Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee Abstract number: 26444 ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF KNEES WITH ROTATING PLATFORM MOBILE BEARING VERSUS POSTERIOR STABILIZED FIXED BEARING PROSTHESES Aditya AGGARWAL, Anuj AGRAWAL Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh, Chandigarh (INDIA) Full flexion of knee is a critical performance requirement for patients in Asia, Middle East and increasingly for patients in Europe and North America. Range of motion after Total Knee Arthroplasty is an important component of a patient’s overall functional outcome. We conducted a randomised prospective study to compare the clinical and radiological results of posterior-stabilised fixed-bearing and rotatingplatform prostheses operated by a single surgeon. Thirty consecutive patients undergoing primary, unilateral knee replacement for osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to receive either a fixed-bearing (14 patients) or rotating-platform (16 patients) prosthesis. The mean follow-up period was 33.5 months, with a minimum follow-up of one year. The Knee Society knee scores, pain scores, functional scores and Oxford knee scores were not statistically different (p>0.05) between the two groups. The mean postoperative range-of-motion of mobile-bearing knees was significantly greater than that of fixed-bearing knees (127.6 degrees versus 110.5 degrees, p=0.016). The radiological analysis found no statistical difference in the alignment of the knee, position of femoral and tibial components and position of joint line between the two groups. Osteolysis was not seen in any knee in either group. There was no bearing instability or spin-out in the rotating platform prostheses group. The use of mobile-bearings in Total Knee Arthroplasty may lead to improvement in the knee performance by simulating more closely normal knee kinematics. It may increase the longevity of implants by reducing the polyethylene wear and periprosthetic osteolysis. 154
Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee Abstract number: 26523 TIBIALIS ANTERIOR TENDON. DOES IT TRULY REPRESENT THE CENTRE OF ANKLE? AN ANATOMICAL STUDY BASED ON 100 ANKLE MRI SCANS Avadhoot KANTAK, Surendra PATNAIK, Praveen PANOSE East Surrey Hospital, Redhill (UNITED KINGDOM) The tibialis anterior tendon is useful landmark to locate ankle centre during total knee replacement for verifying the perpendicularity of the tibial cut in coronal plane (when extramedullary jigs are used). It represents the distal point on the mechanical axis. It remains a reliable marker due to its predictable course which is well stabilized by the extensor retinaculum. Despite its clinical use and widespread acceptance there is little in the literature as a proof of its reliability. We present our study of 100 MRI scans of the ankle joint to determine the position of tibialis anterior tendon in relation to centre of the ankle joint in coronal plane. We examined sagital and transverse cuts of the ankle. Our results indicate that the lateral edge of tibialis anterior tendon lies on an average 1.72 mms (range 1.64 to 1.85 mms) medial to the centre of the ankle joint when studied in the transverse section and it lies anterior to the ankle joint on the paramedial sagital cut 3mm medial from the central section (first medial sagital cut from the central section in a standard MRI protocol) in all 100 scans. We thus conclude that a point about 1.7 to 3mm lateral to the tibialis anterior tendon represents the centre of the ankle joint. 155
- Page 103 and 104: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 105 and 106: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 107 and 108: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 109 and 110: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 111 and 112: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 113 and 114: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 115 and 116: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 117 and 118: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 119 and 120: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 121 and 122: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 123 and 124: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 125 and 126: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 127 and 128: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 129 and 130: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 131 and 132: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 133 and 134: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 135 and 136: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 137 and 138: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 139 and 140: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 141 and 142: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 143 and 144: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 145 and 146: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 147 and 148: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 149 and 150: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 151 and 152: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 153: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 157 and 158: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Should
- Page 159 and 160: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Should
- Page 161 and 162: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - System
- Page 163 and 164: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - System
- Page 165 and 166: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 167 and 168: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 169 and 170: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 171 and 172: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 173 and 174: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 175 and 176: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 177 and 178: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 179 and 180: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 181 and 182: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 183 and 184: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 185 and 186: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 187 and 188: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 189 and 190: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 191 and 192: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 193 and 194: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 195 and 196: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 197 and 198: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 199 and 200: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 201 and 202: Poster Topic: Cartilage Repair Abst
- Page 203 and 204: Poster Topic: Evidence Based Orthop
Poster<br />
Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee<br />
Abstract number: 26444<br />
ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF KNEES WITH ROTATING<br />
PLATFORM MOBILE BEARING VERSUS POSTERIOR STABILIZED FIXED<br />
BEARING PROSTHESES<br />
Aditya AGGARWAL, Anuj AGRAWAL<br />
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Chandigarh, Chandigarh<br />
(INDIA)<br />
Full flexion of knee is a critical performance requirement for patients in Asia, Middle<br />
East and increasingly for patients in Europe and North America. Range of motion<br />
after Total Knee Arthroplasty is an important component of a patient’s overall<br />
functional outcome. We conducted a randomised prospective study to compare the<br />
clinical and radiological results of posterior-stabilised fixed-bearing and rotatingplatform<br />
prostheses operated by a single surgeon. Thirty consecutive patients<br />
undergoing primary, unilateral knee replacement for osteoarthritis were randomly<br />
assigned to receive either a fixed-bearing (14 patients) or rotating-platform (16<br />
patients) prosthesis. The mean follow-up period was 33.5 months, with a minimum<br />
follow-up of one year. The Knee Society knee scores, pain scores, functional scores<br />
and Oxford knee scores were not statistically different (p>0.05) between the two<br />
groups. The mean postoperative range-of-motion of mobile-bearing knees was<br />
significantly greater than that of fixed-bearing knees (127.6 degrees versus 110.5<br />
degrees, p=0.016). The radiological analysis found no statistical difference in the<br />
alignment of the knee, position of femoral and tibial components and position of joint<br />
line between the two groups. Osteolysis was not seen in any knee in either group.<br />
There was no bearing instability or spin-out in the rotating platform prostheses group.<br />
The use of mobile-bearings in Total Knee Arthroplasty may lead to improvement in<br />
the knee performance by simulating more closely normal knee kinematics. It may<br />
increase the longevity of implants by reducing the polyethylene wear and<br />
periprosthetic osteolysis.<br />
154