30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster<br />

Topic: General Orthopaedics<br />

Abstract number: 23363<br />

SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENTS OF KNEE MOTION USING OPTICAL<br />

TRACKING SYSTEM AND RADIO STEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS (RSA)<br />

Roy TRANBERG, Tuuli SAARI, Roland ZÜGNER, Johan KÄRRHOLM<br />

Department of Orthopaedics Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy<br />

University of <strong>Gothenburg</strong>, Göteborg (SWEDEN)<br />

Invasive methods are more reproducible and accurate than non-invasive to record<br />

knee joint kinematics, but are usually less accessible and less safe. Therefore, noninvasive<br />

methods with passive markers are widely used. With these methods varying<br />

marker-sets based upon a number of single markers, or sets of markers, known as<br />

clusters are used to track body segments. We compared one invasive method, radio<br />

stereometric analysis, with a non-invasive method, an optical tracking system with 15<br />

skin mounted markers. Nine subjects (ten knees) were investigated simultaneously<br />

with a dynamic RSA system and a motion capture system while performing an active<br />

knee extension. For flexion/extension there was good accordance on individual basis<br />

as well as a group. For internal/external rotations the group mean was rather similar<br />

up to 25 degrees of flexion. Recordings of abd-/adductions revealed a systematic<br />

mean difference of 2-4° during the measured range o f flexion. Correlation between<br />

the two methods in the horizontal and frontal planes was poor. Our skin marker<br />

model provided reliable data for flexion/extension. Recordings of internal/external<br />

rotation and abduction/adduction were less accurate on individual basis than on<br />

group level, most likely due to soft tissue motions and presence of small true motions<br />

in these planes.<br />

214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!