Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics Abstract number: 24009 DYNAMIC HIP SCREW POSITIONING Parissa REZAI, Sibtain HUSSAIN Lancaster Royal Infirmary, Lancaster (UNITED KINGDOM) We studied the position of the tip of the lag screw in DHS operations over a one year period. The method described by Kyle et al was used to determine the lag screw position on image intensifier films on an electronic radiological system. On the AP xray the screw was either positioned in the superior (S), central (C) or inferior (I) position. On the lateral x-ray the screw was either classified as being anterior (A), central (C) or posterior (P). Total surgeries numbered 101, we excluded 27 because of not having an AP, Lateral or both x-rays.Fourty-one-63% of patients had the lag screw in the CC position. Six-9% were CP, four-6% CA, six-9% SC, four-6% SP, one- 2% SA, three-5% IP; No screws were placed in IP or IA. Four patients had implant failure due to cut out; screw position was SC, CC, CC and CP. The two CC placed screws each had a tip apex distance (TAD) of 31mm and 29mm. The SC placed screw had a TAD of 20mm.Our work indicates that the position of the lag screw had been satisfactory in 63% of cases. The cut out rate in the centrally placed screws was most likely due to an increased TAD. The SC placed screw had a very good TAD however the position was unsatisfactory thereby leading to failure. Accurate placement of the lag screw has an important role in the success of DHS surgery. 226
Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics Abstract number: 24029 INTRA-ARTICULAR MORPHINE INFILTRATION DOES NOT IMPROVE PAIN RELIEF FOLLOWING KNEE ARTHROSCOPY Devendra MAHADEVAN, Mohd GHEEWALA, Srinivas KAMBHAMPATI, Subash TANDON University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (UNITED KINGDOM) A trial was undertaken to establish whether the addition of intra-articular morphine reduced pain after knee arthroscopy. Patients listed for minor knee arthroscopic procedures were recruited and quasi-randomised into: Group 1 (10ml 0.5% Marcaine intra-articular infiltration); and Group 2 (10mg morphine in 9ml 0.5% Marcaine). All patients also received 10ml of 0.5% Marcaine around the portal wounds. Questionnaires were provided pre-operatively and pain scores were recorded preoperatively and at 1hr and 24hr after surgery. To date, 39 patients have been included in this study (Group 1 = 19; Group 2 = 20). The mean age of patients was 46 (range 17 to 80).The preoperative pain scores in the two groups were similar (5.4 & 5.37). In Group 1, there was a significant reduction in pain scores at 1hr post-op (3.47, p
- Page 175 and 176: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 177 and 178: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 179 and 180: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 181 and 182: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 183 and 184: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 185 and 186: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 187 and 188: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 189 and 190: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 191 and 192: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 193 and 194: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 195 and 196: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 197 and 198: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 199 and 200: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 201 and 202: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 203 and 204: Poster Topic: Evidence Based Orthop
- Page 205 and 206: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 207 and 208: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 209 and 210: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 211 and 212: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 213 and 214: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 215 and 216: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 217 and 218: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 219 and 220: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 221 and 222: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 223 and 224: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 225: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 229 and 230: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 231 and 232: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 233 and 234: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 235 and 236: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 237 and 238: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 239 and 240: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 241 and 242: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 243 and 244: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 245 and 246: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 247 and 248: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 249 and 250: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 251 and 252: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 253 and 254: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 255 and 256: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 257 and 258: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 259 and 260: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 261 and 262: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 263 and 264: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 265 and 266: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 267 and 268: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 269 and 270: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 271 and 272: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 273 and 274: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 275 and 276: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
Poster<br />
Topic: General Orthopaedics<br />
Abstract number: 24029<br />
INTRA-ARTICULAR MORPHINE INFILTRATION DOES NOT IMPROVE PAIN<br />
RELIEF FOLLOWING KNEE ARTHROSCOPY<br />
Devendra MAHADEVAN, Mohd GHEEWALA, Srinivas KAMBHAMPATI, Subash<br />
TANDON<br />
University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester (UNITED KINGDOM)<br />
A trial was undertaken to establish whether the addition of intra-articular morphine<br />
reduced pain after knee arthroscopy. Patients listed for minor knee arthroscopic<br />
procedures were recruited and quasi-randomised into: Group 1 (10ml 0.5% Marcaine<br />
intra-articular infiltration); and Group 2 (10mg morphine in 9ml 0.5% Marcaine). All<br />
patients also received 10ml of 0.5% Marcaine around the portal wounds.<br />
Questionnaires were provided pre-operatively and pain scores were recorded preoperatively<br />
and at 1hr and 24hr after surgery. To date, 39 patients have been<br />
included in this study (Group 1 = 19; Group 2 = 20). The mean age of patients was<br />
46 (range 17 to 80).The preoperative pain scores in the two groups were similar (5.4<br />
& 5.37). In Group 1, there was a significant reduction in pain scores at 1hr post-op<br />
(3.47, p