision<br />
procedures. Rates of SSI increase with the number of risk factors present in the<br />
patient, especially after fracture procedures. The most common infecting microorganism<br />
was coagulase-negative staphylococcus, followed by Staphylococcus<br />
aureus, enterococci and streptococci. 38% of the infections arise after one year of<br />
surveillance. Conclusions: Our results confirm difference in rates of SSI depending of<br />
surgical procedure in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. We believe that our decision<br />
to monitor infection with a long term follow up it’s the better way to avoid underreporting<br />
of infection.<br />
308