30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Poster<br />

Topic: Biomaterials<br />

Abstract number: 23686<br />

UNI AND MULTIDIRECTIONAL WEAR RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT<br />

CROSSLINKING GRADE OF UHMWPE FOR ARTIFICIAL JOINTS.<br />

Ana TORRES 1 , Mariano FERNANDEZ-FAIREN 2 , Vanesa GONZALEZ-MORA 2 , M<br />

HOFFMANN 3 , R. STROOJNISDER 3 , F.J. GIL 3 , Antonio MURCIA 1<br />

1 Hospital de Cabueñes, Gijon (SPAIN), 2 Instituto de Traumatologia y Ortopedia,<br />

Barcelona (SPAIN), 3 Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. Joint Research<br />

Centre, European Commision, Ispra (SPAIN)<br />

The objective of this work was to study the effect of UHMWPE crosslinking in relation<br />

to its wear performance. Four different treatments on the UHMWPE material were<br />

investigated. The test methods proposed were a horizontal and multidirectional pinon-disk<br />

to evaluate the wear of polymers in biotribology. RESULTS: 1.Higher wear for<br />

the irradiated and crosslinked UHMWPEs (XLPEs) than for the unirradiated<br />

UHMWPE material. 2. The difference between crosslinked materials is statistically no<br />

significant and that both crosslinking treatments seem to have a similar effect on the<br />

wear resistance of the UHMWPE. 3. Higher number of scars for irradiated and<br />

XLPEs than for the unirradiated UHMWPE, and they are shallower. 4. The grade of<br />

fibril formation is higher for the unirradiated than for the irradiated material and then<br />

less for the XLPEs. 5. The particle formation of the XLPEs corroborates their lower<br />

deformation capacity in comparison with irradiated and unirradiated UHMWPEs. 6.<br />

Higher wear for the irradiated and unirradiated UHMWPE material compared to the<br />

XLPEs on the multidirectional wear test. DISCUSSION: UHMWPEs with higher<br />

capacity to deform locally present a higher wear resistance and lower weight loss<br />

under unidirectional conditions. Unirradiated UHMWPE wears less than irradiated<br />

.CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the XLPEs are optimal materials for<br />

acetabular components in Total Hip Replacements. Under unidirectional sliding<br />

conditions the XLPEs are subjected to more wear compared to unirradiated<br />

UHMWPE. Therefore, in situations where unidirectional sliding motion is the main<br />

type of motion between the articulating components, XLPEs should not be used.<br />

168

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!