Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_ Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_
Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Abstract number: 26672 MID-TERM STUDY WITH BIOLOX FORTE BEARING COUPLES Peteris STUDERS, Martins LEITLANDS Latvian State Hospital of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Riga Stradin’s University, Riga (LATVIA) Our experience of a ceramic on ceramic surface bearing combination with noncemented hip prosthesis starts from 2001, number of patients: 37. Retrospective clinical and radiological analyses were performed on 37 patients with femoral SRL (Zweymuller) prosthesis stem in combination with Biolox forte head and press fit Duraloc (DePuy) metal backed acetabular component matched with ceramic Biolox forte insert. Patients age groups 18-30 years (3 pts), 31-40 years (7 pts), 41-50 years (13 pts), 51-60 years (10 pts), 61-70 years (4 pts). Clinical evaluation - Harris hip score pre operation, 1-3 and 4-6 years post operation. Radiological evaluation - AP and LL X-ray early, 1-3 years and 4-6 years post operation. Average Harris hip score result before operation was 40-60 points, 1-3 years after operation 96-98 points, 4-6 years after operaton 94-96 points. No signs of osteolytic changes around the acetabular component in patients groups 1-3 and 4-6 years after operation were found according to Charnley De Lee zones, and the abscence of radiolucent lines is characteristic for prosthesis stems in both patients groups. Combination noncemented hip implant and ceramic on ceramic bearings can be reasonably proposed for younger patients who are looking for minimal restrictions in the quality of life by reducing the number of revisions as far as possible. 116
Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee Abstract number: 22826 POSTERIOR STABILISED IMPLANTS IN PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT Pierre-Paul CASTELEYN 1 , Dirk GANZER 2 , Hans BAYER-HELMS 3 , Robert KRAUSE 4 , Robert KRAUSE 4 1 Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels (BELGIUM), 2 Dietrich-Bonhoeffer- Klinikum, Altentreptow (GERMANY), 3 St. Josef-krankenhaus-Hilden, Hilden (GERMANY), 4 Orthopädische Fachklinik Verein Oberlinhaus, Potsdam (GERMANY) Introduction: The purpose of this consecutive multicentre prospective case series study was to evaluate the short term clinical, functional, and radiological outcome of a posterior stabilised primary total knee arthroplasty (balanSys® PS, Mathys Ltd Bettlach, Bettlach, Switzerland). Methods: 256 (244 monolateral, n=6 bilateral) consecutive patients were treated for osteoarthritis with a posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty in 4 centres. The follow-up consisted of clinical as well as radiological evaluations, preoperatively, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 years postoperative.Results: Follow-up information is until now available for 236 cases. The mean follow-up time was 14.9 months (range 1.3-30.3 months). Most striking with this design was the rapid recovery of the patients : - KSS, preoperative : 110, 3m :150, 6m : 170- Knee score, preoperative : 57, 3m : 86, 6m : 93-VAS pain, preoperative : 7.9, 3m : 3, 6m : 1.3- VAS satisfaction, preoperative : 3.1, 3m : 7, 6m : 8 Statistical analysis used the Wilcoxon 2 sided test and the Chi-square-test. As major complications we had to revise two patients for instability. 12 patients showed limited mobility and 1 patient is suspected of a radiological loosening. Conclusion: This type of posterior stabilised total knee prosthesis in combination with the described surgical techniques shows promising radiological and clinical short term results, with a rapid recovery and with an acceptable rate of adverse events. 117
- Page 65 and 66: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 67 and 68: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 69 and 70: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 71 and 72: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 73 and 74: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 75 and 76: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 77 and 78: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 79 and 80: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 81 and 82: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 83 and 84: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 85 and 86: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 87 and 88: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 89 and 90: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 91 and 92: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 93 and 94: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 95 and 96: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 97 and 98: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 99 and 100: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 101 and 102: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 103 and 104: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 105 and 106: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 107 and 108: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 109 and 110: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 111 and 112: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 113 and 114: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 115: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip Ab
- Page 119 and 120: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 121 and 122: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 123 and 124: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 125 and 126: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 127 and 128: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 129 and 130: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 131 and 132: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 133 and 134: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 135 and 136: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 137 and 138: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 139 and 140: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 141 and 142: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 143 and 144: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 145 and 146: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 147 and 148: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 149 and 150: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 151 and 152: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 153 and 154: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 155 and 156: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee A
- Page 157 and 158: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Should
- Page 159 and 160: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - Should
- Page 161 and 162: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - System
- Page 163 and 164: Poster Topic: Arthroplasty - System
- Page 165 and 166: Poster Topic: Biomaterials Abstract
Poster<br />
Topic: Arthroplasty - Knee<br />
Abstract number: 22826<br />
POSTERIOR STABILISED IMPLANTS IN PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE<br />
REPLACEMENT<br />
Pierre-Paul CASTELEYN 1 , Dirk GANZER 2 , Hans BAYER-HELMS 3 , Robert<br />
KRAUSE 4 , Robert KRAUSE 4<br />
1<br />
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels (BELGIUM),<br />
2<br />
Dietrich-Bonhoeffer-<br />
Klinikum, Altentreptow (GERMANY),<br />
3<br />
St. Josef-krankenhaus-Hilden, Hilden<br />
(GERMANY), 4 Orthopädische Fachklinik Verein Oberlinhaus, Potsdam (GERMANY)<br />
Introduction: The purpose of this consecutive multicentre prospective case series<br />
study was to evaluate the short term clinical, functional, and radiological outcome of<br />
a posterior stabilised primary total knee arthroplasty (balanSys® PS, Mathys Ltd<br />
Bettlach, Bettlach, Switzerland). Methods: 256 (244 monolateral, n=6 bilateral)<br />
consecutive patients were treated for osteoarthritis with a posterior stabilised total<br />
knee arthroplasty in 4 centres. The follow-up consisted of clinical as well as<br />
radiological evaluations, preoperatively, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 years<br />
postoperative.Results: Follow-up information is until now available for 236 cases. The<br />
mean follow-up time was 14.9 months (range 1.3-30.3 months). Most striking with<br />
this design was the rapid recovery of the patients : - KSS, preoperative : 110, 3m<br />
:150, 6m : 170- Knee score, preoperative : 57, 3m : 86, 6m : 93-VAS pain,<br />
preoperative : 7.9, 3m : 3, 6m : 1.3- VAS satisfaction, preoperative : 3.1, 3m : 7,<br />
6m : 8 Statistical analysis used the Wilcoxon 2 sided test and the Chi-square-test.<br />
As major complications we had to revise two patients for instability. 12 patients<br />
showed limited mobility and 1 patient is suspected of a radiological loosening.<br />
Conclusion: This type of posterior stabilised total knee prosthesis in combination with<br />
the described surgical techniques shows promising radiological and clinical short<br />
term results, with a rapid recovery and with an acceptable rate of adverse events.<br />
117