30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster<br />

Topic: General Orthopaedics<br />

Abstract number: 22904<br />

TRAPEZIECTOMY AND CAPSULAR INTERPOSTIONAL PROCEDURE -<br />

RESULTS OF PATIENT FOLLOW UP<br />

Sujith SIDHARTHAN, Jagan JACOB, Nigel CLAY<br />

Glan Clwyd Hospital, Rhyl (UNITED KINGDOM)<br />

Background: Trapeziectomy is done for osteoarthritis affecting the CMC joint of the<br />

thumb. Many surgical procedures have been described to fill the potential space post<br />

trapeziectomy. Results with these techniques are varied with regards to subjective<br />

relief of symptoms and pinch strength. We raise a distally based redundant capsular<br />

flap of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb, proceed to trapeziectomy, then insert<br />

the free end of the flap into the potential space. The aim of our study was to assess<br />

the subjective outcome of this technique. Material & methods: Retrospective study<br />

done in our institute included 35 patients and 40 thumbs. Patients were followed up<br />

for a mean of 3 years (1-5 years). Outcome was assessed by Disabilities of the Arm,<br />

Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Results: Majority of the patients were<br />

females and the mean DASH score was 36.2 range (1.72 - 62.1). Majority of the<br />

patients were pleased with the procedure but due to other joints in the upper limb<br />

being affected reflected badly on the DASH scores. Conclusions: This study showed<br />

that patients had good pain relief with this procedure which was simple and using the<br />

redundant capsule flap. This was also associated with less morbidity compared to<br />

other procedures described. This also shows that DASH questionnaire is not a good<br />

tool in assessing outcomes in patients who have multiple joint pathologies in the<br />

upper limb.<br />

205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!