30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster<br />

Topic: Biomaterials<br />

Abstract number: 23687<br />

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT COCRMO COUNTERFACES ON UHMWPE WEAR<br />

FOR ARTIFICIAL JOINTS<br />

Ana TORRES 1 , Mariano FERNANDEZ-FAIREN 2 , Vanesa GONZALEZ-MORA 2 , M<br />

HOFFMANN 3 , R. STROOJNISDER 3 , F.J. GIL 3 , Antonio MURCIA 1<br />

1 Hospital de Cabueñes, Gijon (SPAIN), 2 Instituto de Traumatologia y Ortopedia,<br />

Barcelona (SPAIN), 3 Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. Joint Research<br />

Centre, European Commision, Ispra (SPAIN)<br />

The objective in these wear tests was to study the effect of different material<br />

counterfaces on the UHMWPE wear behaviour. The materials used as counterfaces<br />

were based on CoCrMo: forged with hand polished and mass finished, CoCrMo cast<br />

and mass finished and additionally two coatings were proposed. The reciprocating<br />

pin-on-flat (RPOF) device pin-on-disk wear was used for this study. RESULTS:<br />

However, it is more interesting to compare the wear rates of the sliding couples than<br />

to compare the volumetric wear after the one million cycles of the wear test. The<br />

results show that the CoCrMo coating causes the highest UHMWPE wear of all<br />

counterfaces tested. The CoCrMo coating wear rates in an order of magnitude higher<br />

than that produced by the mass finished (forged) alloy, which in this study causes the<br />

least UHMWPE wear. It is interesting to note that different surface treatments (mass<br />

finishing and hand polishing) on the forged CoCrMo alloys lead to a significant<br />

difference in UHMWPE wear. DISCUSION: The mass finished (forged) alloy causes<br />

less UHWPE wear than the mass finished (cast) alloy and the later causes less<br />

UHMWPE wear than the hand polished (forged) alloy. Mass finished (forged)<br />

CoCrMo alloy is harder than the mass finished (cast) alloy and the latter is harder<br />

than the hand polished (forged) alloy. CONCLUSION: Regarding the CoCrMo<br />

coating, it has the highest hardness value, the coating has a very good scratch<br />

resistance. Furthermore, coating fragments may have favour third body wear<br />

mechanisms, roughening too the coating surface<br />

169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!