30.01.2013 Views

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

Abstracts Posters SICOT-SOF meeting Gothenburg 2010 _2_

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster<br />

Topic: Arthroplasty - Hip<br />

Abstract number: 26473<br />

ASSESSMENT OF LOW RESOLUTION DIGITAL DETECTORS FOR<br />

RADIOSTEREOMETRY<br />

Martin DOWNING 1 , George ASHCROFT 2<br />

1 Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Aberdeen (UNITED KINGDOM),<br />

2 Aberdeen University, Aberdeen (UNITED KINGDOM)<br />

Radiostereometry (RSA) is an important method for assessing migration and<br />

inducible movement of orthopaedic implants. Direct digital imaging offers potential<br />

enhancements; however suitable detector choice remains problematic due primarily<br />

to either large size or low resolution. A compact detector of similar proportions to hip<br />

film cassettes is available; however its resolution is only 160 dpi, which is below that<br />

recommended for RSA. We investigated whether with improved marker analysis<br />

methods such detectors could measure markers with sufficient precision and<br />

accuracy.A phantom was constructed with a reference grid of 1400 spherical 2mm<br />

markers arranged in a 10mm spaced grid format. Additionally 25 tantalum markers<br />

each of diameter 1.0, 0.8 and 0.5 mm were added within a 40mm square. The<br />

phantom was imaged repeatedly with a Cannon CXDI50C detector with small<br />

movements between each scan. Marker positions were measured using model<br />

based fitting, and registered to the reference grid identifying measurement<br />

error.Additionally, RSA image pairs from a hip study were reanalysed at half<br />

resolution (150dpi) and compared to the originals. With the phantom, median (max)<br />

radial error was 4 (22), 5 (29), and 4 microns for marker diameters 1.0, 0.8 and<br />

0.5mm respectively. For the 56 RSA image pairs, median (95%ile) marker deviation<br />

was 2 (9) microns, segment movement 5 (12) microns and 0.01 (0.03) degrees, and<br />

rigid body fitting mean error 8 microns.We conclude the application of 160 dpi<br />

detectors will not significantly degrade precision when applied to RSA.<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!