Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee Abstract number: 24378 THE MODIFIED STATIC SPACERS USING ANTIBIOTIC-IMPREGNATED CEMENT ROD IN TWO-STAGE REVISION FOR INFECTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPALSTY. -TECHNICAL NOTE- Ju-Hyung YOO 1 , Chang-Dong HAN 2 , Hyun-Cheol OH 1 1 National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gyeonggi-do (KOREA), 2 Yonsei Univeristy College of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul (KOREA) We report a novel two-stage exchange arthroplasty technique using an antibioticimpregnated cement intramedullary rod for the treatment of infections after total knee arthroplasty. An antibiotic-impregnated cement intramedullary rod can be easily prepared during surgery; a 36Fr-diameter straight thoracic catheter and a 3.0mmdiameter, 22cm-length Steinmann pin were prepared for manufacturing the rod. Vancomycin (1g) was then added to the bone cement. At the late liquid stage of the cement, the antibiotic-impregnated cement was poured into the 50cc enema syringe. The Steinmann pin was inserted into the tube, and the prepared cement was delivered through the tube. The tube was rolled gently to straighten the straight rod. After the cement hardened, the tube was removed from the cement rod using a surgical knife. Finally, a 9mm-diameter, 22cm-length cement rod was obtained. The rod was inserted into the femur and tibia. The proximal medullary canal of the tibia was filled with antibiotic-impregnated cement up to the surface of the proximal tibia while proper anatomic alignment and joint space was maintained by the assistant. Then same procedure was then carried out for distal femur. The space between the cement of the distal femur and proximal tibia was filled with more antibioticimpregnated cement. The rod provides additional stability to the knee to maintain the normal mechanical axis. In addition, there is less pain between prosthesis removal and the later reimplantation. Less soft tissue contracture, less scar adhesion, easy removal of cement intramedullary nail and successful infection control are advantages of this technique. 130
Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee Abstract number: 24424 OUTCOME AFTER KNEE REVISION ARTHROPLASTY USING A ROTATING- HINGED PROSTHESIS: A MINIMUM SIX YEAR FOLLOW-UP Asgeir GUDNASON, Jan MILBRINK, Nils P HAILER Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala (SWEDEN) We evaluate the outcome of the Link Endo-model rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasties used in revision surgery due to aseptic loosening. Between 1991 and 2003, 38 patients (26 females) underwent 42 revision arthroplasties. The mean follow-up was after 8.8 (6-18) years. Complete medical histories and radiographic data were collected for all patients. 15 patients had died and 12 patients declined to participate in clinical follow-up, leaving 13 knees for clinical and radiographic followup. These patients were evaluated according to the Hospital for Special Surgery score (HSSS) and the Knee Society scores (KSS). Radiographic evaluation was performed by standardised radiographs.The mean age at revision surgery was 72 (55-88) years, and most patients had significant medical comorbidities (31 patients). 4 of 42 knees were re-revised due to aseptic loosening, 5 underwent re-revision due to other reasons. The mean HSSS at follow-up was 67 (36-90), the mean KSS-knee was 85 (73-96), and the mean KSS-function was 29 (0-100). Radiographic evaluation showed well-fixed implants without radiolucencies (n=8) or discrete radiolucent lines (n=5), and no implant was deemed to be in need of revision.With revision due to aseptic loosening as the endpoint, 10-year-survival was 89.2%. Knee function was good to satisfactory in a majority of patients, whereas global function scores were impaired. Our results indicate that revision arthroplasty of the knee with the Endomodel rotating-hinge can be performed with good results in an elderly population with a high degree of medical comorbidities. 131
- Page 79 and 80: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 81 and 82: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 83 and 84: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 85 and 86: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 87 and 88: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 89 and 90: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 91 and 92: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 93 and 94: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 95 and 96: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 97 and 98: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 99 and 100: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 101 and 102: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 103 and 104: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 105 and 106: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 107 and 108: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 109 and 110: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 111 and 112: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 113 and 114: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 115 and 116: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 117 and 118: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 119 and 120: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 121 and 122: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 123 and 124: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 125 and 126: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 127 and 128: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 129: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 133 and 134: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 135 and 136: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 137 and 138: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 139 and 140: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 141 and 142: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 143 and 144: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 145 and 146: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 147 and 148: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 149 and 150: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 151 and 152: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 153 and 154: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 155 and 156: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 157 and 158: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Should
- Page 159 and 160: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Should
- Page 161 and 162: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - System
- Page 163 and 164: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - System
- Page 165 and 166: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 167 and 168: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 169 and 170: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 171 and 172: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 173 and 174: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 175 and 176: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 177 and 178: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 179 and 180: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
Poster<br />
Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee<br />
Abstract number: 24378<br />
THE MODIFIED STATIC SPACERS USING ANTIBIOTIC-IMPREGNATED<br />
CEMENT ROD IN TWO-STAGE REVISION FOR INFECTED TOTAL KNEE<br />
ARTHROPALSTY. -TECHNICAL NOTE-<br />
Ju-Hyung YOO 1 , Chang-Dong HAN 2 , Hyun-Cheol OH 1<br />
1 National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital Department of Orthopaedic<br />
Surgery, Gyeonggi-do (KOREA), 2 Yonsei Univeristy College of Medicine, Department<br />
of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul (KOREA)<br />
We report a novel two-stage exchange arthroplasty technique using an antibioticimpregnated<br />
cement intramedullary rod for the treatment of infections after total knee<br />
arthroplasty. An antibiotic-impregnated cement intramedullary rod can be easily<br />
prepared during surgery; a 36Fr-diameter straight thoracic catheter and a 3.0mmdiameter,<br />
22cm-length Steinmann pin were prepared for manufacturing the rod.<br />
Vancomycin (1g) was then added to the bone cement. At the late liquid stage of the<br />
cement, the antibiotic-impregnated cement was poured into the 50cc enema syringe.<br />
The Steinmann pin was inserted into the tube, and the prepared cement was<br />
delivered through the tube. The tube was rolled gently to straighten the straight rod.<br />
After the cement hardened, the tube was removed from the cement rod using a<br />
surgical knife. Finally, a 9mm-diameter, 22cm-length cement rod was obtained. The<br />
rod was inserted into the femur and tibia. The proximal medullary canal of the tibia<br />
was filled with antibiotic-impregnated cement up to the surface of the proximal tibia<br />
while proper anatomic alignment and joint space was maintained by the assistant.<br />
Then same procedure was then carried out for distal femur. The space between the<br />
cement of the distal femur and proximal tibia was filled with more antibioticimpregnated<br />
cement. The rod provides additional stability to the knee to maintain the<br />
normal mechanical axis. In addition, there is less pain between prosthesis removal<br />
and the later reimplantation. Less soft tissue contracture, less scar adhesion, easy<br />
removal of cement intramedullary nail and successful infection control are<br />
advantages of this technique.<br />
130