30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster<br />

Topic: General Orthopaedics<br />

Abstract number: 23253<br />

COMPUTATIONAL PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDY OF BRIEF SCALE FOR<br />

PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS IN ORTHOPAEDIC PATIENTS (BS-POP) FOR<br />

PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN (CLBP)<br />

Katsuhiro YOSHIDA 1 , Miho SEKIGUCHI 1 , Koji OTANI 1 , Shi-ichi KONNO 1 , Hirohumi<br />

MASHIKO 1 , Harumi SHIOTA 1 , Takahumi WAKITA 2<br />

1 Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima (JAPAN), 2 Kansai University, Osaka<br />

(JAPAN)<br />

Introduction: We developed the Brief Scale for Psychiatric Problems in Orthopaedic<br />

Patients (BS-POP) (doctor and patient versions). The present study aimed to<br />

proactively verify the factorial validity, internal consistency, reproducibility, criterionrelated<br />

validity and responsiveness of the BS-POP with regard to chronic low back<br />

pain patients. Methods: Subjects comprised 188 chronic low back pain patients.<br />

During the first test, the BS-POP, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory<br />

(MMPI), Profile of Mood States (POMS), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey version 2<br />

(SF-36 v2) and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) were conducted. In the<br />

second test, patients were asked to complete the BS-POP in order to verify BS-POP<br />

reproducibility. The BS-POP, POMS, SF-36 v2 and RDQ for the third test were<br />

conducted to determine the responsiveness. Results: Factor analysis demonstrated<br />

factorial validity of the BS-POP including 1-factor structure. Internal consistency was<br />

confirmed by Cronbach’s reliability coefficient of 0.754. The correlation coefficients<br />

for the retests were r = 0.920 (doctor version) and r = 0.853 (patient version),<br />

showing reproducibility. Criterion-related validity was confirmed through strong<br />

association with the psychosocial factors of the SF-36, the MMPI, and the POMS. In<br />

comparison with the first test, the total crude scores for BS-POP in the third test were<br />

significantly lower. Moreover, the crude RDQ scores and the psychosocial factors of<br />

the SF-36 v2 significantly improved, confirming responsiveness to treatment.<br />

Discussion: The present findings indicate that the BS-POP possesses sufficient<br />

reliability regarding computational psychology. The BS-POP constitutes a tool<br />

enabling orthopaedists themselves to easily identify psychiatric problems in<br />

orthopaedic patients.<br />

212

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!