Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee Abstract number: 23148 PAIN MANAGEMENT AFTER JOINT REPLACEMENT Chitranjan RANAWAT, Morteza MEFTAH Hospital for Special Surgery, New York (UNITED STATES) INTRODUCTION: Uncontrolled pain after total knee replacement has a deleterious effect on recovery of function, including decreased range of motion (ROM), higher complication rates, and poorer overall outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004, 36 patients (52 knees) underwent total knee replacement at our institution with an advanced postoperative pain management protocol. Preoperatively, all patients received Vioxx, 50 mg; Oxycodone, 20 mg; and Coumadin, 5 mg. All patients were given spinal anesthesia. Intraoperatively, a local mixture of Marcaine. 80 mg; Depo-Medtrol, 40 mg; Morphine, 4 mg; Epinephrine, 300 mcg; Zinacef 750 mg; and clonidine, 100 mcg, was injected into the periarticular ligamentous attachments, posterior capsule, and quadriceps tendon arthrotomy site. Patients were followed with postoperative pain scales, patient assessment questionnaires, and monitored for narcotic requirements. RESULTS: During the study period, narcotic pain requirements, manipulation rates, and the need for prolonged physical therapy were significantly reduced compared to historical controls. Recovery of function and ROM were achieved at an earlier period. DISCUSSION: A relationship appears to exist between acute postoperative pain and the development of arthrofibrosis. By controlling acute pain in the critical early postoperative period following TKR (three days), the presented pain management protocol allowed for improved recovery of knee ROM and function with lower rates for manipulation and prolonged rehabilitation. 120
Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee Abstract number: 23150 CORRECTING VARUS DEFORMITY DURING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: THE "INSIDE-OUT" TECHNIQUE Chitranjan RANAWAT, Morteza MEFTAH Hospital for Special Surgery, New York (UNITED STATES) INTRODUCTION: In 1979, our senior author described this technique for correcting a flexion contracture during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by additional resection of the distal femur and posterior capsular release. Our hypothesis is that this technique effectively corrects both deformities, while reducing the complications related to the more traditional techniques. We describe this technique and assess its effectiveness in a series of 31 consecutive patients. TECHNIQUE: Highlights of this technique are as follows: 1. An osseous resections of 10mm from the level of the uninvolved surfaces of the femur and tibia. 2. A transverse release of the contracted posterior capsule is performed with electrocautery at the level of the tibial resection from the posterior margin of the superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL) to the posterolateral corner of the tibia. 3. A controlled lengthening of the superficial MCL by pie-crusting. RESULTS: Over a 12 month span, we have corrected these biplanar deformities in 31 knees without residual instability. There were no residual flexion contractures greater than 5 degrees. The maximum varus corrected was 30 degrees, and the maximum flexion contracture corrected was 20 degrees. The mean coronal plane correction was to 5.5 degrees of valgus (range: 1 to 9 degrees). DISCUSSION: In a series of 31 consecutive patients, this technique was effective in correcting both deformities. We achieved a mean range of motion of 115 degrees, while avoiding elevation of the joint line or instability. While we report good early results, further studies are needed to better evaluate this technique. 121
- Page 69 and 70: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 71 and 72: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 73 and 74: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 75 and 76: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 77 and 78: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 79 and 80: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 81 and 82: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 83 and 84: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 85 and 86: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 87 and 88: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 89 and 90: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 91 and 92: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 93 and 94: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 95 and 96: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 97 and 98: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 99 and 100: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 101 and 102: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 103 and 104: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 105 and 106: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 107 and 108: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 109 and 110: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 111 and 112: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 113 and 114: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 115 and 116: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 117 and 118: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 119: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 123 and 124: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 125 and 126: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 127 and 128: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 129 and 130: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 131 and 132: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 133 and 134: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 135 and 136: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 137 and 138: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 139 and 140: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 141 and 142: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 143 and 144: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 145 and 146: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 147 and 148: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 149 and 150: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 151 and 152: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 153 and 154: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 155 and 156: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 157 and 158: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Should
- Page 159 and 160: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Should
- Page 161 and 162: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - System
- Page 163 and 164: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - System
- Page 165 and 166: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 167 and 168: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
- Page 169 and 170: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
Poster<br />
Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee<br />
Abstract number: 23148<br />
PAIN MANAGEMENT AFTER JOINT REPLACEMENT<br />
Chitranjan RANAWAT, Morteza MEFTAH<br />
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York (UNITED STATES)<br />
INTRODUCTION: Uncontrolled pain after total knee replacement has a deleterious<br />
effect on recovery of function, including decreased range of motion (ROM), higher<br />
complication rates, and poorer overall outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS:<br />
From October 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004, 36 patients (52 knees) underwent total<br />
knee replacement at our institution with an advanced postoperative pain<br />
management protocol. Preoperatively, all patients received Vioxx, 50 mg;<br />
Oxycodone, 20 mg; and Coumadin, 5 mg. All patients were given spinal anesthesia.<br />
Intraoperatively, a local mixture of Marcaine. 80 mg; Depo-Medtrol, 40 mg; Morphine,<br />
4 mg; Epinephrine, 300 mcg; Zinacef 750 mg; and clonidine, 100 mcg, was injected<br />
into the periarticular ligamentous attachments, posterior capsule, and quadriceps<br />
tendon arthrotomy site. Patients were followed with postoperative pain scales,<br />
patient assessment questionnaires, and monitored for narcotic requirements.<br />
RESULTS: During the study period, narcotic pain requirements, manipulation rates,<br />
and the need for prolonged physical therapy were significantly reduced compared to<br />
historical controls. Recovery of function and ROM were achieved at an earlier<br />
period. DISCUSSION: A relationship appears to exist between acute postoperative<br />
pain and the development of arthrofibrosis. By controlling acute pain in the critical<br />
early postoperative period following TKR (three days), the presented pain<br />
management protocol allowed for improved recovery of knee ROM and function with<br />
lower rates for manipulation and prolonged rehabilitation.<br />
120