Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

30.01.2013 Views

Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Abstract number: 23652 THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE DUTCH SELF-REPORTED HARRIS HIP SCORE AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. Huub VAN DER HEIDE, Bart BOESENACH, Hakim BENALI, Rob NELISSEN Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden (NETHERLANDS) Background: The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a widely used standardized outcome instrument in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). A self-administered version could give the possibility to save time and improve the effectiveness of clinical follow up in THA. Methods: A Harris Hip Score was obtained from 80 patients at a routine clinical follow up by a physician. These patients completed the newly created self reported HHS 2 and 4 weeks after their clinical follow up together with a HOOS and RAND-36 questionnaire. The agreement, correlation and test-retest reliability between the 2 versions of the HHS and the Quality of Life questionnaires was established.Results: A good agreement was established between the total scores of the self-reported and physician administered version of the HHS. The correlation between the self-reported HHS and the Quality of Life questionnaires was good as was the test-retest reliability for the two versions of the HHS. Conclusion: The newly created, self-reported version of the HHS is a valid and reliable standardized outcome instrument and as such is a good alternative for the physician-administered version. This could save time and improve the efficacy of clinical follow up. 16

Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Abstract number: 23663 MID TERM CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY EITH CEMENTLESS STEM Tiberiu BATAGA, Simona BATAGA, Remus OPRIS, Arpad SOLYOM University of Medicine & Pharmacy Tg-Mures, Tg-Mures (ROMANIA) The revision of failed total hip artrhroplasty (THA) is a difficult challenge in reconstructive hip surgery due to severe femoral bone loss. Our Study describes 138 hips that underwent to cementless femoral revision arthroplasty between 2004 and 2009 with a proximal porous coated, modular titanium alloy stem (S- ROMJohnson&Johnson). According to Paprosky’s femoral defect classification, the patients were classified in: type I (17 %) type II (39%) type III (33%) and type IV (11%). All patients patients were present for the final follow-upevaluation and were evaluated clinically (HHS, WOMAC, SF-12 and Satisfaction Test), comparing prewith postoperative results. Radiographic analysis was performed based onthe Engh's criteria. HHS improved from 32.8 to 76.2. 132 stems presented stable bony ingrowth, 6 was stabilized by fibrous tissue. Mechanical failure rate and re-revision rate were zero. Eight years survival rate was 100%, with re-revision as endpoint. Evaluation of bone loss and residual bone stock before surgery are indicative to determine the best surgical choice. No complications were imputable to the S-ROM implant that demonstrates to be an effective implant to reduce pain and restore hip function in revision hip arthroplasty surgery. 17

Poster<br />

Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip<br />

Abstract number: 23652<br />

THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE DUTCH SELF-REPORTED HARRIS<br />

HIP SCORE AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY.<br />

Huub VAN DER HEIDE, Bart BOESENACH, Hakim BENALI, Rob NELISSEN<br />

Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden (NETHERLANDS)<br />

Background: The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a widely used standardized outcome<br />

instrument in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). A self-administered version could give the<br />

possibility to save time and improve the effectiveness of clinical follow up in THA.<br />

Methods: A Harris Hip Score was obtained from 80 patients at a routine clinical follow<br />

up by a physician. These patients completed the newly created self reported HHS 2<br />

and 4 weeks after their clinical follow up together with a HOOS and RAND-36<br />

questionnaire. The agreement, correlation and test-retest reliability between the 2<br />

versions of the HHS and the Quality of Life questionnaires was established.Results:<br />

A good agreement was established between the total scores of the self-reported and<br />

physician administered version of the HHS. The correlation between the self-reported<br />

HHS and the Quality of Life questionnaires was good as was the test-retest reliability<br />

for the two versions of the HHS. Conclusion: The newly created, self-reported version<br />

of the HHS is a valid and reliable standardized outcome instrument and as such is a<br />

good alternative for the physician-administered version. This could save time and<br />

improve the efficacy of clinical follow up.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!