30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster<br />

Topic: General Orthopaedics<br />

Abstract number: 24008<br />

TIP APEX DISTANCE IN DYNAMIC HIP SCREW STILL OVERLOOKED<br />

Parissa REZAI, Sibtain HUSSAIN<br />

Lancaster Royal Infirmary, Lancaster (UNITED KINGDOM)<br />

We examined the TAD in all DHS surgeries over a one year period. The TAD was<br />

calculated using the method described by Baumgaertner MR et al through the use of<br />

the image intensifier and the PACS (electronic radiology system). The magnification<br />

was standardised on each independent x-ray on the image intensifier, from this the<br />

TAD was calculated. Most of the current literature indicates that the TAD should be<br />

less than 20 mm. Total surgeries numbered 101; we excluded 27 on the basis of not<br />

having an AP, Lateral or both x-rays. Of the 65 included the TAD ranged from 3.0<br />

mm to 39.6 mm. 54% percent of patients had a TAD of less than 20 mm, (15%) were<br />

between 20.1-25.0 mm, 12% between 25.1-30.0 mm, fourteen percent (14%)<br />

between 30.1-35.0 mm, five percent (5%) between 35.1-40.0 mm. Although no<br />

formal follow up was made of each patient four patients had further x-rays on the<br />

system showing cut out. TAD's were 20.5, 29.0, 31.6, 32.1mm.Our work reveals that<br />

TAD in DHS surgery has been inadequate over the last year. Fourty five (45%) of<br />

DHS cases had a TAD of greater than 20.0 mm. TAD remains a critical to ensure the<br />

success of DHS surgery. It is essential all those involved in performing DHS surgery<br />

take care to ensure TAD of less than 20 mm in DHS surgery.<br />

225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!