Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics Abstract number: 23925 ELECTROMAGNETIC STIMULATION FOR DELAYED UNION OF HUMERAL SHAFT FRACTURES Ioannis NIKOLOPOULOS, Stephanos KALOS, George KRINAS, Dimitris KIPRIADIS, Apostolos ILIAS, George SKOUTERIS 2nd Orthopaedic Dpt. General Hospital "Asclepeion Voulas", Voula (GREECE) Introduction: The humeral fracture delay union was always a challenge for an orthopaedic surgeon when the initial treatment had to be reviewed. The combination of conservative or surgical treatment with the electromagnetic stimulation for fractures union delay is under serious consideration. Aim of study: The evaluation of electromagnetic stimulation effectiveness in humeral shaft union delay in combination with the initial treatment carry on. Material and Method: From 2000-2005, EMS was applied in seven patients aging from 26-45 years-old with humeral shaft fracture union delay. Initially they were treated with U-slab and Sarmiento brace. The x-rays at 8 weeks revealed fracture inability to consolidate. We decided to apply EMS, a patient-friendly, light-weighted and portable device. The application was taken place once a day at the same time for half an hour over the cast and over the fracture level. We performed clinical and radiological re-evaluation on each patient at 4, 6, 8 and 12 weeks after the EMS application. Results: Five of the patients developed consolidation elements after 4 and the rest after six weeks time. Clinical and radiological fracture union established after 8 weeks in 5 patients and after 10 weeks in the rest three. Discussion – Conclusion: The decision making and the treatment review time is a struggling issue for the orthopaedic surgeon in a shaft fracture delayed union. EMS has many advantages because it is non-invasive, portable, and can be prescribed in an outpatient department, having no particular difficulties on application. 222
Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics Abstract number: 23940 ASSESSMENT OF LATERAL SESAMOID IN HALLUX VALGUS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH THE CONVENTIONAL ASSESSMENT Yuvraj AGRAWAL, Aravind DESAI, Jaysheel MEHTA Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester (UNITED KINGDOM) Introduction: Conventional radiological assessment of hallux valgus involves measuring intermetatarsal angle (IMA1-2), hallux valgus angle (HVA), congruity of metatarsophalangeal joint and overall clinical assessment of the forefoot. However, in current practice, these angles are seldom measured. We observed a consistent pattern of deviation of head of first metatarsal in relation to the lateral sesamoid (LS). The position of LS in relation to head of first metatarsal has never been studied before. We aim to study this pattern to quantify the severity of the deformity and establish its correlation with the conventional technique. Methods: 122 radiographs of 67 consecutive patients who underwent a weight bearing radiographs of their feet were studied. IMA1-2 and HVA were graded as AAOS guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed to identify correlation of displacement with conventional measurements. Results: A definite pattern in displacement of LS was noted. Statistical analysis showed a high correlation between LS position and IMA1-2 with correlation coefficient Rho of 0.74 and a good statistical correlation between LS position and HVA with a Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient Rho of 0.56. Discussion: LS lies laterally and any progressive deformity makes it more accessible to assessment in contrast to medial sesamoid. We report a consistent pattern and classified this position as normal, mild, moderate and severe. As it does not involve any measurements, we believe, this is quick technique of assessment of HV deformity and should help to base our operative decisions. A statistically significant correlation with the conventional techniques was also established. 223
- Page 171 and 172: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 173 and 174: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 175 and 176: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 177 and 178: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 179 and 180: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 181 and 182: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 183 and 184: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 185 and 186: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 187 and 188: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 189 and 190: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 191 and 192: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 193 and 194: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 195 and 196: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 197 and 198: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 199 and 200: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 201 and 202: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 203 and 204: Poster Topic: Evidence Based Orthop
- Page 205 and 206: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 207 and 208: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 209 and 210: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 211 and 212: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 213 and 214: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 215 and 216: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 217 and 218: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 219 and 220: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 221: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 225 and 226: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 227 and 228: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 229 and 230: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 231 and 232: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 233 and 234: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 235 and 236: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 237 and 238: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 239 and 240: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 241 and 242: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 243 and 244: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 245 and 246: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 247 and 248: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 249 and 250: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 251 and 252: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 253 and 254: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 255 and 256: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 257 and 258: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 259 and 260: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 261 and 262: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 263 and 264: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 265 and 266: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 267 and 268: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 269 and 270: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 271 and 272: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
Poster<br />
Topic: General Orthopaedics<br />
Abstract number: 23940<br />
ASSESSMENT OF LATERAL SESAMOID IN HALLUX VALGUS AND ITS<br />
CORRELATION WITH THE CONVENTIONAL ASSESSMENT<br />
Yuvraj AGRAWAL, Aravind DESAI, Jaysheel MEHTA<br />
Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester (UNITED KINGDOM)<br />
Introduction: Conventional radiological assessment of hallux valgus involves<br />
measuring intermetatarsal angle (IMA1-2), hallux valgus angle (HVA), congruity of<br />
metatarsophalangeal joint and overall clinical assessment of the forefoot. However,<br />
in current practice, these angles are seldom measured. We observed a consistent<br />
pattern of deviation of head of first metatarsal in relation to the lateral sesamoid (LS).<br />
The position of LS in relation to head of first metatarsal has never been studied<br />
before. We aim to study this pattern to quantify the severity of the deformity and<br />
establish its correlation with the conventional technique. Methods: 122 radiographs of<br />
67 consecutive patients who underwent a weight bearing radiographs of their feet<br />
were studied. IMA1-2 and HVA were graded as AAOS guidelines. Statistical analysis<br />
was performed to identify correlation of displacement with conventional<br />
measurements. Results: A definite pattern in displacement of LS was noted.<br />
Statistical analysis showed a high correlation between LS position and IMA1-2 with<br />
correlation coefficient Rho of 0.74 and a good statistical correlation between LS<br />
position and HVA with a Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient Rho of 0.56.<br />
Discussion: LS lies laterally and any progressive deformity makes it more accessible<br />
to assessment in contrast to medial sesamoid. We report a consistent pattern and<br />
classified this position as normal, mild, moderate and severe. As it does not involve<br />
any measurements, we believe, this is quick technique of assessment of HV<br />
deformity and should help to base our operative decisions. A statistically significant<br />
correlation with the conventional techniques was also established.<br />
223