Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Systemic Abstract number: 26506 PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF JOINT REPLACEMENT: WHAT WE DO DIFFERENTLY TEN YEARS LATER? Kaur KIRJANEN, Reet KIKAS, Triin TREIAL, Jüri KARJAGIN, Aare MÄRTSON Tartu University Hospital; Clinics of Traumatology and Orthopeadics, Tartu (ESTONIA) Introduction: The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare patients operated at Tartu University Hospital with primary arthroplasty of hip or knee from years 1995 and 2005, with special interest of perioperative management. Results: The numbers of files reviewed were 98 and 871 patients, respectively. Average ages of studied populations were 63±7.2 and 67.2±10.2. 61.4% were females in year 1995 and it increased to 72.6% in year 2005. Co-morbidities were present in nearly 80% of patients in both years. The most abundant co-morbidities were arterial hypertension, other cardiovascular diseases and overweight. In year 1995 general anaesthesia were employed approximately in ~50% of the cases, but only in less than 10% during year 2005. Average operative volumes of crystalloids were 1474 ml in 1995 and 1362 ml in 2005. 50% of patients received colloids in average amount 443 ml in 1995, but 80% of patients received colloids in average amount 575 ml in 2005. Erythrocyte mass transfusion during operation in 1995 was performed in all patients and averaged 936 ml compared to 10% of patients being transfused in 2005 with average transfusion of 519 ml.Length of hospital stay was 18.5 and 6 days, respectively. Conclusions: The number of operated patients increased nearly 10 times during 10 years. The perioperative management of patients became more intensive, less hospital stays, more intense pain therapy. Concerning fluid management, the transfusion of blood products was reduced and use of synthetic colloids increased during 10 years. 164
Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract number: 22863 DEMINERALIZED CALF FOETAL GROWTH PLATE EFFECTS ON EXPERIMENTAL BONE HEALING Amin BIGHAM SADEGH, Mohammad SHADKHAST, Homayon Reza SHAHBAZKIA, Mahmoud Reza KHALEGHI, Ali LAKZIAN Shahrekord University, Shahrekord (IRAN) To stimulate the process of bone healing, several methods have been used previously. These methods include use of ultrasound, electrical stimulation, exposure to electromagnetic field, bone grafts, interporous hydroxyapatite (as a bone graft substitute) and bone growth factors. The following study was designed to evaluate demineralized calf foetal growth plate (DCFGP) effects on bone healing process. Twenty adolscencet, 2-kg- weighing, white New Zealand male rabbits were used in this study. In experimental group (n=10) mid radii bone defect created and filled with DCFGP. In control group (n=10) mid radii bone defect created and left without transplantation. Radiological and histopathological evaluations were performed blindly and results scored and analyzed statistically. Statistical tests did not support significant differences between two groups in radiographically union (P> 0.05). There was a significant difference for bone formation and remodeling at the 56th post operative day (P
- Page 113 and 114: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 115 and 116: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 117 and 118: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 119 and 120: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 121 and 122: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 123 and 124: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 125 and 126: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 127 and 128: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 129 and 130: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 131 and 132: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 133 and 134: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 135 and 136: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 137 and 138: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 139 and 140: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 141 and 142: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 143 and 144: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 145 and 146: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 147 and 148: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 149 and 150: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 151 and 152: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 153 and 154: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 155 and 156: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 157 and 158: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Should
- Page 159 and 160: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Should
- Page 161 and 162: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - System
- Page 163: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - System
- Page 167 and 168: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 169 and 170: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 171 and 172: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 173 and 174: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 175 and 176: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 177 and 178: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 179 and 180: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 181 and 182: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 183 and 184: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 185 and 186: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 187 and 188: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 189 and 190: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 191 and 192: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 193 and 194: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 195 and 196: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 197 and 198: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 199 and 200: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 201 and 202: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 203 and 204: Poster Topic: Evidence Based Orthop
- Page 205 and 206: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 207 and 208: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 209 and 210: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 211 and 212: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
- Page 213 and 214: Poster Topic: General Orthopaedics
Poster<br />
Topic: Biomaterials<br />
Abstract number: 22863<br />
DEMINERALIZED CALF FOETAL GROWTH PLATE EFFECTS ON<br />
EXPERIMENTAL BONE HEALING<br />
Amin BIGHAM SADEGH, Mohammad SHADKHAST, Homayon Reza SHAHBAZKIA,<br />
Mahmoud Reza KHALEGHI, Ali LAKZIAN<br />
Shahrekord University, Shahrekord (IRAN)<br />
To stimulate the process of bone healing, several methods have been used<br />
previously. These methods include use of ultrasound, electrical stimulation, exposure<br />
to electromagnetic field, bone grafts, interporous hydroxyapatite (as a bone graft<br />
substitute) and bone growth factors. The following study was designed to evaluate<br />
demineralized calf foetal growth plate (DCFGP) effects on bone healing process.<br />
Twenty adolscencet, 2-kg- weighing, white New Zealand male rabbits were used in<br />
this study. In experimental group (n=10) mid radii bone defect created and filled with<br />
DCFGP. In control group (n=10) mid radii bone defect created and left without<br />
transplantation. Radiological and histopathological evaluations were performed<br />
blindly and results scored and analyzed statistically. Statistical tests did not support<br />
significant differences between two groups in radiographically union (P> 0.05). There<br />
was a significant difference for bone formation and remodeling at the 56th post<br />
operative day (P