30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster<br />

Topic: Biomaterials<br />

Abstract number: 25148<br />

BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF FIXATION OF DIAPHYSEAL BONE DEFECTS<br />

Vasileios SAKELLARIOU, Haridimos TSIBIDAKIS, George MAZIS, Andreas<br />

MAVROGENIS, Panayiotis PAPAGELOPOULOS<br />

1st Orthopaedic Department, University of Athens, Chaidari (GREECE)<br />

Objective: To compare quantitative data on the biomechanical analysis of different<br />

techniques for fixation of intercalary bone defects, by means of consistently applied<br />

methodology on composite models of the adult femur, tibia and humerus. Method: A<br />

total of fifteen femoral, fifteen tibial and fifteen humeral specimens of fourth<br />

generation composite models were used. An intercalary defect (middle 1/5 of the<br />

length of each model) was created and was reconstructed using plates,<br />

intramedullary nails, external fixators and segmental prosthetic implants. The<br />

specimens were loaded under axial compression, four-point-bending and torsion in<br />

the linear elastic region at sub-yield level. Statistical analysis for each bone model<br />

was performed employing a non-parametric analysis of variance for ranked data, in<br />

order to highlight statistically significant differences between techniques. Results:<br />

The analysis for the femur showed no statistically significant differences in the<br />

ranking of techniques (p=0.088). The analysis for the tibia revealed a statistically<br />

significant difference between groups (p=0.035) with the plate construct ranking<br />

lower than the intact. The analysis for the humerus showed statistically significant<br />

differences between groups (p=0.038) with the intramedullary nail and plate<br />

constructs ranking lower than intact. Conclusions: Modular segmental implants and<br />

external fixator ranked better than other techniques, being the ones always exhibiting<br />

the most enhanced performance in comparison to intact specimen.<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!