30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster<br />

Topic: Biomaterials<br />

Abstract number: 23915<br />

COMPARISON OF PHYSICAL PROPERTIES BETWEEN COMMERCIAL<br />

REINFORCED LIGAMENT (RESORBAID®) AND NEAT POLYLACTIC ACID<br />

(PLA) PREPARED IN A LAB SCALE.<br />

Theodoros BESLIKAS, Anastasios CHYTAS, George PAPAGEORGIOU, John<br />

GIGIS, Dimitrios BIKIARIS, John CHRISTOFORIDES<br />

2nd Orthopaedic Department Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki<br />

(GREECE)<br />

Introduction: There is a widespread use of biocombatible and biodegradable<br />

polymers in orthopaedics. The most used polymer is poly-lactic acid (PLA).Aim: The<br />

aim of the present work is the comparative study of reinforcement ligament<br />

(Resorbaid®) with laboratory prepared PLA. Materials and Methods: In the present<br />

work 10 materials of reinforcement ligament consisted of PLA (Resorbaid®) were<br />

used in comparison with neat PLA prepared in a lab scale. The mechanical<br />

properties were studied with an Instron 3344, while crystallization rates were<br />

evaluated differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized light microscopy with<br />

hot stage (HSM). The biodegradation rate of both materials was studied by<br />

enzymatic hydrolysis. Results: The reinforced ligament has greater mechanical<br />

properties compared with the laboratory prepared PLA. Both samples hydrolyze<br />

relatively slowly, but the commercial sample shows a slightly faster hydrolysis.<br />

Surface cracks appear in the samples due to the weight loss during hydrolysis. The<br />

melting point of reinforced ligament is recorded at around 180oC, while in the case of<br />

the laboratory made PLA around at 171oC. Also the reinforced ligament showed<br />

faster isothermal crystallization at temperatures in the range 100-140oC, as well as<br />

enhanced cold crystallization. Furthermore, it crystallized significantly on cooling from<br />

the melt by 20oC/min, while laboratory made PLA did not crystallize. Conclusions:<br />

Some additives of the commercial ligament may act as nucleating agents reducing<br />

energy activation process of solidification. This may explain all the differences<br />

between the two samples.<br />

171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!