30.01.2013 Views

Public reports pack PDF 3 MB - Blaby District Council

Public reports pack PDF 3 MB - Blaby District Council

Public reports pack PDF 3 MB - Blaby District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Offices Desford Road Narborough Leicestershire LE19 2EP<br />

Telephone: 0116 275 0555 Fax: 0116 275 0368 Minicom: 0116 284 9786 Web: www.blaby.gov.uk<br />

This document is printed on recycled paper<br />

To Members of the Cabinet Executive<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor E. F. White (Leader) − Leader's Portfolio<br />

Date: 9 November 2012<br />

My ref: Cabinet Executive<br />

Your ref:<br />

Contact: Miss Sandeep Mander<br />

Tel no: 0116 272 7640<br />

Fax no: 0116 272 7596<br />

Email: committees@blaby.gov.uk<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor J. O. Hudson (Deputy Leader) − Finance, Efficiency & Assets Portfolio<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor D. R. Clements − Corporate Services and Performance<br />

Portfolio<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor J. A. Dickinson − Policy, Partnerships and Health<br />

Improvement Portfolio<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor F. G. H Jackson − Neighbourhood and Environmental Health<br />

Services Portfolio<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor D. Jennings − Community Services Portfolio<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor T. J. Richardson − Planning, Economic Development and<br />

Housing Strategy Portfolio<br />

Dear <strong>Council</strong>lor,<br />

A meeting of the CABINET EXECUTIVE will be held in the Brooks Room at these offices on<br />

MONDAY, 19 NOVE<strong>MB</strong>ER 2012 at 4.30 p.m. for the transaction of the following business<br />

and your attendance is requested.<br />

Yours faithfully<br />

Colin Jones<br />

Corporate Services Group Manager<br />

1. Apologies for Absence<br />

AGENDA<br />

2. Disclosure of Interests from Members<br />

To receive disclosures of interests from Members (i.e. the existence and the nature<br />

of those interests in respect of items on this agenda).


3. Minutes (Pages 1 - 8)<br />

To approve and sign the minutes of the meeting held on 17 September 2012<br />

(enclosed).<br />

4. <strong>Public</strong> Speaking Protocol<br />

Requests received by the Protocol deadline to be reported by the Interim Democratic<br />

Services & Governance Manager with details of the Agenda Item to which they<br />

relate. (Such persons entitled to use the Protocol attend for the purpose of making<br />

representations, answering questions or giving evidence relating to the business of<br />

the meeting and the time allocated to each person is a maximum of three minutes<br />

unless extended at the discretion of the Chairman).<br />

5. Cabinet Executive Response to Scrutiny Recommendations: Car Parking Charges<br />

Review (Pages 9 - 14)<br />

To consider the report of the Regulatory & Neighbourhood Services Portfolio Holder<br />

(enclosed).<br />

6. Cabinet Executive Response to Scrutiny Recommendations - Distribution of<br />

Community Grants and Participatory Budget Review (Pages 15 - 24)<br />

To consider the report of the Shared Head of Policy, Performance & Partnerships<br />

(enclosed).<br />

7. Scrutiny Report into 16-17 year old Homelessness (Pages 25 - 86)<br />

To consider the report of the Scrutiny Commission (enclosed).<br />

8. Quarter 2 Portfolio Performance Report 2012-13 (Pages 87 - 114)<br />

To consider the report of the Shared Head of Policy, Performance & Partnerships.<br />

9. Establishment Budget 2012/13 and 2013/14 (Pages 115 - 126)<br />

To consider the report of the Director and the Financial Services Group Manager<br />

(enclosed).<br />

10. Treasury Management Strategy - Change of Direction (Pages 127 - 134)<br />

To consider the report of the Deputy Chief Executive (enclosed).<br />

11. Half Year Budget Review and Budget Issues 2012/13 (Pages 135 - 146)<br />

To consider the report of the Deputy Chief Executive (enclosed).<br />

12. Revised Capital Programme 2012/13 (Pages 147 - 158)<br />

To consider the report of the Financial Services Group Manager (enclosed).<br />

13. Corporate Plan Refresh (Pages 159 - 166)<br />

To consider the report of the Chief Executive (enclosed).<br />

14. Neighbourhood Planning: Management, Support and Protocol Arrangements (Pages<br />

167 - 176)<br />

To consider the report of the Interim Group Manager, Planning, Housing Strategy<br />

and Economic Development (enclosed).


15. Broadband Roll Out for the <strong>District</strong> (Pages 177 - 182)<br />

To consider a report from the Corporate Services Group Manager (enclosed).<br />

16. Amendment to Lease of Land to Narborough Parish <strong>Council</strong> (Pages 183 - 188)<br />

To consider the report of the Financial Services Group Manager (enclosed).<br />

17. Climate Local (Pages 189 - 194)<br />

To consider the report of the Regulatory and Leisure Services Group Manager<br />

(enclosed).<br />

18. Green Space Strategy (Pages 195 - 208)<br />

To consider the report of the Health and Recreation Manager (enclosed).<br />

19. Update on Pavilion Capital Expenditure (Pages 209 - 218)<br />

To consider the report of the Regulatory and Leisure Services Group Manager<br />

(enclosed).<br />

20. Strategy for Supporting Vulnerable People 2012-2014 (Pages 219 - 238)<br />

To consider the report of the Community Services Manager (enclosed)


This page is intentionally left blank


110<br />

CABINET EXECUTIVE<br />

Minutes of a meeting held at the <strong>Council</strong> Offices, Narborough<br />

MONDAY, 17 SEPTE<strong>MB</strong>ER 2012<br />

Present:<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor E. F. White (Leader's Portfolio) (Leader)<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor J. O. Hudson (Finance, Efficiency & Assets Portfolio) (Deputy Leader)<br />

Cllr. D .R. Clements - Corporate Services, Performance & Leisure<br />

Portfolio<br />

Cllr. F.G.H. Jackson - Neighbourhood & Environmental Health<br />

Services Portfolio<br />

Cllr. T. J. Richardson - Planning, Economic Development & Housing<br />

Strategy Portfolio<br />

Also in attendance:<br />

Cllr. W. Wright – Vice-Chairman, Scrutiny Commission<br />

Cllr. A.V. Greenwood – Scrutiny Commissioner<br />

Also in attendance as Observers:<br />

Cllr. L. M. Breckon<br />

Officers present:-<br />

Mr S. Beard - Director<br />

Mrs. J. Toman - Director<br />

Mr. C. Jones - Corporate Services Group Manager<br />

Mrs S. Pennelli - Financial Services Group Manager<br />

Ms. Q. Quinney - Community Services Group Manager<br />

Ms A. Hillier - Environmental Health Manager<br />

Mr I. Jones - Housing Strategy and Policy Manager<br />

Mrs L. Bendall - Interim Democratic Services & Governance<br />

Manager<br />

Mrs. L. McBean - Scrutiny Manager<br />

Miss S. Mander - Democratic Services Officer<br />

Apologies:<br />

Cllr. J. A. Dickinson and Cllr. D. Jennings<br />

Cabinet Executive - Monday, 17 September 2012<br />

Page 1<br />

Agenda Item 3


127. WELCOME TO COUNCILLOR TERRY RICHARDSON<br />

111<br />

Cllr. E.F. White welcomed Cllr. T. Richardson as a new Member of the<br />

Cabinet Executive and as Portfolio Holder of Planning, Economic<br />

Development and Housing Strategy.<br />

128. DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS FROM ME<strong>MB</strong>ERS<br />

No disclosures were received.<br />

129. MINUTES<br />

The minutes of the meeting held on 30 July 2012, as circulated, were<br />

approved and signed as a correct record.<br />

130. PUBLIC SPEAKING PROTOCOL<br />

No requests were received.<br />

131. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SCRUTINY COMMISSION: CABINET<br />

RESPONSE TO CAR PARKING CHARGES REVIEW<br />

Considered – Report of the Scrutiny Commission (presented by Cllr. W.<br />

Wright, Vice-Chairman – Scrutiny Commission).<br />

Other Options Considered – None.<br />

Cabinet Executive - Monday, 17 September 2012<br />

DECISION<br />

That Cabinet Executive will respond to the Scrutiny Commission in relation to<br />

implementation of Car Park Charges report recommendation 3 - that<br />

assurance is given for no further increases will be applied for at least two<br />

years from the date of the current increase effective from 1 April 2012.<br />

Reason:<br />

The Local Government and <strong>Public</strong> Involvement in Health Act 2007 places a<br />

duty on Scrutiny to require the Cabinet Executive to consider their <strong>reports</strong><br />

and Cabinet Executive providing a response.<br />

Page 2


132. NEW HOMES BONUS UPDATE<br />

112<br />

Considered – Report of the Deputy Chief Executive and Housing Strategy &<br />

Policy Manager.<br />

Other Options Considered – As advised in the New Homes Bonus (NHB)<br />

Policy Framework the <strong>Council</strong> intends to remain agile and opportunistic in the<br />

utilisation of NHB going forwards and will continue to report progress to<br />

Cabinet Executive.<br />

Cabinet Executive - Monday, 17 September 2012<br />

DECISION<br />

That the actions taken to date in respect of the utilisation of New Homes<br />

Bonus for 2012/13, in accordance with the agreed policy, be approved.<br />

Reason:<br />

As part of the New Homes Bonus Policy Framework approved by <strong>Council</strong> in<br />

December 2011 it was agreed that a report to Cabinet Executive would be<br />

produced in respect of each quarter’s activities detailing how the yearly<br />

allocation of NHB has being utilised to meet the priorities agreed.<br />

133. BUDGET MONITORING<br />

Considered – Report of the Financial Services Group Manager.<br />

Other Options Considered – To not monitor the budgets. This would not<br />

support the <strong>Council</strong>’s requirement to review and take appropriate action to<br />

deliver services within available budget.<br />

DECISION<br />

That the report of the Financial Services Group Manager be accepted.<br />

Reason:<br />

To enable the Cabinet Executive to monitor the budget performance in<br />

relation to key areas of income and expenditure as the financial year<br />

progresses.<br />

Page 3


134. COUNTESTHORPE COUNTRY PARK<br />

113<br />

Considered – Report of the Regulatory & Leisure Services Group Manager<br />

and Financial Services Group Manager.<br />

Other Options Considered – Sell the land to the Parish <strong>Council</strong>. A lease<br />

ensures the <strong>Council</strong> can retain ownership of this important open space while<br />

still ensuring a long term commitment to support and work in partnership with<br />

the Parish <strong>Council</strong>. It is recognised that the Parish <strong>Council</strong> are best placed to<br />

ensure community needs are met and delivered. For these reasons this<br />

option is disregarded.<br />

Cabinet Executive - Monday, 17 September 2012<br />

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL<br />

That the lease of the public open space (known as Countesthorpe Country<br />

Park) to Countesthorpe Parish <strong>Council</strong> be approved, subject to the transfer of<br />

ownership to the <strong>Council</strong> and that delegated authority be given to the<br />

Financial Services Group Manager in consultation with the Portfolio Holders<br />

to agree terms and conclude the legal arrangements.<br />

Reason:<br />

The land is considered of strategic value forming a natural border to the built<br />

edge of Countesthorpe with <strong>Blaby</strong>. It also affords wider and strategically<br />

important green infrastructure links, provides opportunities for formal and<br />

informal sport and recreation, children’s play, nature conservation and<br />

improving health and well being. As such this will be an integral part of the<br />

community and leasing to the Parish will ensure a coordinated approach is<br />

taken to develop, enhance and maintain this facility. This approach is<br />

consistent with the recommendations in the draft Green Space Strategy.<br />

135. GRAFFITI AND FLY-POSTING POLICY<br />

Considered – Report of the Environmental Health Manager.<br />

Other Options Considered – The decision not to update was disregarded as<br />

the Policy needs to reflect current Government guidance and <strong>Council</strong><br />

priorities and ambitions.<br />

DECISION<br />

To approve the Graffiti and Fly Posting Policy attached at Appendix 1 to the<br />

report of the Environmental Health Manager.<br />

Reason:<br />

The <strong>Council</strong>’s Graffiti and Fly Posting policy has been revised and updated to<br />

reflect the latest Government Guidance and current best practice.<br />

Page 4


136. AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROPOSALS FOR BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

GARAGE SITES<br />

114<br />

Considered – Report of the Housing Strategy & Policy Manager.<br />

Other Options Considered –<br />

a) selling all of the garage sites for private development and using the<br />

proceeds to support affordable housing elsewhere in the <strong>District</strong><br />

b) not selling the sites which would leave the <strong>Council</strong> with the responsibility<br />

for maintenance issues and any health and safety matters which may<br />

arise as a result of the deteriorating condition of the sites.<br />

Cabinet Executive - Monday, 17 September 2012<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL<br />

1. To approve plans to dispose of 7 <strong>Council</strong> owned garage sites at nil value<br />

to East Midlands Housing Association for the purpose of developing 18<br />

affordable housing units.<br />

2. To approve the release of the remaining 5 <strong>Council</strong> owned sites for sale.<br />

Reasons:<br />

1. Development of affordable housing complies with the local ambitions and<br />

the objectives of the <strong>District</strong>’s Community Plan (Sustainable Community<br />

Strategy) 2011-2014 and the <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Corporate Plan 2011-<br />

2014<br />

2. In management terms the 12 retained sites listed in the report have<br />

increased in liability for the <strong>Council</strong> from a Health and Safety perspective.<br />

Page 5


137. REVIEW OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACES<br />

115<br />

Considered – Report of the Community Services Group Manager.<br />

Other Options Considered –<br />

• No change to current ways of working<br />

This option is rejected as change is required to make the<br />

required savings and to improve ways of working.<br />

• Delete alternative Green Space post<br />

This option is rejected as the other posts involved in green<br />

space management deliver other <strong>Council</strong> services and this<br />

would have a wider impact on the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

• Reduced hours for the Countryside Officer Post<br />

This option is rejected as it would not deliver the same level of<br />

savings and has less resilience than the preferred option.<br />

• Consider a different provider<br />

This option is rejected as the <strong>Council</strong> already works in<br />

partnership with Stepping Stones and they can provide the<br />

specialist services required.<br />

Cabinet Executive - Monday, 17 September 2012<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL<br />

1. That the restructuring of the management of the parks and open spaces<br />

be approved.<br />

2. That the Director be given delegated authority to take any consequential<br />

action resulting from the implementation of the report.<br />

Reason:<br />

1. The proposed changes will deliver a fit for purpose management of parks<br />

and open spaces and reflect the current business needs.<br />

2. It is appropriate to give the Director delegated authority in the<br />

circumstances specified.<br />

Page 6


138. EXEMPT PARAGRAPH<br />

116<br />

Considered – A proposed resolution to exclude members of the public and<br />

press from the meeting for the forthcoming item.<br />

Resolved:<br />

“That under Section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act, 1972, the public<br />

be excluded from the meeting for the following item on the grounds that the<br />

item involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in<br />

paragraphs 1 and 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the said Act.<br />

Exemption Categories: 1 and 3.<br />

Reason for Exemption: the report contains personal and financial<br />

information about individual members of staff.<br />

<strong>Public</strong> Interest Test: The public interest test has been considered and, in all<br />

the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the<br />

exemption is considered to outweigh the public interest in disclosing the<br />

information.”<br />

139. REVIEW OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACES (EXEMPT)<br />

Considered – Report of the Community Services Group Manager.<br />

Other Options Considered – none.<br />

Cabinet Executive - Monday, 17 September 2012<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL<br />

1. That the redundancy and associated costs of post number 015322 be<br />

approved.<br />

2. That the Director be granted delegated authority to implement the<br />

recommendation 1 (above) and take necessary consequential action.<br />

Reason:<br />

The proposed changes will deliver a fit for purpose management of parks<br />

and open spaces and reflect the current business needs.<br />

THE MEETING CONCLUDED AT 5.05 P.M.<br />

Page 7


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 8


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 November 2012<br />

Subject: Cabinet Executive Response to Scrutiny<br />

Recommendations: Car Parking Charges Review<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Portfolio Holder:<br />

• Jon Wells<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

• Group Manager, Regulatory and Leisure Services<br />

• <strong>Council</strong> Offices<br />

• 0116 2727545<br />

Cllr. Guy Jackson, Portfolio Holder for<br />

Neighbourhood and Environmental Services<br />

1.1 To consider Cabinet Executive’s response to Scrutiny Commission’s further<br />

recommendations following work undertaken on the implementation of car<br />

park charges.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

Recommendation<br />

That Cabinet Executive approves the responses to the Scrutiny Monitoring<br />

Report recommendation 3 on the implementation of Car Park Charges as<br />

detailed in Appendix 1.<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

The recommendation takes into account the aims and objectives of the<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s Car Parking Strategy.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

4.1 Yes<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Yes<br />

Page 9<br />

Agenda Item 5


6. Matters for Consideration<br />

6.1 Cabinet Executive responded to the Scrutiny Commission recommendations<br />

of 17 April 2012 at their meeting on 30 July 2012 (minute 100 refers). All but<br />

one of the four recommendations was agreed. Recommendation three which<br />

requested that assurance is given that no further increases will be applied for<br />

at least two years from the date of the current increase effective from 1 April<br />

2012 was however refused. Scrutiny then presented a further report to<br />

Cabinet on 17 September 2012 (minute 131) requesting that Cabinet reconsider<br />

this decision.<br />

6.2 In accordance with the provisions of The Local Government and <strong>Public</strong><br />

Involvement in Health Act 2007, the Cabinet Executive is required within 2<br />

months of receipt of the Scrutiny report/recommendations:<br />

• To consider it;<br />

• To respond by identifying the action proposed in the light of it;<br />

• To publish its response; and<br />

• If Scrutiny has copied the report to a member, the response to be provided<br />

to the member.<br />

6.3 The key document that guides the way the <strong>Council</strong> delivers car parks is the<br />

Car Parking Strategy. This has 5 strategic aims:<br />

• Provide a range of good quality public car parking facilities which meet the<br />

needs of the whole community.<br />

• Recognise the different characteristics of the main population centres of<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> and liaise with key partners (business, local councils, access<br />

groups etc) in providing car-parking services appropriate to local<br />

circumstances.<br />

• Seek to support the vitality of population centres and local businesses<br />

through the provision and management of appropriate car parking, while<br />

recognising that car parking provision can be an important tool to help<br />

manage traffic in urban areas.<br />

• Reduce burden on the taxpayer and shift the cost of car parking provision<br />

towards the service users and manage the <strong>Council</strong>’s car parking assets in<br />

a cost effective manner.<br />

• Develop effective communication with customers in order to promote the<br />

service and to gather information to inform the development of the service.<br />

6.4 It is clear that the concern of Scrutiny underlying the recommendation is the<br />

economic viability of <strong>Blaby</strong> town centre, although this was perhaps not best<br />

expressed in the wording of the recommendation. This accords with<br />

Objective 3 within the strategy which states;<br />

Objective 3 – Maintain a charging structure that maximises the use of<br />

existing car parks, whilst managing a balance between economic,<br />

environmental and traffic management objectives.<br />

Activities<br />

a) Agree and keep under review a structured charging policy for <strong>Council</strong><br />

public car parks.<br />

6.5 The scale of the budget challenges facing this <strong>Council</strong> over the next few years<br />

are such that it would be wholly inappropriate for the Cabinet to close down<br />

Page 10


any options available to it at this time and hence the recommendation as it<br />

stands can not be accepted.<br />

6.6 It is however accepted that it would be appropriate to review the impact of the<br />

current charging scheme implemented on 1 April 2012. It is important that the<br />

<strong>Council</strong> remains alert and responsive to the rapidly changing economic<br />

environment in order to ensure a vibrant and healthy <strong>District</strong>. Therefore a<br />

review will be carried out and the findings considered in consultation with the<br />

business community.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

7.1 Human Rights Act 1998<br />

Human rights have been considered but there are no overarching matters for<br />

concern in relation to this report.<br />

7.2 Legal Implications<br />

There are no legal implications.<br />

7.3 Human Resources Implications<br />

There are no human resources implications.<br />

7.4 Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

There are no risk, business continuity or resilience issues.<br />

7.5 Equalities<br />

No EINA is required for this report.<br />

7.6 Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

No climate risks are envisaged.<br />

7.7 Crime & Disorder<br />

The proposals present no crime and disorder risk.<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

8.1 None<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

9.1 None specifically for the Report.<br />

10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

10.1 None specifically for the Report.<br />

Page 11


11. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

11.1 Appendix 1 - Cabinet Executive response to the Implementation of Car Park<br />

Charges<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

12.1 Cabinet Executive 17 September 2012<br />

12.2 Cabinet Executive 30 July 2012<br />

12.3 Scrutiny Car Park Charges Report published in April 2012<br />

12.4 <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Car Parking Strategy 2009<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted:<br />

(insert � below to show relevant consultation has taken place)<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Corporate Services Group Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 12


Appendix 1<br />

BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Post Scrutiny – Cabinet Executive Response Form: Implementation of Car Parking Charges - Scrutiny Monitoring Review<br />

Date submitted to Cabinet: 17 September 2012<br />

Cabinet Member responsible for compliance with notice of requirement: Cllr Guy Jackson<br />

Page 13<br />

Recommendation Agreed<br />

R3.<br />

That assurance is given that no further<br />

increases will be applied for at least two<br />

years from the date of the current<br />

increase effective from 1 April 2012.<br />

YES/NO<br />

Cabinet Response including proposed action Responsible<br />

Officer<br />

No Cabinet is unable to give such an assurance<br />

at this time given the financial challenges it<br />

faces. However the charging structure will<br />

be examined in accordance with the Strategy<br />

moving forward.<br />

Regulatory<br />

and Leisure<br />

Services<br />

Group<br />

Manager<br />

Action by<br />

date<br />

Ongoing


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 14


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 th November 2012<br />

Subject: Cabinet Executive Response to Scrutiny<br />

Recommendations - Distribution of Community<br />

Grants and Participatory Budgets Scrutiny<br />

Review<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Portfolio<br />

Holder:<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

• Ann Marie Hawkins<br />

• Shared Head of Policy, Partnership and<br />

Performance<br />

• Policy, Partnership and Performance<br />

• 0116 272 7566<br />

Cllr Jackie Dickinson - Policy, Partnerships &<br />

Health Improvement<br />

1.1 To consider Cabinet Executive response to Scrutiny Commission<br />

following the review of the distribution of Community Grants and part<br />

budgets.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

Recommendation<br />

That the Cabinet Executive approves the responses that have been<br />

compiled in light of the recommendations from the Scrutiny Commission.<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

The recommendations take into account the aims and objectives of<br />

Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> Participatory Budget process, and<br />

Community Action Partnerships Grants Panel.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

4.1 Yes.<br />

Page 15<br />

Agenda Item 6


5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 No.<br />

6. Matters for Consideration<br />

6.1 The Scrutiny commission formally approved its recommendations at<br />

their meeting on the 11 April 2012.<br />

6.2 In accordance with the provisions of The Local Government and <strong>Public</strong><br />

Involvement in Health Act 2007, the Cabinet Executive is required<br />

within 1 months of receipt of the Scrutiny report/recommendations:<br />

To consider it:<br />

To respond by identifying the action proposed in the light of it;<br />

To publish its response; and<br />

If Scrutiny has copied the report to a member, the response to be<br />

provided to the member.<br />

6.3 Appendix 1 to this report is a template containing the four<br />

recommendations of the Scrutiny commission. For each<br />

recommendation there is a proposed Cabinet Executive response,<br />

including proposed action and the <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Officer<br />

responsible for the action.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

Human Rights Act 1998<br />

Human rights have been considered but there are no overarching<br />

matters for concern in relation to this report.<br />

Legal Implications<br />

There are no specific legal implications.<br />

Human Resources Implications<br />

There are no human resources implications<br />

Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

There are no risks, business continuity or resilience issues associated<br />

with this report.<br />

Equalities<br />

The County <strong>Council</strong> conducted an Equalities Impact Assessment on<br />

the Participatory Budget process. The Community Grants are available<br />

Page 16


across <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to all Community Groups and Parishes.<br />

Community Action Partnership administer the grants on behalf of <strong>Blaby</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and are proactively publicising the grants to encourage<br />

applications from hard to reach and more with protected characteristic<br />

in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

There are no specific climate change implications.<br />

Crime & Disorder<br />

There are no specific crime and disorder implications.<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

None.<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

9.1 The following external partners were consulted when formulating this<br />

response:<br />

Community Action Partnership<br />

Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong><br />

10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

There are no specification financial implication.<br />

11. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> Chief Executives EIA improvement plan<br />

monitoring 2012/13.<br />

Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> Equality Impact Assessment Report.<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

None.<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted:<br />

Derk Van Der Wardt (Team Leader Communities and Places)<br />

Darren Walker (Community Action Partnership)<br />

Jackie Dickinson (Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder)<br />

Page 17


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 18


Page 19<br />

BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL APPENDIX 1<br />

Post Scrutiny Cabinet Executive Response Form: Distribution of Community Grants and Participatory Budgets Scrutiny<br />

Review<br />

Date submitted to Cabinet: 30 July 2012<br />

Cabinet Member responsible for compliance with the notice of requirement: Cllr Jackie Dickinson<br />

R1<br />

Recommendation Agreed<br />

That a copy of this report and a letter<br />

highlighting the working group’s conclusion<br />

that there is no geographic bias in the<br />

distribution of <strong>Blaby</strong>’s community grants<br />

should be sent to Braunstone Town and<br />

copied to all parish councils for information.<br />

YES/NO/IN<br />

PART<br />

Yes<br />

Cabinet Response including proposed action Responsible<br />

Officer<br />

For completeness scrutiny will distribute the<br />

report to Braunstone Town and Parishes with<br />

Cabinet Executive’s response once received.<br />

Scrutiny<br />

Manager<br />

Action by<br />

date<br />

Nov 2012<br />

Nov


Page 20<br />

R2 That membership of the ‘awarding panel’ for<br />

the allocation of <strong>Blaby</strong>’s Community Grant<br />

should be widened to include greater political<br />

representation when distributing this public<br />

money. Thought should also be given to<br />

including some public representation on the<br />

panel.<br />

R3 Community Action Partnerships (CAP) should<br />

continue their proactive approach to<br />

supporting applications and in particular<br />

undertake an education exercise with<br />

community bodies in the North Forum area to<br />

ensure they understand the opportunities<br />

available.<br />

Partial As Scrutiny acknowledges the portfolio holder<br />

sits on the awarding panel as do<br />

representatives from the Police, Finance<br />

Officer from CAP, Sports Association, Health,<br />

HOPPP from <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and the<br />

process is facilitated by two officers from CAP.<br />

It is felt that the current panel consists of more<br />

panellists than previously and is more<br />

representative. It is considered that adding<br />

more political representation to the panel<br />

would not necessarily add value to the<br />

process, as the process is not a political one.<br />

The recommendation for a member of the<br />

public to attend is well received. The Executive<br />

welcome greater political input into the grants<br />

panel process, however, it is considered that<br />

the most efficient and effective vehicle for this<br />

should be via the Portfolio Holder or Officers.<br />

Yes<br />

The Parish Liaison Meetings and Newsletter<br />

will be used to promote the grants and<br />

participatory budget schemes. Previous work<br />

with Braunstone Town Civic Centre indicated a<br />

significant increase in applications when<br />

supported by the Town <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

HOPPP Dec 2012


Page 21<br />

R4 Because of the low attendance figures from<br />

members of the public and community bodies<br />

at the Forum (particularly at the North and<br />

Central forums) CAP should look for other<br />

ways to ensure opportunities to participate in<br />

the community grants are promoted more<br />

effectively.<br />

Yes<br />

Community Action Partnership advise us that<br />

they use all avenues of social media, Parish<br />

<strong>Public</strong>ations, Libraries, Village Halls, Mercury<br />

and Newsletters. CAP attend the Community<br />

Forums and provide information about their<br />

grants, they also provide this information to the<br />

unsuccessful projects and state that it is<br />

difficult to establish what other methods could<br />

be adopted. Officers of BDC will support them<br />

in seeing how this can be improved.<br />

HOPPP Dec 2012


Page 22<br />

R5 Cabinet should make representations to<br />

Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> that they<br />

actively consider distribution of the<br />

participatory budgets through CAP to be run<br />

alongside <strong>Blaby</strong>’s Community Grant<br />

Programme – rather then the Community<br />

Forums.<br />

The <strong>Blaby</strong> scheme through CAP is successful,<br />

effectively engages with all parishes, has a fair<br />

assessment programme, provides sign posting<br />

to a range of funding routes and is monitored.<br />

This could achieve better value for money for<br />

County (and tax payers) and potentially offer<br />

better engagement.<br />

No<br />

Communication has taken place between<br />

Officers of BDC & LCC and Officers from<br />

Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> have advised<br />

that they agree that there are benefits to be<br />

made by better aligning the Grant programme<br />

process and Participatory Budget process to<br />

ensure that unsuccessful bids from both<br />

processes have another opportunity to seek<br />

funding. Officers from <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong>,<br />

County <strong>Council</strong> and Community Action<br />

Partnership are working to address this.<br />

Officers from <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> will work with<br />

County <strong>Council</strong> Officers to increase publicity<br />

and awareness of the Participatory Budget<br />

event through Contact and local council<br />

newsletters in order to encourage wider public<br />

awareness.<br />

Officers from <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> meet with<br />

Officers from County <strong>Council</strong> to discuss the<br />

distribution of Participatory Budgets through<br />

CAP. Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong><br />

Community state that Forum Budgets are a<br />

countywide participatory grants programme in<br />

which residents make the decisions, not a<br />

panel of <strong>Council</strong>lors and Officers. LCC state<br />

that feedback from participants demonstrates<br />

they are highly satisfied with the process and<br />

feel it is run effectively and professionally.<br />

The County <strong>Council</strong> already runs a number of<br />

successful community grants programmes that<br />

involve a grants panel and wishes to continue<br />

distributing the Community Forum Budget<br />

funding earmarked for <strong>Blaby</strong> district via a<br />

participatory approach.<br />

O


Page 23<br />

R6 Cabinet should consider whether services run<br />

directly by <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> should be<br />

advised not to compete in the participatory<br />

budget process – this reflects the public<br />

concerns at their involvement in the process.<br />

R7 While not within the terms of this review,<br />

Commission is asked to urge Cabinet to make<br />

recommendations to County that steps are<br />

taken to increase public awareness and<br />

attendance at the forum sessions. Members<br />

of the working group concluded that the<br />

current system was not working effectively in<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong>.<br />

No<br />

Yes<br />

Where eligibility criteria allows BDC to attract<br />

additional funding, officers will continue to<br />

explore all additional sources of income e.g.<br />

BB19. BDC applies for grants in order to<br />

support groups to get additional funding to<br />

meet needs delivered by non statutory<br />

services. By restricting officers from engaging<br />

in this process some of our more vulnerable<br />

residents may not receive valuable support<br />

services.<br />

BDC has and will continue to support<br />

organisations to get additional funding to<br />

support delivery of our corporate priorities.<br />

The Chief Executive has written to Assistant<br />

Chief Executive at Leicestershire County<br />

<strong>Council</strong> to raise the concerns that Members of<br />

the Working Group presented. The County<br />

<strong>Council</strong> have advised that they are actively<br />

addressing the issues raised.<br />

Sa written to County Hall<br />

CE<br />

Actioned


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 24


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 November 2012<br />

Subject: Scrutiny Report into 16-17 year old Homelessness<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

Scrutiny Commission<br />

<strong>Council</strong> offices<br />

Linda McBean<br />

0116 272 7708 or lm@blaby.gov.uk<br />

1.1 To present the findings and recommendations of Scrutiny Commission’s<br />

Community & Partners Working Group in relation to its review of 16 - 17 year<br />

old Homelessness.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

2.2<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

Recommendation<br />

That Cabinet considers the report from Scrutiny Commission in respect of<br />

its review on how 16 -17 homelessness is handled in the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

That Cabinet consider and accept the recommendations set out at<br />

paragraph 6.2 of this report and in the formal Notice of Requirements.<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

As set out in the Local Government and <strong>Public</strong> Involvement in Health Act<br />

2007, implemented on 1 April 2009, it is the duty of the Cabinet Executive<br />

to respond to Scrutiny <strong>reports</strong> and recommendations.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

4.1 Not applicable<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Not applicable<br />

6. Matters for Consideration<br />

Agenda Item 7<br />

6.1 The attached report presents the scope, findings and recommendations from<br />

Scrutiny Commission’s Community & Partners Working Group’s review into<br />

16 and 17 year old Homelessness.<br />

Page 25


6.2 Proposed recommendations<br />

R1 That Cabinet Executive consider and respond to the refreshed Protocol<br />

when approved by the Chief Housing Officer Group at the end of<br />

October 2012.<br />

R2 <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s officers work with County and <strong>District</strong> networks<br />

to improve data collection and presentation of information to provide a<br />

better picture of homelessness across the County that will assist in<br />

developing the service.<br />

R3 That Social Services Children & Young Peoples Services and the<br />

Housing Options Manager report back to Cabinet in six months and<br />

provide<br />

• Year end figures and benchmarking data<br />

• Impact of the refreshed Protocol<br />

• Assessment of the working relationship<br />

R4 With the majority of homeless accommodation being in the City,<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong>’s Health and Community Service Manager via the Chief Housing<br />

Officer Group continues on behalf of <strong>District</strong>s to identify if provision can<br />

be secured for County residents<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

8.1 None<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

9.1 None<br />

11. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

11.1 Appendix 1 Scrutiny Commission Report : 16-17 year Homelessness<br />

Review<br />

Appendix 2 Notice of Requirements<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

12.1 None<br />

Page 26


Page 27<br />

Scrutiny Commission<br />

Community & Partners Working Group<br />

16-17 year old Homelessness Review<br />

1


Page 28<br />

Contents<br />

1. Working Group Membership<br />

2. Introduction and methodology<br />

3. Initial scope and key tasks<br />

4. Evidence and findings<br />

5. Conclusions<br />

6. Recommendations<br />

7. Appendices<br />

8. Background Information<br />

2


Page 29<br />

1. Working Group<br />

The working group comprised<br />

o Cllr Bill Wright– Chair<br />

o Cllr Marian Broomhead<br />

o Cllr David Findlay<br />

o Cllr Tony Greenwood <strong>MB</strong>E<br />

o Cllr Iain Hewson<br />

o Cllr Sam Maxwell<br />

o Cllr Christine Merrill<br />

o Cllr Barbara Parkins<br />

o Cllr Alan Tanner<br />

o Cllr Bev Welsh<br />

Before being elected as Chairman of the <strong>Council</strong> in May 2012, Cllr Jill Blackwell chaired the review. Her continued contribution has<br />

been welcomed.<br />

The working group extends its formal thanks for their help and direction to:-<br />

• Quin Quinney – <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, Housing and Community Services Group Manager<br />

• Rebecca Holcroft – <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Housing Options Manager,<br />

3


Page 30<br />

• Peter Davey - Chief Executive, The Bridge, Loughborough<br />

• Jill Bharkhada - Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong>, Service Manager, Locality Social Work Children & Young People’s Services<br />

4


Page 31<br />

2. Introduction and methodology<br />

Introduction<br />

In May 2009 a Law Lords judgement considered how local authorities support<br />

homeless 16 and 17 year olds (G v Southwark). The case tested the circumstances<br />

under which local authorities should provide accommodation for this age group and the legislation that should apply.<br />

The recommendations that came out of the judgement required <strong>Council</strong>s and social services departments to develop joint working<br />

arrangements to clarify respective roles and responsibilities in their duties towards young people.<br />

A Leicestershire Wide Multi Agency Protocol to assist homeless/potentially homeless 16 and 17 year olds was developed as a<br />

result of this judgement.<br />

Scrutiny was asked by <strong>Blaby</strong>’s Housing & Community Services Group Manager to review both the protocol and the working<br />

relationship between Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong>’s Social Services and <strong>Blaby</strong> Housing Options team, as the Manager had<br />

concerns<br />

Methodology<br />

The group met on six occasions and took evidence from officers and partners including Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong>’s Children<br />

and Young Peoples Service and The Bridge, a single access service at Loughborough. Desk top research was carried out, which<br />

looked at the national and local picture and included a review of best practice in other authorities.<br />

5


Page 32<br />

3. Scope, objectives and key tasks<br />

The review’s scope focused on examining concerns in relation to youth homelessness raised by <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Housing<br />

Options Team, and specifically how the following objectives could be achieved:<br />

• Adoption of a workable protocol that would enable Social Services, young people and local authorities to understand the<br />

process for providing help and support to vulnerable, homeless 16 and 17 year olds.<br />

• Establishing good working relationships between frontline officers, with true joint working and effective information sharing<br />

• Joint commissioning of services for young people<br />

• Identifying suitable accommodation for young people who are children in need<br />

• Undertaking accurate and timely assessments that meet the guidance in the Children Act 1989.<br />

As the impact of forthcoming Welfare Reforms became known, the working group also examined<br />

• <strong>Council</strong>s readiness for increased homelessness<br />

• Funding challenges<br />

• Limited hostel access<br />

Key tasks<br />

• Visit to The Bridge, Loughborough to develop an understanding of a ‘single access point’ and to see at first hand how it<br />

operates.<br />

• Review other local authorities’ homelessness protocols to assess best practice.<br />

• Look at the difference between <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s services for homeless 16 – 17 year olds and Leicestershire County<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s Locality Social Work Children & Young People’s Services. From this, the Group wanted to identify constraints and<br />

issues experienced in dealing with this vulnerable group and how young people might ‘fall through the net’.<br />

6


Page 33<br />

7


Page 34<br />

4. Evidence and Findings<br />

Leicestershire Approach<br />

Under the Children’s Act 1989 local authorities have a primary duty to 16 -17 year olds who present as homeless. To ensure<br />

homeless 16 -17 year olds do not fall between County’s Children’s Services and <strong>Blaby</strong>’s Housing Options teams, local authorities,<br />

in the statutory guidance are advised to have a joint protocol which sets out how each department will work together.<br />

The Bridge was chosen through the Chief Housing Officers Group using Regional Innovation and Efficiency Project (REIP) funding<br />

to:<br />

• develop a joint working protocol for Leicestershire local authorities and social services<br />

• develop and roll out the Single Access Point model across Leicestershire.<br />

The Leicestershire Multi-Wide Agency Protocol for 16-17 year old homeless was presented to the Chief Housing Officers Group in<br />

November 2010 – Appendix 1<br />

The Bridge, in Loughborough, (a voluntary agency providing homelessness prevention services via service level agreement to<br />

Charnwood Borough <strong>Council</strong>) , operates what is known as a single access point for all 16-17 year olds with housing problems in<br />

Charnwood. It is a reputable project with experience in providing support to homeless 16-17 year olds.<br />

Single Access Point<br />

Single Access Point (SAP) is a specialist homelessness prevention service which works with 16-17 year olds who are having<br />

difficulties where they are living or are homeless. Its ethos is to provide effective and co-ordinated help to ensure that young<br />

people get the best possible service to help prevent them from becoming homeless in the first place. When Scrutiny started this<br />

work, The Bridge in Loughborough, funded by Charnwood Borough <strong>Council</strong>, was the only SAP in the County.<br />

8


Page 35<br />

In April 2012, a one year pilot between The Bridge, Oadby & Wigston Borough <strong>Council</strong> and County’s Children and Young Peoples<br />

Services was launched with joint funding from Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> and Oadby & Wigston Borough <strong>Council</strong>. The service<br />

is delivered from the Connexions office in Wigston.<br />

Since its launch and up to September 2012 just over 20 young people and their families have used the service with a number of<br />

those young people avoiding going into care as a result. A number of young people have been assisted to plan for future<br />

accommodation options. In terms of longer term outcomes, it is very early days and premature to give a full analysis.<br />

From October 2012 office space will no longer be available at the Connexions office in Wigston and alternative accommodation is<br />

being sought.<br />

Protocol Analysis<br />

The protocol, developed in 2010, refers to a service delivery model that simply is not in place for five of the seven Leicestershire<br />

districts. Other concerns identified by members with the protocol are:<br />

• Inadequate monitoring and evaluation mechanisms contained in the protocol (i.e. the Young Persons Accommodation Needs<br />

Group is not set up).<br />

• Dispute resolution mechanisms are not being used. There is no way to challenge the decisions that are made about young<br />

people that Social Services deem ‘ NOT’ to be children in need.<br />

Other specific issues that were identified through the review:<br />

• Failure of Social Services to inform Housing Options of the outcomes of assessments<br />

• Failure to follow statutory guidance on completing assessments<br />

• Difficulties in getting Social Services to confirm the level of help a young person has received.<br />

9


Page 36<br />

• Difficulties in communicating with individual front line officers<br />

• The Housing Options Team and Social Services staff were clearly confused as to ‘each others’ duties and information is not<br />

being shared<br />

• Recommendations arising from the assessment process for Children’s & Young people’s services are not being carried out.<br />

Speaking to best practice authorities the view was that there are tensions between social services and housing teams across all<br />

local authorities. Analysis of 16-17 year old homelessness protocols, attached at appendix 2, shows commonality in the issues<br />

being presented for example:-<br />

• Monitoring arrangements<br />

• Common assessment process<br />

• Pathways<br />

Protocol Development:<br />

Feedback from the Chief Housing Officer Group identified 16-17 year old homelessness as a priority for district housing groups.<br />

A new protocol for <strong>District</strong>s in Leicestershire who do not use or have a Single Access Point is being developed by the<br />

Homelessness Delivery Group to make it more <strong>District</strong> relevant and useable (this is due to be signed off by the Chief Housing<br />

Officers Group at the end of October 2012).<br />

Work is also underway to refresh the existing protocol produced by The Bridge, for Charnwood Borough <strong>Council</strong> and this will<br />

incorporate feedback from the Oadby & Wigston Borough <strong>Council</strong> pilot.<br />

Homelessness in <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

10


Page 37<br />

Specific issues that were a cause of frustration for the Housing Options Team included:<br />

• “The protocol that has been developed refers to a service delivery model that is not in place. The Single Access Point (SAP)<br />

only exists in Charnwood. Therefore, the current protocol is undeliverable for Local Authorities in its current format.<br />

• Specific problems that have occurred:<br />

o Failure of Social Services to inform Housing Options of the outcomes of assessments<br />

o Failure to follow statutory guidance on completing assessments<br />

o Difficulties in getting Social Services to confirm the level of help a young person has received.<br />

o Difficulties in communicating with individual front line officers<br />

11


Page 38<br />

Prevention and Demand at <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

Each young person who approaches <strong>Blaby</strong> for help with housing presents a unique set of challenges which are resource intensive<br />

to meet. Failure to meet these challenges has the potential for a wide reaching impact for the young person and for the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong>’s Housing Option Team of five staff are proactive and the following practices and principles guide their work. In short they:<br />

• never turn anyone away.<br />

• now work from the <strong>Blaby</strong> Service Shop as well as the <strong>Council</strong> offices<br />

• work closely with landlords on Private Sector promotion<br />

• use Stonham to support homelessness placement. (Stonham has recently come to the end of its funding and can no longer<br />

take on new host households in the County. Existing hosts will still be used, if suitable for the young person’s needs, but<br />

availability is patchy).<br />

• provide all 16 and 17 year olds, at risk of homelessness, with a comprehensive service which is focused on enabling the<br />

young person to remain at, or return home, where appropriate. Where this is not appropriate services arranges suitable<br />

accommodation and/or access to statutory services.<br />

• Foster or Care Home option is unlikely to be used for 16-17 year olds, typically, supported lodging providers are used. The<br />

majority of homeless resource is in the City and <strong>Blaby</strong>’s Health & Community Services Group Manager, on behalf of the<br />

<strong>District</strong>s is liaising with the City to see if any provision can be secured for county residents.<br />

The issues that hamper their effectiveness in the support they provide to young people include:<br />

• Lack of suitable temporary accommodation – there is no specific supported accommodation in the County, low availability at<br />

generic supported accommodation projects. (Bed & Breakfast accommodation is avoided wherever possible. The difficulty<br />

12


Page 39<br />

is making sure the location for supported lodgings doesn’t impact on getting to college, work, routines etc. Kennedy House<br />

Hostel is located in Wigston and takes referrals across south Leicestershire).<br />

• Lack of access to support – most young people lack basic independent life skills and require support to achieve successful<br />

independence. Most young people who lose their family accommodation do so because of serious behaviour issues<br />

including drug and alcohol misuse, domestic violence, abuse and offending or anti-social behaviour. Without being<br />

assessed as being a child in need, there is limited availability of support to address these needs.<br />

• Legal matters – under 18’s are often not able to hold a tenancy for themselves. Most require a guarantor and private<br />

tenancies are almost unheard of for this group.<br />

• Lack of access to benefits, education and work advice.<br />

• High rates of lost contact or tenancy failure<br />

13


Page 40<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

APR<br />

Chart 1<br />

MAY<br />

JUN<br />

JULY<br />

C1 - Housing Options Demand 2012/13<br />

AUG<br />

SEPT<br />

OCT<br />

NOV<br />

DEC<br />

JAN<br />

FEB<br />

MAR<br />

Prevention cases<br />

Housing Applications<br />

Face 2 Face contact<br />

- <strong>Council</strong> offices<br />

Face 2 Face contact<br />

- BJSS<br />

Other<br />

Homeless Cases<br />

14


Page 41<br />

16 -17 year old Homelessness<br />

As at 22 August 2012, the second quarter of this financial year (July-Sept 2012 ) there were three 16 and 17year old homelessness<br />

cases.<br />

Between January and August 2012, eleven 16-17 year olds approached <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for advice; six were referred on to<br />

Social Services for assessment. Of those six, four cases had been resolved before assessment, while contact continued for two<br />

cases as they had not been assessed as a child in need. For the remaining five of the eleven cases no help was required after the<br />

initial contact. Members were reassured cases are not double counted.<br />

Rather than an absence of a homelessness problem in <strong>Blaby</strong>, the low numbers reported reflects the Housing Options Team<br />

strength in resolving housing problems before they amount to homelessness.<br />

This is shown in benchmarking data against other Leicestershire districts from quarterly PE1 returns to the Department of<br />

Communities and Local Government - chart 2<br />

15


Page 42<br />

170<br />

160<br />

150<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Chart 2<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong><br />

Charnwood<br />

2012 Successful Preventions<br />

Data Source: PE1 Quarterly DCLG return<br />

Harborough<br />

Hinckley & Bosworth<br />

Melton<br />

NW Leics<br />

Oadby & Wigston<br />

Rutland<br />

Qtr 1<br />

Qtr 2<br />

Qtr3<br />

16


Page 43<br />

Prevention and demand<br />

Demand levels can be seasonal and have been fairly stable over the past three years. Affordability, sofa surfing and non violent<br />

relationship breakdown remain the main reasons for homelessness.<br />

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation 2008 - Youth Homelessness in the UK report highlights the main trigger for youth homelessness<br />

is the breakdown of family relationships, often compounded by problems at school, overcrowding at home, mental health problems,<br />

substance abuse and crime and is evidenced in chart 3<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Affordability -<br />

O/occ<br />

Affordability -<br />

PRS<br />

Arrears - RSL<br />

Reasons for Approach trend<br />

NTQ -<br />

Friends/relatives<br />

NTQ - Parents<br />

NTQ - Section<br />

21<br />

Relationship<br />

Breakdown -<br />

Non-Violent<br />

Relationship<br />

Breakdown -<br />

Violent<br />

2011/12<br />

2012/13<br />

Chart 3<br />

17


Page 44<br />

Prevention demand was low in August partly due to school holidays but increases again in September. Contacts made through<br />

the <strong>Blaby</strong> Service Shop has increased accounting for a third of face to face contact - chart 4<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Chart 4<br />

C 2 - Prevention Outcomes Comparison<br />

Jan-March Apr-June Jul - Sep Oct-Dec<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

18


Page 45<br />

Data and information gathering<br />

Internal systems used<br />

Customer Relationship Management system - Housing Options use CRM as their main case management tool to record notes<br />

and actions for homelessness and prevention cases. The system records all contacts from every channel, value/failure, reason for<br />

contact and for some contacts, diversity information.<br />

The systems used to record and monitor youth homelessness (and indeed all homelessness services) is internal and does not<br />

interface with other external systems<br />

Records are recorded against an address or individual and used by other departments (ie council tax), so can hold a wide variety of<br />

information.<br />

ABRITAS – the Choice Based Lettings (CBL) system – records data on all applicants for social housing. It is also used by other<br />

partners in the Leicestershire Choice Based Lettings schemes and currently holds over 10, 000 records.<br />

However it only holds information on CBL applicants and information relating directly to their housing application. It does not<br />

interact with other internal or external systems.<br />

PE1 Spreadsheet – used for compile specific government statistics each quarter. This records data on homelessness prevention<br />

cases (case officer, dates, who, age, tenure, reason for approach and outcome). This is also used to monitor officer case load, end<br />

to end times, reasons for contact, age and tenure and outcomes and performance data for management.<br />

Flare – records data on all grant and loan applicants via Disabled Facilities Grant or emergency minor works grant<br />

Financials spreadsheet – records data on clients receiving loans or written deposits and repayment details.<br />

Scorecard – monthly and quarterly internal performance data including:-<br />

• Statutory Homeless Applications (chart 1)<br />

19


Page 46<br />

• Homelessness prevention work (chart 4)<br />

• Percentage of homelessness cases successfully resolved<br />

From July this year, the age of those approaching the council for help has been recorded and monitored. This is not yet embedded<br />

into every day practice, nor have records been updated retrospectively. There is a commitment to go back to April 2011 but this<br />

has not yet been achieved.<br />

Members wanted to look at the wider Countywide homelessness picture and see how data was shared.<br />

The <strong>District</strong> Implementation Group carried out a mini gap analysis in July 2012 to compare the number of young people presenting<br />

as homeless and the kind of issues highlighted. The findings were of little value as each <strong>District</strong> collates and records<br />

homelessness data differently therefore no meaningful analysis could be made.<br />

Funding<br />

The annual budget for the total homelessness support service (across all ages) is funded by a direct grant from the Department of<br />

Communities & Local Government (DCLG). In 2012-13 the grant was £57,000. The <strong>Council</strong> has received notification that the<br />

same grant will be paid in 2013/14.<br />

Spend as at September 2012<br />

Bed & Breakfast £1,141<br />

Rent deposit scheme £4,655<br />

Spend to save £9,015<br />

Arrears payment (set up on a repayable loan basis) £655<br />

Total £15,466<br />

The Working Group was told funding streams are continually sought, an example of this was that in 2011 the <strong>Council</strong> received a<br />

further £7,000 grant from the DCLG, which was used to assist those facing rent increases.<br />

20


Page 47<br />

In August 2012, a further £300,000 was awarded by the DCLG for a City and Countywide partnership project, led by County<br />

Officers.<br />

Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> processes and procedures<br />

The first contact from a young homeless person who approaches the Children & Young Peoples Service is with the Bassett Street<br />

team who establish firstly if they are homeless and secondly if there is any other support available - relatives, family, friends. Then<br />

an initial assessment is completed to establish needs and if they should come under local authority care (always a last resort and<br />

going into local authority care is prevented).<br />

Jill Bharkhada, Service Manager, Locality Social Work Children and Young People’s Services gave evidence to members that a<br />

restructure of the County’s Social Work Children & Young People’s service in December 2011 was aimed at providing a more<br />

consistent response and approach as well as supporting staff development in understanding legislation, issues and guidance.<br />

Since then the service has been reassessed to improve locality links. From 15 October 2012 arrangements for assessing young<br />

people will be through one of three Strengthening Families Teams.<br />

Working Together<br />

The Government vs. LB Southwark judgement (2009) requires local authorities’ housing and social services departments to work<br />

together to provide support and accommodation to 16 and 17 year olds. This is an area <strong>Blaby</strong> Housing Options officers expressed<br />

as a frustration and was not as effective as it should be.<br />

Findings from a Homeless LINK survey (Dec 2011) would support this view<br />

• ‘Local authorities largely felt this was due to Children’s Services, although it was also reported that the two-tier local authority<br />

structure was a barrier to effective working’.<br />

• Survey response: ‘Our protocol is very new and needs to be reviewed. We still experience difficulties in getting CYPS to<br />

accept their duty and follow the protocol’ (LA East Midlands.)<br />

21


Page 48<br />

• Case study evidence provided by Housing Options, attached at appendix 3, suggests information was not being shared and<br />

dispute resolution mechanisms were not being used i.e. not providing outcomes of assessment or level of support being<br />

received by a young person.<br />

As this review has progressed a more pro-active approach has been pursued between the Housing Options Team and<br />

Leicestershire Social Services Children & Young People team at Bassett Street, Wigston. Feedback received by the working group<br />

from both County and Housing Options confirms improved communication and better understanding of roles.<br />

The National Picture<br />

Nationally, there has been a 16% increase from 2010 to 2011 (9590 in 2010 to 11360 in 2011) and in the last 12 years emergency<br />

bed & breakfast accommodation need has increased 44%. In the last financial year 50290 households were accepted as<br />

homeless. Nationally this is a 14% increase on 2010/11 and a 26% rise since 2009/10. Source: CRISIS<br />

In August 2012 the DCLG published a homelessness plan for England, part of its Making every contact count: A joint approach to<br />

preventing homelessness report. This report highlights:<br />

• Prevention: as the key to making every contact count with 34% of homelessness cases due to eviction by relatives or friends<br />

• Family breakdown: is critical to address, with 18 % of all acceptances in taking part in a homelessness survey mentioning<br />

parental separation or divorce as the a ‘trigger’ for their situation<br />

• Wider housing reforms: with 19% of homelessness cases due to the household being unable to find alternative<br />

accommodation when a tenancy ends, flexibilities under the Localism Act and initiatives within the Housing Strategy for<br />

England are also cited as important factors in reducing homelessness.<br />

• Local innovation, integration and collaboration: the Government wants to see better local leadership and new local authority<br />

led multiagency partnerships to prevent homelessness; integration of existing local services; and new funding mechanisms.<br />

22


Page 49<br />

23


Page 50<br />

5. Conclusions<br />

Each young person who comes to us for help with housing presents a unique set of challenges. In the current economic times and<br />

with forthcoming welfare reforms the preparedness of the council is essential to ensure the right help is provided from clear<br />

signposting to in depth assessment and referral.<br />

National evidence shows an increase in youth homelessness and without early intervention and prevention action, and a protection<br />

for funding for youth homelessness services there is a risk of creating a new generation of young people who will have severe and<br />

complex needs later in life. Source - Homeless Link Survey Dec 2011.<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> Housing Options team is consistently delivering a high level of prevention and intervention actions. The concerns and issues<br />

raised with scrutiny shows its commitment to providing an excellent service.<br />

Refreshing the 16-17 year old Homelessness Protocol has been long and protracted and the working group welcomes progress<br />

now being made to make it more fit for purpose relevant for <strong>District</strong>s and County Social Services.<br />

The working group had difficulty getting real time youth homelessness data and benchmarking information from both County Social<br />

Services and Housing Options and in some cases there was no clarity and little value in the information provided.<br />

There needs to be a more co-ordinated and transparent approach to data collection to allow for more meaningful and useable<br />

information.<br />

It is imperative Social Services and districts work jointly in order to maximise resources and meet the duty to young people. The<br />

working group is satisfied steps are being to address communication issues and this should continue.<br />

24


Page 51<br />

6. Recommendations –<br />

R1 That Cabinet Executive consider and respond to the refreshed Protocol when approved by the Chief Housing Officer Group<br />

at the end of October 2012.<br />

R2 <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Officers to work with County and <strong>District</strong> networks to improve data collection and presentation of<br />

information to provide a better picture of homelessness across the County and in developing the service.<br />

R3 That Social Services Children & Young Peoples Services and the Housing Options Manager report back to Cabinet<br />

Executive in six months and provide<br />

• Year end figures and benchmarking data<br />

• Impact the refreshed Protocol is having<br />

• Assessment of the working relationship<br />

R4 With the majority of homeless accommodation being in the City, <strong>Blaby</strong>’s Health and Community Service Manager via the<br />

Chief Housing Officer Group continues on behalf of <strong>District</strong>s to identify if provision can be secured for County residents<br />

25


Page 52<br />

7. APPENDICES<br />

Appendix 1 Leicestershire wide Multi Agency Protocol to assist homeless/potentially homeless 16-17 year olds -<br />

November 2010<br />

Appendix 2 Protocol best practice analysis<br />

Appendix 3 16-17 year old Homelessness case study<br />

8. Background information<br />

• Provision of Accommodation for 16 and 17 year old young people who may be homeless and/or require<br />

accommodation – Dept for children and young families Issued: April 2010<br />

• Dept for Communities and Local Government – Making every contact count: a joint approach to<br />

homelessness August 2012<br />

• <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong>s’ Network Homelessness Research & Policy briefing - Making every Contact Count: a joint<br />

approach to Homelessness – August 2012<br />

• Homeless Watch – Young and Homeless: a survey of services and local authorities December 2011<br />

• Shelter – Know your Rights: information about housing and homelessness for young people<br />

• Joseph Rowntree Foundation 2011 – Tackling homelessness and exclusion, understanding complex<br />

26


Page 53<br />

27


Page 54<br />

Leicestershire Wide Multi Agency Protocol to assist homeless/<br />

potentially homeless 16 and 17 year olds<br />

Final version after consultation with partners<br />

APPENDIX 1<br />

28


Page 55<br />

Presented to Chief Housing Officers Group on Friday 12 November 2010<br />

Multi agency Leicestershire wide Protocol for homeless 16 and 17 year olds<br />

Between<br />

Children and Young People’s Services and the Leicestershire Housing <strong>District</strong>s (<strong>Blaby</strong>, Charnwood, Hinckley and Bosworth, Market<br />

Harborough, Melton, North West Leicestershire and Oadby and Wigston), Connexions, the Youth Offending Service, The Bridge and<br />

other partners and stakeholders<br />

1. Introduction<br />

29


Page 56<br />

1.1 This protocol is in response to the House of Lords Judgment G v Southwark handed down in May 2009. This Judgment<br />

highlighted the responsibilities of Children’s Social Care towards homeless 16 and 17 year olds and the interrelationship<br />

between duties under The Children Act 1989 and the homelessness legislation.<br />

1.2 This protocol replaces all earlier versions and sets out the roles and the statutory responsibilities of Children’s Social Care and<br />

the Housing <strong>District</strong>s following the House of Lords Judgment. The protocol also lays down the roles and responsibilities of<br />

other partners and stakeholders.<br />

1.3 Underpinning the operation of the protocol is partnership working and use of common assessment processes to respond<br />

flexibly and ensuring the best use of limited resources and time.<br />

1.4 The protocol is laid out in 8 sections and describes the process to be followed and delivered by agencies in response to<br />

homeless and or potentially homeless 16 and 17 year olds.<br />

Stage 1 Initial Contact<br />

Stage 2 Initial response processes<br />

Stage 3 Intensive support and homelessness prevention<br />

Stage 4 Assessment by Children’s Social Care<br />

Stage 5 Decision by Children’s Social Care<br />

Stage 6 Accommodation and Support by Children’s Social Care<br />

Part 7 Special Circumstances<br />

Part 8 Monitoring and review of the protocol<br />

30


Page 57<br />

2. Aims and Objectives<br />

2.1 To ensure the effective discharge of corporate responsibilities between Children’s Social Care and the Housing <strong>District</strong>s by<br />

jointly addressing the diverse accommodation and care needs of 16 and 17 year old homeless young people.<br />

2.2 To ensure effective homelessness prevention services for homeless 16 and 17 year olds.<br />

2.3 This protocol recognizes the need for partnership working and use of the Common Assessment Framework (CAF) to help<br />

meet the needs of young people and their families who may be vulnerable to becoming homeless.<br />

2.4 To ensure the provision of good quality accommodation appropriate to the diverse accommodation needs of young<br />

people.<br />

2.5 Wherever possible young people should be placed in suitable accommodation. Bed and Breakfast type accommodation<br />

should only be used in an emergency and as a last resort.<br />

3. Guiding Principles<br />

3.1 It is recognized that it is in the best interests of children and young people to live with their immediate families unless there is<br />

evidence to the contrary.<br />

31


Page 58<br />

3.2 Safeguarding concerns should be reported to CYPS Children Social Care for investigation in line with Leicestershire and<br />

Rutland LSCB procedures.<br />

3.3 The protocol puts effective homelessness prevention at the heart of the approach to helping potentially homeless 16 and 17<br />

year olds and is designed to build on the positive work that was undertaken prior to the Southwark Judgment.<br />

3.4 Where young people are unable or unwilling to return to their immediate families young people should be supported to<br />

explore wider kinship care and network providers where their needs can be met.<br />

3.4 Where it has been established that a young person is homeless and unable to return home, the Southwark Judgment makes<br />

it clear that Children’s Social Care is the lead agency to assist young people. The Children Act 1989 is the primary legislation<br />

used to assist these young people.<br />

3.5 The Housing <strong>District</strong>s shall retain a role in such cases as outlined in Section 27 (3c) of the Children Act 1989, which empowers<br />

local Children’s services authorities, including any local housing authority, for “help in the exercise of any of their functions”<br />

under Part III of the Children Act 1989 Act. The Southwark Judgment made it clear that Children’s Social Care and the<br />

Housing <strong>District</strong>s should work closely together.<br />

3.6 To jointly ensure all workers are aware of the housing needs of homeless young people and the responsibility of each<br />

agency to address these needs.<br />

Stage 1: Initial Contact<br />

4 A young person may make contact or seek advice from a number of agencies:<br />

32


Page 59<br />

• Children’s Social Care<br />

• Housing <strong>District</strong>s<br />

• Youth Offending Services<br />

• Connexions<br />

• Third sector or statutory agencies such as Colleges and Citizens Advice Bureaus<br />

• Self referrals to accommodation providers or advice agencies<br />

Where a young person is presenting as being potentially homeless or wanting to leave home they should be referred to the County<br />

wide [SINGLE ACCESS POINT] who will take responsibility for completing an initial interview to ascertain the young person’s<br />

circumstances.<br />

Children’s Social Care will not normally accept referrals for an initial child in need assessment on the basis of a young person<br />

requiring accommodation without the young person first accessing the County wide [SINGLE ACCESS POINT] for intensive support<br />

in the first instance.<br />

Stage 2: Initial response process<br />

[SINGLE ACCESS POINT] assessors will take responsibility for the initial response process and will begin to gather detailed information<br />

to determine whether the young person is homeless or whether they can be supported to return home. If a long term home cannot<br />

be secured, where appropriate the [SINGLE ACCESS POINT] will try to prevent the need for an emergency accommodation<br />

placement away from the family by securing agreement that the young person can stay for a short period pending the<br />

assessment and further work.<br />

The initial meeting with the young person will focus on key areas:<br />

33


Page 60<br />

4.1 Current situation establishing why the young person is potentially homeless,<br />

4.2 History including family, accommodation and if they or their family are known to Children’s Social Care ,<br />

4.3 Health, vulnerabilities and safeguarding,<br />

4.4 Young persons views and aspirations and<br />

4.5 Views and resources of those with parental responsibility.<br />

5. In all cases home visits will be carried out to families and carers unless there are safeguarding concerns. Home visits will be<br />

carried out within 48 hours of the young person making contact with the [SINGLE ACCESS POINT] The objective is to seek<br />

family reunification and reconciliation. Mediation can play a key role in homelessness prevention and in helping to improve<br />

family relationships.<br />

Stage 3: Intensive Support and homelessness prevention<br />

6.1 [SINGLE ACCESS POINT] assessors will work with families to give them the tools to effectively manage crisis situations to<br />

prevent homelessness. The County Wide [SINGLE ACCESS POINT] will work with young people to achieve a planned move<br />

from home, where possible with ongoing family support for the young person, if this is the desired outcome for families.<br />

6.2 Where a young person is not able to return home the County Wide [SINGLE ACCESS POINT] will explore kinship care and or<br />

other appropriate accommodation with the young person. In this situation the County Wide [SINGLE ACCESS POINT]<br />

assessors will facilitate and support this by drawing up a bespoke support plan for the young person and act as a broker for<br />

other agencies.<br />

34


Page 61<br />

6.3 In cases where a young person is unable to return home and there are no other identifiable options, the outcomes of the<br />

initial meeting and follow-up work and attempted reconciliation will be recorded. A clear record of how and why the young<br />

person is homeless will be compiled as this will assist with Children’s Social Care initial child in need assessment.<br />

Stage 4: Assessment Process<br />

7.1 The relevant Housing <strong>District</strong> and Children’s Social Care will jointly fund emergency accommodation for up to a maximum<br />

of 10 working days during which time Children’s Social Care will complete an initial child in need assessment.<br />

7.2 Following receipt of a referral by the County wide [SINGLE ACCESS POINT], Children’s Social Care will complete a further<br />

assessment to determine whether or not the young person is a “child in need” for the purposes of the Children Act 1989.<br />

Children’s Social Care must satisfy themselves of the following tests:<br />

A. Is the applicant a child?<br />

B. Is the applicant a child in need?<br />

C. Does the child appear to Children’s Social Care to require accommodation?<br />

D. Is the need for accommodation the result of one of the following criteria: section 20 (1) (A)-(C) which is reproduced below:<br />

I. There being no person who has responsibility for the child<br />

II. The child is lost or abandoned<br />

35


Page 62<br />

III. The person who has been caring for the child is being prevented from doing so (permanently and for whatever reason)<br />

from providing the child with suitable accommodation or care<br />

E. Consideration must be given to the young person’s wishes and feelings.<br />

7.3 Most homeless young people will be a child in need with the exception of young people who have previously lived<br />

independently. Young people who are resourceful, streetwise and able to survive should not be deemed to be living<br />

independently.<br />

7.4 The In Care team will be responsible for carrying out the initial child in need assessments for homeless young people.<br />

7.5 Children’s Social Care will continue to explore the possibility of the young person returning to live with immediate or wider<br />

family where it is appropriate to do so.<br />

Stage 5: Decision of the Children’s Social Care<br />

8.1 Initial child in need assessments will be completed within 10 working days.<br />

8.2 The initial child in need assessment will confirm whether or not the criteria for accommodation under section 20 have been<br />

reached. If the young person is deemed to be a child in need Children’s Social Care will ensure that accommodation and<br />

financial assistance is provided for the young person.<br />

36


Page 63<br />

8.3 The decision will be based on all the available information available. Where it is established that the young person is both<br />

homeless and a child in need the legal criteria for accommodation provided under section 20 will have been met<br />

8.4 A young person needs to understand and consent to becoming looked after. Information about becoming a child in care<br />

should be impartial and balanced. Young people can contact one of the Children’s rights officers for information and<br />

advice about the implications of becoming a child in care.<br />

8.5 Where section 20 criteria are met Children’s Social Care will be responsible for the funding and provision of<br />

accommodation. Children’s Social Care can request assistance to identify appropriate accommodation from the Housing<br />

<strong>District</strong>s for this purpose.<br />

8.6 Where the criterion for section 20 is not met, a decision will need to be made as to whether the young person meets the<br />

criteria for section 17 as a child in need. This decision will be made irrespective of whether the young person needs<br />

accommodation or not.<br />

8.7 A young person who is not considered to be a child in need will be referred back to the relevant Housing <strong>District</strong> for an<br />

application as a homeless person under Part V11 of the Housing Act 1996 (as amended by the Homelessness Act 2002).<br />

Stage 6: Accommodation and Support from Children’s Social Care<br />

37


Page 64<br />

9.1 Unless there is a clear reason for a young person to be placed in residential or foster care, Children’s Social Care may call<br />

upon other agencies to assist in identifying suitable accommodation and support.<br />

9.2 Where a young person becomes a child in care, Children’s Social Care becomes financially responsible and the young<br />

person will no longer be eligible to claim benefits.<br />

9.3 When a young person has been accommodated Children’s Social Care will complete a Core Assessment and pathway<br />

plan to outline the young person’s accommodation and support needs.<br />

Stage 7: Special Circumstances<br />

10. Young People who are prisoners or under supervision from Youth Offending Services<br />

This protocol recognizes that young people known to Youth Offending Services can face significant challenges with their<br />

accommodation and family circumstances.<br />

10.1 If a young person is ordered not to return home, there is a risk that they could be remanded in custody if they do not have<br />

an address. In these circumstances Youth Offending Services will be responsible for exploring accommodation options with<br />

the young person, including kinship networks and friends.<br />

38


Page 65<br />

10.2 If there are no available accommodation options, provided Youth Offending Service has explored all of the available<br />

accommodation options and recorded this, they should refer directly to Children’s Social Care.<br />

10.3 Where a young person is in custody and it is likely that they will be homeless on release; Youth Offending Services should<br />

refer the young person directly to Children’s Social Care at least 4 weeks prior to their release to enable an assessment to be<br />

undertaken.<br />

10.4 Where a young person is sentenced to custody whilst being accommodated under section 20 or while being a child in<br />

care, a Child in Care Review should be convened prior to release in order to plan for accommodation and support services.<br />

Teenage Parents<br />

11.1 Some young people will have dependant children themselves and may experience homelessness. Young parents will be<br />

assessed by the county wide [SINGLE ACCESS POINT] in the same way as other young people.<br />

11.2 In cases where young people are already known to Children’s Social Care and or they have a child subject to a child<br />

protection plan, Children’s Social Care will ensure that the parent(s) have a child in need assessment carried out in their<br />

own right by a separate team within Children’s Social Care.<br />

39


Page 66<br />

11.3 This is intended to ensure that young parents are assessed as child in need in their own right and ensures parity of process.<br />

11.4 If young parent(s) become looked after it should not automatically follow that any dependants become looked after.<br />

Out of hours<br />

12.1 Where out of hours referrals are made to Children’s Social Care emergency duty Team (EDT) where a young person<br />

presents as homeless, emergency duty team will need to ascertain whether or not a young person has an immediate<br />

housing need and, if so, provision will be under The Children Act 1989 section 20.<br />

12.2 The young person will then be referred to the county wide [SINGLE ACCESS POINT] the next working day for an assessment<br />

under stage 2.<br />

12.3 The emergency duty team will deal with such requests in a way which is consistent with the framework set out in this<br />

protocol and in the spirit of the Statutory Guidance.<br />

13. Young People who are not owed a housing duty and are not considered to be a child in need<br />

13.1 There will be a small number of cases who will not be owed a duty by Children’s Social Care or housing. It is anticipated<br />

that this will be a very unusual set of circumstances.<br />

40


Page 67<br />

13.2 In such circumstances a re-referral back to the county wide [SINGLE ACCESS POINT] for further support and assistance in<br />

accessing accommodation should be made.<br />

13.3 It is anticipated that young people falling outside of the Housing and Children Act’s for the purpose of accommodation will<br />

continue to be supported by the CAF process and that a robust support plan will be in place.<br />

Dispute resolution and concerns<br />

14.1 This protocol is intended to minimize disputes and encourage open and respectful dialogue.<br />

14.2 Differences of opinion over the responsibility and proposed action should be dealt with by the caseworker in each<br />

department. If the issue cannot be resolved at this level the matter should be referred jointly to the respective team<br />

managers for resolution. All dispute resolution and resulting decisions will be taken in the spirit of this protocol and<br />

recognizing the need for effective interagency working<br />

14.3 Managers will then determine an appropriate course of action in the context of the disagreement from a range of options<br />

listed below.<br />

41


Page 68<br />

14.4 Options include organizing a meeting between line managers to re-establish good working relationships or to negotiate<br />

acceptable compromises for both services. Discussing concerns with senior managers to explore strategic solutions and<br />

compromise.<br />

14.5 A record of the disagreement will be forwarded to the Young Persons Accommodation Needs Group<br />

Equality and Diversity<br />

15.1 The equality and diversity policies of Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> and of each <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> will underpin the way the<br />

various agencies address the accommodation needs of young people.<br />

15.2 Workers in both agencies are expected to promote the principles of equality and diversity and seek the elimination of<br />

discrimination on these grounds.<br />

15.3 Services will be delivered in a fair, equitable and non discriminatory manner.<br />

15.4 Young people will be encouraged to participate in the decision making process around their accommodation needs.<br />

Evaluation and monitoring of the protocol<br />

42


Page 69<br />

16.1 This protocol and the county wide [Single Access Point] is initially a county wide pilot for one year.<br />

16.2 Responsibility for monitoring the protocol will be undertaken by the County wide Young Persons Accommodation Needs<br />

Group. They will be seeking feedback from both front line staff and management.<br />

16.3 The protocol will be reviewed 12 months from its inception.<br />

43


Page 70<br />

Common<br />

Assessment<br />

Framework<br />

An over view of the multi agency protocol for homeless/ potentially 16 and 17 year<br />

olds<br />

Initial<br />

Contact<br />

Young people<br />

can present at a<br />

number of<br />

agencies<br />

Initial<br />

response<br />

process<br />

SAP<br />

provides<br />

Intensive<br />

support and<br />

homelessne<br />

Referral to County<br />

Wide Single Access<br />

Point for all<br />

potentially<br />

homeless young<br />

Needs assessment<br />

completed. Home<br />

visits to parents,<br />

carers and other<br />

parties.<br />

Homelessness<br />

prevention toolkit<br />

including<br />

reconciliation and<br />

mediation<br />

YOS will undertake<br />

homelessness<br />

prevention work and<br />

refer direct to CSC<br />

Assessment<br />

process by<br />

Children’s<br />

Social Care<br />

Decision of<br />

accommod<br />

ation panel<br />

Accommod<br />

ation and<br />

support<br />

from<br />

Children’s<br />

44


16-17 yr old Homelessness Protocol – Best Practice Analysis<br />

Leicestershire Wide Multi Agency Protocol to<br />

assist homeless/potentially homeless 16-17 yr<br />

olds<br />

Stage 1 Contact<br />

A young person may make contact or seek advice<br />

from a number of agencies:<br />

• Children’s Social Care<br />

• Housing <strong>District</strong>s<br />

• Youth Offending Services<br />

• Connexions<br />

• Third sector or statutory agencies such as<br />

Colleges and Citizens Advice Bureaus<br />

• Self referrals to accommodation providers<br />

or advice agencies<br />

Children’s Social Care will not normally accept<br />

referrals for an initial child in need assessment on<br />

the basis of a young person requiring<br />

accommodation without the young person first<br />

accessing the County wide [SINGLE ACCESS<br />

POINT] for intensive support in the first instance.<br />

Only one district, Charnwood BC has a SAP.<br />

SAP being piloted in O&WBC May – Nov 2012<br />

The remaining Housing Options teams in Leics<br />

operate referral system<br />

Stage 2 Initial response processes<br />

[SINGLE ACCESS POINT] assessors will take<br />

responsibility for the initial response process and<br />

will begin to gather detailed information to<br />

APPENDIX 2<br />

Worcestershire, Sussex, Norfolk County<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

(protocols identified as best practice by Anna Whalen,<br />

Youth Homelessness Advisor for the Dept of Communities<br />

and Local Government<br />

When a young person is homeless or threatened<br />

with homelessness, they should be directed to see<br />

the Young Persons Worker. When a joint<br />

assessment is required, this will be carried out within<br />

10<br />

working days. (Sussex)<br />

Children’s services duty teams are not directly<br />

accessible to the public. In the rare instance of a<br />

young person who has a housing need first<br />

presenting themselves in crisis to a children’s duty<br />

team they will be asked to telephone Care Connect.<br />

Care Connect will collect from the young person<br />

sufficient information to make a referral to the duty<br />

team for assessment, if appropriate. (Norfolk C)<br />

Connexions will be required to attend all joint<br />

assessments for 16/17 year olds with Children’s<br />

Social Care and Housing. Connexions workers can<br />

advocate for the young person and, if appropriate<br />

can speak on behalf of the young person during an<br />

assessment.<br />

check with the relevant housing options team<br />

whether the young person has already contacted<br />

them and if so the status of their request for<br />

Page 71<br />

45


Leicestershire Wide Multi Agency Protocol to<br />

assist homeless/potentially homeless 16-17 yr<br />

olds<br />

determine whether the young person is homeless<br />

or whether they can be supported to return home.<br />

No timeframe given<br />

The initial meeting with the young person will focus<br />

on key areas:<br />

4.6 Current situation establishing why the<br />

young person is potentially homeless,<br />

4.7 History including family, accommodation<br />

and if they or their family are known to<br />

Children’s Social Care ,<br />

4.8 Health, vulnerabilities and safeguarding,<br />

4.9 Young persons views and aspirations and<br />

Views and resources of those with parental<br />

responsibility<br />

3.2 working relationship issues for districts in some<br />

cases, resolution can be slow and time consuming<br />

Home visits will be carried out within 48 hours of<br />

the young person making contact with the<br />

[SINGLE ACCESS POINT] The objective is to<br />

seek family reunification and reconciliation.<br />

Mediation can play a key role in homelessness<br />

prevention and in helping to improve family<br />

relationships.<br />

Page 72<br />

Worcestershire, Sussex, Norfolk County<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

(protocols identified as best practice by Anna Whalen,<br />

Youth Homelessness Advisor for the Dept of Communities<br />

and Local Government<br />

assistance under the Housing Act;(Norfolk)<br />

Initially the Housing Options team will determine<br />

whether the young person is homeless within 28<br />

days.(Worcestershire)<br />

If the young person is homeless within 28 days the<br />

Housing Options team will make a referral to<br />

Children’s Services using the assessment<br />

form.(Worcestershire)<br />

If a young person first presents themselves for<br />

assistance to a local housing authority they will be<br />

directed immediately to the housing options team,<br />

who will:<br />

-ascertain the young person’s circumstances and<br />

immediate needs, by interviewing them;<br />

-where necessary, and provided the young person<br />

agrees, telephone the children’s services duty team<br />

to ascertain whether the young person is already<br />

known to children’s services and whether there is<br />

further information about the young person’s<br />

circumstances which would affect a decision about<br />

the safety of a return home( Norfolk)<br />

46


Leicestershire Wide Multi Agency Protocol to<br />

assist homeless/potentially homeless 16-17 yr<br />

olds<br />

Stage 3 Intensive support and homelessness<br />

prevention<br />

The County Wide [SINGLE ACCESS POINT] will<br />

work with young people to achieve a planned<br />

move from home, where possible with ongoing<br />

family support for the young person, if this is the<br />

desired outcome for families.<br />

Where a young person is not able to return home<br />

the County Wide [SINGLE ACCESS POINT] will<br />

explore kinship care and or other appropriate<br />

accommodation with the young person<br />

Worcestershire, Sussex, Norfolk County<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

(protocols identified as best practice by Anna Whalen,<br />

Youth Homelessness Advisor for the Dept of Communities<br />

and Local Government<br />

if appropriate, contact the young person’s parents<br />

and/or others with whom the young person has been<br />

staying to ascertain the reasons for them leaving and<br />

being unable to return and to try to extend their stay<br />

for the immediate future, while their application for<br />

assistance is determined;<br />

•if this is not possible:<br />

-arrange emergency temporary and confirming that<br />

any invoices are to be sent to the housing options<br />

team;<br />

-ensure that the young person understands any<br />

additional charges which they will have to pay for<br />

accommodation and the consequences of not doing<br />

so;<br />

-if the young person has no funds for their immediate<br />

needs, and can get no other immediate help,<br />

telephone the children’s services duty team to<br />

discuss assistance under Section 17; (Norforlk)<br />

In cases where a young person is unable to return Other agencies and teams, including integrated<br />

Page 73<br />

47


Leicestershire Wide Multi Agency Protocol to<br />

assist homeless/potentially homeless 16-17 yr<br />

olds<br />

home and there are no other identifiable options,<br />

the outcomes of the initial meeting and follow-up<br />

work and attempted reconciliation will be recorded<br />

Stage 4 Assessment by Children’s Social Care<br />

The relevant Housing <strong>District</strong> and Children’s Social<br />

Care will jointly fund emergency accommodation<br />

for up to a maximum of 10 working days during<br />

which time Children’s Social Care will complete an<br />

initial child in need assessment.<br />

Following receipt of a referral by the County wide<br />

[SINGLE ACCESS POINT], Children’s Social<br />

Care will complete a further assessment to<br />

determine whether or not the young person is a<br />

“child in need” for the purposes of the Children Act<br />

1989.<br />

Children’s Social Care must satisfy themselves of<br />

the following tests:<br />

Page 74<br />

Worcestershire, Sussex, Norfolk County<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

(protocols identified as best practice by Anna Whalen,<br />

Youth Homelessness Advisor for the Dept of Communities<br />

and Local Government<br />

youth support services, educational and voluntary<br />

agencies and others, may become aware of a young<br />

person aged 16 or 17 who is facing, or already in, a<br />

housing crisis, or who has nowhere settled to stay<br />

(for instance, sofa-surfing). They should:<br />

•refer the young person to children’s services by<br />

completing form NSCB1 and sending it to Norfolk<br />

Care Connect by fax or email;<br />

Within 10 working days of receiving a referral via<br />

Norfolk Care Connect, children’s services duty<br />

teams will determine whether<br />

•the young person is a child in need;<br />

•children’s services should offer them<br />

accommodation under Section 20( Norfolk)<br />

Children’s Services will arrange for a Core<br />

Assessment (much more detailed) of the young<br />

person’s needs (including housing needs). The Core<br />

Assessment will be carried out within 35 days, and<br />

will determine the young person’s needs and their<br />

eligibility for services. (Worcestershire)<br />

48


Leicestershire Wide Multi Agency Protocol to<br />

assist homeless/potentially homeless 16-17 yr<br />

olds<br />

A. Is the applicant a child?<br />

B. Is the applicant a child in need?<br />

C. Does the child appear to Children’s Social Care<br />

to require accommodation?<br />

D. Is the need for accommodation the result of one<br />

of the following criteria: section 20 (1) (A)-(C)<br />

which is reproduced below:<br />

IV. There being no person who has<br />

responsibility for the child<br />

V. The child is lost or abandoned<br />

VI. The person who has been caring for the<br />

child is being prevented from doing so<br />

(permanently and for whatever reason) from<br />

providing the child with suitable accommodation or<br />

care<br />

E. Consideration must be given to the young<br />

person’s wishes and feelings.<br />

The In Care team will be responsible for carrying<br />

out the initial child in need assessments for<br />

homeless young people<br />

Stage 5 Decision by Children’s Social Care<br />

Initial child in need assessments will be completed<br />

within 10 working days.<br />

The initial child in need assessment will confirm<br />

whether or not the criteria for accommodation<br />

under section 20 have been reached. If the young<br />

Worcestershire, Sussex, Norfolk County<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

(protocols identified as best practice by Anna Whalen,<br />

Youth Homelessness Advisor for the Dept of Communities<br />

and Local Government<br />

In the case of young people aged 16-17 years<br />

presenting themselves as homeless directly through<br />

a Worcestershire Hub office or contact centre, or<br />

being referred by an agency, to the Children’s<br />

Services Access Centre a referral will be made to<br />

the FAST team where they believe the applicant is a<br />

child in need and FAST will complete an Initial<br />

Assessment of the young persons needs within 7<br />

working days. (Worcestershire)<br />

Children’s Services will arrange for a Core<br />

Assessment (much more detailed) of the young<br />

person’s needs (including housing needs). The<br />

Core Assessment will be carried out within 35<br />

Page 75<br />

49


Leicestershire Wide Multi Agency Protocol to<br />

assist homeless/potentially homeless 16-17 yr<br />

olds<br />

person is deemed to be a child in need Children’s<br />

Social Care will ensure that accommodation and<br />

financial assistance is provided for the young<br />

person.<br />

Young people can contact one of the Children’s<br />

rights officers for information and advice about the<br />

implications of becoming a child in care<br />

Where section 20 criteria are met Children’s Social<br />

Care will be responsible for the funding and<br />

provision of accommodation. Children’s Social<br />

Care can request assistance to identify appropriate<br />

accommodation from the Housing <strong>District</strong>s for this<br />

purpose.<br />

A young person who is not considered to be a child<br />

in need will be referred back to the relevant<br />

Housing <strong>District</strong> for an application as a homeless<br />

person under Part V11 of the Housing Act 1996<br />

(as amended by the Homelessness Act 2002).<br />

Page 76<br />

Worcestershire, Sussex, Norfolk County<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

(protocols identified as best practice by Anna Whalen,<br />

Youth Homelessness Advisor for the Dept of Communities<br />

and Local Government<br />

days, and will determine the young person’s<br />

needs and their eligibility for services.<br />

(Worcestershire)<br />

If the young person has not accepted an offer of<br />

assistance under Section 20 treat the young<br />

person’s application in the same way as if a duty is<br />

owed under Section 17 but section 20 does not<br />

apply (see immediately below).<br />

If a duty is owed under Section 17 BUT Section<br />

20 does NOT apply<br />

•determine duties owed under Housing Act 1996<br />

•assist young person in completing housing benefit<br />

claim form if they have been occupying emergency<br />

accommodation as a children’s services placement.<br />

(Norfolk)<br />

Where there is no s17 or s20 duty owed by<br />

Children’s Services then the applicant can make a<br />

claim for Housing Benefit and it will be the<br />

responsibility of the Housing Officer / Floating<br />

Support Worker to ensure this happens.<br />

50


Leicestershire Wide Multi Agency Protocol to<br />

assist homeless/potentially homeless 16-17 yr<br />

olds<br />

Stage 6 Accommodation and Support by<br />

Children’s Social Care<br />

Where a young person becomes a child in care,<br />

Children’s Social Care becomes financially<br />

responsible and the young person will no longer be<br />

eligible to claim benefits.<br />

When a young person has been accommodated<br />

Children’s Social Care will complete a Core<br />

Assessment and pathway plan to outline the young<br />

person’s accommodation and support needs<br />

Part 7 Special Circumstances<br />

If a young person is ordered not to return home,<br />

there is a risk that they could be remanded in<br />

custody if they do not have an address. In these<br />

circumstances Youth Offending Services will be<br />

responsible for exploring accommodation options<br />

with the young person, including kinship networks<br />

and friends.<br />

If there are no available accommodation options,<br />

provided Youth Offending Service has explored all<br />

of the available accommodation options and<br />

recorded this, they should refer directly to<br />

Children’s Social Care<br />

Where a young person is in custody and it is likely<br />

that they will be homeless on release; Youth<br />

Worcestershire, Sussex, Norfolk County<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

(protocols identified as best practice by Anna Whalen,<br />

Youth Homelessness Advisor for the Dept of Communities<br />

and Local Government<br />

(Worcestershire)<br />

In the case of a young person being subject to a<br />

Care Order or accommodated under S20 of the<br />

Children Act 1989, funding will be provided by<br />

Children’s Services and they will not be eligible for<br />

Housing Benefit. (Worcestershire)<br />

If a young person does not engage with support, the<br />

Young Persons Worker will carry out a home visit.<br />

Joint visits with Children’s Social Care will be carried<br />

out where appropriate. (Sussex)<br />

YOT case manager must, through the Asset process<br />

conducted at the start of and during the custodial<br />

Page 77<br />

51


Leicestershire Wide Multi Agency Protocol to<br />

assist homeless/potentially homeless 16-17 yr<br />

olds<br />

Offending Services should refer the young person<br />

directly to Children’s Social Care at least 4 weeks<br />

prior to their release to enable an assessment to<br />

be undertaken<br />

Where a young person is sentenced to custody<br />

whilst being accommodated under section 20 or<br />

while being a child in care, a Child in Care Review<br />

should be convened prior to release in order to<br />

plan for accommodation and support services.<br />

Teenage Parents:<br />

Some young people will have dependant children<br />

themselves and may experience homelessness.<br />

Young parents will be assessed by the county wide<br />

[SINGLE ACCESS POINT] in the same way as<br />

other young people.<br />

In cases where young people are already known to<br />

Children’s Social Care and or they have a child<br />

subject to a child protection plan, Children’s Social<br />

Care will ensure that the parent(s) have a child in<br />

need assessment carried out in their own right by<br />

a separate team within Children’s Social Care.<br />

If young parent(s) become looked after it should<br />

not automatically follow that any dependants<br />

become looked after<br />

Where out of hours referrals are made to<br />

Children’s Social Care emergency duty Team<br />

Page 78<br />

Worcestershire, Sussex, Norfolk County<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

(protocols identified as best practice by Anna Whalen,<br />

Youth Homelessness Advisor for the Dept of Communities<br />

and Local Government<br />

sentence, identify any need for accommodation on<br />

release. (Norfolk)<br />

If the young person is not an open case to children's<br />

social care and it becomes apparent to the YOT<br />

case manager that the young person will not have<br />

suitable accommodation on release, the YOT case<br />

manager will complete form NSCB1 and send it to<br />

Norfolk Care Connect by fax or e-mail, wherever<br />

possible at least 1 month before the young person's<br />

planned release. (Norfolk)<br />

If a 16 or 17 year old woman is pregnant or has a<br />

child/children of her own, children’s services’ duties<br />

will be determined towards each of them individually.<br />

The LSCB pre-birth protocol should be followed if<br />

relevant. Similarly, if a young person is in a<br />

partnership with an older person, only duties towards<br />

the 16 or 17 year old will be considered by the duty<br />

team(Norfolk)<br />

52


Leicestershire Wide Multi Agency Protocol to<br />

assist homeless/potentially homeless 16-17 yr<br />

olds<br />

(EDT) where a young person presents as<br />

homeless, emergency duty team will need to<br />

ascertain whether or not a young person has an<br />

immediate housing need<br />

Part 8 Monitoring and review of the protocol<br />

Worcestershire, Sussex, Norfolk County<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

(protocols identified as best practice by Anna Whalen,<br />

Youth Homelessness Advisor for the Dept of Communities<br />

and Local Government<br />

Children’s Services, and the Housing Authority, will<br />

monitor what happens to the young person following<br />

a referral and this will be used to gauge the<br />

effectiveness of this Joint Protocol<br />

An annual meeting will take place to review the Joint<br />

Protocol, and the working relationship between the<br />

two agencies. (Worcestershire)<br />

There will be inter-agency training, e.g. a Housing<br />

Officer could give a training session/presentation to<br />

Children’s Services, and a Children’s Services<br />

Officer could give a training session/presentation to<br />

the Housing Authority, about their respective work.<br />

There will also be joint training arranged, whereby<br />

officers from both agencies will attend relevant<br />

courses together (Worcestershire)<br />

The housing, care and support needs of a young<br />

person may change over time. Further joint<br />

assessments can be requested by Children’s Social<br />

Care, housing services, Connexions or the young<br />

person to review actions agreed or reassess the<br />

needs of the young person. (Sussex)<br />

Page 79<br />

53


APPENDIX 3<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Homelessness Case Study (an amalgamation of two<br />

cases)<br />

AJ – a 17 year old male.<br />

AJ approached the <strong>Council</strong> Housing Options Team having been asked to leave a<br />

hostel due to his behaviour.<br />

He approached the Housing Options Team late having been to Social Services at<br />

Bassett Street, South Wigston for advice. Initially he had been told by Social<br />

Services duty officer to go to Leicester City <strong>Council</strong> for housing help. He had been<br />

there but had been referred to <strong>Blaby</strong> as he in fact had no connection with Leicester,<br />

having lived in <strong>Blaby</strong> for several years.<br />

On presenting to the Housing Options Team, initial details of his circumstances were<br />

taken. His mum confirmed that she was not willing to have him at home due to his<br />

behaviour.<br />

It appeared that AJ had spent several nights sleeping rough and was suffering from<br />

ill health. He was tired, hungry and crying. It also transpired that AJ had had contact<br />

previously with Social Services and had in fact been placed in temporary<br />

accommodation by them for a considerable while having experienced problems<br />

when living with his father.<br />

In addition, AJ had mental health problems including self-harm and history of suicide<br />

attempts, had a poor relationship with both parents, had a long history of social<br />

services involvement with his family, educational welfare issues, increasing offending<br />

and a relationship breakdown with his partner.<br />

As it appeared that AJ had already been assessed and accommodated by Social<br />

Services, a copy of the Child in Need assessment was requested.<br />

In the meantime, a deal was brokered for placing AJ temporarily with his mum<br />

pending the outcome of his application.<br />

At first, Social Services denied that any assessment had been carried out or that AJ<br />

had been accommodated by them.<br />

AJ informed us that Social Services had placed him in B+B and then found him a<br />

hostel space. He was given money by Social Services to help buy food and clothing.<br />

This led us to believe that AJ had been in receipt of accommodation and support<br />

from Social Services because he was a child in need.<br />

When that was denied, we requested a further assessment of AJ. This assessment<br />

was allegedly carried out on 5 th October without Social Services seeing AJ or<br />

updating the information they held. We were informed that AJ had been assessed<br />

as NOT a child in need and therefore, not in need of accommodation or support<br />

provided by Social Services.<br />

Page 80<br />

54


We requested a copy of this assessment but to date, no response has been made to<br />

our request.<br />

Eventually, AJ managed to provide a copy of his original assessment confirming that<br />

he was a child in need and had been in receipt of accommodation and support from<br />

Social Services. This had ended as he was deemed to have resolved all of his<br />

issues as he had been placed in a hostel.<br />

AJ is currently not receiving any support or accommodation from Social Services.<br />

He has been referred to our in house resident support team for help and is currently<br />

temporarily at his mum’s house. If this arrangement breaks down, we will have no<br />

alternative but to place AJ in a B+B.<br />

AJ is still vulnerable. His behaviour, mental health issues and offending all indicate<br />

that his issues are not resolved and that he requires support to become successfully<br />

independent.<br />

Page 81<br />

55


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 82


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

SCRUTINY COMMISSION NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS<br />

APPENDIX 2<br />

The Local Government and <strong>Public</strong> Involvement in Health Act 2007, implemented 1 April 09, places a duty<br />

on Scrutiny, by notice in writing, to require the Cabinet Executive, within two months of receipt of<br />

Scrutiny’s report/recommendations:<br />

Page 83


Page 84<br />

BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Post Scrutiny – Cabinet Executive Response in respect of<br />

Review of 16 – 17 Homelessness<br />

Date :<br />

Cabinet Member responsible for Compliance with notice of requirement:<br />

Recommendation Agreed<br />

R1 That Cabinet Executive<br />

consider and respond to the<br />

refreshed Protocol when<br />

approved by the Chief<br />

Housing Officer Group at the<br />

end of October 2012.<br />

R2 <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

officers work with County<br />

and <strong>District</strong> networks to<br />

improve data collection and<br />

presentation of information to<br />

provide a better picture of<br />

homelessness across the<br />

County that will assist in<br />

developing the service.<br />

YES/NO/PART<br />

APPENDIX 2<br />

Cabinet Response including proposed action Responsible<br />

Officer<br />

Action by<br />

date


Page 85<br />

R3 That Social Services<br />

Children & Young Peoples<br />

Services and the Housing<br />

Options Manager report<br />

back to Cabinet in six<br />

months and provide<br />

• Year end figures and<br />

benchmarking data<br />

• Impact of the refreshed<br />

Protocol<br />

• Assessment of the<br />

working relationship<br />

R4 With the majority of homeless<br />

accommodation being in the<br />

City, <strong>Blaby</strong>’s Health and<br />

Community Service Manager<br />

via the Chief Housing Officer<br />

Group continues on behalf of<br />

<strong>District</strong>s to identify if provision<br />

can be secured for County<br />

residents<br />

APPENDIX 2


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 86


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 th November 2012<br />

Subject: Quarter 2 Portfolio Performance Report 2012-13<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Portfolio Holder:<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

Ann Marie Hawkins<br />

Shared Head of Service Policy Performance &<br />

Partnerships<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Offices<br />

Tel: 0116 272 7566<br />

Cllr. David Clements, Corporate Services,<br />

Performance & Health<br />

To update the Cabinet Executive on the performance of each portfolio against<br />

the priorities set out in portfolio statements during quarter 2 2012/13.<br />

Recommendation / Recommendation to <strong>Council</strong><br />

That the quarterly portfolio performance <strong>reports</strong> be accepted<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

To enable the Cabinet to monitor performance throughout the organisation<br />

in order to focus on the rate of improvement and monitor priorities. It is<br />

important that areas of good performance are recognised and that<br />

appropriate action is taken on those requiring improvements.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

4.1 Has your report been included on the Forward Plan? Yes<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 No<br />

Page 87<br />

Agenda Item 8


6 Matters for Consideration<br />

6.1 The Portfolio Reports for quarter 2 2012/13 are attached at Appendix 1.<br />

6.2 Overall performance for Q2 has been analysed and 69% of indicators<br />

exceeded their target (where set) and where comparable 64% improved on<br />

performance for the previous quarter, and 64% improved on their<br />

performance for the same period last year.<br />

6.3 Quarterly meetings between individual Portfolio holders and the Portfolio<br />

holder for Corporate Services, Performance & Health were held in early<br />

November, providing an opportunity for discussion about progress within the<br />

Portfolio.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

Human Rights Act 1998<br />

Human rights have been considered and there are no overarching matters for<br />

concern in relation to this report.<br />

Legal Implications<br />

There are no legal implications in relation to this report.<br />

Human Resources Implications<br />

There are no implications in relation to this report.<br />

Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

There are no risks, business continuity or resilience issues in relation to this<br />

report.<br />

Equalities<br />

No EINA is required for this report.<br />

Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

Not relevant to this report<br />

Crime & Disorder<br />

There are no crime and disorder issues in relation to this report<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

None<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted (identified by �):<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Corporate Services Group Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 88


10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

None<br />

11. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

11.1 Portfolio Performance Reports for Quarter 2 2012/13<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

None<br />

Page 89


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 90


Performance - Exceptions:<br />

This Qtr Target Against<br />

Target<br />

1<br />

Previous<br />

qtr<br />

Comparison Against<br />

Perf. v<br />

previous<br />

qtr<br />

Same<br />

qtr last<br />

year<br />

Perf. v<br />

last year<br />

% of invoices paid within 10 days 89.21% 90% ���� 92.24% ���� 93.74% ����<br />

Comments: See People Exceptions below. The Finance team was operating with a vacancy of 1 FTE<br />

between August and mid September.<br />

People – Exceptions<br />

Service Total<br />

FTE<br />

No of<br />

available<br />

days<br />

No of<br />

working<br />

days<br />

lost<br />

Vacancies Sickness<br />

%<br />

available<br />

days lost<br />

Days<br />

lost due<br />

to<br />

sickness<br />

% of<br />

available<br />

days lost<br />

Comments<br />

Finance 10.57 676.48 32 4.73% 7 1% Finance Assistant post<br />

vacant between 1 st<br />

Revenues<br />

Value for Money Indicators<br />

Finance, Efficiency & Assets<br />

Quarter 2<br />

2012/13<br />

Portfolio Priorities<br />

1. Understand costs and deliver a responsive, cost effective and high quality financial<br />

service.<br />

2. Maintaining the high collection rate of the Revenues Service whilst driving efficiency and<br />

improving Customer Service.<br />

3. Maximising the use of the council’s assets.<br />

4. Instilling principles of good, sustainable procurement.<br />

5. Continue a culture of transparency with emphasis on financial control, audit, fraud and<br />

risk.<br />

14.89 952.96 37.5 3.94%<br />

This<br />

Year<br />

To date<br />

Previous<br />

Year<br />

Page 91<br />

August and 16 th<br />

September.<br />

Actions for Improvements<br />

September 2012


Portfolio Holder’s Quarterly Statement<br />

PRIORITY 1 - Understand costs and deliver a responsive, cost effective and high quality financial<br />

service.<br />

As well as working with all managers to understand their costs and the resulting efficiencies from<br />

service improvements the Finance team continues to explore ways to automate processes in the<br />

finance function itself in order to free up staff time and improve on the quality and timeliness of<br />

data provided.<br />

The use of electronic time sheets and expense claims has reduced the need for keying of paper<br />

based forms, releasing staff to perform other tasks within the department and as a consequence<br />

increase resilience. During quarter 2 the Finance team has introduced a more streamlined<br />

approach to the production of monthly management team <strong>reports</strong>, such as the establishment<br />

report and key income report, with a view to reducing the double-keying of financial data. Work<br />

has commenced on the annual budget process which has seen the Finance team meeting with<br />

group managers and services to review their budgeted expenditure and income for the next<br />

financial year. As a result of these meetings, and ongoing discussions with managers, the draft<br />

budget is currently being compiled.<br />

The introduction on 1 st April 2013 of business rates pooling, and localisation of council tax<br />

support poses a significant challenge to the Authority’s future financial position, and the Finance<br />

team is working closely with colleagues in other services as well as other Leicestershire<br />

authorities to ensure that the impact of these new initiatives is closely managed.<br />

As a support service the Finance department continues to assist with the implementation of the<br />

new Website, Pavilion on-line booking system and Revenues System, with the aim of ensuring<br />

that the interfaces into the Financial system are correctly implemented. This assurance will retain<br />

the Financial Control mechanisms across systems in addition to automating tasks currently<br />

carried out manually within the Finance function.<br />

The Finance department continues to provide and maintain financial information in support of the<br />

monitoring of S106 contributions and the asset function is working in partnership with the<br />

Planning Obligations Officer and Parish <strong>Council</strong>s to both enhance the Authority’s relationship<br />

with Parishes and to maximise the use of the S106 monies with community engagement.<br />

The Authority’s annual Financial Statement was approved by Audit Committee on 27 th<br />

September 2012. Once again the Authority received an unqualified opinion on it’s Accounts from<br />

the external auditors Pricewaterhouse Cooper.<br />

The team’s new trainee accountant has commenced studying towards the first stage of the<br />

CIPFA (Chartered Institute of <strong>Public</strong> Finance Accountants) qualification, with initial examinations<br />

to be taken in December 2012. Finance Services continues to engage with CIPFA with a view to<br />

becoming an accredited employer, which will enable the Authority to develop training and<br />

development programs for our Finance staff and ensure that we are able to fully support our staff<br />

in reaching their full potential.<br />

2<br />

Page 92<br />

September 2012


PRIORITY 2 - Maintaining the high collection rate of the Revenues Service whilst driving<br />

efficiency and improving Customer Service.<br />

Collection rates for both <strong>Council</strong> Tax and Business Rates have remained high in recent years<br />

despite the economic climate. The Revenues Department has continually strived to deliver these<br />

high collection rates during the implementation of the Revenues System project and the<br />

continuing uncertain economy. Collection rates are slightly above the target at the end of quarter<br />

2, but slightly below the same period last year. This is during a period when Officers in the<br />

Revenues department are also engaged in the implementation of the new system due to ‘go live’<br />

in December 2012.<br />

PRIORITY 3 - Maximising the use of the council’s assets.<br />

The capital and revenue programmes for 2012/13 included a number of asset related projects to<br />

improve assets within the <strong>Council</strong>’s ownership. These projects included:<br />

• Whetstone Way Bridge. The team is project managing a range of repair works to a<br />

number bridge structures across the district to ensure bridges and structures forming<br />

country side walks and recreation areas (such as the Whetstone Way countryside<br />

recreation area); are maintained subject to funding to ensure the full use of the sites in line<br />

with the Corporate aims and objectives Works have started on site at Whetstone way with<br />

repairs to the masonry and structural repairs<br />

• Improvements to Shower/toilet facilities – Since the <strong>Council</strong>’s Climate Change Action Plan<br />

and Green travel Plan supported people travelling to work by bicycle it was recognised<br />

that the <strong>Council</strong>’s facilities required improvement in support of this initiative. The Assets<br />

team has procured and managed the installation of an additional cycle cage and currently<br />

drawing up the proposals for the other improvement to showers<br />

• Sustainability – The group is continually working to bring about improvements in the<br />

management of energy and performance of the corporate assets; this with the<br />

maintenance programmes and whilst working with the Environment team with the<br />

Corporate Climate Change Action plan.<br />

• Development of the Golf Range at the Pavilion – whilst this project is being delivered<br />

across portfolios support is being given by the Asset Management function to assist in<br />

procuring, developing and delivering the new facility.<br />

PRIORITY 4 - Instilling principles of good, sustainable procurement.<br />

The Welland Procurement Partnership continue to assist Officers to procure effectively and<br />

recent projects such as the feasibility study for the future of the Littlethorpe Depot have provided<br />

opportunity for Officers to work with the Partnership.<br />

PRIORITY 5 - Continue a culture of transparency with emphasis on financial control, audit, fraud<br />

and risk.<br />

To further the Authority’s commitment to openness and transparency we now publish details of<br />

all payments to suppliers in excess of £250 (including VAT) on our website each month. Other<br />

financial data and information published on our website includes the Financial Statement,<br />

approved by Audit Committee on 27 th September 2012, and details of senior officers’ salaries in<br />

accordance with the government’s open data requirements.<br />

3<br />

Page 93<br />

September 2012


The <strong>Council</strong> is required by law to protect the public funds we administer. Fraud and error costs<br />

public services an estimated £21 billion a year (National Fraud Authority (NFA) 2012 Annual<br />

Fraud Indicator). For example, council tax fraud is estimated to cost local authorities is now<br />

thought to cost £131 million a year, which is an increase of 32% from 2011 figures. In an effort to<br />

protect against and tackle fraud, the <strong>Council</strong> is once again taking part in the National Anti Fraud<br />

Initiative. We are therefore sharing information provided to us with other bodies through the Audit<br />

Commission to detect potential fraudulent activity.<br />

We are undergoing a Systems Thinking Intervention into Benefit Fraud Service. This has been<br />

supported by the Department of Work and Pensions to deliver improvement in the quality of the<br />

service. A new process for dealing with potential benefit fraud is being drawn up to ensure that<br />

we focus on the work of most value to the <strong>Council</strong>. This includes joint working with the Job<br />

Centre Plus, training of staff and preventative work.<br />

During the first 2 quarters of this year, we there have been 2 prosecutions, 4 administrative<br />

penalties and 1 caution issued. This equates to overpayments of nearly £6,000 of housing<br />

benefit, council tax benefit, and council tax discount, and nearly £20,000 of other benefit fraud.<br />

The work on the revision of the Corporate Plan 2011-14 Critical Activities includes an<br />

assessment of potential risks associated with the delivery of these and mitigating actions to be<br />

taken.<br />

Monitoring of Cabinet Executive Decisions:<br />

Ref Report Title Decision Current position<br />

1255 Proposed Capital<br />

Resources &<br />

Programme 12/13<br />

1217 Procurement of<br />

Replacement System for<br />

Revenues & Benefits<br />

3. That the delegated authority<br />

be granted to the Financial<br />

Services Group Manager in<br />

consultation with the Legal<br />

Services Manager to purchase<br />

the area of land for the Pavilion<br />

Golf range development.<br />

That the Financial Services<br />

Group Manager be authorised to<br />

take steps to conclude the<br />

procurement process and<br />

ultimately award the contract to<br />

the preferred bidder.<br />

4<br />

Page 94<br />

The legal process has now been<br />

completed and this piece of land<br />

has now transferred into the<br />

ownership of the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The contractual arrangements in<br />

relation to this purchase were<br />

finalised in October 2011. The<br />

implementation of this project is<br />

ongoing and the ‘go live’ date is<br />

anticipated to be the 10 th<br />

December 2012<br />

September 2012


Performance - Exceptions:<br />

None<br />

Performance – Exceptionally good performance<br />

Health Improvement – Number<br />

of Patients referred to the<br />

Exercise Referral Programme<br />

This Qtr Target Against<br />

Target<br />

1<br />

Previous<br />

qtr<br />

Comparison Against<br />

Perf. v<br />

previous<br />

qtr<br />

Same<br />

qtr last<br />

year<br />

Perf. v<br />

last year<br />

89 80 ☺ 46 ☺ 45 ☺<br />

Comments: The project continues to perform well with increasing amounts of referrals from local GP’s. This<br />

has been achieved by improved and positive communication with GP’s about the programme. These links<br />

will be developed further as part of the <strong>Blaby</strong> Staying Healthy Forum.<br />

People – Exceptions<br />

Service Total<br />

FTE<br />

Partnerships<br />

No of<br />

available<br />

days<br />

Value for Money Indicators<br />

New indicator being developed<br />

for Q3<br />

Policy, Partnerships & Health Improvement<br />

Quarter 2<br />

2012/13<br />

Portfolio Priorities<br />

1. Enable the development of town and parish councils to deliver localism and the Big<br />

Society Agenda.<br />

2. Increase the capacity of the voluntary sector to better meet the needs of local<br />

communities.<br />

3. Get <strong>Blaby</strong> Healthier<br />

4. Increase capacity to better commission services focusing on the strategic areas of:-<br />

Children and young people, Community safety, Environment & Health and well-being.<br />

No of<br />

working<br />

days<br />

lost<br />

Vacancies Sickness<br />

%<br />

available<br />

days lost<br />

Days<br />

lost due<br />

to<br />

sickness<br />

% of<br />

available<br />

days lost<br />

3.04 194.56 7 3.60%<br />

This<br />

Year<br />

To date<br />

Previous<br />

Year<br />

Page 95<br />

Comments<br />

Actions for Improvements<br />

September 2012


Portfolio Holder’s Quarterly Statement<br />

PRIORITY 1 - Enable the development of town and parish councils to deliver localism and<br />

the Big Society Agenda.<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> previously ran Code of Conduct Meetings with Parish and Town <strong>Council</strong>s, after<br />

consultation with clerks these meeting have been renamed to quarterly Liaison Meetings and<br />

contain an agenda that is Local <strong>Council</strong> lead. These meeting encourage discussion and<br />

feedback and are a forum to consult with Local <strong>Council</strong> to shape services.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> have also developed a newsletter called the ‘Local <strong>Council</strong> Voice’ which allows the<br />

<strong>District</strong> to keep local councils informed with information that they request or the opportunity to<br />

circulate information they feel will be informative.<br />

Localism Act - A high level action plan has been developed by the Head of Policy, Performance<br />

and Partnerships in conjunction with the senior management team and group managers. An<br />

briefing will be prepared for members in December.<br />

PRIORITY 2 - Increase the capacity of the voluntary sector to better meet the needs of<br />

local communities.<br />

The <strong>Blaby</strong> Voluntary and Community Forum relaunched on the 12 th June 2012, having not met<br />

since December 2011. The forum provides the opportunity for voluntary and community sector<br />

organisations to come together to network, share sector intelligence, skills and experience. VAL<br />

are working to increase skills through volunteering to improve chances of employment and<br />

placements within the <strong>District</strong>. They can deliver free training in a range of subjects regarding<br />

volunteering that can assist in volunteer recruitment, to helping groups apply for funding. The<br />

more we collaborate and support our voluntary sector the more we can learn from one and other,<br />

which will provide us a better knowledge to meet the needs of our community.<br />

Discussions are ongoing with the Community Action Partnership regarding the delivery of their<br />

objectives of the Community Plan<br />

PRIORITY 3 – Get <strong>Blaby</strong> Healthier<br />

A <strong>Blaby</strong> Staying Healthy Forum has been established to bring a wide range of health partners<br />

together to improve the Health of our <strong>District</strong>. Using local health data the partnership has<br />

identified 6 local priorities:<br />

- Ageing Population - Substance Abuse<br />

- Obesity & Healthy Weight - Smoking Cessation & Tobacco Control<br />

- Teenage Pregnancy & Sexual Health - Mental Health & Wellbeing<br />

The Forum is developing a robust performance framework and a range of health improvement<br />

projects. To support the work streams Samantha Clarke our new Health Improvement Officer<br />

has recently joined us.<br />

PRIORITY 4- Increase the capacity to better commission services<br />

A review of <strong>Blaby</strong> Together is underway to consider how it should be refocused and reconfigured<br />

to develop, improve and join up locality commissioning and partnership delivery in the future<br />

including Children and Young People, Supporting Leicestershire Families, Community Safety,<br />

Environment and Health. Findings from the review will be reported to partners in December.<br />

Monitoring of Cabinet Executive Decisions:<br />

Ref Report Title Decision Current position<br />

None to be monitored<br />

2<br />

Page 96<br />

September 2012


Performance – Exceptions<br />

FOI requests – number of new<br />

requests<br />

This Qtr Target Against<br />

Target<br />

1<br />

Previous<br />

qtr<br />

Comparison Against<br />

Perf. v<br />

previous<br />

qtr<br />

Same<br />

qtr last<br />

year<br />

Perf. v<br />

last year<br />

166 N/A N/A 199 ☺ 113 ����<br />

Comments: 47% increase on same period last year - Although the team continue to put work relating to<br />

FOI on the web site, the case load and work involved with FOI’s continues to increase. Analysis being<br />

undertaken to understand types of request and time taken.<br />

Number of young people involved<br />

in sports, health & recreational<br />

activities (Change 4 Life Project)<br />

1176 1100 ☺ 1229 ���� 1448 ����<br />

Comments: The programme performed well this quarter. The number of participants has reduced from last<br />

year as the programme has changed to deliver more focussed activities based on customer needs. Toddler<br />

Town is a particularly successful service with regular attendances of 80 per session.<br />

Whole <strong>Council</strong> - Number of<br />

working days lost due to sickness<br />

absence (average per employee)<br />

Corporate Services, Performance & Leisure<br />

Quarter 2<br />

2012/13<br />

Portfolio Priorities<br />

1. Put the customer first in all we do.<br />

2. Focus on continuous performance improvement.<br />

3. Ensuring that the right people with the right skills deliver excellent services for <strong>Blaby</strong>.<br />

4. Deliver efficient and cost effective support services.<br />

5. Improve opportunities for residents to engage in sport, leisure, recreation and cultural<br />

activities.<br />

2.06 1.74 ���� 2.09 ☺ 1.39 ����<br />

Comments: As previously outlined, the method for recording sickness absence has changed which has<br />

made sickness absence more accurate. For this reason, the <strong>Council</strong> is likely to see an increase in sickness<br />

absence compared to last year. We will continue to review this, highlighting trends and addressing areas of<br />

concern.<br />

Year to date figures are 4.14 days per employee compared to 2.93 days per employee at the end of<br />

September 2011, this equates to an extra 282 days sickness across the council in comparison to the year to<br />

date figure for Sept 11.<br />

Page 97<br />

September 2012


Exceptionally good performance:<br />

Website – number of unique<br />

users<br />

This Qtr Target Against<br />

Target<br />

Comments: 177% increase on same period last year<br />

2<br />

Previous<br />

qtr<br />

Comparison Against<br />

Perf. v<br />

previous<br />

qtr<br />

Same<br />

qtr last<br />

year<br />

Perf. v<br />

last year<br />

101,806 N/A N/A 87,992 ☺ 36,776 ☺<br />

Pavilion Sales £43,542 £37,320 ☺ £41,955 ☺ £36,063 ☺<br />

Comments: Q2 highlights were 90 4-14yr olds per day for 6 weeks of the summer holiday. In addition the<br />

performance of the external pitches has exceeded the return on investment for year 1 with income at £7042<br />

compared with an estimated £5000.<br />

Visitors to The Pavilion 56,289 55,300 ☺ 40,512 ☺ 11,953<br />

Comments: Footfall through the centre continues to exceed expectations; this is a result of increased<br />

occupancy not just casual activities such as badminton and squash and increased marketing of club<br />

sessions, classes, meeting room bookings, Surestart activities and the children’s holiday schemes. In<br />

addition to the above, Community Action Partnership and the activities offered by the third sector continue to<br />

be well utilised by service users.<br />

Positive Activities Referral<br />

Programme – number of young 37 20 ☺ 15 ☺ N/A N/A<br />

people referred<br />

Comments: The project is developing well. Improved awareness with partner agencies has increased the<br />

level of referrals received. Feedback is positive from participants.<br />

People – Exceptions<br />

Service Total<br />

FTE<br />

Customer &<br />

Electoral<br />

Services<br />

Democratic<br />

Services<br />

No of<br />

available<br />

days<br />

No of<br />

working<br />

days<br />

lost<br />

Vacancies Sickness<br />

%<br />

available<br />

days lost<br />

Days<br />

lost due<br />

to<br />

sickness<br />

% of<br />

available<br />

days lost<br />

17.37 1111.68 69.5 6.25%<br />

5 294 38 12.93%<br />

Page 98<br />

Comments<br />

1 member of staff is<br />

currently off work with<br />

a long term sickness<br />

issue. The officer<br />

concerned is being<br />

supported through the<br />

illness and when<br />

appropriate will be<br />

assisted with a phased<br />

return to work.<br />

I member of staff was<br />

off work with a long<br />

term sickness issue.<br />

This is no longer ongoing<br />

and will therefore<br />

September 2012


Value for Money Indicators<br />

Systems Thinking – Room<br />

Bookings<br />

Other VFM indicators being<br />

developed<br />

This<br />

Year<br />

To date<br />

Approx.<br />

22<br />

weeks<br />

of staff<br />

time<br />

saved.<br />

Portfolio Holder’s Quarterly Statement<br />

PRIORITY 1<br />

Put the customer first in all we do.<br />

Previous<br />

Year<br />

3<br />

not impact on future<br />

performance.<br />

Actions for Improvements<br />

This affects all services across the <strong>Council</strong>, but in<br />

particular Property Services, Customer Services<br />

and Caretakers. The benefits are the freeing up of<br />

staff time to deliver other work. See Priority 4.<br />

A Toolkit for engaging with Harder to Reach Groups has been developed to ensure that we<br />

attempt to understand all our customer views and that we design our services around what<br />

matters to the customer.<br />

The Service Managers are working together to prepare for a Customer Excellence Award. The<br />

work is leading to a more consistent approach to customer Services and to ensure shared<br />

learning.<br />

PRIORITY 2<br />

Focus on continuous performance improvement.<br />

The Corporate Plan 2011-14 Critical Activities have been reviewed in order to ensure that they<br />

reflect current issues and changes. The progress of delivery will be monitored through a<br />

proposed new Performance Management Framework. This puts the Corporate Priorities and<br />

Ambitions at the centre of everything that we do which will support continuous improvement in<br />

service delivery across the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong>’s Annual Report has been produced and distributed. This is a public facing<br />

document which highlights achievements, performance and financial reporting for 2011/12.<br />

Systems Thinking interventions have continued to be carried out across the <strong>Council</strong>. Room<br />

bookings have been completed with a new process being implemented. Understanding the<br />

service or ‘Check’ has taken place in Benefit Fraud and Benefits services and these are now<br />

moving into the re-design stage. The <strong>Council</strong> has also continued to look at ways of embedding<br />

the Systems Thinking Culture through articles on our intranet, a <strong>Blaby</strong> Lean Thinking group<br />

holding regular meetings, presentations to and involvement of Scrutiny and ‘end of check’<br />

presentations now including all Senior managers and Members.<br />

Page 99<br />

September 2012


PRIORITY 3<br />

Ensuring that the right people with the right skills deliver excellent services for <strong>Blaby</strong>.<br />

Athena, the <strong>Council</strong>s e-learning development tool was launched over this period. It was<br />

launched with a mandatory course on Data Protection which will minimise risks to the <strong>Council</strong><br />

with regards to information and data handling. We are working with a number of departments to<br />

get more courses published which will encourage financial and resource efficiencies.<br />

A staff survey has been carried out to assess the satisfaction and well being of employees. The<br />

return rate was a very positive 72%. An away day held with SLT considered the information<br />

received and ways of moving this forward. An action plan to address issues raised will be<br />

compiled following a series of staff workshops in November.<br />

A SLT away day also starting formulating the <strong>Council</strong>s People Strategy which will inform training<br />

needs for employees to deliver excellent services<br />

PRIORITY 4<br />

Deliver efficient and cost effective support services.<br />

A Systems Thinking review into the method of booking meeting rooms has resulted in potential<br />

savings of 22 weeks of staff time per year. For people requesting the rooms there is a total<br />

saving of 6 weeks approx across the organisation. The main individual beneficiaries are Property<br />

Services saving 7.5 weeks approx p.a., Customer Services saving 4.5 weeks approx p.a. and<br />

Caretakers 3 weeks approx. Property Services have used this ‘extra’ time, to offer more support<br />

to Building Control with the initial processing of applications requesting Building Regulations<br />

Approval. Caretakers are able to deal with their routine tasks with fewer interruptions and<br />

Customer Services have more time to deal with their other work.<br />

PRIORITY 5<br />

Improve opportunities for residents to engage in sport, leisure, recreation and cultural<br />

activities.<br />

Sport, Culture & Recreation<br />

The Positive Activities Referral Scheme (PARS) continues to grow with agencies referring young people<br />

at risk of offending to the scheme for the young people to take part in physical activity along with<br />

educational programmes to support them in moving away from ASB. PARS has recently been highlighted<br />

in a national publication by Sport England as an example of best practice.<br />

A revised Green Space Strategy has been developed and further consultation is now complete. The<br />

revised document will be considered by <strong>Council</strong> in November. An action plan to deliver the key themes is<br />

being finalised and our new green space management staffing structure is being implemented. The new<br />

approach to managing green space is already seeing results as improvement projects at Bouskell Park<br />

(car park) and Jubilee Park (fencing & car park) are being implemented.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong>’s Sport & Physical Activity Commissioning Plan launched 14 new activities in this quarter<br />

which has led to an increase in participation levels and percentage take-up rates.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong>’s 3 rd Annual Sports Awards are being planned and we look forward to this successful event<br />

taking place on Wed 21 st Nov at Brockington College.<br />

The Pavilion<br />

Q2 usage data provide evidence that more of our community are accessing <strong>Blaby</strong>’s leisure facilities.<br />

Work is now taking place to profile our customers and permit a greater understanding of how we can<br />

better reach into the community. The capital programme at the Pavilion remains a focus with a further<br />

4<br />

Page 100<br />

September 2012


eport scheduled for Cabinet in November. An internet booking and payment system is now close to<br />

going live. Closer links are being formed with SLM (who manage Enderby Leisure Centre) to enhance<br />

working relationships and ensure the range and diversity of activities compliment each other.<br />

Enderby Leisure Centre<br />

The wet summer weather has reduced golf usage. However visits in other areas of the facility more than<br />

made up for this disappointment with the Olympics a contributory factor.<br />

A Customer Insight project using the MOSAIC tool is underway at Enderby Leisure Centre. The aim of the<br />

project is to profile the existing and potential customer base with the intention of conducting a marketing<br />

campaign to increase memberships at an appropriate point.<br />

Monitoring of Cabinet Executive Decisions:<br />

Ref Report Title Decision Current position<br />

1281 Green Space<br />

Strategy<br />

That the new Green Space<br />

Strategy be withdrawn for<br />

further development with<br />

scrutiny.<br />

5<br />

Page 101<br />

Green Space Strategy<br />

revised through feedback<br />

from Scrutiny and further<br />

partner consultation. The<br />

revised strategy will be going<br />

to <strong>Council</strong> in November.<br />

September 2012


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 102


Performance – Exceptions<br />

Exceptionally good performance:<br />

People – Exceptions<br />

Service Total<br />

FTE<br />

No of<br />

available<br />

days<br />

No of<br />

working<br />

days<br />

lost<br />

Vacancies Sickness<br />

%<br />

available<br />

days lost<br />

1<br />

Days<br />

lost due<br />

to<br />

sickness<br />

% of<br />

available<br />

days lost<br />

Neighbourhood<br />

Services<br />

70.22 4494.08 272 6.05%<br />

Comments – there have been a number of long term sickness cases this year due to manual nature of the<br />

job and an ageing work force. All of which have/are being managed appropriately through the absent<br />

management process.<br />

Portfolio Holder’s Quarterly Statement<br />

Neighbourhood & Environmental Health Services<br />

Quarter 2<br />

2012/13<br />

Portfolio Priorities<br />

1. Improve the overall appearance and cleanliness of community spaces.<br />

2. Ensure that <strong>Blaby</strong>’s Refuse and Recycling service is lean, efficient and fit for purpose.<br />

PRIORITY 1 - Improve the overall appearance and cleanliness of community spaces<br />

The service is reviewing how it monitors service requests to develop a more meaningful performance<br />

indicator. We are examining the time taken for service requests to be actioned and what factors influence<br />

this time by exception reporting. This will allow a more meaningful dataset which permits greater analysis<br />

and valuation.<br />

Empty Homes<br />

Since the Empty Homes Strategy was adopted, proactive work has been undertaken to bring empty<br />

homes back into use, through correspondence with owners of empty properties and enforcement action<br />

with long standing empty homes. Within Q2 owners of 126 empty homes, were contacted and 91 of these<br />

are now back in use. Enforcement action on tough long term empties has commenced on 10 properties<br />

from within the district. We have served notices on 3 properties, stage 4 enforcement letters sent to 2<br />

properties. Contact is currently being made with another 3 properties to understand what the owners<br />

plans are for their properties and to make them aware of our enforcement procedures.<br />

New initiatives are being explored by the Empty Homes Working Group to improve delivery of results for<br />

the strategy. These include the introduction of new funding for empty home owners to assist in bringing<br />

properties back into use (which will also provide housing for vulnerable households for a minimum of 2<br />

years); developing links with local Estate Agents to assist owners with letting or marketing their properties;<br />

and working with East Midlands Housing Association to identify owners wishing to participate in the<br />

purchase and repair scheme which is being part funded by the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Better Business for All<br />

Start up <strong>pack</strong> now launched for new businesses to improve accessibility and awareness of regulators and<br />

encourage and support economic business growth.<br />

Page 103<br />

September 2012


Climate Change<br />

Gold Motorvate Award received, for the second year running, for reductions in carbon dioxide production<br />

in the <strong>Council</strong>’s fleet vehicles. Over the last year, the <strong>Council</strong>’s carbon footprint has been reduced by an<br />

additional 3.1%, This is a total of 21.7% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions since 2009/10. As a result<br />

of this we are the highest performing <strong>Council</strong> in terms of CO2 emissions in the East Midlands. The Solar<br />

PV installed at the Pavilion in December 2011 has already achieved a feed-in-tariff of £3501.40, in 10<br />

months set against a predicted £3374 for the first 12 months.<br />

Envirocrime<br />

Three successful prosecutions secured. Two people were found guilty of duty of care offences and were<br />

fined a total of over £1000. One person was found guilty of a littering offence and fined a total of £215.<br />

Building Control<br />

1. Maintained income levels despite the current economic climate and in particular the extremely<br />

negative affect that it is having on the UK construction industry whilst at the same time being<br />

exposed to fierce competition from the private sector.<br />

2. Following the recent successful introduction of charges for works carried out on Street Naming and<br />

Numbering within our district, the Section has been able to report that from April of this year this has<br />

attracted £4,470.00 of additional income into the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

3. Continued to expand on the number of Partner Agents who submit their applications to ourselves<br />

which attracts additional income into this council that would usually be payable to other Local<br />

Authorities.<br />

4. Utilised the skills of our Surveyors in a diversification exercise that has enabled the <strong>Council</strong> to save<br />

money by not having to employ the services of external consultants to carry out Fire Risk<br />

Assessments on its own buildings and have also acted on an advisory basis in the design process of<br />

the new Golf Driving Range at the Pavilion.<br />

5. Carried out 712 Building Control inspections on building works currently under construction within our<br />

<strong>District</strong> whilst at the same time maintaining our 100% record for attending those sites on the same<br />

day as requested<br />

6. Simplified the process for ourselves and our customers in dealing with both defective and new street<br />

nameplates within the <strong>District</strong> of <strong>Blaby</strong> after having carried out a Systems Thinking exercise on this<br />

area.<br />

Priority 2 - Ensure that <strong>Blaby</strong>’s Refuse and Recycling service is lean, efficient and fit for purpose<br />

A further recycling trial was conducted in Braunstone Town, Sharnford, Sapcote and Aston Flamville<br />

during September. Based on the results from the trial and the financial implications associated with glass<br />

collection, a report was taken to cabinet on Monday, 22 nd October 2012 recommending a change to the<br />

recycling collection service. The report recommended that we collect mixed recyclate (paper/card, plastic<br />

and cans) in one bin on a fortnightly basis. It also recommended that glass would not be collected from<br />

the kerbside unless the economics for collecting it become more viable. Residents would be asked to use<br />

the colour separated glass banks provided in the <strong>District</strong> or put the glass in the residual waste bin. This<br />

report was subsequently approved by Members.<br />

Monitoring of Cabinet Executive Decisions:<br />

Ref Report Title Decision Current position<br />

1248 Enforcement Action,<br />

Land at Narborough<br />

Road South Braunstone<br />

Town<br />

That the Regulatory Services<br />

Group Manager and Legal<br />

Services Manager be delegated<br />

to take action in relation to land<br />

off Narborough Road South,<br />

Braunstone Town, using the<br />

Compulsory Purchase Powers<br />

under Section 226(1)(a) of the<br />

2<br />

Page 104<br />

Compulsory Purchase Order<br />

served on 26 th March with a<br />

deadline of 31 st May 2012 for<br />

any representation to be made<br />

to the Secretary of State.<br />

Representation was made in<br />

respect of the CPO – <strong>Public</strong><br />

September 2012


Town and Country Planning Act<br />

1990 and procedure under<br />

Section 103 of the Law Of<br />

Property Act 1925.<br />

3<br />

Page 105<br />

Inquiry now set for 8/1/13. The<br />

owner is progressing a private<br />

sale.<br />

September 2012


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 106


Performance – Exceptions<br />

Average number of days taken to<br />

process Housing and <strong>Council</strong> Tax<br />

Benefit Claims<br />

This Qtr Target Against<br />

Target<br />

1<br />

Previous<br />

qtr<br />

Comparison Against<br />

Perf. v<br />

previous<br />

qtr<br />

Same<br />

qtr last<br />

year<br />

Perf. v<br />

last year<br />

7.21 N/A N/A 6.64 ���� 5.84 ☺<br />

Comments: Increase in processing applications has been caused by the introduction of electronic notifications<br />

(ATLAS) from the DWP which has hampered progress in this area nationally. However performance in this<br />

area is now improving and new claims have improved from an average of 26 days to 14 days and similarly<br />

changes in circumstances have improved to just under 6 days.<br />

Domestic burglaries<br />

246<br />

(year to<br />

date)<br />

N/A N/A<br />

Not comparable –<br />

cumulative figures<br />

150 ����<br />

Comments: The number of domestic burglaries has risen by 69% from the corresponding month last year.<br />

The police have developed an action plan to try and tackle the issue. The rise is a Countywide rise.<br />

DFG’s – Time from first contact to<br />

approval (Majors)<br />

106.9 N/A N/A 72 ���� 145.20 ☺<br />

Comments: The approval times for major works varies enormously due to the complex nature of the jobs.<br />

Events such as hospital admission or the seriousness of the disabled persons condition can all delay the<br />

approval of work. Children’s cases tend to be more complex and lengthy too. This has happened on several<br />

occasions in the last quarter which has impacted on performance reported.<br />

Homelessness - % of cases<br />

resolved successfully<br />

61.65% N/A N/A 75.21% ���� 66.67% ����<br />

Comments:<br />

The drop in percentage of cases resolved successfully is reducing due to higher numbers of cases where we<br />

have lost contact with the client. We assume that if people no longer need our help that they have<br />

satisfactorily resolved their housing problem but cannot record an outcome against them if we have no<br />

evidence to support this. We are currently looking at “lost contact” cases to see if there is anyway we can<br />

work differently to reduce this. This is also compounded with having a higher level of complex cases in the<br />

system. These cases take much longer to resolve successfully and we are predicting a large rise in the<br />

number of successful cases in January 2013 as these cases resolve.<br />

Young people engaged via BB19<br />

bus<br />

Community Services<br />

Quarter 2<br />

2012/13<br />

Portfolio Priorities<br />

1. Improve Outcomes and Opportunities for Communities and Individuals.<br />

2. Help residents understand what services are available and make it possible for them to be<br />

able to use them.<br />

747 N/A N/A 568 ☺ 1113 ����<br />

Comments: The summer project was attended by 252 young people over 12 days in August. The first Autumn<br />

project is underway with the bus attending Croft, Cosby, Enderby and <strong>Blaby</strong><br />

Page 107<br />

September 2012


Exceptionally good performance:<br />

Substance use – number of<br />

people supported<br />

This Qtr Target Against<br />

Target<br />

21<br />

(Year to<br />

date)<br />

N/A N/A<br />

Comments: number of new cases continues to increase over time<br />

Theft of motor vehicle 30 N/A N/A<br />

Comments:<br />

First Contact – number of forms<br />

received<br />

2<br />

Previous<br />

qtr<br />

Comparison Against<br />

Perf. v<br />

previous<br />

qtr<br />

Not comparable –<br />

cumulative figures<br />

Same<br />

qtr last<br />

year<br />

12<br />

(year to<br />

date)<br />

Perf. v<br />

last year<br />

☺<br />

Not comparable –<br />

cumulative figures 62 ☺<br />

62 N/A N/A 55 ☺ 36 ☺<br />

Comments: number of forms up due to canvassing of customers who receive assisted bins<br />

People – Exceptions<br />

Service Total<br />

FTE<br />

Community<br />

Services<br />

Team<br />

(inc GM & PA)<br />

12.14<br />

Value for Money Indicators<br />

No of<br />

available<br />

days<br />

776.96<br />

No of<br />

working<br />

days<br />

lost<br />

This<br />

Year<br />

To date<br />

Vacancies Sickness<br />

%<br />

available<br />

days lost<br />

Previous<br />

Year<br />

Page 108<br />

Days<br />

lost due<br />

to<br />

sickness<br />

36.5<br />

% of<br />

available<br />

days lost<br />

4.7%<br />

Comments<br />

1 officer on phased<br />

return has impacted on<br />

figures<br />

Actions for Improvements<br />

September 2012


Portfolio Holder’s Quarterly Statement<br />

PRIORITY 1<br />

• The Housing Options Teams are now holding locality meetings with Children’s<br />

Occupational Therapy services in order to progress complex child cases more quickly.<br />

This approach has worked well with adult occupational therapy services.<br />

• New partnership arrangements have been developed with Acorn Training who now have a<br />

member of staff based within the Community Services Team who provides access to<br />

employment support for individuals and families<br />

• BB19 summer road shows held 12 locations in August reaching 252 young people<br />

• The Benefits Team have started a ‘lean thinking’ intervention to look at ways of improving<br />

the service that are provided to our customers. Given the forthcoming welfare reform<br />

changes the time is right for this intervention with an intention of looking at the barriers or<br />

obstacles that prevent us from being able to carry out our daily work/tasks<br />

PRIORITY 2<br />

• Information regarding emergency heating grants has been widely published on facebook, twitter<br />

and in contact magazine and the new parish council newsletter as have the dates for available<br />

properties on our Choice Based Lettings scheme. We have also been promoting the late night<br />

Thursday housing options session at <strong>Blaby</strong> service shop.<br />

• Consultation on the <strong>Council</strong> Tax Support changes from April 2013 has now ended.<br />

Further considerations as to the final scheme are now underway<br />

• Early preparation work has begun on the raft of welfare reform changes that will have an<br />

impact on <strong>Blaby</strong> residents which include the Social Fund, changes to LHA rules,<br />

introduction of the size criteria rules for social housing and the planned introduction of the<br />

benefit cap<br />

Monitoring of Cabinet Executive Decisions:<br />

Ref Report Title Decision Current position<br />

None to be monitored<br />

3<br />

Page 109<br />

September 2012


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 110


Performance – Exceptions<br />

Planning – end to end time, Major<br />

applications<br />

This Qtr Target Against<br />

Target<br />

1<br />

Previous<br />

qtr<br />

Comparison Against<br />

Perf. v<br />

previous<br />

qtr<br />

Same<br />

qtr last<br />

year<br />

Perf. v<br />

last year<br />

209 N/A N/A 35 ���� 130.80 ����<br />

Comments: The figures for September show that the average E2E time for Major applications was 141 days.<br />

This is higher than Q1 outturn which was 35 days. However this increase is attributed to the 2 applications<br />

Planning – end to end time, Minor<br />

applications<br />

77.38 N/A N/A 57.46 ���� 71.16 ����<br />

Comments: The figures for September show that the average E2E time for Minor applications was 51 days.<br />

This is markedly lower than August which was 96 days and is lower than Q1 outturn which was 57 days.<br />

Planning - % of applications valid<br />

on receipt<br />

48.16% 70% ���� 49.12% ���� 50.36% ����<br />

Comments: This shows an area of work going forward to ensure that we can encourage applicant's to submit<br />

applications "right first time" to reduce rework and waste in the system.<br />

Exceptionally good performance:<br />

Planning – end to end time,<br />

householder applications<br />

This Qtr Target Against<br />

Target<br />

Previous<br />

qtr<br />

Comparison Against<br />

Perf. v<br />

previous<br />

qtr<br />

Same<br />

qtr last<br />

year<br />

Perf. v<br />

last year<br />

38.09 N/A N/A 48.65 ☺ 44.48 ☺<br />

Comments: The figures for September show that the average E2E time for Householder applications was 33<br />

days. This is markedly lower than August which was 96 days and is lower than Q1 outturn which was 48<br />

days.<br />

Planning – end to end time, other<br />

applications<br />

Planning, Economic Development & Housing<br />

Strategy<br />

Quarter 2<br />

2012/13<br />

Portfolio Priorities<br />

1. Enable the provision of appropriate and sustainable housing and employment<br />

opportunities to meet the needs of local communities.<br />

2. Increase the potential for the local economy to grow including the further regeneration of<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> Town Centre.<br />

3. Ensure all development is acceptable and sustainable.<br />

4. Encourage a culture of compliance through more effective regulation.<br />

42.31 N/A N/A 49.21 ☺ 52.10 ☺<br />

Comments: The figures for September show that the average E2E time for Other applications was 38 days.<br />

This is markedly lower than August which was 96 days and is lower than Q1 outturn which was 51 days.<br />

Page 111<br />

September 2012


Planning - % of determined<br />

applications approved<br />

Comments:<br />

Decent Homes - % of decent<br />

Three Oaks Homes<br />

Comments:<br />

Number of affordable homes<br />

delivered<br />

Comments:<br />

People – Exceptions<br />

No significant exceptions<br />

Value for Money Indicators<br />

82.81% 75% ☺ 83.72% ���� 77.74% ☺<br />

93% N/A N/A 85% ☺ 75% ☺<br />

23 N/A N/A 18 ☺ 2 ☺<br />

This<br />

Year<br />

To date<br />

Portfolio Holder’s Quarterly Statement<br />

Previous<br />

Year<br />

2<br />

Actions for Improvements<br />

PRIORITY 1 - Enable the provision of appropriate and sustainable housing and employment<br />

opportunities to meet the needs of local communities<br />

Core Strategy Examination Pre- Hearing Inquiry held on 31 July<br />

BDC Statements submitted to the Examination on 21 September<br />

BDC responding to ad hoc requests by the Inspector<br />

Complying with Development Plan Regulations re Core Strategy.<br />

Lubbesthorpe application determined by Development Control Committee on 1 st November 2012,<br />

awaiting Secretary of State decision whether to call in.<br />

PRIORITY 2 - Increase the potential for the local economy to grow including the further<br />

regeneration of <strong>Blaby</strong> Town Centre.<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> Heritage Trail installed and launched<br />

Environmental improvements in <strong>Blaby</strong> , including hanging baskets in the Town Centre and improvements<br />

to the village green.<br />

Town Centre Partnership meeting on 25 September<br />

Preparing for the Christmas light switch on<br />

Ongoing work with Construction futures<br />

Page 112<br />

September 2012


PRIORITY 3 - Ensure all development is acceptable and sustainable<br />

Continuing work through the development management system and ongoing advancement with the<br />

progress of the Core Strategy. Work will commence shortly on the Allocations, Designations and<br />

Development Management Development Plan Document to enshrine concepts of sustainable<br />

development within a strong policy framework and thereby ensure conformity with the National Planning<br />

Policy Framework. Core Strategy due to be adopted early 2013.<br />

PRIORITY 4 - Encourage a culture of compliance through more effective regulation.<br />

Ongoing proactive work of the Enforcement Team and provision of reactive service during ‘Out of office<br />

hours’ for responding to unauthorised development. Active monitoring of conditions attached to planning<br />

permissions.<br />

Monitoring of Cabinet Executive Decisions:<br />

Ref Report Title Decision Current position<br />

1196 Designation of a<br />

Conservation Area in<br />

Glenfield<br />

That the Draft Character<br />

Statement for the proposed<br />

designation of a conservation<br />

are in Glenfield be used for the<br />

purposes of publicising the<br />

proposed designation and that<br />

public consultation be carried<br />

out on the proposal to designate<br />

a conservation are in Glenfield.<br />

3<br />

Page 113<br />

It is proposed that the public<br />

consultation on the proposal<br />

takes place in January 2013.<br />

Following the consultation the<br />

scheme will be progressed to<br />

designation.<br />

September 2012


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 114


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 th November 2012<br />

Subject: Establishment Budget 2012/13 and 2013/14<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Jane Toman Sarah Pennelli<br />

Director Financial Services Group Manager<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Offices <strong>Council</strong> Offices<br />

0116 272 7502 0116 272 7650<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor David Clements – Corporate Services,<br />

Portfolio Holder:<br />

Performance and Leisure Portfolio Holder<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor John Hudson - Finance & Efficiencies<br />

Portfolio Holder<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

1.1 To set out, for consideration by the Cabinet Executive, the revised<br />

establishment budget for the current financial year and the proposed budget<br />

for 2013/14.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

Recommendation to Cabinet Executive<br />

The Cabinet Executive is asked to consider and approve the content of this<br />

report in advance of the detailed service budget proposals and in the<br />

context of the overall budget strategy for next financial year. The<br />

establishment costs will be incorporated into the General Fund and Capital<br />

Programme draft budgets for consideration by the Cabinet Executive at a<br />

later date.<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

To make Cabinet Executive aware of the establishment costs which will<br />

influence the overall General Fund budget proposals for 2013/14.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

Yes<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Yes<br />

Page 115<br />

Agenda Item 9


6. Matters for Consideration<br />

6.1 ESTABLISHMENT BUDGETS 2012/13 AND 2013/14<br />

Establishment costs represent a substantial proportion of the core costs of the<br />

<strong>Council</strong>. The majority of the budget consists of salaries, employers’<br />

superannuation and national insurance contributions but also includes<br />

provisions for sickness, maternity leave, temporary staffing and agency costs.<br />

Contingency sums are incorporated into the budget to provide a source of<br />

funds to meet unplanned establishment related costs which may arise during<br />

the course of the year.<br />

Set out in this report and the table at Appendix A are the key facts and<br />

figures relating to the size and structure of the establishment, the associated<br />

costs and additional information in respect of a number of staff related issues.<br />

The report is based on the information which is available at the present time<br />

and is based on the current establishment. Any future changes that are<br />

proposed will be reflected in the final budget proposals if known, otherwise will<br />

be incorporated at the appropriate point when the budget is revised.<br />

6.1.1 Establishment Budget – Current Year<br />

(i) The original net establishment budget of £8,587,297 for 2012/13 was<br />

approved on 28 th November 2011. Following the completion of the budget<br />

process, changes to establishment related costs were incorporated into the<br />

estimates and are reflected within the revised figure. These are shown in<br />

Table 1 below.<br />

Table 1<br />

Net Establishment Budget as approved November 2011<br />

Add:<br />

Change in Employer’s Pension Contribution rates<br />

Additional External Funding – Sure Start Receptionists/Cleaner<br />

Temporary Post – Project Officer (£15,000 part funding)<br />

Policy & Partnerships – additional external funding<br />

Reduction in external funding for Highways Cyclical Maintenance<br />

(due to pay award)<br />

Less:<br />

Reduction in Pay Award from 2.5% to nil<br />

Human Resources restructure<br />

Directorate review<br />

Building Control Admin Assistant – post deleted<br />

Grounds Maintenance – TUPE transfer to Three Oaks Homes<br />

Environmental Health & Licensing restructure<br />

£<br />

8,587,297<br />

5,078<br />

18,280<br />

37,759<br />

7,456<br />

1,628<br />

(181,019)<br />

(22,699)<br />

(62,899)<br />

(20,500)<br />

(93,645)<br />

(59,047)<br />

Net Budget per latest Establishment Report 8,217,689<br />

Page 116


(ii) Performance Against Budget<br />

As part of the original 2012/13 establishment budget proposals it was agreed<br />

to achieve savings of £80,000 in staffing costs during the course of the current<br />

year. As at the end of September 2012, expenditure on salaries was<br />

£3,946,423 against the profiled budget of £4,212,373, representing a gross<br />

saving of £265,950 achieved largely through vacant posts, and shared<br />

arrangements in respect of the Head of Policy, Performance & Partnerships.<br />

However, it has been necessary, for operational reasons, to employ<br />

temporary and agency staff in certain key areas and the cost of doing so as at<br />

30 th September was £400,528. It is envisaged that the need for temporary or<br />

casual staff will continue through to the end of the financial year, albeit at a<br />

much reduced level since much of the requirement is in the first half of the<br />

financial year. In net terms, the establishment budget is overspent by<br />

£134,578 as at 30 th September 2012. Redundancy costs incurred during the<br />

first half of the year, arising from restructuring, amount to £37,005, and this<br />

sum will be charged against the <strong>Council</strong>’s balances in line with the existing<br />

policy.<br />

(iii) Revised Budget Position<br />

Establishment costs for 2012/13, taking into account actual expenditure to<br />

date and including additional one-off temporary posts mainly within Planning<br />

and Benefits, are forecast to outturn at £8,268,982, an increase of £51,293<br />

against the original budget of £8,217,689.<br />

6.1.2 Staff Turnover<br />

Turnover of staff within the establishment has increased over the last year.<br />

Over the last 7 months (1 st April – 31 st October, 2012) 16 employees have left<br />

the <strong>Council</strong>’s employment from established posts compared with 8 for the<br />

same period last year. This represents a turnover rate for this period of 6.1%<br />

compared to a turnover rate of 2.6% for the same period last year. In addition<br />

to this there have been 6 redundancies and 3 TUPE transfers during the first<br />

7 months of this financial year.<br />

A proportion of days lost due to vacancies is recovered by employing<br />

temporary or agency staff where required. At the end of September 2012 the<br />

<strong>Council</strong> had incurred £400,528 in respect of agency/temporary staff costs<br />

compared to £192,421 for the same period the previous year. The reason for<br />

this significantly higher cost is that it has been necessary to employ additional<br />

resource in Planning Services to support the <strong>Council</strong> through the<br />

Lubbesthorpe planning application process, as well as additional assistance<br />

within the Benefits team. These costs, and projected further expenditure for<br />

the remainder of the financial year, have been incorporated into the 2012/13<br />

Revised Budget and are being closely monitored.<br />

6.1.3 Sickness Absence<br />

The 2011/12 outturn for sickness shows that an average of 6.36 days were<br />

lost per employee due to sickness compared to 7.04 days the previous year.<br />

This is below the national average of 8.0 days per employee in local<br />

government (source = Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development<br />

Page 117


(CIPD) Simply Health Absence Report 2012). Sickness has shown a slight<br />

increase during the first half of 2012/13.<br />

6.1.4 Current Year Position<br />

At 30 th September 2012 actual expenditure on establishment costs was<br />

£4,383,956, inclusive of temporary and agency staff and redundancy costs,<br />

which represents 53.34% of the full year adjusted original budget of<br />

£8,217,689. This is reflective of the number of temporary or agency staff<br />

employed during the first half of the financial year, particularly in respect of<br />

grass cutting etc. during the summer months, and the establishment budget is<br />

profiled accordingly. However, the ongoing requirement for temporary and<br />

agency staff mainly in the Planning service area, referred to in paragraph<br />

6.1.2 above, is forecast to lead to an overspend of approximately £51,000 in<br />

2012/13.<br />

6.2 BUDGET PROPOSALS 2013/14<br />

6.2.1 Personnel Statistics<br />

The establishment currently equates to 255.62 full time equivalent posts<br />

(F.T.E.), a decrease of 19.54 F.T.E.’s over the position 12 months ago. This<br />

includes the effect of the Directorate review, and restructuring exercises within<br />

Environmental Services and Human Resources, as well as the recent senior<br />

management review, and changes to the recycling service. The table at<br />

Appendix B summarises the movement between September 2011 and<br />

September 2012.<br />

6.2.2 On-Costs<br />

National Insurance<br />

The employers’ National Insurance contributions for 2013/14 have not yet<br />

been announced, and so contributions have been incorporated into the<br />

budgets assuming a 3% increase over the current rate, but with earning<br />

thresholds remaining unchanged. Any subsequent changes to the rates will<br />

be reported to the Cabinet Executive as and when the <strong>Council</strong> receives<br />

notification.<br />

Superannuation – Pension Contributions<br />

The <strong>Council</strong>’s contributions to the Leicestershire Superannuation Fund have<br />

been included at a rate of 16.7% of basic pay for 2012/13 and 17.7% of basic<br />

pay for 2013/14, in line with details provided by the County <strong>Council</strong>. It is now<br />

anticipated that proposed changes to employees’ contribution levels will not<br />

take effect until April 2014.<br />

IAS19<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> is required to fully implement the implications of the International<br />

Financial Reporting Standards (IAS19) in relation to Retirement Benefits.<br />

The objective of this is to ensure that retirement benefits are accounted for<br />

Page 118


when they are committed to, even though the actual “giving” may be several<br />

years into the future. This ensures a better reflection of the economic reality<br />

between the employer and the pension fund, showing any shortfalls or<br />

surpluses in the net assets in the pension scheme.<br />

Service costs will therefore reflect the ‘current service costs’ as assessed by<br />

actuaries, with corresponding adjustments being made within the Income and<br />

Expenditure Accounts to ensure that the <strong>Council</strong> Tax requirements reflect only<br />

actual contributions.<br />

The estimates contained within Appendix A do not include the impact of<br />

IAS19.<br />

6.2.3 Establishment Details<br />

The estimated costs projected for 2013/14, as shown in Column D of the table<br />

at Appendix A, are based on the forecast establishment as at 1 st April 2013.<br />

They are inclusive of any scale point increments which are applicable to<br />

employees with effect from 1 st April 2013 and the cost of employer pension<br />

and national insurance contributions. The figures include a provision for a pay<br />

award of 1% in line with the <strong>Council</strong>’s Medium Term Financial Strategy.<br />

The analysis includes provisions for seasonal temporary assistance in respect<br />

of the front-line workforce and overtime/market supplement budgets where<br />

applicable.<br />

The overall gross decrease from the original 2012/13 budget on a like for like<br />

basis is calculated at £213,156 inclusive of increments. The net establishment<br />

budget, in respect of the General Fund, after taking into account the<br />

implications of external and internal funding is estimated at £8,004,533,<br />

compared to the 2012/13 like for like figure of £8,217,689. This does not<br />

include any provision for IAS19 which is an accounting entry that does not<br />

affect the total budget requirement. This represents a 2.6% decrease against<br />

the original net budget for the current year. If the pay award is not settled and<br />

there is no increase in pay for 2013/14 there will be a saving of around<br />

£78,500.<br />

6.2.4 External Funding<br />

Column C of the table at Appendix A and the table in paragraph 6.2.6<br />

indicate those posts which have been and/or are planned to be funded<br />

externally and/or from balances over the two years 2012/13 and 2013/14.<br />

6.2.5 Summary<br />

The overall proposed reduction in establishment costs for 2013/14 is 2.6%, at<br />

a time when inflation is running at over 2%. 2013/14 will undoubtedly<br />

represent a challenging year in terms of delivering a balanced budget and<br />

these costs form an important element of the overall equation.<br />

6.2.6 The table below shows the sources of the external funds receivable.<br />

Page 119


2012/13<br />

Original<br />

£<br />

2012/13<br />

Revised<br />

£<br />

2013/14<br />

First<br />

£<br />

The Pavilion – Sure Start Funding 0 18,280 20,803<br />

Capital Funding – Revenues & Benefits 0 26,091 0<br />

Community Services Manager – part<br />

funded by Hinckley & Bosworth B.C.<br />

0 2,651<br />

0<br />

Domestic Abuse Outreach Worker 0 6,000 6,600<br />

Substance Use Officer<br />

Deputy Chief Executive – Shared S151<br />

0 14,410 0<br />

role with Harborough D.C.<br />

0 46,800<br />

0<br />

Project Officer (Neighbourhood Services) 0 15,000 0<br />

Sport & Physical Activity Graduate<br />

Trainee<br />

0 12,956 4,561<br />

Highways Cyclical Maintenance 76,648 75,021 75,496<br />

Lubbesthorpe Planning Application 0 29,963 0<br />

Policy & Partnerships 0 7,456 0<br />

TOTAL 76,648 254,628 107,460<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

Human Rights Act 1998<br />

N/A<br />

Legal Implications<br />

The proposals are compliant with the <strong>Council</strong>’s constitution<br />

Human Resources Implications<br />

N/A<br />

Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

N/A<br />

Equalities<br />

No Equalities Impact Need Assessment is needed for this report<br />

Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

N/A<br />

Crime & Disorder<br />

N/A<br />

Other<br />

N/A<br />

Page 120


8. Other Options Considered<br />

To report separately on the establishment costs in advance of the main<br />

budget considerations<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

None<br />

10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

These are set out in the body of the report<br />

11. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

11.1 Appendix A – Budgeted Establishment costs for 2012/13 and 2013/14<br />

11.2 Appendix B – Number of FTE’s for 2012/13 and 2013/14<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted:<br />

(insert � below to show relevant consultation has taken place)<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Corporate Services Group Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 121


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 122


ESTABLISHMENT COSTS 2012/13 REVISED AND 2013/14 FIRST ESTIMATES APPENDIX A<br />

2012/13 2012/13 2012/13 2012/13 2013/14 2013/14 2013/14<br />

POSTS @ FTE @ FIRST REVISED EXTERNAL REVISED VARIANCE FIRST EXTERNAL FIRST NET VARIANCE NO<br />

01/04/13 01/04/13 FUNDING NET % + 1 % FUNDING % OF<br />

A B C D D TO A B C D D TO A INC<br />

CHIEF EXECUTIVE 8 6.54 354,707 324,791 324,791 -8.43% 321,316 321,316 -9.41% 4<br />

DEPUTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE 2 1.54 124,342 140,032 -46,800 93,232 -25.02% 122,018 122,018 -1.87% 0<br />

DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS 2 1.68 127,101 115,343 115,343 -9.25% 30,120 30,120 -76.30% 1<br />

DIRECTOR OF PERFORMANCE & PEOPLE 2 1.54 108,366 112,300 112,300 3.63% 114,498 114,498 5.66% 0<br />

CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP MANAGER 41 35.36 1,161,253 1,003,405 1,003,405 -13.59% 1,030,664 1,030,664 -11.25% 30<br />

FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP MANAGER 37 32.14 937,347 916,067 -26,091 889,976 -5.05% 924,705 924,705 -1.35% 9<br />

HEALTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES GROUP MANAGER 43 38.22 1,154,606 1,231,383 -23,061 1,208,322 4.65% 1,146,124 -6,600 1,139,524 -1.31% 20<br />

REGULATORY SERVICES GROUP MANAGER 45 35.02 1,306,925 1,256,911 -31,236 1,225,675 -6.22% 1,253,721 -25,364 1,228,357 -6.01% 30<br />

PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP MANAGER 30 26.87 838,585 990,628 -29,963 960,665 14.56% 914,557 914,557 9.06% 8<br />

NEIGHBOURHOOD SERVICES GROUP MANAGER 67 66.22 2,186,386 2,175,298 -90,021 2,085,277 -4.62% 1,974,832 -75,496 1,899,336 -13.13% 22<br />

HEAD OF POLICY, PERFORMANCE & PARTNERSHIPS 9 7.49 272,620 259,393 -7,456 251,937 -7.59% 272,407 272,407 -0.08% 3<br />

TRAINEES 4 4.00 33,455 33,455 33,455 0.00% 36,955 36,955 10.46% 0<br />

TOTAL 290 256.62 8,605,694 8,559,007 -254,628 8,304,379 -3.50% 8,141,918 -107,459 8,034,458 -6.64% 127<br />

CENTRAL PROVISIONS<br />

SICK PAY/COVER 25,625 25,625 25,625 0.00% 25,625 25,625 0.00%<br />

OCCUPATIONAL MATERNITY PAY 13,093 13,093 13,093 0.00% 18,996 18,996 45.09%<br />

GROSS STATUTORY MATERNITY PAY 52,312 52,312 52,312 0.00% 46,919 46,919 -10.31%<br />

RECOVERABLE STAT. MATERNITY PAY -48,127 -48,127 -48,127 0.00% -43,165 -43,165 -10.31%<br />

CORPORATE CONTINGENCY SENIOR MANAGERS PRP inc in revised 17,000 0 0 0.00% 0 0 -100.00%<br />

CHILDCARE VOUCHER SCHEME 1,700 1,700 1,700 0.00% 1,700 1,700 0.00%<br />

Page 123<br />

OTHER<br />

NET TURNOVER SAVINGS RE VACANCIES -80,000 -80,000 -80,000 0.00% -80,000 -80,000 0.00%<br />

Reduction in Pay Award from 2.5% to Nil -181,019<br />

Change in Employer's Pension Contribution rates 5,078<br />

Human Resources restructure -22,699<br />

Corporate Services restructure -33,617<br />

Legal & Information Officer - post deleted -29,282<br />

Additional External Funding - Sure Start Receptionists/Cleaner 18,280<br />

Building Control Admin Assistant - post deleted -20,500<br />

Grounds Maintenance - TUPE transfer to Three Oaks Homes -93,645<br />

Environmental Health & Licensing restructure - phase 1 -4,047<br />

Environmental Health & Licensing restructure - phase 2 -55,000<br />

Temporary post - Project Officer (£15,000 part funding) 37,759<br />

Policy & Partnerships - additional external funding 7,456<br />

Reduction in External Funding - Highways Cyclical Maintenance 1,628<br />

290 256.62 8,587,297 8,523,610 -254,628 8,268,982 -3.71% 8,111,993 -107,459 8,004,533 -6.79%<br />

-318,315 DECREASE (£) -582,764<br />

TOTAL NET ESTABLISHMENT 290 256.62 8,217,689 8,523,610 -254,628 8,268,982 0.62% 8,111,993 -107,459 8,004,533 -2.59%<br />

51,293 DECREASE (£) -213,156


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 124


Establishment 2013/14 : Projected Movement in Posts & FTE's APPENDIX B<br />

Note : excludes temporary posts which are externally funded for 2013/14<br />

Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected 2013/14<br />

No.of No.of Movement Movement Based On<br />

Posts Posts in in No. of Posts No. of FTEs<br />

Division Code at Sep 2011 at Sep 2011 Posts FTEs at Sep 2012 at Sep 2012 NOTES<br />

Chief Executive 1103 2 1.81 2 1.81<br />

Human Resources 8002 8 6.31 -2 -1.58 6 4.73 Following service review April 2012.<br />

DCE 8026 2 1.54 2 1.54<br />

Director 8028 2 1.68 -1 -1.00 1 0.68 Voluntary Redundancy<br />

Director 8023 2 1.54 2 1.54<br />

Corporate Services Group Manager 1301 2 1.50 0.50 2<br />

0.5 Administrator post merged with 0.5<br />

vacant Legal Services Support Officer<br />

2.00 post.<br />

Scrutiny 1008 2 1.50 2 1.50<br />

2 new posts created as part of Corporate<br />

Services review + 1 transferred from Legal<br />

Democratic Services & Governance Mgmt 1370 0 0.00 3 3.00 3 3.00 Services.<br />

2 posts deleted as part of Corporate<br />

Services review, 2 transferred to<br />

Communications, 0.81 FTE moved to<br />

Customer Systems 1350 5 4.81 -5 -4.81 0 0.00 Corporate Performance.<br />

Customer Services 8025 17 14.89 1 0.05 18 14.94<br />

Reprographics 8000 2 1.39 2 1.39<br />

Civics 8012 1 0.97 -1 -0.97 0 0.00 Post deleted.<br />

2 posts transferred from Customer<br />

Communications 1109 2 2.00 2 2.00 4 4.00 Systems.<br />

Part time post transferred to Electoral<br />

Democratic Services 8005 4 3.55 -1 -0.55 3 3.00 Services.<br />

Part time post transferred from Democratic<br />

Electoral Services 1305 3 1.97 1 0.70 4 2.67 Services.<br />

2 posts deleted as part of Corporate<br />

Services review; 1 post transferred to DS<br />

& Governance; 0.5 FTE transferred to CS<br />

Legal Services 8011 4 3.61 -4 -3.61 0 0.00 Group Manager.<br />

Land Charges 1308 3 2.86 3 2.86<br />

Financial Services Group Manager 8090 1 1.00 1 1.00<br />

Finance 8006 11 10.57 11 10.57<br />

Temporary posts 2012/13 only - working<br />

on installation of new Revenues & Benefits<br />

Revenues 1302 19 15.46 -3 -0.47 16 14.99 System.<br />

Property Services 8029 2 2.00 2 2.00<br />

Cleaners/Caretakers 8008 7 3.58 7 3.58<br />

Housing & Community Services Group Mgr 3050 2 1.50 2 1.50<br />

Housing Private Sector 3003 3 3.00 3 3.00<br />

Housing Options 3021 6 6.00 1 0.00 7 6.00<br />

Domestic Abuse Outreach post now<br />

covered by two part-time employees (one<br />

day per week funded by Hinckley<br />

&Bosworth BC). Substance Abuse Officer<br />

Community Services 2006 9 9.00 1 -0.28 10 8.72 reduced to 3 days per week.<br />

Benefits 3008 21 19.00 21 19.00<br />

Administrator post created as part of<br />

Regulatory Services Group Manager 8050 1 1.00 1 0.61 2 1.61 Environmental Services review.<br />

Reduction in establishment following<br />

Environmental Services 8013 23 21.05 -3 -2.72 20 18.33 Environmental Services review.<br />

Building Control 2212 6 6.00 -1 -1.00 5 5.00 Admin Assistant post deleted.<br />

Health & Recreation (NEW) 2140 3 2.00 3 2.00<br />

Countryside Officer post deleted following<br />

Green Space review. New post - Green<br />

Space Engagement Officer working one<br />

Countryside Recreation Areas 2004 1 1.00 -0.80 1 0.20 day per week.<br />

Physical Development Sports 2003 1 1.00 1 1.00<br />

The Pavilion 2011 12 5.81 0.07 12 5.88 Minor change in working hours.<br />

Health Promotion 2141 1 1.00 1 1.00<br />

New post arising from Senior Management<br />

Planning & Economic Devpt Group Manager 2270 0 0.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 review.<br />

Planning Enforcement 2204 4 3.28 0.01 4 3.29<br />

Development Control 2202 10 10.00 10 10.00<br />

Planning Admin 2210 4 3.68 4 3.68<br />

Planning Policy 2205 8 5.90 8 5.90<br />

Housing Strategy 3000 3 3.00 3 3.00<br />

Neighbourhood Services Group Manager 8070 2 2.00 2 2.00<br />

Environmental Service Operations 8016 3 3.00 1 1.00 4 4.00 Project Officer 1 FTE secondment<br />

Cleansing 2126 11 10.22 11 10.22<br />

Boxes to Bins - reduction of 3 drivers and 5<br />

Refuse & Recycling 2127 48 48.00 -8 -8.00 40 40.00 operatives.<br />

Vehicle Maintenance 2130 4 4.00 4 4.00<br />

3 FTE's transferred to Three Oaks Homes<br />

Grounds Maintenance 2005 7 7.00 -3 -3.00 4 4.00 under TUPE arrangements.<br />

Highways Cyclical Maintenance 4001 2 2.00 2 2.00<br />

Head of Service post now shared with<br />

Head of Policy, Performance & Partnerships 8017 3 2.50 -0.50 3 2.00 Harborough <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

0.81 FTE transferred from Customer<br />

Systems following Corporate Services<br />

Corporate Performance 1112 4 3.68 1 0.81 5 4.49 review.<br />

Risk & Benefit Fraud 1110 1 1.00 1 1.00<br />

Trainees 8035 4 4.00 4 4.00<br />

308 275.16 -19 -19.54 289 255.62<br />

Net Decrease -19 -19.54<br />

Page 125<br />

Prepared by Deborah Jarvis 08/11/12 Page 1


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 126


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 th November, 2012<br />

Subject: Treasury Management Strategy – Change of<br />

Direction<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Portfolio Holder:<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

Jim Holden<br />

Deputy Chief Executive<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Offices<br />

0116 272 7502<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor John Hudson – Finance & Efficiencies<br />

Portfolio Holder<br />

1.1 To provide Members with an update on progress in connection with the<br />

Treasury Management Strategy Change in Direction approved by Cabinet<br />

Executive earlier this year.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

2.2<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

3.2<br />

Recommendation to Cabinet Executive<br />

Agenda Item 10<br />

That the decision to withdraw the entirety of the <strong>Council</strong>’s holding in the<br />

Scottish Widows Investment Partnership liquidity investment funds is<br />

approved; and<br />

That the 2012/13 approved counterparty limit in relation to investments<br />

placed with nationalised or part-nationalised UK banks be increased from<br />

£5m to £8m.<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

The Scottish Widows fund is invested in short dated highly liquid financial<br />

instruments and the rate of return on the investment has fallen significantly<br />

in recent years. The forecast return for 2013/14 financial year indicates a<br />

further fall in the return with little or no prospect of a reversal of this trend in<br />

the foreseeable future. By withdrawing from the fund and managing the<br />

investments in house the <strong>Council</strong> will be able to benefit from higher returns<br />

from fixed term longer term deposits.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong>’s current Investment Strategy limits the maximum amount that<br />

can be invested with an individual counterparty to £5m. By increasing this<br />

limit to £8m for nationalised or part-nationalised UK banks the <strong>Council</strong> will<br />

be able to take advantage of a greater range of investment opportunities<br />

for deposits of one year and above.<br />

Page 127


4. Forward Plan<br />

This report has not been included in the last Forward Plan. It is a key<br />

decision. Since the publication of the Forward Plan it has become apparent<br />

that returns on investments held with Scottish Widows Investment Partnership<br />

are diminishing and that there is a window of opportunity whereby the <strong>Council</strong><br />

can re-invest funds for a fixed term one year period at a more attractive rate of<br />

interest. Therefore it is impracticable to defer the decision on this report until<br />

after the operative date of the next Forward Plan on which it could appear.<br />

Accordingly the General Exception Procedure contained in Part 4 Section 2<br />

Paragraph 18 of the Constitution has been invoked to enable its<br />

consideration. The Scrutiny Commissioners have been informed and public<br />

notice has been given by posting it at the <strong>Council</strong> Offices.<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Yes<br />

6. Matters for Consideration<br />

6.1 Introduction<br />

Earlier this year the Cabinet Executive was presented with a report which<br />

suggested a change in direction in relation to its long term external investment<br />

fund with the Scottish Widows Investment Partnership (SWIP) and long term<br />

borrowing plans.<br />

Members, having considered the proposals set out in the report, approved the<br />

following recommendations:<br />

• to utilise a proportion of the funds currently held in the external<br />

investment fund to reduce the <strong>Council</strong>’s exposure to current and<br />

potential future borrowing costs.<br />

• to also redirect a proportion of the monies held in the external<br />

investment fund from short dated highly liquid financial instruments into<br />

longer dated fixed rate financial instruments to achieve higher rates of<br />

return.<br />

6.2 Since then the <strong>Council</strong> has withdrawn a total of £2.8m from the SWIP fund as<br />

follows:<br />

• £1m in support of the initial deposit with Lloyds TSB in relation to the<br />

Local Authority Mortgage Scheme.<br />

• £1.8m to negate the need to take up long term borrowing through the<br />

<strong>Public</strong> Works Loan Board (PWLB) to finance capital investment.<br />

6.3 However, shortly after the Cabinet Executive’s approval was granted<br />

investment rates with SWIP began to show signs of improvement and so<br />

further withdrawals from the fund were put on temporary hold.<br />

6.4 Over the first half of 2012/13 the SWIP fund has earned a rate of return of<br />

Page 128


0.82% (equating to an annual return of 1.64%). However, the view of the fund<br />

managers is that this level of return is expected to fall away significantly over<br />

the second half of the financial year and into 2013/14. Expectations for<br />

2012/13 is for a full year return of around 1.1%, with next year’s forecast<br />

return falling further to approximately 0.9%. In contrast to this, in house<br />

investments have faired better to date in 2012/13, with an average rate of<br />

return of 1.48%.<br />

6.5 Given the position outlined above it is now proposed that the <strong>Council</strong><br />

withdraws its remaining funds held with SWIP, currently just over £5.5m, and<br />

instead manages those funds within the umbrella of its own internal<br />

investments. One year fixed term interest rates with some of the nationalised<br />

and part-nationalised UK banks are currently available at around 2.25%.It is<br />

proposed therefore that a proportion of these funds currently held by SWIP,<br />

up to £3m, is placed into a one year sterling enhanced fixed rate deposit.<br />

6.6 With regard to the balance of the funds, approximately £2.5m, an exercise is<br />

currently being undertaken to ascertain whether it would be financially<br />

beneficial for the <strong>Council</strong> to<br />

a) retain these funds to avoid additional future borrowing or to<br />

b) invest over a longer term (i.e. two to three years) to secure a competitive<br />

longer term rate of return which may not be available in a years time.<br />

Paradoxically longer term investments, i.e. two year funds, are presently<br />

earning marginally lower interest rates than one year investments. The return<br />

on all these options i.e. one, two and three year deposits, is higher than the<br />

<strong>Public</strong> Works Loan board borrowing costs, currently 1.7% over ten years..<br />

6.7 The <strong>Council</strong>’s current investment strategy limits the maximum amount that<br />

can be invested with an individual counterparty to £5m. In recent years falling<br />

credit ratings as a result of the state of the global economy has meant that the<br />

number of institutions eligible for inclusion on the <strong>Council</strong>’s approved lending<br />

list has become very limited.<br />

For this reason, coupled with the fact that the <strong>Council</strong>’s in house treasury<br />

officers will have an additional £5.5m to invest, it is proposed that the<br />

counterparty limit for nationalised and part-nationalised UK banks only should<br />

be increased from £5m to £8m, to provide greater flexibility.<br />

At the same time the <strong>Council</strong> need to be mindful of the risks associated with<br />

placing a significant proportion of its available investment funds with any one<br />

single institution. The <strong>Council</strong>’s current total exposure to Lloyds Bank is as set<br />

out below:-<br />

Amount Rate Maturity Date<br />

£ %<br />

Lloyds TSB – 11 months 1,000,000 3.10 13 th February 2013<br />

Lloyds TSB – 7 months 1,400,000 1.70 13 th March 2013<br />

Lloyds TSB – 11 months 1,600,000 3.00 11 th April 2013<br />

Lloyds TSB – 11 months 1,000,000 3.00 11 th April 2013<br />

Total 5,000,000<br />

Page 129


In addition the <strong>Council</strong> has placed two tranches of £1m each with Lloyds for a<br />

five year period to support the Local Authority Mortgage Scheme.<br />

By approving the increased limit the potential exposure would increase to<br />

£10m, and for this reason it would be prudent, should investing the balance of<br />

£2.5m be the most appropriate course of action, to look to another institution.<br />

6.8 Attached at Appendix A is the <strong>Council</strong>’s current approved counterparty list,<br />

updated to reflect the higher limits being proposed in this report.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

Human Rights Act 1998<br />

N/A<br />

Legal Implications<br />

The proposals are compliant with the <strong>Council</strong>’s constitution<br />

Human Resources Implications<br />

N/A<br />

Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

N/A<br />

Equalities<br />

No Equalities Impact Need Assessment is needed for this report<br />

Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

N/A<br />

Crime & Disorder<br />

N/A<br />

Other<br />

N/A<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

To maintain the <strong>Council</strong>’s investment with the Scottish Widows Investment<br />

Partnership. Falling rates of return on the external fund make this option<br />

increasingly less viable.<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

None.<br />

Page 130


10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

As set out in the report.<br />

11. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

Appendix A – Approved Counterparty List<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

None.<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted:<br />

(insert � below to show relevant consultation has taken place)<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Corporate Services Group Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 131


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 132


UK Banks<br />

Monetary Maximum Period<br />

Limit for Investment<br />

Santander UK plc £5m 3 Months<br />

Barclays Bank plc £5m 3 Months<br />

HSBC Bank plc £5m 3 Months<br />

Standard Chartered Bank £5m 3 Months<br />

Nationalised/Part Nationalised Banks<br />

Lloyds TSB Bank plc/Bank of Scotland plc £8m 3 Years<br />

RBS plc/Nat West Bank plc £8m 3 Years<br />

Building Societies<br />

Nationwide Building Society £5m 3 Months<br />

Yorkshire Building Society £5m 3 Months<br />

Coventry Building Society £5m 3 Months<br />

Leeds Building Society £5m 3 Months<br />

Nottingham Building Society £5m 3 Months<br />

Other Institutions<br />

APPROVED COUNTERPARTY LENDING LIST 2012/13<br />

Local Authorities £5m 5 Years<br />

UK Debt Management Office (DMADF) £5m 5 Years<br />

Supranational Institutions £5m 5 Years<br />

Multi-Lateral Development Banks £5m 5 Years<br />

UK Gilts £5m 5 Years<br />

Money Market Funds (per Fund) £5m n/a<br />

NB: Monetary limits apply to groups as well as individual counterparties.<br />

Page 133<br />

APPENDIX A


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 134


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 th November, 2012<br />

Subject: Half Year Budget Review and Budget Issues 2012/13<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Portfolio Holder:<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

Jim Holden<br />

Deputy Chief Executive<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Offices<br />

0116 272 7502<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor John Hudson – Finance & Efficiencies<br />

Portfolio Holder<br />

1.1 To bring to the attention of the Cabinet Executive a number of matters in<br />

relation to the approved budgets for 2012/13 financial year based on the<br />

performance over the first six months of the financial year.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

2.2<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

Recommendation to Cabinet Executive<br />

That the Cabinet Executive accepts the outcome of the half-yearly budget<br />

review including the revised outturn forecast and in particular those specific<br />

areas of income and expenditure which have been highlighted.<br />

That the <strong>Council</strong> makes an additional contribution of £175,496 from the<br />

General Fund Balances, representing the amount by which 2012/13 net<br />

expenditure is projected to exceed the original net revenue expenditure<br />

budget.<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

The most recent information relating to actual expenditure and income<br />

performance against the budget for the first half of 2012/13 indicates that<br />

the <strong>Council</strong>’s General Fund Revenue Account net expenditure is likely to<br />

exceed the original budget by around £175,000.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

Yes<br />

Page 135<br />

Agenda Item 11


5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Yes<br />

6. Matters for Consideration<br />

6.1 Introduction<br />

The <strong>Council</strong>’s arrangements for the sound stewardship of public funds<br />

incorporate a requirement to carry out a formal review of its revenue<br />

budgetary performance over the first six months of each financial year. This<br />

exercise complements the regular monthly and quarterly portfolio budget<br />

monitoring <strong>reports</strong> submitted to Cabinet Executive. Performance in respect of<br />

capital expenditure and income is dealt with in a separate report.<br />

In addition to providing an indication of the overall performance the review<br />

aims specifically to identify any significant areas of concern relating to<br />

expenditure or income including those which cannot reasonably be dealt with<br />

either through:-<br />

a) the established virement arrangements, or<br />

b) off-set against identified underspends and/or income increases going<br />

forward<br />

This information is then also incorporated into the formal revised estimates for<br />

the current financial year which will be presented to Cabinet Executive in<br />

February 2013.<br />

6.2 Establishment Costs<br />

The overall establishment costs represent a key element of the <strong>Council</strong>’s total<br />

budgetary requirements. As part of the arrangements for overseeing the<br />

budget monitoring of these costs the Cabinet Executive receive a regular<br />

report analysing performance against profiled budget.<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> included provision for a pay award of 1% in the 2012/13 budget<br />

proposal, albeit subsequently this award did not materialise. In addition there<br />

were increases built in to reflect increments for those employees not yet at the<br />

top of their pay scales. The original net revenue funded establishment budget<br />

for 2012/13 therefore, excluding the pay award, but including those posts<br />

whose costs are met through specific external funding, was £8,217,689.<br />

At 30 th September 2012 net expenditure amounted to £4,383,956 against the<br />

profiled budget of £4,212,373 net of planned efficiency savings of £40,000<br />

over the first half year. This represents an overspend variance of £134,578 or<br />

3.19%. This takes into account around £400,528 of agency and temporary<br />

staff costs incurred in the first six months primarily within the planning,<br />

benefits, refuse and recycling, cleansing, grounds maintenance and health<br />

and leisure services. It is anticipated that, due to seasonal variations, and in<br />

line with previous years, agency and temporary staffing costs will reduce<br />

Page 136


during the second half of the financial year although the ongoing requirement<br />

for temporary support within planning and benefits means that the forecast<br />

outturn costs will exceed the original approved budget by around £51,000.<br />

Redundancy costs incurred during the first half of the year, arising from<br />

restructuring, amount to £37,005, and this sum will be charged against the<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s balances in line with the existing policy.<br />

6.3 Specific Cost Centres<br />

The half-year budget monitoring information has also highlighted a number of<br />

non-establishment expenditure and income matters in relation to the General<br />

Fund Revenue Account which needs to be brought to Members attention.<br />

These are set out in more detail below.<br />

6.3.1 Fuel Costs<br />

Fuel expenditure represents a significant cost to the <strong>Council</strong> with an annual<br />

budget of £351,965. At the half year stage expenditure is £175,624 against a<br />

profiled budget of £175,985. This represents a small underspend and full<br />

year costs remain on course to outturn within the annual budget.<br />

6.3.2 Legal Costs<br />

External legal costs incurred at the half-year stage amount to £24,119 against<br />

a full year budget of £62,383. The highest levels of spend relates to planning<br />

conditions and enforcement work. Based on the information available to date<br />

there is no requirement to increase the full year budget for these areas.<br />

A further £38,700 is expected to be incurred on legal work in connection with<br />

the Lubbesthorpe planning application, although this sum will be funded from<br />

the earmarked reserve set aside specifically for this purpose.<br />

There are no known additional costs to date in respect of Planning appeals<br />

costs, which are charged directly to the <strong>Council</strong>’s balances.<br />

6.3.3 Income Variances<br />

Income generation from fees and charges forms a key part of the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

overall financial health and variations have a significant impact on net outturn<br />

expenditure. The table below sets out the actual position at the half year,<br />

relating to the key income streams together with a full year revised forecast.<br />

Full Year Profiled Actual Variance Full Year<br />

Income Half Year Half Year +/(-) Income<br />

Budget Income Income<br />

Revised<br />

Budget<br />

Forecast<br />

£<br />

£<br />

£<br />

£<br />

£<br />

Development Control Fees 400,000 200,000 130,686 (69,314) 325,000<br />

Building Control Fees 235,000 136,300 130,371 (5,929) 235,000<br />

Local Land Charge Fees 170,000 85,000 90,674 5,674 170,000<br />

Scottish Widows Investment 60,689 29,131 45,275 16,144 63,717<br />

Internally Managed Funds 60,000 30,000 79,295 49,295 160,000<br />

Refuse/Recycling 1,704,147 977,352 906,409 (70,943) 1,541,550<br />

Page 137


Pavilion – Huncote 149,280 82,140 85,039 2,899 153,304<br />

Pest Control 31,000 23,870 10,952 (12,918) 13,824<br />

Car Parks 125,700 62,346 51,948 (10,398) 125,700<br />

TOTAL 2,935,816 1,626,139 1,530,649 (95,490) 2,788,095<br />

It can be seen from the above table that, in total, the first half year outturn<br />

income from all these sources is £95,490 or 5.87% below the original profiled<br />

estimate. The full year outturn forecast indicates an overall negative variance<br />

of £157,721 or 5.37% for these income streams. Specific comments are set<br />

out below.<br />

6.3.4 Development Control/Building Control<br />

Fees and charges from Development Control and Building Control have a<br />

strong correlation to the state of the local economy. Building Control fees are<br />

running ahead of budget at the half year stage but since income is traditionally<br />

weighted towards the spring and summer months it is anticipated that income<br />

will outturn around budget. Development Control income is significantly below<br />

profile at the end of September 2012. This is as a result of a number of factors<br />

including a reflection of the current state of the economy, the seasonal<br />

variations in submission of applications, and developers holding back the<br />

submission of large fee income generating schemes pending the initial<br />

outcomes of both the Core Strategy Examination in <strong>Public</strong> and the<br />

determination of the Sustainable Urban Extension application at<br />

Lubbesthorpe. Consequently the revised income forecast has been reduced<br />

to £325,000<br />

The fee of £125,000 received for the application in respect of the proposed<br />

development at Lubbesthorpe has been transferred into an earmarked<br />

reserve and all additional costs associated with dealing with this application<br />

are being off-set against this income. The original fee income has been<br />

supplemented with a further £50,000 at the 2011/12 year end to take account<br />

of the extended time required to process and determine the application.<br />

6.3.5 Investment Income<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> generates investment income in two ways. Firstly through its<br />

externally managed investment fund valued at £5.541m at 1 st April 2012 and<br />

secondly through earnings on short term cash flow surpluses.<br />

With regard to the former it was originally estimated that the fund would return<br />

a rate of 1.1% over the full financial year, compared to a rate of 1.38% during<br />

2011/12 based on advice received from the fund managers. The fund<br />

managers are required to achieve a return over the year of at least 0.5%<br />

above the London Interbank Bid rate (LIBID) for local authority seven day<br />

money (which is currently 0.37% per annum) and therefore their benchmark<br />

return for the year is 0.87%. Current performance to the half year stage<br />

indicates an annual return of 1.64%, however this rate of return is expected to<br />

fall away significantly in the second half year to an annual rate of around<br />

1.15%.<br />

The Cabinet Executive has previously approved the following change in<br />

direction of the <strong>Council</strong>’s Investment Strategy:<br />

• To utilise a proportion of the funds currently held with Scottish Widows<br />

Page 138


Investment Partnership to reduce the <strong>Council</strong>’s exposure to current and<br />

potential future borrowing costs;<br />

• To redirect a proportion of the funds from short dated highly liquid<br />

financial instruments into longer dated fixed rate financial instruments<br />

to achieve a higher rate of return.<br />

During 2011/12, the <strong>Council</strong> utilised £1m to support the Local Authority<br />

Mortgage Scheme, and a further £1.8m to repay maturing long term loans.<br />

Initially the remaining funds were left with Scottish Widows in short dated<br />

liquid investments since the rate of return showed signs of improvement<br />

towards the end of 2011/12, and in the first half of this financial year.<br />

However, given the fund managers’ forecast of a downturn in the rate of<br />

return it is considered that the time is right to withdraw the remaining balance<br />

and instead manage the investments in house alongside the <strong>Council</strong>’s other<br />

cashflow surpluses. By locking funds into longer dated fixed term rates offered<br />

by approved counterparties the <strong>Council</strong> will be able to achieve more certainty<br />

in its investment returns.<br />

Earnings on in-year cash flow surpluses have significantly outperformed<br />

Scottish Widows, with an average annual earnings rate of 1.48% over the first<br />

six months of the year. The half year budget of £30,000 has been exceeded<br />

by £49,295 producing a total income figure of £79,295. This compares with<br />

half year earnings of £69,175 from cash flow surpluses in the 2011/12<br />

financial year. The full year budget for 2012/13 has therefore been increased<br />

to £160,000 compared to the original budget which was £60,000.<br />

6.3.6 Refuse/Recycling Income<br />

At the half year stage income from refuse/recycling activities was £70,943<br />

short of the profiled budget. A general fall in the prices achievable for<br />

recyclable materials suggest that by the year end income will fall short of the<br />

original budget by approximately £162,000.<br />

6.3.7 Pavilion – Huncote<br />

The table above indicates that income generation from activities at the<br />

Pavilion in Huncote is currently slightly above profile at £85,039 compared<br />

with a half year budget of £82,140. Income is forecast to outturn at year end<br />

at around £153,300, marginally above the original budget.<br />

6.3.8 Land Charges<br />

Income from this source is above profile at the half year stage. Actual income<br />

is £90,674 against a budget of £85,000, although historically fee income tends<br />

to fall away during the winter months and it is expected that by the year end<br />

income will be in line with the approved budget. The <strong>Council</strong> continues to<br />

carry out the Land Charges function on behalf of Hinckley & Bosworth <strong>Council</strong><br />

and income and expenditure in respect of this aspect of the service is<br />

included in the figures above.<br />

6.3.9 Car Park Income<br />

Income from charges for parking in 2012/13 was included in the original<br />

budget at £125,700. Actual income to 30 th September amounts to £51,948<br />

Page 139


against a profiled budget of £62,346. However, it is still anticipated that the<br />

original budgeted income target for 2012/13 will be achieved.<br />

6.3.10 Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) – Proxy for Depreciation<br />

In addition to meeting the interest charges on loans each year the <strong>Council</strong> is<br />

also statutorily required to set-aside funds to meet the principal element of<br />

loan repayments. This is referred to as the Minimum Revenue Provision<br />

which, from a prudence perspective, is the minimum amount that has to be<br />

charged within the <strong>Council</strong>’s accounts.<br />

Every <strong>Council</strong> is required to have in place a policy in respect of MRP. The<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s approved policy in relation to the charging of Minimum Revenue<br />

Provision (MRP) is as follows:<br />

• Historic debt incurred prior to the introduction of the Prudential Code on 1 st<br />

April, 2004 will be charged using the regulatory method, i.e. at the rate of<br />

4% per annum on a reducing balance basis<br />

• MRP in respect of assets acquired under Finance Lease will be charged<br />

at a rate equal to the principal element of the annual lease rental for the<br />

year in question<br />

• Prudential borrowing incurred since 1 st April, 2004 will attract MRP using<br />

the asset life method, and will be charged over a period which is<br />

reasonably commensurate with the estimated useful life applicable to the<br />

nature of the expenditure, using equal annual instalments. For example,<br />

capital expenditure on a new building, or on the refurbishment or<br />

enhancement of a building, will be related to the estimated life of that<br />

building<br />

The MRP liability for 2012/13 is now estimated at £550,951 compared with the<br />

approved budget of £564,846, representing a decrease of £13,895. The latest<br />

estimate for MRP includes provision for repayment of new borrowing<br />

undertaken to finance capital schemes, and reflects a change in the method<br />

of calculating the annual repayment in respect of borrowing to fund disabled<br />

facilities grants to more accurately reflect the useful life of the assets being<br />

funded.<br />

Page 140


6.4 Summary of Variances<br />

The table below sets out by portfolio an analysis of the original and revised<br />

budgets for 2012/13.<br />

Community Services<br />

Finance, Efficiency & Assets<br />

Health Improvement & Corporate Services<br />

Leader<br />

Neighbourhood & Environmental Health<br />

Services<br />

Planning, Economic Development &<br />

Housing Strategy<br />

Policy, Performance & Partnerships<br />

Appropriations<br />

Transfer to/(from) General Fund Balances<br />

Net Budget Requirement<br />

Surplus/(Deficit)<br />

Original<br />

Estimate<br />

2012/13<br />

£<br />

2,091,065<br />

1,543,805<br />

2,146,981<br />

511,971<br />

3,156,824<br />

1,176,252<br />

511,650<br />

(1,796,514)<br />

(234,599)<br />

9,107,435<br />

Revised<br />

Estimate<br />

2012/13<br />

£<br />

2,137,210<br />

1,281,595<br />

2,027,456<br />

470,810<br />

3,312,292<br />

1,590,747<br />

665,541<br />

(1,968,121)<br />

(234,599)<br />

9,282,931<br />

(175,496)<br />

The table below provides a breakdown of the movement of £171,607 in the<br />

Appropriations Account between the original estimate and revised estimate for<br />

2012/13. This cost centre is used to account for material changes which are<br />

complex to account for within individual service cost centres at the half year<br />

stage.<br />

Analysis of Movement in Appropriations Variance<br />

£<br />

Reduction in pay award re-allocated to services<br />

Corporate Services Review savings re-allocated to services<br />

Environmental Health & licensing Review savings re-allocated to<br />

services<br />

Reversal of Increased Capital Charges (inc. in service budgets)<br />

HR Settlements and Termination Payments<br />

Local Development Framework – central budget provision<br />

transferred to service<br />

Revenue Contributions towards Capital Expenditure<br />

IAS19 Pensions Adjustments<br />

Contributions from Earmarked Reserves to meet budgets brought<br />

forward and other commitments<br />

Reduction in Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP)<br />

New Homes Bonus - agreed contribution to Parish <strong>Council</strong>s<br />

Total Variance<br />

Page 141<br />

120,557<br />

30,000<br />

50,000<br />

(37,341)<br />

20,145<br />

(8,200)<br />

257,028<br />

(62,077)<br />

(578,310)<br />

(13,895)<br />

50,486<br />

(171,607)


The overall forecast variance equates to an increase of £175,496 or 1.92%<br />

against the original full year budget. The table below shows the most<br />

significant individual changes that have contributed to this overall variance:<br />

Analysis of Significant Variances<br />

Increases in Expenditure/Reductions in Income<br />

Establishment<br />

51,293<br />

Reduction in Locality Partnership funding 10,000<br />

Reduction in income from <strong>Council</strong> Tax Summons costs 30,000<br />

Reduction in income from Planning Fees 75,000<br />

Reduction in Pest Control fees and charges 17,176<br />

Refuse & Recycling Composting fees 11,330<br />

Reduction in Refuse & Recycling income 162,597<br />

Provision for Boxes to Bins Trial 20,000<br />

Costs associated with Depot Relocation project 30,000<br />

Compromise Agreements 20,155<br />

Reductions in Expenditure/Increases in Income<br />

Brought Forward budgets no longer required (34,272)<br />

Reduction in External Audit Fees (78,370)<br />

Estimated Loan Interest Payable (20,584)<br />

Estimated Investment Income Receivable (103,146)<br />

Minimum Revenue Provision (13,895)<br />

Other Minor Increases/(Decreases) in Net Expenditure (1,788)<br />

Total Variance<br />

£<br />

175,496<br />

Based on the above forecast there is a need to make an additional<br />

contribution of £175,496 from the <strong>Council</strong>’s balances to support net revenue<br />

expenditure.<br />

6.5 Utilisation of General Reserve Fund<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> established a General Reserve Fund at the start of the current<br />

financial year to provide a source of funding to:-<br />

a) mitigate the short term impact of any loss of formula grant<br />

b) provide the opportunity for “invest to save” projects to be delivered<br />

subject to a sound business case<br />

This fund stood at £2.247m at 1 st April 2012. Planned utilisation during the<br />

year includes £200,000 to support the 2012/13 budget and a further £177,104<br />

to cover the costs of two major capital schemes – the website development<br />

project and the new revenues and benefits system.<br />

In accordance with the Medium Term Financial Strategy, future utilisation to<br />

underpin General Fund Revenue Account expenditure is planned to be at a<br />

much reduced level. Based on the above transactions the fund will stand at<br />

£1.870m at 1 st April 2013.<br />

Page 142


6.6 Utilisation of General Fund Balances<br />

Under arrangements incorporated into the <strong>Council</strong>’s constitution, the Cabinet<br />

Executive has authority to access the <strong>Council</strong>’s balances to meet additional<br />

cost pressures which may arise during the course of any one financial year up<br />

to the value of 2% of the net revenue budget. This equates to £182,149 for<br />

2012/13 financial year. The forecast extra net revenue expenditure falls within<br />

this figure.<br />

The balances at the commencement of the financial year stood at £2.641m.<br />

After taking into account the forecast outturn figure referred to earlier in this<br />

report, and planned contributions principally in respect of the Core Strategy,<br />

the net impact would be a reduction of £410,095 in the General Fund balance<br />

bringing the year end figure to £2.231m, equivalent to 24.5% of the net<br />

General Revenue Account budget.<br />

6.7 Looking Forward<br />

There are a significant number of financial challenges going forward which the<br />

<strong>Council</strong> will need to start to get to grips with as we approach the new financial<br />

year. These include:-<br />

• Proposals to change <strong>Council</strong> Tax Benefit, including a 10% reduction in<br />

funding, from 2013/14 onwards<br />

• Preparation for the introduction of Universal Credit over a period from<br />

2013/14 to 2017/18<br />

• The further reductions in core grant funding planned for 2013/14 through<br />

to 2014/15, as set out in the Spending Review<br />

• The risks associated with the introduction of Business Rate Reduction,<br />

placing increasing resilience on the buoyancy of the local economy for any<br />

growth in core grant funding<br />

• The Government’s requirement to fund future allocations of New Homes<br />

Bonus, estimated nationally at £2bn, from within income generated by<br />

Business Rates and the drive to generate additional income through<br />

delivering on new homes<br />

• The increasing focus on the development of the local economy to both<br />

sustain and create jobs and wealth<br />

6.8 Conclusion<br />

The first half of 2012/13 financial year has seen services continue to be<br />

delivered to a high standard. There are additional budget pressures evident at<br />

the half year arising principally from reductions in income and increases in<br />

establishment costs. This is being addressed by way of a contribution from<br />

the balances. It will be essential to maintain close monitoring of revenue<br />

income and expenditure during the second half of the year to minimise any<br />

potential end of year adverse variance. The <strong>Council</strong> is well prepared<br />

financially for the future challenges ahead and will continue to provide sound<br />

financial management of the public funds under its stewardship.<br />

Page 143


7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

Human Rights Act 1998<br />

N/A<br />

Legal Implications<br />

The proposals are compliant with the <strong>Council</strong>’s constitution<br />

Human Resources Implications<br />

N/A<br />

Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

N/A<br />

Equalities<br />

No Equalities Impact Need Assessment is needed for this report<br />

Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

N/A<br />

Crime & Disorder<br />

N/A<br />

Other<br />

N/A<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> has put in place a range of measures to enable in-year variances<br />

between forecast actual expenditure and available budgets to be addressed.<br />

To opt not to address such issues would not be in the best interests of<br />

managing the <strong>Council</strong>’s financial affairs.<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

N/A<br />

10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

As set out in the report<br />

Page 144


11. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

None to this report<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

Budget Monitoring Reports for 2012/13<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted:<br />

(insert � below to show relevant consultation has taken place)<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Corporate Services Group Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 145


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 146


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 th November 2012<br />

Subject: Revised Capital Programme 2012/13<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Sarah Pennelli<br />

Financial Services Group Manager<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Offices<br />

0116 272 7650<br />

Portfolio Holder <strong>Council</strong>lor J. Hudson – Finance & Efficiency<br />

Portfolio Holder<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

1.1 To inform Members of the available capital resources, the progress of the<br />

Capital Programme 2012/13 and to gain approval for additional items to the<br />

programme.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

Recommendation to <strong>Council</strong><br />

That the report be accepted and that the additional capital expenditure of<br />

£112,000 be authorised as an addition to the Capital Programme.<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

The additional expenditure is required to ensure resources are available to<br />

implement the new Revenues and Benefits system with as little risk to<br />

customers as possible. To ensure the appropriate vehicles and machinery<br />

are provided to operational areas of the Authority.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

4.1 Yes<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Not applicable it is a matter for <strong>Council</strong><br />

Page 147<br />

Agenda Item 12


6. Matters for Consideration<br />

6.1 The 2012/13 Capital Programme was formally approved by <strong>Council</strong> on 20 th<br />

February 2012. The detailed programme, which is set out in Appendix A,<br />

amounted to an investment of £1.584m. Added to this there were a number<br />

of schemes brought forward from previous years together with the associated<br />

funding allocation, which amounted to £1.087m, as well as net expenditure on<br />

new projects totalling a further £1,772m. Altogether this leads to a revised<br />

capital programme of £4.443m for 2012/13.<br />

6.2 In accordance with the <strong>Council</strong>’s Capital Strategy, the Officer Asset<br />

Management Group is charged with constantly monitoring and reviewing<br />

progress on the capital programme. This includes those schemes brought<br />

forward from previous years, to seek to ensure that the resources available<br />

are deployed efficiently and effectively. Each capital project has a nominated<br />

project manager who is responsible for the delivery of the project.<br />

6.3 Capital Expenditure 2012/13<br />

6.3.1 Appendix B gives details of the actual spending against budget for all<br />

schemes in the approved capital programme for the period 1 st April 2012 to<br />

31 st October 2012. The table includes any in-year changes and identified<br />

variations in project costs.<br />

6.3.2 The overall position at 31 st October 2012 is that actual expenditure of<br />

£1.655m has been incurred, with additional commitments of £0.243m against<br />

the overall revised budget of £4.443m. This represents 42.72% of the<br />

proposed programme. The Asset Management Group are monitoring the<br />

schemes closely to ensure completion by the end of the financial year and<br />

where possible reallocate unused funding to allow additional capital projects<br />

to be undertaken but stay within the agreed programme budgets.<br />

6.3.3 As part of the monitoring process a number of amendments to the original<br />

programme have been identified. The additional expenditure on these<br />

projects have been authorised through separate <strong>reports</strong> that have been<br />

brought before <strong>Council</strong> or have been added through the monitoring of<br />

received funds. S106 Monies being an example of this. In addition to this an<br />

additional requirement has been identified for £112,000 to be added to the<br />

Capital Programme for which Authorisation is sought. The movement in the<br />

total Capital Programme is detailed in the table overleaf and additional<br />

narrative around each item is provided in further depth in the text.<br />

Page 148


Authorised Capital Programme 2012/13 ( inlcuding 2011/12 B/Fwd) 2,670,726<br />

Authorised Additions<br />

Bin Purchase (Boxes to Bins) 900,000<br />

Local Authority Mortgage Scheme 1,000,000<br />

Contribution from NHB - empty properties 50,000<br />

Revised Authorised Programme 4,620,726<br />

Vehicle Saving (Boxes to Bins) (390,000)<br />

Disabled Facility Grants - further funding rec'd 23,831<br />

Additional S106 Monies Rec'd 70,415<br />

Additional Enhancement to Payroll - funded within revenue budget 5,901<br />

Net savings to Capital Programme net of self funded additions (289,853)<br />

Revenues & Benefits Replacement System 25,000<br />

Additional Vehicles - Three Oaks Homes 35,182<br />

Operational Vehicles/Mowers 51,624<br />

Proposed Additions to Capital Programme 111,806<br />

Total Revised Capital Programme 4,442,679<br />

Note : The following items have been funded from the contingency within the Capital<br />

Programme and therefore do not form additional capital investment over and above<br />

that authorised.<br />

Formation of additional Staff Car Park Area 7,000<br />

Installation of Ramp at the Pavilion 4,000<br />

Contribution towards Narborough Park Fencing 5,000<br />

Online Booking System at the Pavilion – to integrate to corporate systems 10,697<br />

Covers for Inspection Pits at Depot 4,900<br />

31,597<br />

6.3.4 The original 2012/13 Capital Programme included the sum of £978,000 for the<br />

replacement of fleet vehicles, including four kerbside recycling vehicles. The<br />

Boxes to Bins initiative that was approved at <strong>Council</strong> on the 22 nd October<br />

removed the requirement to replace the four kerbside recycling vehicles but<br />

required an additional refuse vehicle be purchased in addition to those<br />

already included in the initial Capital Programme. This revision generates a<br />

net saving in capital expenditure of £390,000 on vehicles that is attributable to<br />

the Boxes to Bins initiative.<br />

6.3.5 Offset against this is a further requirement to fund additional vehicles as<br />

follows:<br />

• £35,000 leased to Three Oaks Homes, the cost of which is recovered<br />

in the recharge made to Three Oaks Homes<br />

• £51,624 for operational vehicles and mowers<br />

6.3.6 The requirement to borrow £900,000 to purchase 40,000 240 litre wheeled<br />

bins was identified in the Boxes to Bins initiative approved by <strong>Council</strong> on 22 nd<br />

October 2012.<br />

6.3.7 On 19 th July 2011 the <strong>Council</strong> approved an advance of £1m to Lloyds Banking<br />

Page 149<br />

£


Group as part of the Local Authority Mortgage Scheme. This scheme is aimed<br />

at first time buyers and the advance equated to the <strong>Council</strong>’s share of<br />

financial assistance through the provision of an indemnity. The scheme has<br />

proven to be a great success and the <strong>Council</strong>, therefore, agreed to support<br />

the scheme with a further £1m advance which was transferred to Lloyds in<br />

July 2012. This additional £1m has now been fully utilised and additional<br />

funds from Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> are in the process of being made<br />

available to <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> residents.<br />

6.3.8 Along with East Midlands Housing Association, the <strong>Council</strong> has also<br />

contributed £50,000 from its New Homes Bonus grant allocation towards<br />

bringing empty homes back into use on a purchase and repair basis. It is<br />

estimated that the <strong>Council</strong>’s contributions will lead to 2 to 3 empty properties<br />

being brought back into use during this financial year.<br />

6.3.9 Included within the 2011/12 capital programme was an amount of £175,000<br />

for the replacement Revenues and Benefits system. The remaining amount of<br />

£105,000 was brought forward into this financial year and this project is<br />

anticipated to be delivered in the coming months. A further provision of<br />

£25,000 has been included within the revised capital programme to make<br />

allowance for additional staffing costs during the ‘go live’ period. This will<br />

ensure any backlogs that have built up over the ‘go live’ period is processed<br />

quickly and brought fully up to date. Provision has been made for the resource<br />

requirements for both the Revenues and Benefits departments.<br />

This project was funded through spend to save reserves and the payback<br />

period including this additional expense is still within a five year period.<br />

6.3.10 Spend on Disabled Facilities Grants is shown in the table below. Although<br />

this only equates to 47% of available DFG resources, it is expected to require<br />

the ability to commit 2013/14 funding towards the end of this financial year to<br />

allow an earlier start on next year’s grant awards. Of the £626,185 2012/13<br />

funding, £409,354 is funded through borrowing.<br />

Brought Forward from 2011/12 209,354<br />

New resources made available in 2012/13 416,831<br />

Expenditure to date (238,062)<br />

Commitments to date (91,692)<br />

Balance Carried Forward 296,432<br />

6.3.11 The improvements to the Pavilion and the development of a golf range are<br />

included within the Capital Programme and Appendix B in line with the original<br />

investment proposals. A separate report providing an update on the Pavilion<br />

Capital Expenditure has capital implications which will be incorporated in the<br />

Capital Programme should the recommendations be accepted by <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

6.4 Capital Resources<br />

6.4.1 The <strong>Council</strong>’s projected available capital resources are determined at the<br />

beginning of each financial year and a detailed breakdown of the resources<br />

required to support the programme are shown at Appendix C. The funding<br />

shown in Appendix C assumes that all schemes will be fully implemented.<br />

Page 150<br />

£


6.5 Estimated Resources Carried Forward<br />

6.5.1 The total resources estimated to be carried forward into 2013/14 are £985,499<br />

but of this £809,620 is already committed or ring fenced as follows:<br />

VAT Shelter Receipts from Three Oaks Homes<br />

277,441<br />

Special Schemes Reserve Fund 42,763<br />

Computer Room Reserve Fund 100,000<br />

Leisure Centre Renewals Fund 389,416<br />

Total 809,620<br />

6.5.2 This leaves only £197,879 available to spend on new projects or variations<br />

within current projects. The Asset Management Group are monitoring spend<br />

against projects very closely to ensure that the resources are maximised in<br />

this financial year.<br />

6.5.3 Should any significant asset issues arise requiring immediate attention,<br />

having only £197,879 available is cause for concern. It is not sustainable to<br />

continue to borrow regardless of the current interest rates available as<br />

repayments of principle/interest have to be found from within an ever<br />

constrained revenue account. This concern was highlighted in the 2009/10<br />

Financial Statement Audit report by the authority’s external auditors,<br />

PriceWaterhouse Coopers.<br />

“With lower levels of receipts now available to the <strong>Council</strong> in the Usable<br />

Capital Receipts reserve, future capital funding will need to come from<br />

increased borrowing or through the use of revenue resources. In either<br />

case the long term consequences will mean an additional charge to<br />

revenue, either through the impact of financial capital expenditure directly<br />

with revenue resources or through the additional interest payments of<br />

long term borrowing. The <strong>Council</strong> should consider the long term<br />

consequences on the revenue budget of future capital expenditure.”<br />

6.5.4 Accordingly, any capital projects that gain approval for 2013/14 will again<br />

largely have to be funded from borrowing. Asset disposals have diminished in<br />

recent years from an already low base of building assets. It is, therefore, likely<br />

that Members will once again be asked to consider a substantially reduced<br />

capital programme for the forthcoming financial year.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

Human Rights Act 1998<br />

N/A<br />

Legal Implications<br />

N/A<br />

Page 151<br />

£


Equalities<br />

N/A<br />

Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

N/A<br />

Crime & Disorder<br />

N/A<br />

Human Resources Implications<br />

N/A<br />

Risk Assessment<br />

N/A<br />

Other<br />

N/A<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

8.1 The option of proceedings with the current year’s capital programme without<br />

review and amendment could lead to a mismatch at resources and needs.<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

9.1 This report has been produced in consultation with the Asset Management<br />

Group.<br />

10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

10.1 This report sets out the up to date position with regard to the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

2012/13 Capital Programme.<br />

11. Appendix to this report<br />

11.1 Appendix A – Capital Expenditure and Funding Summaries<br />

11.2 Appendix B – Detailed Revised Capital Programme 2012/13<br />

11.3 Appendix C – Budgeted Capital Resources<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

12.1 Asset Management Group working papers<br />

Page 152


The following Officers/Members have been consulted (identified by �):<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Legal Services Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 153


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 154


Capital Expenditure - 2012/2013<br />

Prior Years<br />

Schemes<br />

B/Fwd<br />

Approved<br />

Allocations<br />

March 2010<br />

In-Year<br />

Movements<br />

Revised<br />

Expenditure<br />

Expenditure +<br />

Commit's to<br />

Period 7<br />

2012/2013<br />

APPENDIX A<br />

Unspent Project<br />

Budget C/Fwd<br />

£ £ £ £ £ £<br />

HOUSING<br />

Emergency Boiler Replacement Contingency 8,496 20,000 0 28,496 7,321 21,175<br />

Local Authority Mortgage Scheme (LAMS) 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0<br />

Contribution Towards Empty Homes Scheme 0 0 50,000 50,000 0 50,000<br />

Disabled Facilities Grants - Major Works 209,354 200,000 23,831 433,185 234,243 198,942<br />

Disabled Facilities Grants - Minor Works 0 193,000 0 193,000 95,510 97,490<br />

GENERAL FUND<br />

Assets - New Builds 0 0 15,788 15,788 15,788 0<br />

- In year Additions 15,788<br />

- In year Reductions 0<br />

Asset Maintenance 383,148 11,000 11,000 405,148 54,273 350,875<br />

- In year Additions 11,000<br />

- In year Reductions 0<br />

Community Projects 201,197 144,500 59,627 405,324 196,748 208,576<br />

- In year Additions 112,160<br />

- In year Reductions ( 52,533 )<br />

Corporate Equipment and Information Technology 247,992 1,015,000 611,899 1,874,891 282,957 1,591,933<br />

- In year Additions 946,496<br />

- In year Reductions ( 334,597 )<br />

Environmental Services 37,039 0 0 37,039 11,176 25,863<br />

Land Use and Economic Development 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

TOTAL 1,087,226 1,583,500 1,772,145 4,442,870 1,898,016 2,544,854<br />

Funding - 2011/2012<br />

Funding for<br />

Schemes<br />

B/Fwd<br />

Original Total<br />

Funding<br />

2011/2012<br />

Supplementary<br />

Funding<br />

2011/2012<br />

Total Capital<br />

Programme<br />

Funding<br />

2011/2012<br />

Capital<br />

Expenditure<br />

Funding<br />

2011/2012<br />

Funding<br />

C/FWD<br />

£ £ £ £ £<br />

Internally Funded:<br />

Prudential Borrowing 622,058 1,359,500 593,722 2,575,281 ( 538,539 ) 2,036,741<br />

Useable Capital Receipts 0 0 37,153 37,153 ( 29,599 ) 7,554<br />

Useable Capital Receipts / Investments (LAMS) 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 ( 1,000,000 ) 0<br />

Leisure Centre Renewals Fund 3,714 0 3,140 6,854 ( 5,836 ) 1,018<br />

Special Schemes Reserve 27,365 31,000 0 58,365 ( 7,321 ) 51,043<br />

Revenue Funded Capital Expenditure 227,257 0 59,672 286,929 ( 125,130 ) 161,798<br />

Externally Funded:<br />

Disabled Facilities Grant 0 193,000 0 193,000 ( 95,510 ) 97,490<br />

Leicestershire CC - <strong>Blaby</strong> Town Centre Works 7,957 0 0 7,957 ( 7,876 ) 82<br />

Leicestershire CC - Bouskell Park 15,000 0 0 15,000 ( 15,000 ) 0<br />

Leicestershire CC - Cycle Facilities 3,921 0 0 3,921 ( 3,140 ) 781<br />

Leicestershire CC - Play Builder 1,909 0 0 1,909 0 1,909<br />

Housing Association Contibutions to DFG Grants 0 0 23,831 23,831 ( 5,456 ) 18,375<br />

S106 Contributions - Various 141,006 54,625 195,631 ( 53,434 ) 142,197<br />

DEFRA - Air Quality Grant 37,039 0 0 37,039 ( 11,175 ) 25,864<br />

Total Funding 1,087,226 1,583,500 1,772,145 4,442,870 ( 1,898,016 ) 2,544,854<br />

Page 155<br />

D:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\6\9\8\AI00009896\$0kpqd3po.xls 08/11/1215:34


REVISED CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2012/13 APPENDIX B<br />

GENERAL FUND<br />

Assets - New Builds<br />

Budgets bfwd from<br />

2011/12<br />

Original Approved<br />

Budget<br />

Programme<br />

2012/2013<br />

Virements /<br />

Additions etc<br />

within the year<br />

REVISED BUDGET<br />

PROGRAMME<br />

Expenditure +<br />

Commit's to Period<br />

7 2012/2013<br />

Unspent Project<br />

Budget C/Fwd<br />

£ £ £ £ £ £<br />

Thorpe Astley Community Centre 0 0 15,788 15,788 15,788 0<br />

Asset Maintenance<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> Joint Service Shop Remodelling 899 0 0 899 776 123<br />

Carbon Management Works 2,761 0 0 2,761 0 2,761<br />

Create Fitness/Dance Studio At Pavillion 40,000 0 0 40,000 0 40,000<br />

Create Golf Driving Range At Pavillion 220,954 0 0 220,954 34,707 186,247<br />

Refurbishment Of Facilities At Pavillion 37,420 0 0 37,420 0 37,420<br />

Improvements To Pavillion Car Park 53,000 0 0 53,000 0 53,000<br />

Installation Of Extra Pavillion Heating 6,854 0 0 6,854 5,838 1,016<br />

Improve Cycle Facilites At <strong>Council</strong> Offic 6,440 0 0 6,440 3,140 3,300<br />

Increase Size Of Depot Yard 9,820 0 0 9,820 9,812 8<br />

Create Additional Staff Car Parking Spaces 0 0 7,000 7,000 0 7,000<br />

Install Ramp Outside Pavillion Portcabin 0 0 4,000 4,000 0 4,000<br />

Refurbishment Of Shower Facilities At Co 0 11,000 0 11,000 0 11,000<br />

Fire Alarm Installation At The Depot 5,000 0 0 5,000 0 5,000<br />

Sub Total 383,148 11,000 11,000 405,148 54,273 350,875<br />

Community Projects<br />

Improvements To Btc Paving & Landscaping 3,840 0 0 3,840 3,840 0<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> Town Masterplan Improvements 1,990 0 0 1,990 0 1,990<br />

Improvements To Btc Hanging Baskets 5,522 0 0 5,522 5,428 94<br />

Improvements To Btc Addnl Benches & Bins 4,780 0 0 4,780 4,682 98<br />

Improvements To Btc Addnl Notice Boards 5,000 0 0 5,000 4,935 65<br />

Installation Of Benches - 2012 0 0 4,000 4,000 2,750 1,250<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> Town Masterplan Improv. 12-13 0 25,000 -4,000 21,000 0 21,000<br />

Addnl Bollards In <strong>Blaby</strong> Town Centre 3,606 0 0 3,606 2,800 806<br />

Whistleway Steps Improvements 0 15,000 0 15,000 12,000 3,000<br />

Bouskell Park Better Places Project 30,000 0 0 30,000 24,355 5,645<br />

S106 Contrib To Littlethorpe Play Area 0 0 53,891 53,891 53,891 0<br />

Contrib. towards fencing of Narborough Park 0 0 5,000 5,000 0 5,000<br />

Whistleway Countryside Bridges 12-13 975 30,000 0 30,975 28,027 2,948<br />

Capital Grant Programme - 2012/13 0 54,500 0 54,500 54,500 0<br />

On-Street Parking Schemes 12-13 0 20,000 0 20,000 0 20,000<br />

Whistleway / Speedwell Cl. Play Area 1,909 0 0 1,909 0 1,909<br />

Childrens Play Programme 2,569 0 0 2,569 0 2,569<br />

S106 Receipts<br />

S106 - Stoney Stanton 0 0 0 0 -460 460<br />

S106 - 4A Duncan Avenue, Huncote 2,436 0 0 2,436 0 2,436<br />

S106 - Coventry Road, Narborough 48,533 0 -48,533 0 0 0<br />

S106 - Barns Lane, Kirby Muxloe 61,414 0 0 61,414 0 61,414<br />

S106 - Oakfield Avenue, Glenfield 0 0 556 556 0 556<br />

S106 - Huncote Road, Croft 0 0 3,897 3,897 0 3,897<br />

S106 - Nowell Close, Glen Parva 0 0 2,436 2,436 0 2,436<br />

S106 - Groby Road, Glenfield 0 0 2,436 2,436 0 2,436<br />

S106 - Fairview Avenue, Whetstone 0 0 11,691 11,691 0 11,691<br />

S106 - Church Farm, Elmesthorpe 0 0 4,871 4,871 0 4,871<br />

S106 - Barry Drive, Kirby Muxloe 0 0 4,872 4,872 0 4,872<br />

S106 - Hillborough Close, Glen Parva 0 0 2,436 2,436 0 2,436<br />

S106 - Desford Road, Kirby Muxloe 0 0 4,871 4,871 0 4,871<br />

S106 - Wigston Street, Countesthorpe 0 0 1,461 1,461 0 1,461<br />

S106 - Forest Drive, Kirby Muxloe 0 0 4,871 4,871 0 4,871<br />

S106 - Tournament Drive, Glenfield 0 0 4,871 4,871 0 4,871<br />

S106 - St. Johns - Enderby 28,623 0 0 28,623 0 28,623<br />

Sub Total 201,197 144,500 59,627 405,324 196,748 208,576<br />

Page 156<br />

D:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\6\9\8\AI00009896\$0kpqd3po.xls 08/11/1215:34


REVISED CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2012/13 APPENDIX B<br />

Budgets bfwd from<br />

2011/12<br />

Original Approved<br />

Budget<br />

Programme<br />

2012/2013<br />

Virements /<br />

Additions etc<br />

within the year<br />

REVISED BUDGET<br />

PROGRAMME<br />

Expenditure +<br />

Commit's to Period<br />

7 2012/2013<br />

Unspent Project<br />

Budget C/Fwd<br />

£ £ £ £ £ £<br />

Corporate Equipment and Information Technology<br />

Personnel & Payroll System 831 0 5,901 6,732 6,732 0<br />

Upgrade Of <strong>Council</strong> Web Services 71,788 0 0 71,788 67,304 4,484<br />

Power Standby Generator 6,732 0 0 6,732 4,534 2,198<br />

Pv Polar Systems 1,966 0 0 1,966 1,943 23<br />

Litterbin Replacement Programme 12-13 0 12,000 0 12,000 11,836 164<br />

Purchase Fleet Vehicles - 2012-13 Prog. 0 978,000 -303,000 675,000 138,377 536,623<br />

Purchase 240Ltr Bins For Boxes To Bins 0 0 900,000 900,000 0 900,000<br />

Covers for Inspection Pits at Depot 0 0 4,900 4,900 4,778 122<br />

Gas Monitoring Works At The Pavillion 16,350 0 0 16,350 0 16,350<br />

E-Financials Upgrade To 4.1 0 25,000 0 25,000 0 25,000<br />

Online Booking System At The Pavillion 228 0 10,695 10,923 10,923 0<br />

Replacement Revenues & Benefits System 105,317 0 25,000 130,317 36,530 93,787<br />

CONTINGENCIES :<br />

Amg Capital Contingency 44,780 0 -31,597 13,183 0 13,182<br />

Sub Total 247,992 1,015,000 611,899 1,874,891 282,957 1,591,933<br />

Environmental Services<br />

Air Quality Action Plan 37,039 0 0 37,039 11,176 25,863<br />

Sub Total 37,039 0 0 37,039 11,176 25,863<br />

Land Use and Economic Development<br />

Sub Total 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

TOTAL GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROGRAMME 869,376 1,170,500 698,314 2,738,189 560,942 2,177,247<br />

HOUSING<br />

Private Sector Housing<br />

Disabled Facilities Grants - Major Works 209,354 200,000 23,831 433,185 234,243 198,942<br />

Disabled Facilities Grants - Minor Works 0 193,000 0 193,000 95,510 97,490<br />

Contribution Towards Empty Homes Scheme 0 0 50,000 50,000 0 50,000<br />

Contribution To L.A. Mortgage Scheme 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0<br />

Provision Of Heating Grants 8,496 20,000 0 28,496 7,321 21,175<br />

Sub Total 217,850 413,000 1,073,831 1,704,681 1,337,074 367,607<br />

CAPITAL PROGRAMME - SUMMARY<br />

HOUSING 217,850 413,000 1,073,831 1,704,681 1,337,074 367,607<br />

GENERAL FUND 869,376 1,170,500 698,314 2,738,189 560,942 2,177,247<br />

TOTAL - 20112/13 PROGRAMME 1,087,226 1,583,500 1,772,145 4,442,870 1,898,016 2,544,854<br />

Page 157<br />

D:\moderngov\Data\AgendaItemDocs\6\9\8\AI00009896\$0kpqd3po.xls 08/11/1215:34


INTERNAL FUNDING<br />

Useable Capital Receipts - Sale of General Fund Assets 188,360<br />

- TOH VAT Shelter Receipts<br />

(Ringfenced for Investment)<br />

998,592<br />

Unsupported Borrowing - General Fund - Prudential Borrowing 622,058<br />

Renewals Fund - Leisure 396,270<br />

Special Schemes Reserves - Various Projects 101,128<br />

- Computer Room Reserve 100,000<br />

Revenue Funded Capital Expenditure 227,257<br />

EXTERNAL FUNDING<br />

BUDGETED CAPITAL RESOURCES STATEMENT<br />

for the financial year 2012/13 as at Period 7<br />

TOTAL INTERNAL FUNDING 2,633,666<br />

Disabled Facilities Grant - DCLG -<br />

- Housing Association Contrib. -<br />

S106 Contributions - Various 171,765<br />

DEFRA - Air Quality Grant 37,039<br />

Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> - Better Places - <strong>Blaby</strong> 22,957<br />

- Playbuilder 1,909<br />

- Cycle Facilities 3,921<br />

TOTAL EXTERNAL FUNDING 237,591<br />

TOTAL FUNDING 2,871,257<br />

OF WHICH COMMITTED 2,683,217<br />

FREE BALANCE 188,041<br />

Page 158<br />

APPENDIX C<br />

BALANCE ADDITIONAL FUNDING FUNDING OF BALANCE<br />

B/F FUNDING UTILISED REMAINING C/F<br />

as at IN as at CAPITAL as at<br />

01-Apr-12 2012 / 13 31-Oct-12 PROGAMME 31-Mar-13<br />

(IN RESERVES) (Estimated) * (Estimated) *<br />

£ £ £ £<br />

47,671<br />

278,848<br />

1,939,222<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

59,672<br />

2,325,414<br />

193,000<br />

23,831<br />

23,866<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

240,697<br />

2,566,111<br />

(29,599)<br />

(1,000,000)<br />

(538,539)<br />

(5,836)<br />

(7,321)<br />

-<br />

(125,130)<br />

(1,706,425)<br />

(95,510)<br />

(5,456)<br />

(53,434)<br />

(11,175)<br />

(22,876)<br />

-<br />

(3,140)<br />

(191,591)<br />

(1,898,016)<br />

(7,554)<br />

-<br />

(2,022,741)<br />

(1,018)<br />

(51,043)<br />

-<br />

(161,798)<br />

(2,244,156)<br />

(97,490)<br />

(18,375)<br />

(142,197)<br />

(25,864)<br />

(82)<br />

(1,909)<br />

(781)<br />

(286,698)<br />

(2,530,854)<br />

198,879<br />

277,441<br />

-<br />

389,416<br />

42,763<br />

100,000<br />

-<br />

1,008,499<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1,008,499<br />

809,620<br />

198,879


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 th November 2012<br />

Subject: Corporate Plan Refresh<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Sandra Whiles, Chief Executive<br />

0116 272 7501<br />

sw2@blaby.gov.uk<br />

Portfolio Holder: Cllr E White - Leader<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

1.1 To advise Members of the outcome of the Corporate Plan refresh and to seek<br />

approval for the revised critical activities<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

Recommendation / Recommendation to <strong>Council</strong><br />

To approve the refreshed Corporate Plan<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

It is timely to update the plan to reflect current and known future challenges<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

Yes<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Yes<br />

6. Matters for Consideration<br />

Agenda Item 13<br />

The Corporate Plan is the document which sets out how <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

will deliver its commitments set out in the Community Plan which is the<br />

vision developed with other public services, outlining what we want the district<br />

to be like in 2026.<br />

The Corporate Plan is based on information about the district and customer<br />

feedback and identifies how we will contribute to improvements over the next<br />

3 years which will help us to deliver our long term vision.<br />

Page 159


Since the 3 year Corporate Plan was approved by <strong>Council</strong> in April 2011, the<br />

landscape has changed both due to reducing resources and changing<br />

priorities, be they national or local and, it was therefore considered timely to<br />

review the critical activities set out within the Plan. As they were developed by<br />

the community and our partners, the priorities and ambitions within the report<br />

remain unchanged with the 4 priorities for the council being:<br />

• Vibrant Places – Sustaining and Improving the Environment<br />

• Access to Quality Provision for Children and Young People<br />

• Health & Well Being for All<br />

• High Quality, Responsive, Efficient and Valued <strong>Public</strong> Services<br />

There are 24 ambitions within the plan which will remain the same for reasons<br />

already stated. The critical activities have been revised to incorporate new<br />

priorities such as the implementation of the Supporting Leicestershire<br />

Families model and the implementation of the scheme for the Localisation of<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Tax as well as responding to the impact of Welfare Reform.<br />

The revised critical activities are high level activities and each of these may<br />

require several different services working on a number of projects in order to<br />

achieve. These individual activities will be identified within service plans and<br />

will be reported on via the quarterly performance <strong>reports</strong>. A report setting out<br />

the revised performance management framework will be the subject of a<br />

report to the Cabinet Executive on 14 th January 2013.<br />

The revised Critical activities are detailed at Appendix 1 of this report.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

Human Rights Act 1998<br />

Human rights have been considered but there are no overarching matters for<br />

concern in relation to this report.<br />

Legal Implications<br />

There are none associated with this report.<br />

Human Resources Implications<br />

There are none associated with this report.<br />

Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

There are none associated with this report.<br />

Equalities<br />

As the priorities within the plan have remained unchanged, there is no EINA<br />

for this report.<br />

Page 160


8. Other Options Considered<br />

• No other options were considered as the Corporate Plan should reflect<br />

current priorities.<br />

9. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

• The Medium Term Financial strategy details how we will deliver our<br />

Corporate Priorities and the annual budget is agreed by <strong>Council</strong> each<br />

February. There are no additional resource implications as an outcome of<br />

this report.<br />

10. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

10.1 Revised list of critical activities 2011 - 14<br />

11. List of Background Papers<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted:<br />

(insert � below to show relevant consultation has taken place)<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Corporate Services Group Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 161


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 162


Priority 1 - Vibrant Places – Sustaining & Improving the<br />

Environment<br />

Ambition 1: There will be less nuisance and fewer community safety<br />

issues relating to traffic.<br />

• Consider and represent community views to Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> and partners etc on<br />

traffic issues, relating to infrastructure, development proposals and Core Strategy.<br />

• Deliver and update Air Quality Action Plans.<br />

Ambition 2: There will be greater opportunities for people to travel by<br />

public transport and means other than the car.<br />

• To ensure that the Development Plan enables opportunities for reduced car use, increased<br />

public transport networks and for us to influence the provision of infrastructure.<br />

Ambition 3: Community areas including recreation, parks and open<br />

spaces and streets will be clear for all to enjoy and use.<br />

• Deliver the Clean & Safe Strategy.<br />

• Deliver the Green Space Strategy Action Plan.<br />

Ambition 4: <strong>Blaby</strong> town centre will provide a greater retail experience<br />

for shoppers.<br />

• Support and develop the <strong>Blaby</strong> Town Centre Partnership to improve the Town Centre ‘offer’ for<br />

residents, businesses and customers.<br />

Ambition 5: Use of current infrastructure (roads, community facilities,<br />

public realm) will be maximised and improved where economically<br />

viable.<br />

• Put a rigorous process in place to deal with potential challenge through ‘The Community Right to<br />

Bid’.<br />

Ambition 6: New infrastructure (roads, community facilities etc) will<br />

be included as appropriate to support any proposed growth through<br />

development.<br />

• Use the planning system to support the provision of new infrastructure.<br />

Ambition 7: The housing needs of communities will be met, including<br />

ensuring affordable housing for all age groups across the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

• Deliver the Development Plan.<br />

• Review and deliver the Housing Strategy and associated policies including production of an<br />

affordable housing supplementary planning document and a vulnerable persons housing<br />

strategy.<br />

Page 163


Ambition 8: Development of the right quality and quantity (housing<br />

and employment sites) to take place in the right places, informed by<br />

local communities and their representatives.<br />

• Deliver the Local Plan, and build confidence in <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> around influencing<br />

planning matters appropriately.<br />

Ambition 9: Communities make appropriate adaptations to climate<br />

change and take steps to reduce its impact.<br />

• Commit to and Implement ‘Climate Local’ and deliver the critical activities.<br />

Priority 2 - Access to Quality Provision for Children & Young<br />

People<br />

Ambition 10: There will be better and more facilities and activities for<br />

Children and Young People.<br />

• Revise and implement the Children’s and Young People’s Strategy<br />

Ambition 11: Integrated youth support work available for the most<br />

vulnerable young people.<br />

• Revise and implement the Children’s and Young People’s Strategy<br />

Ambition 12: Greater support for families with young children and<br />

teenagers.<br />

• Deliver a local model for Supporting Families Leicestershire<br />

Ambition 13: Young people are actively involved in planning and<br />

delivering improvements to services.<br />

• Revise and implement the Children’s and Young People’s Strategy<br />

Ambition 14: All children and young people reach their potential,<br />

including in education.<br />

• Revise and implement the Children’s and Young People’s Strategy<br />

Priority 3 - Health & Well Being for All<br />

Ambition 15: The health of residents will improve through<br />

preventative measures.<br />

• Develop and deliver a local health plan for <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

Page 164


Ambition 16: Vulnerable people are more involved, valued and<br />

supported to live independently within the community with a good<br />

quality of life.<br />

• Deliver a Vulnerable Persons Strategy and Action Plan.<br />

• Maximise our ability to provide an advice service, including welfare reform, to enable people to<br />

access income appropriately.<br />

Ambition 17: There will be greater opportunities for people to<br />

improve their chances of employment.<br />

• Develop and implement the Economic Development Strategy.<br />

Ambition 18: People feel a greater sense of pride, local identity and<br />

get on well together in their communities irrespective of personal<br />

background.<br />

• Working with parishes, key community groups and the voluntary sector to share and achieve<br />

common goals, including an effective community engagement mechanism.<br />

Ambition 19: Crime levels including Anti-Social Behaviour will fall;<br />

people will feel safer and have a greater public confidence in all<br />

community safety services.<br />

• Deliver the Community Safety Plan<br />

Priority – 4 High Quality, Responsive, Efficient and Valued<br />

<strong>Public</strong> Services<br />

Ambition 20: High performing accessible services that meet the<br />

needs of our community.<br />

• Deliver continuous improvement by challenging our services to provide what matters to the<br />

customer as efficiently and effectively as possible.<br />

• Improve access to services based on an understanding of the customer’s needs and point of<br />

view.<br />

Ambition 21: Transparent reporting and involvement of the local<br />

community.<br />

• Provide relevant and accessible information that matters to the local community.<br />

• Improve service delivery by ensuring services are shaped by customer demand.<br />

Ambition 22: Efficient services that provide value for money.<br />

• Continually challenge and review service costs and quality.<br />

Ambition 23: Fairness and respect for all with no one suffering<br />

disadvantage.<br />

• Ensuring that services meet the diverse needs of the community.<br />

• Deliver the People Strategy (The <strong>Blaby</strong> Way).<br />

Page 165


Ambition 24: There are talented people within the <strong>Council</strong> who have<br />

the skills to deliver high quality, responsive, efficient, valued public<br />

services.<br />

• The People Strategy (The <strong>Blaby</strong> Way) is in place, communicated and delivered<br />

• Deliver the Member Development Strategy.<br />

Page 166


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 November 2012<br />

Subject: Neighbourhood Planning: Management, Support and<br />

Protocol Arrangements<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Portfolio Holder:<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

Flo Churchill<br />

Interim Group Manager, Planning, Housing Strategy<br />

and Economic Development<br />

0116 272 7727<br />

Flo.Churchill@blaby.gov.uk<br />

<strong>Council</strong>lor Terry Richardson – Planning, Economic<br />

Development and Housing Strategy<br />

1.1 This report sets out the issues relating to the practical implementation of the<br />

Neighbourhood Planning Regulations, outlining the new responsibilities that<br />

fall to the <strong>Council</strong> and seeking approval for the area designation for the Fosse<br />

Villages Neighbourhood Plan Area.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

2.2<br />

2.3<br />

2.4<br />

2.5<br />

Recommendations:<br />

That Cabinet Executive:<br />

Agenda Item 14<br />

Delegates to the relevant Group Manager the duty to make an application<br />

for further funding available from the Department of Communities and<br />

Local Government when the appropriate stage in the Neighbourhood<br />

Planning process has been met for the Fosse Villages Neighbourhood<br />

Plan.<br />

Approves the establishment of a Neighbourhood Planning Reserve Fund<br />

for monies received in relation to designation, examination and<br />

referendums on Neighbourhood Plans.<br />

Approves the suggested management arrangements contained in Section<br />

6 of this Report.<br />

Accepts the progress on the Leicester and Leicestershire Neighbourhood<br />

Planning Toolkit.<br />

Approves the application from the Fosse Villages Neighbourhood Working<br />

Group for the Neighbourhood Plan Area to be confirmed.<br />

Page 167


3.<br />

3.1<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

A Neighbourhood Plan is capable of becoming part of the Statutory<br />

Development Plan for the area and therefore a material consideration in<br />

the determination of planning applications. It is therefore appropriate for<br />

there to be a mechanism whereby the <strong>Council</strong>, in line with the<br />

Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012, can formally approve any<br />

applications to be recognised as an ‘Qualifying Body’ or for an area to be<br />

recognised as an ‘Appropriate Area’ for Neighbourhood planning purposes.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

4.1 This report has not been included in the last Forward Plan. It is a key<br />

decision. The matter has become apparent since the publication of the<br />

Forward Plan and because of the application from the Fosse Villages<br />

Neighbourhood Group it is impracticable to defer the decision on this report<br />

until after the operative date of the next Forward Plan on which it could<br />

appear. Accordingly the General Exception Procedure contained in Part 4<br />

Section 2 Paragraph 9 of the Constitution has been invoked to enable its<br />

consideration. The Scrutiny Commissioners have been informed and public<br />

notice has been given by posting it at the <strong>Council</strong> Offices.<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Yes<br />

6. Matters for Consideration<br />

Main issues<br />

6.1 The Localism Act 2011 devolves planning powers to Parish and Town<br />

<strong>Council</strong>s or Neighbourhood Forums to lead on the preparation of<br />

Neighbourhood Plans. These powers are outlined in detail in the<br />

Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations which came into force on 6 th<br />

April 2012. Neighbourhood planning is one of the five key measures in the<br />

Localism Act and specifically relates to the production of Neighbourhood<br />

Plans, Neighbourhood Development Orders and Community Right to Build<br />

Orders.<br />

6.2 <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has the responsibility as the local planning authority for<br />

the area to determine applications for Neighbourhood Plan Areas. The<br />

<strong>Council</strong> also has a general duty to support those preparing Neighbourhood<br />

Plans. This is a new responsibility arising from the Localism Act.<br />

Background Information<br />

6.3 Neighbourhood planning is a key measure in the Localism Act 2012. It<br />

devolves some of the responsibility to parish and town councils and<br />

neighbourhood forums as “Qualifying Bodies.” Neighbourhood Plans are<br />

required to be ‘pro-development.’ They cannot be used to stop development<br />

already allocated or permitted and cannot propose less development than that<br />

in the Local Plan Core Strategy. They can however propose more<br />

development than allowed for in the Local Plan Core Strategy. This report<br />

Page 168


deals with Neighbourhood Plans.<br />

6.4 The Neighbourhood planning process also provides Parish and Town<br />

<strong>Council</strong>s an opportunity to work in partnership with the <strong>Council</strong> in the<br />

preparation of the Allocations and Development Management part of the<br />

Local Plan Core Strategy.<br />

6.5 Neighbourhood Plans will be subject to an independent check by the<br />

appointed Examiner to ensure that proposals comply with equalities and<br />

human rights legislation. <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> will have advised prior to the<br />

examination whether it is considered that the Neighbourhood Plan is in<br />

conformity with the Core Strategy Local Plan.<br />

Neighbourhood Planning regulations<br />

6.6 The Neighbourhood Planning Regulations became effective on April 6 2012<br />

and set out the statutory procedures for Neighbourhood Plans. <strong>Blaby</strong> has<br />

received a request from the Fosse Villages Neighbourhood Plan group area to<br />

be recognised for formal designation as a neighbourhood plan area and it is<br />

intended that advertisements will be placed to advertise this application in line<br />

with the Regulations. .<br />

6.7 There are seven new key duties for <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in respect of<br />

Neighbourhood Planning thus:<br />

1. Duty to support<br />

2. Designate Neighbourhood Area<br />

3. Designate Neighbourhood Forum<br />

4. Consider compliance with statutory<br />

and EU requirements<br />

5. Advise independent examiner on<br />

representations received and other<br />

matters<br />

6. Fund and organise examination<br />

7. Consider examiners<br />

recommendations<br />

8. Fund and undertake referendum<br />

9. Duty to Adopt<br />

Designation of a Neighbourhood Area<br />

6.8 The <strong>Council</strong> is responsible for receiving and determining applications for the<br />

designation of a neighbourhood area such as the one received from the<br />

Fosse Villages Group. The whole of the district in <strong>Blaby</strong> is covered by either<br />

Parish or Town <strong>Council</strong>s or Parish Meetings.<br />

6.9 Applications for the designation of a neighbourhood area must include the<br />

proposed boundary and supporting information on why the boundary is an<br />

appropriate one. The <strong>Council</strong> is then required to advertise the application for a<br />

statutory six week period and thereafter consider any representations<br />

received.<br />

6.10 The only potential difficulty that may arise in respect of the designation of<br />

Page 169


Neighbourhood Areas is if an application is received from a group promoting<br />

for instance a Business Led neighbourhood plan where the areas are already<br />

covered by parish councils.<br />

Application by Fosse Villages Neighbourhood Forum<br />

6.11 The <strong>Council</strong> has received an application from the Fosse Villages Forum to<br />

have the area they have designated recognised as “An appropriate area” for<br />

the purposes of composing a Neighbourhood Plan. Officers are now in a<br />

position to recommend that <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> approves the designation of<br />

its first Neighbourhood Plan area.<br />

Independent Examination<br />

6.12 A Neighbourhood Plan or Neighbourhood Development Order will need to be<br />

assessed by an “Independent Examiner” who will be paid for by the <strong>Council</strong><br />

and appointed in conjunction with the “Qualifying Body.” The examiner will<br />

then recommend either that the plan is submitted to a referendum (with or<br />

without amendments) or that the proposed plan is refused. In reaching the<br />

decision the examiner will have to have regard to the plan’s conformity with<br />

the National Planning Policy Framework and any other national planning<br />

policy and with the <strong>Council</strong>`s Core Strategy, compliance with EU Directives,<br />

how the plan promotes equality and human rights, any consultation<br />

undertaken and the plan’s response to consultation. Costs of the examination<br />

have been estimated to be around £20,000 according to CLG..<br />

6.13 <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> will also be responsible for publishing the Examiner’s<br />

report and considering any recommendations that the Examiner may make.<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has the right to endorse the Examiner’s comments and<br />

recommendations or to reject them and refer back to the Examiner for further<br />

examination.<br />

Referendum<br />

6.14 If the Neighbourhood Plan passes the examination then the next stage is for<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to hold a referendum on the making of the plan. The<br />

<strong>Council</strong> is responsible for organising and paying for the referendum.. A<br />

referendum must take place as a minimum in the designated area to which<br />

the plan relates and those entitled to vote are those persons within the plan<br />

area who are entitled to vote in local elections. If the plan gains support from<br />

over 50% of those voting however small the turnout might be then the <strong>Council</strong><br />

have no choice but to adopt the Neighbourhood Plan as part of the<br />

Development Plan.<br />

Duty to Support<br />

6.15 The Localism Act requires local authorities to support communities in all<br />

aspects of neighbourhood planning. This is a new duty. It is up to each local<br />

authority to determine how that support is expressed. To date <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> has given financial support in terms of the Front Runner monies<br />

received from CLG that were passed in their entirety to the Fosse Villages<br />

Forum; other authorities have not been so generous. The Duty to Support is a<br />

significant resource challenge to the <strong>Council</strong> but at the same time could also<br />

comprise an opportunity to better connect with our communities and to work<br />

Page 170


with them to help them realise their communities’ aspirations. Support can be<br />

given in ways that do not directly involve financial expenditure such as<br />

allowing groups access to council information and data bases and to<br />

resources such as maps etc without passing on charges.<br />

6.16 <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has to determine what level of support it wishes to<br />

provide to the Neighbourhood Planning process and whether it is appropriate<br />

to devote either financial resources or officer time and commitment towards<br />

helping groups and forums to develop their plans.<br />

6.17 Currently <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> provides support to the Fosse Villages<br />

Neighbourhood Forum by both passing on finance in terms of Front Runner<br />

monies and providing officer support to the regular meetings of the Forum and<br />

to the public consultation exercises that they run.<br />

6.18 Additional funding has recently been announced that is intended to support<br />

local authorities in resourcing the required support for Neighbourhood Plans.<br />

Funding will be available in two tranches, £5,000 on designation of the<br />

Neighbourhood Plan area and £20,000 on completion of the referendum. It is<br />

clear from the current guidance on this funding that it is intended to directly<br />

support the additional burden placed on local authorities and it is therefore<br />

recommended that this funding is placed within a Neighbourhood Planning<br />

reserve fund to support the <strong>Council</strong>’s work in discharging it’s responsibilities<br />

for neighbourhood planning<br />

Duty to Adopt<br />

6.19 Once a Neighbourhood plan has received more than 50% support at a local<br />

referendum the <strong>Council</strong> will be required to adopt it as part of the Development<br />

Plan and will therefore be required to determine future applications for<br />

development bearing it in mind as a ‘material consideration.’<br />

Governance and Protocols<br />

6.20 The Portfolio Holder for Planning will be the lead Member for Neighbourhood<br />

Planning matters and will be supported from officers within the Planning<br />

Service and the Policy, Partnerships and Performance Service. Closer<br />

engagement will be critical to the success of the Neighbourhood Planning<br />

process within <strong>Blaby</strong>. The ability of the Planning Service to provide the likely<br />

level of support within existing resources is unclear but these issues will be<br />

closely examined during the forthcoming review of the Planning Service.<br />

Leicester and Leicestershire Neighbourhood Planning Toolkit<br />

6.21 The County <strong>Council</strong> continue to give a very high level of support to the Fosse<br />

Villages Neighbourhood Forum and are working on a Leicester and<br />

Leicestershire Neighbourhood Planning Toolkit and have established a project<br />

steering group to carry this work forward. <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is represented<br />

on this body by the Planning Policy Team Leader. The toolkit will aim to<br />

support communities across the County in developing a Neighbourhood Plan<br />

and will provide:<br />

Page 171


o An overview of what Neighbourhood Plans can and cannot do;<br />

o Signpost and support groups to access the information and guidance<br />

already available;<br />

o Provide a framework for developing a Neighbourhood Plan in<br />

Leicestershire and the roles and responsibilities of all key partners;<br />

o Outline minimum requirements before commencing engagement in the<br />

process for both communities and local authorities;<br />

o Outline details of other approaches that may be more suitable such as<br />

Village Design Statement, or single issue projects and documents<br />

6.22 Co-operation on Neighbourhood Planning matters will also count towards<br />

helping the <strong>Council</strong> to discharge its duty to cooperate on planning matters,<br />

another new duty introduced by the Localism Act and the NPPF.<br />

6.23 It is anticipated that the following support mechanisms are required to support<br />

Neighbourhood Planning:<br />

o Developing a timetable for engagement with any future proposals for<br />

Neighbourhood Plans;<br />

o Provide advice and encouragement to Neighbourhood Forums to<br />

engage with the development plan process and to have an input into<br />

the Allocations, Designations and Development Management DPD that<br />

will follow on after the Core Strategy Local Plan;<br />

o Subject to reasonable requests area and site plans to be provided at<br />

cost<br />

o Subject to reasonable requests technical <strong>reports</strong> and extracts of data<br />

sets to be provided at cost<br />

o Subject to reasonable requests site histories to be provided<br />

o Subject to reasonable requests provision of any other information that<br />

is in the public domain<br />

o Provision of officer support in respect of meeting compliance with EU<br />

Directives and National Policy with regard to equalities legislation and<br />

human rights legislation.<br />

o Continued support to the Fosse Villages Neighbourhood Forum<br />

including provision of council facilities such as meeting rooms without<br />

charge<br />

o Creation of a Neighbourhood Planning page on the official <strong>Blaby</strong><br />

<strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Website to act as a single point of reference for<br />

information, to share best practice and to promote awareness of<br />

Neighbourhood Planning<br />

Resources to support this work will be considered during the forthcoming<br />

review of the Planning service<br />

Summary of Main Issues<br />

6.24 It is proposed that the following protocols are adopted in dealing with any<br />

Neighbourhood Planning issues:<br />

Task/Duty Protocol to be adopted<br />

Advertisement of the request to Planning Group Manager to arrange<br />

designate an area or a forum advertisement for 6 weeks<br />

Preparation of report on Planning Group manager to prepare report for<br />

Page 172


application to be designated a<br />

Forum or Area<br />

Cabinet setting out decisions to be made<br />

Appointment of the Examiner Planning Group Manager to appoint examiner in<br />

conjunction with Neighbourhood Forum<br />

Referendum Democratic services to fund and organise<br />

referendum<br />

Adoption of the Plan Report to Cabinet prepared by Group Manager<br />

informing members of the result of the<br />

referendum<br />

Consideration of the Development Control Committee to determine<br />

Neighbourhood Plan as a applications in accordance with the<br />

‘material consideration.’<br />

Neighbourhood Plan as part of the statutory<br />

Development Plan.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

Human Rights Act 1998<br />

• Human rights have been considered but there are no overarching matters<br />

for concern in relation to this report.<br />

Legal Implications<br />

• Any Neighbourhood Plans that pass the referendum stage must be<br />

adopted by <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and will then become part of the<br />

statutory Development Plan which in turn becomes a material<br />

consideration in the determination of planning applications<br />

Human Resources Implications<br />

• Human resource implications have been outlined in the body of the report<br />

and comprise mainly of officer time and commitment.<br />

Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

• Neighbourhood Planning, whilst important does not present any major<br />

risks to the corporate business of the <strong>Council</strong>. There is some potential<br />

impact in terms of the officer commitment that may be required but<br />

involvement will always be considered against a back ground of business<br />

requirements and resilience.<br />

• Risk and business continuity/resilience issues have been considered in the<br />

report.<br />

Equalities<br />

• The proposals contained within this report are not judged to have any<br />

significant impacts in terms of the various equalities groups and this has<br />

been demonstrated through carrying out an Impact and Needs<br />

assessment.<br />

• An EINA has been carried out and no adverse impacts identified<br />

Page 173


Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

• Climate risks have been considered. It is noted that Neighbourhood Plans<br />

will be required to undergo Environmental Assessment and Strategic<br />

Environmental Assessment according to European legislation.<br />

Crime & Disorder<br />

• No potential impacts or crime and disorder risks have been identified.<br />

Other<br />

• None<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

• Not engaging in supporting neighbourhood planning activities would be a<br />

dereliction of the duty imposed by the Localism Act and therefore not<br />

engaging in the process has not been considered.<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

• None<br />

10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

• It is currently anticipated that current known financial implications<br />

can be met from existing budgets<br />

• Implications for resourcing will be considered as an integral part of<br />

the forthcoming Planning Service Review<br />

• It is anticipated that <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> will apply for the<br />

additional funding recently announced by CLG and available from<br />

October 2012 according to the stage of progress that has been<br />

achieved.<br />

11. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

• Fosse Villages Neighbourhood Plan Area Designation request<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted:<br />

(insert � below to show relevant consultation has taken place)<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Corporate Services Group Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 174


Page 175


Page 176


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 November 2012<br />

Subject: Broadband Roll Out for the <strong>District</strong><br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Portfolio Holder:<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

• Colin Jones<br />

• Group Manager, Corporate Services<br />

• <strong>Council</strong> Offices<br />

• 0116 2727569<br />

Cllr D Clements<br />

Corporate Services, Performance and Leisure<br />

1.1 To seek approval to apply £50,000, as a contribution to a partnership project,<br />

led by Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong>, to improve broadband connectivity<br />

across the <strong>District</strong><br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

Recommendation<br />

That a contribution of £50,000 from the Broadband Reserve, be allocated to<br />

enable <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> to participate in a partnership project, led by<br />

Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong>, to improve broadband connectivity across<br />

the <strong>District</strong><br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

To support the county wide initiative and provide benefits to the community<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

4.1 Yes<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Yes<br />

6. Matters for Consideration<br />

Broadband Across Leicestershire<br />

Page 177<br />

Agenda Item 15


6.1 Super-fast broadband (SFBB) is emerging as a priority infrastructure within<br />

Leicestershire. The deployment of super-fast broadband (SFBB) will:<br />

• provide the foundations from which the UK economy will grow and recover<br />

from �the recession – to improve prosperity in the wider economy<br />

• ensure the UK is competitive in global markets<br />

• improve consumer power and choice, overcoming rural isolation<br />

• help transform the way public services are delivered<br />

• increase access to services<br />

• reduce the need to travel and tackle climate change<br />

National and Local Funding<br />

6.2 British Telecom (BT) is investing £2.5bn to roll-out SFBB across the UK. It is<br />

anticipated that through this investment two thirds of the UK population will<br />

have access to SFBB by the end of 2014. A map showing the location of BT<br />

investment in Leicestershire is included at appendix A. BT considers that all<br />

other areas, referred to as the final third, are not commercially viable and will<br />

require public sector funding.<br />

6.3 The Government aims to ensure that all of the UK has access to the best<br />

broadband connectivity in Europe by 2015. Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> has<br />

a vision to deliver SFBB (c24Mbit/s) to all premises in Leicestershire by 2017<br />

with at least 90% being delivered by 2015.<br />

£6m has been allocated by Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> to match the<br />

Government’s £3.14m allocation. A further £300,000 has been allocated by<br />

the County <strong>Council</strong> to provide better broadband services in the most remote<br />

areas.<br />

All Leicestershire district council’s are being invited to invest to ensure that the<br />

deployment can extend to as many businesses and residential premises as<br />

possible. Furthermore, the County <strong>Council</strong> is leading efforts to encourage<br />

Government to increase its allocation and is working with other East Midlands<br />

authorities to secure European Regional Development Funding (ERDF).<br />

Broadband Roll-Out Proposals<br />

6.4 Following the Government’s approval of Leicestershire’s broadband strategy,<br />

the County <strong>Council</strong> will lead the procurement of a supplier using the<br />

Government’s national procurement Framework; this includes BT and Fujitsu.<br />

Procurement will commence in December 2012 and be complete by summer<br />

2013. Deployment will commence following this until 2015.<br />

At this stage it is not possible to determine the specific technology which the<br />

contracted supplier will use to improve broadband connectivity. It is, however,<br />

expected that the majority of improvements will be through fixed-line<br />

connections rather than through mobile (4G) and satellite broadband. These<br />

innovative solutions could be especially important in remote rural areas.<br />

It is not possible to identify the full costs of deploying SFBB to the final third<br />

with Leicestershire until later in the procurement process. Indicative research<br />

has estimated this at a minimum of £20m. For <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> the total cost is<br />

Page 178


estimated as £2.8m.<br />

It is estimated that public investment in SFBB within areas that will not receive<br />

commercial support could result in a Gross Value Added uplift of £36.4m (for<br />

Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland).<br />

Key Issues<br />

6.5 There is significant evidence within the <strong>District</strong> that poor connectivity issues<br />

have affected both businesses and communities<br />

It is estimated that 8600 premises within <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> will not have access to<br />

SFBB without public sector investment. This equates to 21% of all premises<br />

within the district. Across all Leicestershire premises this figure is estimated at<br />

30%.<br />

There are areas within <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> with very poor broadband connectivity. It<br />

is estimated that 1,235 premises are classified a Slow-Spots with current<br />

broadband speeds of between 0.5Mbit/s and 2Mbit/s. 248 premises are<br />

classified as Not-Spots with speeds of less than 0.5Mbit/s.<br />

Current estimated broadband speeds have been mapped and are available at<br />

www.leics.gov.uk/broadband.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

7.1 Human Rights Act 1998<br />

Human rights have been considered but there are no overarching matters for<br />

concern in relation to this report.<br />

7.2 Legal Implications<br />

There are no direct legal implications arising from this report.<br />

7.3 Human Resources Implications<br />

There are no Human Resources implications.<br />

7.4 Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

This project does not present any major risks.<br />

7.5 Equalities<br />

No EINA is required for this report.<br />

7.6 Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

No impact<br />

7.7 Crime & Disorder<br />

There are no Crime and Disorder implications.<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

Take no action – Not considered the most appropriate action as the<br />

community may loose out on the benefits of this county wide scheme.<br />

Page 179


9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

Earlier in 2012 Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong> undertook a broadband survey.<br />

Over 4,600 responses were received, including 650 from businesses. The<br />

results of the consultation will help to create a picture of where there is poor<br />

connectivity and demand for super-fast broadband. The full report is available<br />

at www.leics.gov.uk/broadband<br />

10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

Current year 2013/14 2014/15<br />

Revenue £0 £0 £0<br />

Capital £50,000 £0 £0<br />

This funding was provided for as part of the closedown of the 2011/12 financial year<br />

by the creation of a specific broadband reserve as noted in the Audit Committee<br />

report of 28 th June 2012 relating to the closedown of accounts 2011/12.<br />

11. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

Appendix A - A map showing the location of BT investment in<br />

Leicestershire<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

N/A<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted:<br />

(insert � below to show relevant consultation has taken place)<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Corporate Services Group Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 180


Appendix A<br />

BT commercial deployment of super-fast broadband by Exchange area<br />

copyright. All rights reserved. Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong>. LA100019271. Published 2012<br />

Red shaded areas show telephone exchanges BT has or will deploy SFBB to<br />

Boundaries of telephone exchanges are indicative<br />

© Crown<br />

N.B. SFBB will not be available to all premises in enabled exchange areas. Some small areas<br />

will still be considered commercially unviable. Such areas will fall within scope for pubic<br />

sector investment under Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong>’s procurement.<br />

Page 181


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 182


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 th November 2012<br />

Subject: Amendment to Lease of Land to Narborough Parish<br />

<strong>Council</strong><br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Portfolio Holder:<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

Sarah Pennelli<br />

Financial Services Group Manager<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Offices<br />

0116 272 7650<br />

Cllr J. Hudson – Finance & Efficiency Portfolio<br />

Holder<br />

1.1 To seek authority to amend and combine the existing leases in relation to the<br />

open space known as “Narborough Park”.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

Recommendation to <strong>Council</strong><br />

That the existing lease to Narborough Parish <strong>Council</strong> be amended to<br />

combine the areas of land as highlighted on the plan in Appendix 1 and<br />

delegated Authority be given to the Financial Services Group Manager in<br />

consultation with the Portfolio Holder to agree terms and conclude the legal<br />

arrangements.<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

It is appropriate to amalgamate the lease agreements with Narborough<br />

Parish <strong>Council</strong> and alter the boundary of those leases to coincide with the<br />

replacement fencing.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

Yes<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Not applicable it is a matter for <strong>Council</strong><br />

Page 183<br />

Agenda Item 16


6. Matters for Consideration<br />

Narborough Parish <strong>Council</strong> currently lease the area known as Narborough<br />

Park under two lease agreements dated 4 th November 2009.<br />

Discussions in relation to the replacement of the fencing on the boundary<br />

between Narborough Park and the <strong>Council</strong> Offices have led to a proposal to<br />

alter the boundary of the area leased by Narborough Parish <strong>Council</strong> and also<br />

to amalgamate the two leases that are currently in existence.<br />

Extended discussions between Officers of <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and the<br />

Parish <strong>Council</strong> have taken place and the following are elements that have<br />

been considered in the process:<br />

o The replacement fencing should be of the type to ensure safety of the<br />

public utilising the park in relation to vehicles accessing the <strong>Council</strong><br />

Offices via the driveway.<br />

o That a contribution is made by <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to reflect some of<br />

the additional expenditure that has resulted in this enhanced<br />

specification.<br />

o That the boundary of the leased area be amended to extend the verge<br />

as shown in Appendix A in order that a further six spaces be<br />

accommodated within the staff car park and to allow access for<br />

emergency vehicles.<br />

o That the annual lease value of £1,065 be reduced to a nominal sum.<br />

Recent arrangements where Parish <strong>Council</strong>s have taken on the<br />

responsibility and costs of maintenance have been at a nominal<br />

amount to recognise the expenditure that the Parish <strong>Council</strong>s take on<br />

with maintenance and upkeep of such areas.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

Human Rights Act 1998<br />

Not Applicable<br />

Legal Implications<br />

All legal implications will be considered throughout the process.<br />

Human Resources Implications<br />

There are no Human Resources implications.<br />

Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

The considerations for the replacement fencing took into account the physical<br />

barrier that was needed along the boundary between the park and the<br />

driveway leading to the <strong>Council</strong> Offices. It is anticipated that a fence line<br />

providing a physical barrier reduced the risk of incidents of children running<br />

into the path of oncoming vehicles.<br />

Equalities<br />

No EINA is required for this report.<br />

Page 184


Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

There are no Nottingham Declaration implications.<br />

Crime & Disorder<br />

There are no Crime and Disorder implications.<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

Not to make alterations to the lease agreement. With the replacement of the<br />

fencing it seemed the appropriate time to consider the boundary of the area<br />

used and take the opportunity to revise the boundary and to amalgamate the<br />

agreements. For this reason not altering the existing leases was not<br />

considered.<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

Narborough Parish <strong>Council</strong> has been consulted through discussions with the<br />

Parish Clerk.<br />

The Regulatory Services Group Manager has also been consulted throughout<br />

this process.<br />

10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

It is proposed that a nominal rent is charged for the amalgamated lease<br />

agreements.<br />

A contribution towards the replacement fencing equating to approximately<br />

50%,(£5,000) of the cost is proposed. This has been included within the<br />

Report detailing the Revised Capital Programme 2012/13.<br />

Per annum<br />

Revenue/Cost £1,065<br />

Capital £5,000<br />

11. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

11.1 Appendix 1 : Plan of Land to be Leased to Narborough Parish <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

12.1 Counter Part Lease 1 between <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> dated 4 th Nov. 2009<br />

12.2 Counter Part Lease 2 between <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> dated 4 th Nov. 2009<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted (identified by �):<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Legal Services Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 185


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 186


Page 187


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 188


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 November 2012<br />

Subject: Climate Local<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Portfolio Holder:<br />

• Jon Wells<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

• Group Manager, Regulatory and Leisure Services<br />

• <strong>Council</strong> Offices<br />

• 0116 2727545<br />

Cllr Guy Jackson – Neighbourhood and<br />

Environmental Health Services Portfolio Holder<br />

1.1 To advise members of the Local Government Association ‘Climate Local’<br />

initiative and seek the <strong>Council</strong>’s approval to sign up to it.<br />

1.2 To outline the implications of making such a declaration.<br />

1.3 Seek approval for the Climate Change Working Members Group to progress<br />

the next stage of the process; which is, to propose an ambition and set out<br />

clear and measurable actions. The Regulatory and Leisure Services Group<br />

Manager will then bring a further detailed report back to <strong>Council</strong> setting this<br />

out for approval.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

2.2<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

3.2<br />

Recommendations to Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong><br />

That <strong>Council</strong> sign up to Climate Local.<br />

That the Climate Change Working Members Group be requested to set out<br />

a level of ambition, develop an action plan and report this back to a future<br />

<strong>Council</strong> meeting for approval.<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

Agenda Item 17<br />

The initiative supports the <strong>Council</strong>’s continued drive and ambition to act on<br />

a changing climate following the signing of the Nottingham Declaration in<br />

2006.<br />

This will help the <strong>Council</strong> to capture opportunities and benefits of action on<br />

climate change through:<br />

Page 189


3.3<br />

1) Saving on energy bills.<br />

2) Generating income from renewable energy.<br />

3) Attracting new jobs and investment in ‘green’ industries.<br />

4) Reduce flood risks and help to manage the impacts of extreme<br />

weather (such as drought).<br />

5) Tackling fuel poverty.<br />

6) Protecting the natural environment.<br />

This will provide a way to show the <strong>Council</strong>’s leadership on climate change<br />

to our communities, partners and collectively to government and other<br />

national stakeholders.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

4.1 Yes<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Yes<br />

6. Matters for Consideration<br />

6.1.1 The <strong>Council</strong> signed the Nottingham Declaration in December 2006 thereby<br />

demonstrating its commitment to act on a changing climate. Following on<br />

from this the <strong>Council</strong> implemented a Fuel Poverty Strategy and developed<br />

and delivered action plans for Climate Change, Green Travel and Carbon<br />

Management. Some of the key work carried out is detailed below:<br />

• The installation of a Combined Heat and Power System at Enderby<br />

Leisure Centre giving a carbon dioxide saving of 351.9 tonnes ongoing<br />

• Installation of a Solar PV system at the Pavilion which has provided<br />

£3,500 in Feed In Tariffs (FITs) in its first year<br />

• Bike week cycle servicing and car tyre checks<br />

• The installation of automatic meter reading for all utilities throughout the<br />

organisation<br />

• Refuse and recycling round rationalisation<br />

• Safe and efficient driving SaFeD training sessions for all staff<br />

This has resulted in the following achievements:<br />

• A Green Apple Award for our Time 4 Change programme<br />

• Silver and Gold Motorvate Awards for a reduction in vehicle emissions<br />

• Top performer in the East Midlands with a 21.7% reduction in carbon<br />

emissions in three years<br />

• Established a knowledge partnership with DeMontfort University to support<br />

local communities in reducing costs associated with running a home<br />

• A greater awareness of resource usage, saving over £25,000 year on year<br />

in fuel bills<br />

6.2 Climate Local is an initiative to drive, inspire and support <strong>Council</strong> action on a<br />

changing climate. The initiative supports our efforts both to reduce carbon<br />

Page 190


emissions and also to improve resilience to the affects of our changing climate<br />

and extreme weather. Climate Local will help the <strong>Council</strong> to capture<br />

opportunities and benefits of action on climate change, through saving on<br />

energy bills, generating income from renewable energy, attracting new jobs<br />

and investment in ‘green’ industries, reducing flood risks and managing<br />

impacts of extreme weather, tackling fuel poverty and protecting our natural<br />

environment.<br />

6.3 By signing Climate Local the <strong>Council</strong> will commit to:<br />

• Set out actions we intend to take locally to further reduce our carbon<br />

emissions and respond to changes in the climate within our own<br />

operations, services and with the local community<br />

• Set a level of ambition and actions in the following areas: mainstreaming<br />

climate change, energy, local economic growth, natural environment,<br />

planning and the built environment, transport, waste, health and our<br />

communities.<br />

• Share actions, progress and learning with other partners<br />

6.4 To ensure delivery against the Nottingham Declaration a Climate Change<br />

cross-party Members Working Group was established. This has successfully<br />

helped to guide and aid delivery of Climate Change and Green Travel actions<br />

while raising carbon awareness among members and staff. The success of<br />

the Group is such that if the <strong>Council</strong> are minded to commit to Climate Local<br />

then they should be asked to develop future actions and outcomes. This will<br />

also ensure leadership within the local community.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

7.1 Human Rights Act 1998<br />

Human rights have been considered but there are no overarching matters for<br />

concern in relation to this report.<br />

7.2 Legal Implications<br />

All legal implications will be advised upon when an action list is developed<br />

subsequent to this Report being approved.<br />

7.3 Human Resources Implications<br />

There are no Human Resources implications.<br />

7.4 Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

Financial risks and future revenue streams will be considered as part of this<br />

process.<br />

7.5 Equalities<br />

No EINA is required for this report.<br />

7.6 Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

The Nottingham Declaration has now been replaced by the Climate Local<br />

document, and it is recommended the <strong>Council</strong> sign up to the new Climate<br />

Local to show its continued support to the Environment, and allow the <strong>Council</strong><br />

to continue to excel in this area of work.<br />

Page 191


7.7 Crime & Disorder<br />

There are no Crime and Disorder implications.<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

8.1 Do nothing and risk reputational damage through lack of commitment to the<br />

climate change agenda.<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

9.1 Climate Change Members Working Group<br />

Leicestershire Together Environment Hub<br />

10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

10.1 Costs associated with any actions will be brought forward for discussion in the<br />

next paper. Resource costs are already incorporated within revenue budgets.<br />

10.2 Resource for delivery exists within the Environmental Health Service. There<br />

maybe implications moving forward dependent on final actions agreed.<br />

11. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

11.1 Appendix 1 – Climate Local Declaration<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

12.1 Cabinet Executive 7 December 2006<br />

12.2 Cabinet Executive 30 June 2008<br />

12.3 Cabinet Executive 8 September 2008<br />

12.4 Cabinet Executive 6 October 2008<br />

12.5 Cabinet Executive 1 December 2008<br />

12.6 Cabinet Executive 23 March 2009<br />

12.7 Cabinet Executive 18 January 2010<br />

12.8 Cabinet Executive 22 March 2010<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted:<br />

(insert � below to show relevant consultation has taken place)<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Corporate Services Group Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 192


APPENDIX 1 – CLIMATE LOCAL DECLARATION<br />

Climate Local<br />

BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Our commitment to taking action in a changing climate<br />

We recognise that our council has an important role to help our residents and<br />

businesses to capture the opportunities and benefits of action on climate change.<br />

These include saving money on energy bills, generating income from renewable<br />

energy, attracting new jobs and investment in ‘green’ industries, supporting new<br />

sources of energy, managing local flood-risk and water scarcity and protecting our<br />

natural environment.<br />

We will progressively address the risks and pursue the opportunities<br />

presented by a changing climate, inline with local priorities, through our role<br />

as:<br />

• Community leader – helping local people and businesses to be smarter about<br />

their energy use and to prepare for climate impacts;<br />

• Service provider – delivering services that are resource efficient, less carbon<br />

intensive, resilient and that protect those who are most vulnerable to climate<br />

impacts;<br />

• Estate manager – ensuring that our own buildings and operations are<br />

resource efficient, use clean energy, and are well prepared for the impacts of<br />

a changing climate.<br />

In signing this commitment, we will:<br />

[Date]<br />

• Set locally-owned and determined commitments and actions to reduce<br />

carbon emissions and to manage climate impacts. These will be specific,<br />

measurable and challenging;<br />

• Publish our commitments, actions and progress, enabling local<br />

communities to hold us to account;<br />

• Share the learning from our experiences and achievements with other<br />

councils; and<br />

• Regularly refresh our commitments and actions to ensure they are current<br />

and continue to reflect local priorities.<br />

BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

[Signature of Leader]<br />

Page 193


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 194


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 November 2012<br />

Subject: Green Space Strategy<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Portfolio Holder:<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

Phill Turner<br />

Health & Recreation Manager<br />

Pavilion<br />

0116 2727647<br />

Cllr David Clements, Portfolio Holder for Corporate<br />

Services, Performance & Leisure<br />

1.1 To approve a Green Space Strategy for the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

Recommendation to <strong>Council</strong><br />

That the Green Space Strategy at Appendix 1 be approved.<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> needs to develop and adopt a Green Space Strategy in order<br />

to strengthen its strategic approach to the provision of green space within<br />

the <strong>District</strong> and ensure a co-ordinated approach with partners.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

4.1 Yes<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Yes<br />

6. Matters for Consideration<br />

Agenda Item 18<br />

6.1 At present the <strong>Council</strong> does not have a Green Space Strategy and therefore<br />

has no formalised strategic direction for green space.<br />

6.2 Green space is an essential ingredient of successful neighbourhoods and it<br />

provides a wide range of social, economic and environmental benefits to local<br />

communities. There is huge national demand for better quality green spaces.<br />

Page 195


Surveys repeatedly show how much the public values them, while research<br />

reveals how closely the quality of green spaces links to levels of health, crime<br />

and the quality of life in every neighbourhood. Well designed green space<br />

provides space for recreational activities, improving physical health and<br />

fitness and improving mental health and well being.<br />

6.3 National best practice guidance for developing Green Space Strategies has<br />

been used to provide the structure of the Green Space Strategy.<br />

6.4 An earlier version of the Green Space Strategy was brought to Cabinet<br />

Executive on 11 June 2012 (minute 48 refers). Following Scrutiny ‘call in’ a<br />

further report was taken to Cabinet Executive on 30 July 2012 (minute 101)<br />

withdrawing the Strategy: recognising it needed further development work and<br />

consultation. This process is now complete and the version appended to this<br />

report is a complete revision taking on board the views of the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Scrutiny Commission and those of local Parish <strong>Council</strong>s and other external<br />

community groups.<br />

6.5 The Strategy now has a clear purpose, to:<br />

• Provide a shared vision for the future and ensure linkages are evident.<br />

• Provide a framework for Parish / Town <strong>Council</strong>’s and community<br />

groups.<br />

• Help to identify improvements required and to set priorities.<br />

• Help make the case for funding opportunities and planning obligations.<br />

• Be responsive to the changing financial, planning and policy<br />

environment.<br />

� Understand and manage public expectations in relation to green space<br />

issues.<br />

• Improve access and usage.<br />

6.6 To deliver the strategy an action plan has been developed using the following<br />

themes:<br />

• Provide - we will seek to provide sufficient accessible green space to<br />

meet current and future demand<br />

• Improve - we will seek to maintain and raise the quality of our green<br />

spaces<br />

• Connect - we will work in partnership to develop and manage<br />

continuous green networks for people and wildlife<br />

• Involve - we will work in partnership with the community and<br />

stakeholders to develop, manage and promote green spaces<br />

• Resource - we will seek to ensure sufficient resources are available to<br />

develop, manage and maintain green spaces<br />

• Sustain - we will work to ensure that the management of our green<br />

spaces have a positive impact on people, the local economy and the<br />

environment<br />

• Conserve - we will ensure that green space biodiversity, landscape<br />

and natural heritage is protected and conserved<br />

6.7 The action plan will be monitored through quarterly Portfolio Reports and<br />

internal working groups and will remain a working document.<br />

Page 196


6.8 The Strategy has been developed jointly with our partners, through<br />

consultation with related statutory and voluntary sector organisations, service<br />

providers and customers.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

Human Rights Act 1998<br />

Human rights have been considered but there are no overarching matters for<br />

concern in relation to this report.<br />

Legal Implications<br />

There are no legal implications.<br />

Human Resources Implications<br />

There are no human resources implications.<br />

Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

There are no risks, business continuity or resilience issues associated with<br />

this report.<br />

Equalities<br />

An EINA has been carried out and any adverse impacts identified have been<br />

mitigated in the EINA Action Plan.<br />

Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

Climate Change has been considered within the strategy. On page 4 of the<br />

strategy it is stated that in delivering the strategy we will recognise the<br />

changing climate and manage sites accordingly.<br />

Crime & Disorder<br />

Through the strategy we will work to reduce anti-social behaviour (ASB) by<br />

implementing good design principles and by working with local agencies to<br />

address ASB when it occurs.<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

8.1 To not adopt the strategy – this would continue the present position with<br />

uncertainty around required provision and lack of clarity of role and ownership<br />

of sites.<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

9.1 Consultations with internal and external partners have been undertaken with<br />

139 comments, suggestions or amendments put forward.<br />

Page 197


9.2 The following internal groups were consulted:<br />

• Green Infrastructure Forum<br />

• S106 Working Group<br />

• Management Board<br />

• Scrutiny Commission<br />

• Cabinet Briefing<br />

• Cabinet Executive<br />

• Quality Services Working Group<br />

9.3 The following external partners were consulted:<br />

• Environment Agency<br />

• Natural England<br />

• Leicestershire and Rutland Wildlife Trust<br />

• The Woodland Trust<br />

• Parish <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

• Leicestershire Access Forum<br />

• The Friends of Fosse Meadows<br />

• Stepping Stones<br />

• Leicester City <strong>Council</strong><br />

• Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong><br />

10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

10.1 There are no financial implications arising directly from the adoption of the<br />

strategy. Implementation of the action plan will have budgetary implications<br />

which will be subject to the usual budgetary processes.<br />

11. Appendices to this report<br />

11.1 Appendix 1 – Green Space Strategy<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

• Planning Policy Guidance – PPG17: Planning for Open Space, Sport and<br />

Recreation (2002)<br />

• Urban Green Spaces Task Force report – Green Spaces Better Places (2002)<br />

• Living Spaces, Cleaner, Safer, Greener (2002)<br />

• European Landscape Convention<br />

• The Natural Environment & Rural Communities (NERC) Act<br />

• Green Space Strategies – A Good Practice Guide (2004)<br />

• 6C’s Green Infrastructure Strategy (2010)<br />

• East Midlands Green Infrastructure Scoping Study (2009) & Stepping Stones<br />

Project<br />

• Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Landscape and Woodland Strategy<br />

• Building a Big Society for our area – A Community Plan for <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

(2011)<br />

• <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Local Development Framework (LDF) Core Strategy<br />

Submission Version (January 2012)<br />

Page 198


• <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> PPG 17 Open Space, Sports & Recreation Facilities<br />

Assessment (2009)<br />

• <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Children’s Play Strategy (2007-2012)<br />

• Local Health Data (various sources)<br />

• Leicester, Leicestershire & Rutland Biodiversity Action Plan<br />

• Areas of Separation Policy (included in Core Strategy)<br />

• Countryside Policy (included in Core Strategy)<br />

• Leicestershire Rights of Way Improvement Plan<br />

• Leicester City Rights of Way Improvement Plan<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted:<br />

(insert � below to show relevant consultation has taken place)<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Legal Services Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 199<br />

REPORT END


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 200


BLABY<br />

GREEN SPACE<br />

STRATEGY 2012<br />

Draft – October 2012<br />

Page 201


Introduction p.3<br />

Purpose of the Strategy<br />

Scope<br />

Vision for our Green Space p.4<br />

How will we deliver this?<br />

Current Green Space Provision p.5<br />

Consultation Key Findings p.5<br />

Green Space Standards & Practice p.6-7<br />

Summary of Green Space<br />

Standards<br />

Assessing Green Space<br />

Adoption, Ownership<br />

and Management<br />

Disposal or Leasing<br />

of Sites<br />

Developer Contributions<br />

Safeguarding Green Space<br />

Partnership Working<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Strategic Sites p.8<br />

Delivering the Strategy p.8<br />

2<br />

Action Plan<br />

Evaluation & Review<br />

Page 202


<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has risen to the challenge of preparing a strategy for its green<br />

spaces in the light of the current fi nancial situation to make the greatest use of the<br />

resources and meet the needs of local residents. The Green Space Strategy is one of<br />

a number of plans refl ecting the Community Plan and will inform the development<br />

of the <strong>Council</strong>’s Local Development Framework. The Strategy will inform planning<br />

policy and enable the <strong>Council</strong> to protect and enhance Green Spaces. The strategy<br />

should become the reference point for all the <strong>Council</strong>’s decisions in relation to the<br />

design, development, management, maintenance and funding of green spaces.<br />

Purpose of the Strategy:<br />

Scope<br />

Provide a shared vision for the future and ensure the linkages are evident<br />

Provide a framework for parish / town councils and community groups<br />

Help to identify improvements required and to set priorities<br />

Help make the case for funding opportunities and planning obligations<br />

Be responsive to the changing fi nancial, planning and policy environment<br />

Understand and manage public expectations in relation to green space issues<br />

Improve access and usage<br />

The scope of this strategy will include the following classifi cations of green space:<br />

Green Space Classifi cation Description<br />

Parks and Recreation Grounds Recreation grounds, parks, and formal gardens often with a wide range<br />

of uses<br />

Outdoor Sports Space Fixed sports spaces that are accessible to the public (sports pitches, tennis<br />

courts etc)<br />

Children’s and Young People’s Space Equipped space (play areas) and provision for teenagers (multi-use games<br />

areas)<br />

Informal Open Space Spaces open and free to use but neither laid out or managed for a specifi c<br />

function<br />

Natural Green Space Natural Green Space open to the public (meadows, river fl oodplain & woodland)<br />

Allotments Areas for people to grow their own produce and plants<br />

Churchyards and Cemeteries Churchyards & cemeteries which can provide a tranquil haven for people<br />

and wildlife<br />

Green Corridors Green links from urban areas to the countryside and other settlements<br />

Green Wedges Strategic green space to prevent settlements merging and to guide development<br />

<strong>Public</strong> Rights of Way <strong>Public</strong> rights of way can include bridleways, paths and cycle routes<br />

Civic Spaces This includes Market Squares, often in busy shopping areas<br />

Sites of Special Scientifi c Interest (SSSI) Sites designated as being ecologically or geologically important<br />

Page 203<br />

3


The Strategic vision for <strong>Blaby</strong>’s green spaces was developed by the <strong>Council</strong>’s Green<br />

Infrastructure Forum with key stakeholders and has the support of Elected Members.<br />

The strategic vision for <strong>Blaby</strong>’s green space strategy is shown below:<br />

“ To provide green spaces that make a positive contribution to the quality and<br />

diversity of the local environment and to the health and well-being of our residents.<br />

Our green spaces can be used, valued and enjoyed by everyone.”<br />

4<br />

How will we deliver this?<br />

Promote our green spaces to increase usage<br />

and encourage the use of green spaces as part<br />

of a healthy lifestyle<br />

Listen to the views of local residents about what<br />

they want in relation to green space<br />

Provide events and activities on our green spaces<br />

Reduce defi ciencies in green space across the<br />

district through the planning system<br />

Prioritise our green space sites and identify sites<br />

of strategic importance<br />

Prioritise investment and improvements at our<br />

green space sites<br />

Work in partnership with Parish / Town <strong>Council</strong>s<br />

and other relevant organisations to ensure a coordinated<br />

approach to green space issues.<br />

Monitor this strategy and review it annually.<br />

Encourage voluntary & community groups to<br />

participate in the management & development of<br />

green spaces.<br />

Manage & maintain green space sites to provide<br />

quality local facilities.<br />

Recognise the changing climate and manage sites<br />

accordingly.<br />

Page 204


2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

The charts below provide an overview of the supply and defi ciencies of green space<br />

throughout the <strong>District</strong>:<br />

Category Current level of provision<br />

(Hectares/1000 population)<br />

Current level of provision (hectares/1000 population)<br />

National standard (hectares/1000 population)<br />

Allotments Children and<br />

young people<br />

Churchyards<br />

and cemetaries<br />

Informal<br />

open space<br />

Natural<br />

green space<br />

National standard<br />

(Hectares/1000 population)<br />

Allotments 0.16 0.3<br />

Children and young people 0.05 0.3<br />

Churchyards and cemetaries 0.19 0<br />

Informal open space 1.31 0.5<br />

Natural green space 2.24 1<br />

Outdoor sport 1.52 1<br />

Parks and recreation grounds 0.41 0.8<br />

Outdoor<br />

sport<br />

Parks and<br />

recreation grounds<br />

A range of consultation has taken place with residents in relation to green space,<br />

including a Community & Young Persons survey, a <strong>Public</strong> Satisfaction with Parks<br />

& Open Spaces report and the <strong>Blaby</strong> Residents survey. Common themes can be<br />

drawn from these different consultations, these are shown below:<br />

Increasing the amount of provision for teenagers<br />

Increasing the amount of park furniture (benches, bins & lighting)<br />

Reducing the amount of dog fouling<br />

Satisfaction levels with open spaces remains high<br />

Only a small proportion of local residents want to<br />

volunteer at a local open<br />

space.<br />

Page 205<br />

5


The following information highlights key standards and practice which will be<br />

undertaken by the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> when managing green space:<br />

Summary of Green Space National Standards<br />

This table below summaries the proposed quantity and access standards for green<br />

space across the <strong>District</strong>.<br />

Typology Quantity Standard Access Standard<br />

Parks and Recreation Grounds 0.8 ha/1000 800 metres (15 mins straight line walk time)<br />

Outdoor Sports Space 1.0 ha/1000 480 metres (10 mins straight line walk time)<br />

Children & Young People’s Space 0.30 ha/1000 Junior Provision – 450m (just under 10 mins straight line walk time)<br />

Youth Provision – 800 m (15 mins straightline walk time)<br />

Informal Open Space 0.5 ha/1000 480 metres (10 mins straight line walk time)<br />

Natural Greenspace 1.0 ha/1000 960 metres (20 mins straight line walk time)<br />

Allotments 0.3 ha/1000 480m (10 mins straight line walk time)<br />

A comparison with existing provision establishes the following key themes:<br />

Assessing Green Space<br />

Existing green space and new green space submitted through the planning process<br />

will be assessed against a strategic criteria to determine its strategic value. The<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s criteria for assessing green space is based on the following elements:<br />

6<br />

Protect and enhance existing sites<br />

Increase play areas and facilities for<br />

young people<br />

Increase and improve rural provision<br />

Usage<br />

Facilities<br />

Size<br />

Biodiversity & wildlife<br />

Develop multi-functional sites<br />

Improve access and quality of sites<br />

Increase allotment provision<br />

Utilise existing natural green space<br />

Linkages to strategic green<br />

infrastructure / wedges or corridors<br />

Other considerations<br />

(historical and cultural)<br />

This strategic value will be used to determine our approach to adoption, ownership<br />

and management to help establish future priorities and create a positive change in<br />

service delivery.<br />

Adoption, Ownership and Management<br />

Following the above assessment, the process below will be followed to determine<br />

who will take ownership of the site:<br />

Stage 1 – <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to adopt (if no, progress to stage 2)<br />

Stage 2 – Parish / Town <strong>Council</strong> to adopt (if no, progress to stage 3)<br />

Stage 3 – Management Company to adopt (minimum standards to be applied)<br />

Page 206


Disposal or Leasing of Sites<br />

The <strong>Council</strong> will use the following criteria when considering any sites for disposal<br />

and in relation to any requests made to BDC by Parish / Town <strong>Council</strong>s or Community<br />

Organisations wishing to take ownership of a BDC site:<br />

Is there suffi cient quantity<br />

in the locality?<br />

Is there suffi cient access to<br />

other similar opportunities?<br />

Is there suffi cient quality in the locality?<br />

What is the current and future value of the land?<br />

Will the green space be improved or<br />

alternative/additional facilities provided?<br />

The <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> will endeavour to re-invest into green space sites with receipts and<br />

maintenance resources released from any such arrangements.<br />

Developer Contributions<br />

Contributions are typically secured against residential development but can also be<br />

required for non residential development if it would have an impact on the area. The<br />

provision of infrastructure, facilities and services which are required by a planning<br />

obligation should, where possible, be provided on site. However, there will be<br />

circumstances where this may not be practical or appropriate. In these circumstances,<br />

the <strong>Council</strong> will seek fi nancial contributions towards the provision and / or maintenance<br />

of infrastructure, facilities and services at an alternative off-site location.<br />

In relation to off-site contributions, due to the variation between sites and locations of new<br />

residential housing developments, it is considered to be impractical (given the time scale<br />

allowed to determine planning applications) to individually cost up each application where<br />

an off-site contribution is required. Therefore the <strong>Council</strong> has developed a standard formula<br />

for calculating the cost of providing the required facilities offsite. This model considers<br />

the diverse range of recreational, play and sporting needs of the community along with<br />

providing areas natural green space that will benefi t wildlife and ecology.<br />

Planning legislation requires for these off-site contributions to be invested in local<br />

infrastructure that will benefi t the residents of the new development. The <strong>Council</strong> has<br />

established a Working Group to make recommendations on how these contributions are<br />

used in consultation with local Parish / Town <strong>Council</strong>s.<br />

Safeguarding Green Space<br />

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) provides against building on green<br />

spaces and the sites of sports and recreational buildings for non-recreational uses. The<br />

NPPF indicates that local communities can identify for special protection green areas of<br />

particular importance by designating land as Local Green Space. Green Wedges and Areas<br />

of Separation along with their detailed boundaries will be reviewed through the <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s Allocations, Designations and Development Management Plan Document.<br />

Partnership Working<br />

We will work in partnership with the County <strong>Council</strong>, Parish / Town <strong>Council</strong>s and<br />

Community Groups to manage and enhance our green spaces. The <strong>Council</strong> needs to<br />

develop strong relationships with external organisations and its residents to provide,<br />

develop and enhance services. It will continue to work with its partners to improve<br />

the <strong>District</strong>’s green spaces, from listening to what local users want to adopting new<br />

ideas on their use, layout and management.<br />

7<br />

Page 207


The sites listed below are the <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s strategic sites (these sites have the highest<br />

score using the assessment described on p6 and will be prioritised for investment)<br />

8<br />

Fosse Meadows (Sharnford)<br />

Bouskell Park (<strong>Blaby</strong>)<br />

Glen Hills Nature Reserve (Glen Parva)<br />

Crow Mills Way (South Wigston)<br />

Osiers Nature Reserve (Braunstone)<br />

Action Plan<br />

An Action Plan has been developed to implement the Strategy, this will deliver<br />

against the following strategic themes:<br />

Provide - we will seek to provide suffi cient accessible green space to meet<br />

current and future demand<br />

Improve - we will seek to maintain and raise the quality of our green spaces<br />

Connect - we will work in partnership to develop and manage continuous<br />

green networks for people and wildlife<br />

Involve - we will work in partnership with the community and stakeholders<br />

to develop, manage and promote green spaces<br />

Resource - we will seek to ensure suffi cient resources are available to<br />

develop, manage and maintain green spaces<br />

Sustain - we will work to ensure that the management of our green spaces<br />

have a positive impact on people, the local economy and the environment<br />

Conserve - we will ensure that green space biodiversity,<br />

landscape and natural heritage is protected and conserved<br />

Evaluation and Review<br />

The Green Space Strategy will be monitored and evaluated<br />

through the following mechanisms:<br />

The <strong>Council</strong>’s Green Infrastructure Forum<br />

The <strong>Council</strong>’s Planning Obligations Monitoring Group<br />

<strong>Public</strong> Satisfaction Surveys<br />

Quality Audits<br />

Regular Strategy Updates and Annual Review<br />

Cabinet Executive Portfolio<br />

Reports<br />

Tel: 0116 275 0555<br />

www.blaby.gov.uk<br />

Page 208<br />

Jubilee Park (Enderby)<br />

Whetstone Way (Whetstone)<br />

Whistle Way (Narborough / Enderby)<br />

Countesthorpe Country Park


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 November 2012<br />

Subject: Update on Pavilion Capital Expenditure<br />

Report author<br />

and contact<br />

details:<br />

Portfolio Holder:<br />

• Jon Wells<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

• Group Manager, Regulatory and Leisure Services<br />

• <strong>Council</strong> Offices<br />

• 0116 2727545<br />

Cllr David Clements – Health Improvement and<br />

Corporate Services Portfolio Holder<br />

1.1 To provide an update to Members of the Cabinet Executive on the Pavilion<br />

Capital Investment proposals approved on 4 July 2011 (minute 63 refers).<br />

1.2 Members are asked to approve in principle further investment.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

2.2<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

3.2<br />

Recommendations<br />

That Cabinet Executive defers a decision on the Driving Range Project until<br />

early 2013.<br />

To approve additional capital expenditure of £25,000 for the refurbishment<br />

of changing areas/squash courts/ancillary facilities<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

To allow further consideration and examination of the options for the driving<br />

range in the light of tender prices received.<br />

The proposals will address identified weaknesses with the current offer and<br />

maintain the building to a proper standard.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

4.1 Yes<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Yes<br />

Page 209<br />

Agenda Item 19


6. Matters for Consideration<br />

6.1 Cabinet agreed the following investment programme for the Pavilion on 4 July<br />

2011 (minute 63 refers).<br />

1 Golf driving range £225,000<br />

2 Refurbishment of changing rooms, squash<br />

courts etc<br />

£40,000<br />

3 Replacement of all weather pitch £22,000<br />

4 Development of fitness suite and dance<br />

studio<br />

£40,000<br />

5 Car parking £53,000<br />

Total £380,000<br />

Appendix 1 provides an update of capital spend to date and the latest position<br />

with the investment programme.<br />

6.2 This report seeks authority to vary from the original capital investment as<br />

follows:<br />

1 Golf driving range £225,000 Defer a<br />

decision<br />

until early<br />

2013<br />

2 Refurbishment of changing rooms, squash<br />

courts etc<br />

£40,000 £65,000<br />

3 Replacement of all weather pitch £22,000 £22,000<br />

(completed)<br />

4 Development of fitness suite and dance £40,000 £40,000<br />

studio<br />

5 Car parking £53,000 £53,000<br />

Total £380,000 £180,000<br />

The capital programme can be scheduled for completion within the next six<br />

months. During this time further consideration can be given to the driving<br />

range project to enable a more detailed proposal to be brought forward for<br />

future deliberation.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

7.1 Human Rights Act 1998<br />

Human rights have been considered but there are no overarching matters for<br />

concern in relation to this report.<br />

7.2 Legal Implications<br />

There are no legal implications.<br />

7.3 Human Resources Implications<br />

Additional employment will be provided through the management of the<br />

Driving Range, increased catering and supervision of new activities.<br />

7.4 Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

Page 210


The risks associated with these proposals are mainly financial:<br />

Firstly, if the centre doesn’t continue to offer a product which meets customer<br />

Expectations the income will decline. This investment is therefore designed to<br />

keep the offer relevant to today’s demands and thereby minimise this risk.<br />

Secondly the report identifies anticipated levels of income. If these are not<br />

achieved the return of investment will take longer. The anticipated usage,<br />

customer demand and likely income levels have been examined closely and<br />

are considered to be realistic. Competitor analysis has been undertaken and<br />

there is a clear under provision of the intended facilities in this area. The<br />

proposed developments will compliment the facilities offered at Enderby and<br />

enhance the viability of both sites.<br />

These proposals will not affect the <strong>Council</strong> business continuity and resilience<br />

plans and will not create new critical services.<br />

7.5 Equalities<br />

The proposals seek to address issues relating to gender, age and sexual<br />

orientation and the new facilities will be designed to be fully accessible by all<br />

groups. An EINA has been carried out and the proposals positively address<br />

identified under provision for some age groups and some barriers to<br />

participation for other groups.<br />

7.6 Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

The Pavilion has achieved very significant reductions in its energy and water<br />

consumption over the past two years.<br />

7.7 Crime & Disorder<br />

The proposals are intended to reduce incidents of crime and disorder by<br />

offering alternative activities for young people. The design of the<br />

development will seek to minimise the possibility of vandalism, etc.<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

8.1 Do nothing – if the Pavilion doesn’t continue to offer a product which meets<br />

customer expectations the income will decline. This investment is therefore<br />

designed to keep the offer relevant to today’s demands and thereby minimise<br />

this risk.<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

9.1 Through the Planning process for the Golf Driving Range. There will be<br />

consultation with Young people, Sport England on the details of the proposals<br />

moving forward.<br />

10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

10.1 The finance implications assume the project is funded through a loan repaid<br />

over 10 years with an interest rate of 2.5%. This is done for illustrative<br />

purposes to show funding costs. Actual treatment of returns will be<br />

determined in accordance with treasury and investment strategy.<br />

A summary of all the finance information is provided in Appendix 2 along with<br />

assumptions made.<br />

Page 211


11. Appendix/Appendices to this report<br />

11.1 Appendix 1 – Details of the Proposed Developments and Update<br />

11.2 Appendix 2 – Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

12.1 Cabinet Executive 4 July 2011<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted:<br />

(insert � below to show relevant consultation has taken place)<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Corporate Services Group Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 212


Appendix 1 - Details of the Proposed Developments.<br />

1. Golf Driving Range<br />

It is proposed to design build and operate a golf driving range on the open land at<br />

the rear of The Pavilion in Huncote. Research indicates that the site would be a good<br />

venue / location for such a facility. Flood lighting – essential to enable all year round<br />

use – is recognised as a potential problem in terms of impact. It is proposed<br />

therefore to use lights mounted on columns around the range with light directed<br />

inwards and down to minimise light pollution and spread. The proposed site has a<br />

public footpath running across it and this would need to be diverted.<br />

Reasons<br />

• Good location for the development of a Golf Driving Range<br />

• Uses underutilised land and is a suitable leisure use for a contaminated and<br />

unstable former landfill site.<br />

• Provides a new income stream<br />

• Will increase the range of facilities on offer to some of the Pavilions target groups<br />

e.g. Young People.<br />

• Low operating costs which minimises financial risk<br />

Financial<br />

The capital cost is estimated at £225,000<br />

Revenue costs include;<br />

• Staffing – one part time staff member to cut grass, collect balls, etc. (£11,000pa)<br />

• Maintenance (catered for within an overall provision of a part time maintenance<br />

employee working 10 hrs per week at the centre - £4,000pa)<br />

• Fuel costs – flood lighting (£3,550pa)<br />

Additional income is estimated at £125,000 pa.<br />

Potential Barriers<br />

• Planning consent required<br />

• Footpath realignment will be necessary<br />

• Additional car parking will be needed<br />

Update<br />

The 16 bay driving range proposed to the rear of the centre has now received<br />

planning consent, diversion routes for the public footpath have been agreed and the<br />

building design and landscaping scheme approved. Several matters have since<br />

arisen which now require closer consideration before proceeding, in particular the<br />

substructure of the building, lighting requirements and perimeter<br />

fencing/landscaping. A further report will therefore be brought to Cabinet early next<br />

year with further detail on this project. Initial tender prices suggest the budgeted<br />

figure of £225,000 is someway short of the initial estimated cost of £400,000. In<br />

addition NNDR costs attributable to the driving range are £8015 per year.<br />

Page 213


2. Refurbishment of Changing areas / Squash courts / Ancillary facilities<br />

It is proposed to fully overhaul the changing facilities (including floors, walls and<br />

seating arrangements, giving attention to colour schemes and utilising materials to<br />

minimise ongoing maintenance costs), refurbish and decorate squash courts and to<br />

provide heating to the squash court corridor. The intention is to provide facilities to a<br />

standard similar to that available at Enderby.<br />

Reasons<br />

• The existing provision for male and female changing is in urgent need of attention.<br />

The open communal showers in the male change are considered to be a barrier to<br />

participation by some segments and the changing facilities generally are looking tired<br />

and whilst staff work hard to keep them clean and to a level that meets customer’s<br />

expectations, they are dull and dingy with mould at high levels. They currently fall<br />

below the current expectations of customers and as such represent a risk to the<br />

continued levels of usage and income.<br />

• The only heating in the squash court area is provided by radiant electric heaters in<br />

the courts themselves. The glazing of openings between the squash area and the<br />

main sports hall carried out many years ago resulted in disruption to the air<br />

movement within the building. This means that the corridors get very cold in the<br />

winter months as do the courts when they are not in active use. The original tiled<br />

floor is still in place; replacement tiles are not available as they are now<br />

discontinued.<br />

• The Squash courts need redecoration and some require continual of the wall<br />

plaster due to general deterioration due to age and usage. The need to add value<br />

and properly maintain our squash facility is of growing importance with the continued<br />

reduction of alternative squash venues in the area which is creating an opportunity to<br />

benefit.<br />

• The Pavilion now has 4 Squash teams competing in local Leagues and socialising<br />

at The Pavilion, in 2008 there was only 1 team and little or no social or club<br />

networking. This demonstrates the potential for growth and increasing income<br />

through secondary spend in the centre.<br />

Financial<br />

The capital cost of the works is estimated to be £40,000<br />

It is proposed to make provision for increased staffing of the bar (12 hours per week)<br />

to cater for increased centre usage arising from all the developments (£4,400pa)<br />

(actual spend will depend on demand and income will more than balance<br />

expenditure).<br />

The refurbishment will help to reduce the risk to the current annual income of<br />

£150,000pa.<br />

Potential Barriers<br />

• None identified<br />

Update<br />

It is now proposed that this refurbishment be extended into the main staircase area<br />

to encourage greater use and development of the existing bar and kitchen facilities.<br />

The initial cost for this is in the region of £65,000. The potential for growth is<br />

demonstrated as 5 squash teams competing in local leagues in Leicestershire are<br />

based at the Pavilion with this now becoming the preferred choice within the area.<br />

Page 214


3. Replace Astro Turf external court surface with a 3G rubber crumb.<br />

It is proposed to remove existing astro turf surface from one external court and<br />

replace with 3G rubber crumb surface similar to existing surface on the other<br />

external court. There are two external courts,1 of which is an astro turf surface and<br />

the other is state of the art 3G Rubber crumb. These surfaces were both laid in 2007<br />

and it was decided then to install astro turf on one as it offered the potential for a<br />

range of sports such as tennis , netball etc. In practice these games have never<br />

been taken up and the court is underutilised as customers playing 5-a-side football<br />

have a strong preference for the 3G surface.<br />

Reasons<br />

• 3G Surface out sells astro 2 to 1 and many court hires are lost.<br />

• Tennis, netball and multi sports have not taken off and with 5 a side now being as<br />

popular as it is there is a potential to increase sales of court time on another 3G<br />

surface<br />

• There is now the opportunity for multi sports to be played on 3G.<br />

• The existing maintenance programme would be amended and less equipment<br />

required - reducing costs.<br />

• There is an opportunity to increase footfall and secondary income generation.<br />

Financial<br />

The capital cost of the work is estimated to be £22,000<br />

Assuming the resurfaced court is used as often as the existing 3G court an additional<br />

£5,000 income pa would be realised.<br />

Payback on investment on this basis alone would therefore be achieved in under 5<br />

years.<br />

Potential Barriers<br />

• None identified<br />

Update<br />

This work was completed on budget (£22,000) and has increased income above<br />

projections by £2,000 in the first year.<br />

Page 215


4. Fitness Suite and Dance Studio Development<br />

The Fitness suite is under utilised and currently has old equipment that is fast<br />

approaching the end of its life span. Replacing with the same equipment is<br />

considered to have little or no prospect of generating a return or enhancing the<br />

programme on offer. It is proposed to remove all gym equipment from the fitness<br />

suite. Mobile equipment will be added to enable the space to also be used as a<br />

versatile multi activity area, aimed particularly at 6 -16 year olds. This equipment can<br />

also be utilised in the Dance Studio, elsewhere around the building or even in our<br />

parks and open spaces.<br />

The Dance Studio was created in 2007 from a squash court. It is now in need of<br />

redecoration and currently offers 5 classes per week, doubles up as a overspill<br />

meeting room and is well used during school holidays for the successful kids activity<br />

schemes that have been running since the summer of 2010. The Dance studio will<br />

have a mirror wall added and new equipment which will include a Transverse<br />

Climbing Wall which is a virtual climbing experience generated by computer.<br />

Reasons<br />

• The Fitness suite space can be better utilised to increase footfall.<br />

• The gym equipment is fast approaching the end of its life and will require<br />

investment with little or no additional return.<br />

• The new offer better supports the <strong>Council</strong>s corporate aims with respect to 6-16 year<br />

olds and the disabled, community segments currently under provided for within our<br />

programmes.<br />

• Creates funding opportunities and has the potential to reduce anti social behaviour<br />

in the district<br />

• Is attractive to schools and emergency services and other community groups.<br />

• Reduces the risk of obesity in young people.<br />

• The offer for 6-16 years would fill a gap in provision and provide a complete range<br />

of activities from birth to retirement and beyond thereby addressing more fully the<br />

ambitions around Healthier lifestyles and reducing obesity.<br />

Financial<br />

The Capital Costs of the work is estimated at £40,000.<br />

Revenue spend is planned to include additional Dance/Activity leader wages (19 hrs<br />

per week) £11,300pa (actual spend will depend on demand and income will more<br />

that balance expenditure).<br />

Potential Barriers<br />

• None identified<br />

Update<br />

The proposal and cost estimate has not changed from that approved by Cabinet in<br />

July 2011. The costs estimate remains at £40,000.<br />

Page 216


5. Additional car parking<br />

The increased usage anticipated would cause parking problems as the capacity is<br />

fully utilised now at peak times. It is proposed to rationalise the car park to create<br />

more spaces and resolve some of the poor layout issues. Additional car parking to<br />

the rear of the Pavilion is also envisaged, particularly for Driving Range users.<br />

Reasons<br />

• Anticipated need for additional capacity<br />

• Desire to rationalise existing car parking and landscaped areas to improve flow and<br />

appearance of the centre.<br />

• Additional car parking to the rear of the Pavilion for Driving Range users.<br />

Financial<br />

This is estimated to require a Capital expenditure in the region of £53,000.<br />

Potential barriers<br />

• Requires Planning Consent.<br />

Update<br />

To support the anticipated increased usage there will be a need to create additional<br />

spaces. This was to be provided in two ways: a new car park at the rear and<br />

changing the layout of the main car park. With a decision to defer the driving range<br />

project it is now proposed that this money is fully utilised to make more effective use<br />

of the current car park area by changing layout.<br />

Page 217


APPENDIX 2 – Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

All Weather Pitch<br />

Capital investment £22,000<br />

2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19<br />

£ £ £ £ £ £<br />

Income 7,000 7,175 7,354 7,538 7,727 7,920<br />

No Additional Rev Expenditure 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Cost of Capital Borrowing 2,201 2,201 2,201 2,201 2,201 2,201<br />

Interest 550 550 550 550 550 550<br />

Profit/(Loss) 4,249 4,424 4,603 4,787 4,975 5,169<br />

Fitness & Dance Studio<br />

Capital investment £65,000<br />

Income 9,000 9,225 9,456 9,692 9,934 10,183<br />

Establishment costs 5,000 5,050 5,101 5,152 5,203 5,255<br />

Cost of Capital Borrowing 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000<br />

Interest 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000<br />

Profit/(Loss) (1,000) (825) (645) (459) (269) (72)<br />

Squash & Changing Room Refurb<br />

Capital investment £40,000<br />

Income - Vending 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000<br />

Income - Squash court 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000<br />

Vending costs & consumables 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600<br />

Cost of Capital Borrowing 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500<br />

Interest 1,625 1,625 1,625 1,625 1,625 1,625<br />

Profit/(Loss) (4,725) (4,725) (4,725) (4,725) (4,725) (4,725)<br />

Car Park<br />

Capital investment £53,000<br />

Cost of Capital Borrowing 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300 5,300<br />

Interest 1,325 1,325 1,325 1,325 1,325 1,325<br />

Profit/(Loss) (6,625) (6,625) (6,625) (6,625) (6,625) (6,625)<br />

Summary<br />

Income 24,000 24,400 24,810 25,230 25,661 26,103<br />

Revenue Costs 9,600 9,650 9,701 9,752 9,803 9,855<br />

Cost of Capital Borrowing 18,001 18,001 18,001 18,001 18,001 18,001<br />

Interest 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500<br />

Total Profit/(Loss) (8,101) (7,751) (7,392) (7,023) (6,643) (6,254)<br />

2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19<br />

Note: The investment in the All Weather Pitch has taken place and is generating income above that originally<br />

anticipated. Assumptions. Interest is based on 2.5% PWLB borrowing rate over 10 years. Element of the capital<br />

investment are written over the estimated life of 10 years.<br />

Page 218


BLABY DISTRICT COUNCIL<br />

Meeting: Cabinet Executive<br />

Date: 19 th November 2012<br />

Subject: Strategy for Supporting Vulnerable People<br />

2012-2014<br />

Report of: Teresa Neal<br />

Community Services Manager<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Offices<br />

0116 272 7785<br />

Portfolio Holder:<br />

Status: <strong>Public</strong><br />

Cllr. D. Jennings<br />

Community Services Portfolio Holder<br />

1. Purpose of Report<br />

1.1 To advise Members of the new Vulnerable Persons Strategy and to<br />

recommend endorsement of the strategy.<br />

2.<br />

2.1<br />

3.<br />

3.1<br />

Recommendation / Recommendation to <strong>Council</strong><br />

That the Vulnerable Persons Strategy be approved.<br />

Reason for Decision Recommended<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is committed to ensuring access to our services is<br />

available to all parts of our community including those that are the most<br />

vulnerable.<br />

4. Forward Plan<br />

4.1 Yes.<br />

5. Key Decision<br />

5.1 Yes.<br />

Agenda Item 20<br />

6. Matters for Consideration<br />

6.1 At present the <strong>Council</strong> does not have a Vulnerable Persons Strategy and<br />

therefore has no formalised strategic direction.<br />

6.2 <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is committed to assisting vulnerable people in<br />

sustaining independent living. We will throughout our business processes<br />

ensure that vulnerable and potentially vulnerable people are identified at an<br />

early stage and receive the appropriate advice and support either through<br />

direct service provision or through partnerships with key stakeholders such as<br />

Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong>, Police and voluntary sector.<br />

Page 219


6.3 The Strategy outlines an approach which will meet the expectations of<br />

vulnerable people and their supporting agencies whilst meeting the overall<br />

objectives of the Government, including the focus on supporting families<br />

without compromising <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s business objectives.<br />

6.4 The purpose of the strategy is to ensure services to vulnerable adults are<br />

more personalised, more preventative and more focused by:<br />

• Providing a shared vision and commitment to assisting vulnerable people<br />

• Improved access and usage of services by vulnerable people<br />

• Ensuring all departments within <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> consider the impact of<br />

any changes in service provision, funding or policies on vulnerable people.<br />

• Vulnerable people are consulted and help us shape services of the future.<br />

• <strong>District</strong> and parish councillors understand what we mean by vulnerability and<br />

know where to refer individuals and families to.<br />

• The safeguarding of vulnerable adults and children is considered in respect of<br />

any information we become aware of.<br />

6.5 All teams within <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> should:<br />

• Support people to live as independently as possible and have a good quality<br />

of life.<br />

• Ensure people have the opportunity to make choices and have as much<br />

control as possible over their lives.<br />

• People get the support they need in local and community settings.<br />

• Ensure the most vulnerable people are safeguarded against abuse.<br />

• Support and encourage individuals to adopt a healthier lifestyle and behaviour<br />

and be self-reliant.<br />

• Provide people with information about the range of services available to them<br />

as a first response to need.<br />

6.6 The Vulnerable Persons Strategy 2012-2014 has been developed jointly by<br />

the council and its partners, through consultation with related statutory and<br />

voluntary sector organisations and service providers. The strategy comprises<br />

of the strategy itself, identification of vulnerable people, map of services and<br />

an action plan. The action plan will be reviewed quarterly through the<br />

Vulnerable People & Places Forum.<br />

7. Other Relevant Considerations<br />

Human Rights Act 1998<br />

• Human rights have been considered but there are no overarching matters<br />

for concern in relation to this report.<br />

Legal Implications<br />

• There are no legal implications<br />

Human Resources Implications<br />

• There are some implications in terms of human resources in relation to<br />

ensuring staff and members receive training on what we mean by<br />

vulnerability, identifying and signposting individuals.<br />

Risk Assessment & Business Continuity<br />

• There are no risks, business continuity or resilience issues associated with<br />

this report.<br />

Page 220


Equalities<br />

• An EINA has been carried out and any adverse impacts identified have<br />

been mitigated in the EINA Action Plan.<br />

Nottingham Declaration and Climate Change<br />

• N/A<br />

Crime & Disorder<br />

• The strategy supports the Community Safety Strategy for 2012-2014, in<br />

relation to ensuring that those most vulnerable within our communities<br />

including offenders are supported to reduce the chance of them<br />

reoffending or individuals becoming involved in crime and disorder.<br />

8. Other Options Considered<br />

8.1 There is an expectation on the <strong>Council</strong> to develop and adopt a Vulnerable<br />

Persons Strategy. There are no alternative options available.<br />

9. Appropriate Consultations<br />

9.1 The consultation period has proved successful with internal and external<br />

partners contributing comments, suggestions and amendments.<br />

9.2 The following internal partners were consulted:<br />

• Service Managers with responsibility for front facing teams & strategic<br />

housing<br />

9.3 The following external partners were consulted:<br />

• Members of the Vulnerable People & Places Forum<br />

• Police<br />

• Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong><br />

• Community Action Partnership<br />

10. Financial and Efficiency Implications<br />

10.1 Recommendation can be implemented within existing resources.<br />

11. Appendices to this report<br />

11.1 Appendix A – Strategy for Supporting Vulnerable People 2012-2014.<br />

12. List of Background Papers<br />

• The Vulnerable People & Places Forum has been operational for over twelve<br />

months and the cases we have dealt with at this meeting have informed this<br />

strategy. The notes from the meeting are confidential as they name<br />

individuals/families but the support required for these persons has helped us<br />

develop both the strategy and the action plan.<br />

• The Vulnerability Action Plan is attached to this report to inform on how we<br />

intend to implement the strategy at an operational level.<br />

The following Officers/Members have been consulted (identified by �):<br />

� Head of Paid Service (Chief Executive)<br />

� S. 151 Officer (Deputy Chief Executive)<br />

� Monitoring Officer (Legal Services Manager)<br />

� Cabinet Executive Portfolio Holder (Cabinet Executive/<strong>Council</strong> <strong>reports</strong> only)<br />

Page 221


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 222


<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

Strategy for supporting vulnerable people<br />

2012-2014<br />

This document sets out the commitment and approach of <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

<strong>Council</strong> towards supporting vulnerable people in all aspects of its service<br />

planning and delivery.<br />

Page 223


Contents<br />

Introduction<br />

Section 1 Purpose & Scope<br />

• Local Priorities<br />

• Policies<br />

Section 2 Evidence of local need<br />

• Definition of vulnerability<br />

• Joint Strategic Needs Assessment<br />

Section 3 Identifying Vulnerability<br />

• Vulnerable People & Places Forum<br />

Section 4 Delivering the Strategy<br />

• Support services<br />

• Leicestershire Supporting Families<br />

Section 5 Measuring outcomes<br />

• Social Return on Investment<br />

Section 6 Conclusion & Summary<br />

Appendices<br />

Appendix 1 Identification of vulnerable people<br />

Appendix 2 Map of services<br />

Page 224


A Strategy to Support Vulnerable People within <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> 2012<br />

Introduction<br />

Improving the life chances of our most vulnerable residents is a key strategic<br />

priority for <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (BDC). We know that increasingly people<br />

with care and support needs expect a better quality of life and services that<br />

are tailored to their needs.<br />

Delivering this requires people to have a real choice and control over services<br />

and access to the resources they need when they need them to ensure they<br />

live a healthy life and remain independent for as long as possible.<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is committed to assisting vulnerable people in<br />

sustaining independent living. We will throughout our business processes<br />

ensure that vulnerable and potentially vulnerable people are identified at an<br />

early stage and receive the appropriate advice and support either through<br />

direct service provision or through partnerships with key stakeholders such as<br />

Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong>, Police, and the voluntary sector.<br />

Whilst there continues to be a focus on high performance across the council,<br />

it is essential that we are able to demonstrate that our service provision is<br />

tailored to meet the needs of our most vulnerable customers.<br />

The purpose of this strategy is to ensure services to vulnerable adults are<br />

more personalised, more preventative and more focused.<br />

This strategy outlines an approach which will meet the expectations of<br />

vulnerable people and their supporting agencies whilst meeting the overall<br />

objectives of the Government, including the focus on supporting families,<br />

without compromising <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s business objectives.<br />

The strategy has been informed by national policy such as the Welfare<br />

Reforms, Localism Bill and the Health & Social Care Bill.<br />

Page 225


Section 1 Purpose & Scope<br />

1.1 The purpose of the strategy is to:<br />

• Provide a shared vision and commitment to assisting vulnerable people<br />

• Improve access and usage of services by vulnerable people<br />

• Ensure all services within <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> consider the impact of<br />

any changes in service provision, funding or policies on vulnerable<br />

people.<br />

• Vulnerable people are consulted and help us shape services of the<br />

future.<br />

• <strong>District</strong>, Parish <strong>Council</strong>lors and officers understand what we mean by<br />

vulnerability and know where to refer individuals and families to.<br />

• The safeguarding of vulnerable adults and children is considered in<br />

respect of any information we become aware of.<br />

1.2 The scope of the strategy is that vulnerable people are everyone’s<br />

business. This is supported by <strong>Blaby</strong>’s principles and our policies<br />

which are detailed below:<br />

• Personalisation – recognition that service users play a central role in<br />

the shaping of their own care.<br />

• Prevention and early intervention - High quality universal services can<br />

act to prevent problems occurring.<br />

• Personal responsibility – To note that prevention is not something<br />

services can do alone and that the empowerment of individuals and<br />

communities is key in people improving their own lives.<br />

• Building Community Capacity – in recognition of the role of active<br />

communities in directly promoting the well being of individuals.<br />

• Service development – to facilitate the growth of an improved range of<br />

service provision (working alongside service users, providers, potential<br />

providers and partners.)<br />

All teams within <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> will:<br />

• Support people to live as independently as possible and have a good<br />

quality of life.<br />

• Ensure people have the opportunity to make choices and have as<br />

much control as possible over their lives.<br />

• Ensure people get the support they need in local and community<br />

settings<br />

• Ensure the most vulnerable people are safeguarded against abuse.<br />

• Support and encourage individuals to adopt a healthier lifestyle and<br />

behaviour and be self-reliant.<br />

• Provide people with information about the range of services available<br />

to them as a first response to need.<br />

Page 226


Section 2 - Evidence of Local Need<br />

.<br />

2.1 Definition of vulnerability<br />

We recognise that we have a responsibility to ensure that the<br />

vulnerable and socially excluded are protected. Our policies and<br />

processes need to be sensitive and provide adequate opportunity for<br />

the less resourceful to access and obtain relevant assistance and<br />

support both in the short term and beyond.<br />

A vulnerable adult is a person aged 18 or over, “who is or may be in<br />

need of community care services by reason of mental or other<br />

disability, age or illness: and who is or may be unable to take care of<br />

him or herself, or unable to protect him or herself against significant<br />

harm or exploitation.” Section 2 “no Secrets”, Department of Health and<br />

the Home Office (2000)<br />

2.2 Those that might be potentially vulnerable therefore include but not<br />

limited to;<br />

• · Supporting Leicestershire Families<br />

• · Tenant under 18;<br />

• · Tenant under 25;<br />

• · Pensionable age;<br />

• · Leaving care;<br />

• · Homeless;<br />

• · First Tenancy;<br />

• · Ex-offender;<br />

• · Fleeing domestic abuse/harassment;<br />

• · Misusing drugs;<br />

• · Misusing alcohol;<br />

• · Neurological impairment;<br />

• · Sensory impairment;<br />

• · Physical impairment;<br />

• · Mental health impairment;<br />

• · Chaotic lifestyle;<br />

• · Literacy;<br />

• · Learning difficulties;<br />

• · Life skills issues;<br />

• · Involvement with Social Services;<br />

• · Cultural/religious/sexual orientation<br />

• · Recently bereaved;<br />

• · Single parent families;<br />

• · Pregnant women (particularly teenagers);<br />

• · Unemployed people;<br />

• · People who are considered to be financially excluded; and<br />

• · Those who have difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading<br />

English.<br />

Page 227


2.3 Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA)<br />

The <strong>Blaby</strong> JSNA is the primary document which describes the health<br />

and wellbeing needs in <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong>. It tell us that<br />

• In 2010 the population of <strong>Blaby</strong> was estimated to be 128200. Around<br />

42% of the population are aged 60 years and over. By 2030 the<br />

population of over 65’s is estimated to increase by 60%.<br />

• In 2010 there were 54100 people over 60 years and 27500 aged over<br />

80.<br />

• In 2010 there are estimated to be around 7500 people in <strong>Blaby</strong> over<br />

the age of 65 with a limiting long term illness. By 2030 this is estimated<br />

to increase to around 12200, an increase of 63.6%.<br />

• It is estimated that 19, 400 adults are obese, 6.4% of reception<br />

children and 14% of year 6’s.<br />

• 14, 700 adults smoke<br />

• There are an estimated 13700 adults who binge drink (18.2%)<br />

• In 2010 there are estimated 1170 people in <strong>Blaby</strong> with dementia. By<br />

2030 this is estimated to increase to 2280 people, an increase of 96%.<br />

• In 2010/11 there were 499 people in <strong>Blaby</strong> registered with their GP as<br />

having a mental health disorder including schizophrenia, biopolar<br />

disorder and other psychoses.<br />

This evidences a greater need for mental health support services.<br />

The facts and figures inform us that in the longer term an ageing<br />

population will mean there will be a rise in demand for health services<br />

and long term care, creating a challenge for the funding of public<br />

services. We will also need to provide more choice in homes for the<br />

elderly. Current supported (sheltered) stock is out of date and fails to<br />

meet decent homes standard. We need to work towards improving the<br />

choice for the elderly.<br />

Alongside this there are those individuals within the district whose<br />

unhealthy lifestyles have a significant impact on people’s quality of life<br />

and ability for people to maintain independence. They also have a<br />

significant impact on the demand for health and social care services.<br />

These choices and behaviours include alcohol, substance use,<br />

smoking and healthy weight.<br />

Section 3 Identifying vulnerability<br />

3.1. The key element is that we identify a vulnerable person at the earliest<br />

possible stage. Identification can be difficult as vulnerable people often<br />

demonstrate quite rational and normal behaviour with the<br />

characteristics being fragmented, obscure and particular to individuals.<br />

Identification of a vulnerable person can occur at any time during the<br />

course of an individuals’ contact with us and staff should ensure that<br />

they use any contact as a way by which potential vulnerability can be<br />

identified.<br />

Page 228


3.2 <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> will use all the sources of information available to<br />

help us to identify vulnerability. It is more difficult where a vulnerable<br />

person is not on our radar and this is where we need staff and<br />

councillors to share knowledge with the Community Services Team.<br />

The sharing of this information then allows the team to support the<br />

vulnerable person using a range of tools that are available to us.<br />

3.3. The current service provision at BDC has a breadth of experience of<br />

supporting people in independent living across a wide range of client<br />

groups such as, households where there is Domestic Abuse; rehousing<br />

of high risk offenders, drug and alcohol users, families with complex<br />

needs, children with behavioral difficulties; etc. Many of the service<br />

users span several groups and over 30% have mental health<br />

difficulties. BDC workers have developed skills and expertise at<br />

working with clients on many issues simultaneously.<br />

3.4. Alongside this the Vulnerable People & Places Forum (VPPF) allows<br />

those individuals or families that are identified by other teams within the<br />

local authority, partners and other external organisations to be brought<br />

to a multi agency meeting to discuss their needs and ensure the<br />

relevant support is put in place. A single referral process is used which<br />

all internal teams and external agencies have adopted.<br />

3.5. In anti social behaviour cases a ‘vulnerability matrix’ is completed<br />

which prompts a series of questions and subject areas aimed at being<br />

able to identify and determine the extent of vulnerability. Where the<br />

matrix comes out as high risk then a referral to the Vulnerable People<br />

and Places Forum (VPPF) is made automatically.<br />

3.6. The completion of the referral form and in ASB cases the vulnerability<br />

matrix enables us to assess what support if any is required. In<br />

particular we will ensure;<br />

• Appropriate agencies are advised of the service user’s circumstances<br />

and if required a referral made for specialist support<br />

• Policy and procedures are adopted and regularly reviewed to ensure<br />

synergy across disparate teams<br />

• Capture and record all relevant details and actions through the VPPF<br />

• Where appropriate hold to account agencies to ensure actions are<br />

followed through.<br />

• Individual/family will remain as a case at the VPPF until their risk has<br />

been reduced or the case has moved to the responsibility of one<br />

agency.<br />

3.7. The purpose of identifying potential vulnerability is to ensure that the<br />

service provided is wherever possible tailored to meet the needs of the<br />

individual. Where we do not directly provide a service, identifying<br />

vulnerability can prompt staff to signpost people to relevant<br />

organisations that can provide support.<br />

Page 229


3.8. We have access to a great deal of information through direct and<br />

indirect contact with individuals. Whilst sensitivity and discretion are<br />

obviously important in protecting the privacy of individuals it is essential<br />

that data is shared amongst different sections of the organisation and<br />

partners, and is used to maximum effect to ensure that vulnerable<br />

people are known and identified. Data will be shared in line with the<br />

Data Protection Act. It is also important that internal relationships are<br />

effective especially the relationship between key teams such as our<br />

Environmental Health Officers and those officers who work within the<br />

Community Services Group.<br />

Section 4 - Delivering the strategy<br />

4.1. The pathway by which vulnerable people are identified and potentially<br />

supported is outlined in Appendix 1 .The provision of support may be<br />

long term or may also be time limited to enable an individual to gain the<br />

skills, motivation and confidence to move on to greater independence.<br />

4.2. Level of support and roles of support services will be determined<br />

following an assessment of individual’s circumstances.<br />

4.3 <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> provides the following services:-<br />

• · Domestic abuse outreach service<br />

• · Substance use support<br />

• . Alcohol Support Group<br />

• · Resident Support<br />

• · Children’s Worker<br />

• · Anti Social Behaviour<br />

• · First Contact<br />

• · GP referral scheme<br />

• · Home Security Scheme<br />

• · Youth provision via BB19 Bus<br />

• · Financial & Debt management advice<br />

• · Benefit & Housing advice<br />

• · Positive Activities for Young People<br />

• · Disability Facilities Grant<br />

• .Environmental Protection<br />

• · Translator service<br />

• · Assisted bin collection<br />

• . Memo cameras<br />

4.4 Provision provided by external agencies includes:-<br />

• · Befriending service<br />

• · Victim support for people who have been victims of ASB or hate<br />

• · Mental Health Forum<br />

• · Carers Forum<br />

Page 230


• · Children’s Centres, associated provision through these<br />

• · Place to grow<br />

• · 20:20 mentoring<br />

• . Safe Inside Safe Outside<br />

• Housing Related Support from Nottingham Community Housing<br />

Association<br />

• Employment support by Acorn Training<br />

Please see Appendix 2 map of services.<br />

4.5 Vulnerability can affect an individual, a couple and families. The<br />

Government is committed to significantly improving outcomes for<br />

families and their children while reducing the current costs to the public<br />

services. Leicestershire Supporting Families Programme will roll out in<br />

April 2013.<br />

The service will be provided for families across Leicester,<br />

Leicestershire & Rutland across housing tenures and referrals will<br />

come from a wide range of services including self-referrals, local<br />

Registered Social Landlords, Social Services, Health, Education,<br />

Police, Probation and Voluntary Sector agencies. This will build on the<br />

work we already undertake as detailed within this strategy with<br />

vulnerable people.<br />

4.6 The family workers will network with other local initiatives and the full<br />

range of statutory agencies to build a network of support to assist<br />

families to settle into the area, break social isolation and to improve the<br />

quality of family life. It is anticipated that the workers will sit within a<br />

multi-disciplinary team to aid this initiative. The emphasis will be on<br />

supporting and empowering service users to build on their independent<br />

living skills and parenting skills.<br />

4.7 The eligibility criteria for the programme will be families who:<br />

• Consist of at least one adult and one child, who are involved in crime<br />

and anti-social behaviour and or,<br />

• Have children not in school and or<br />

• Have an adult on out of works benefits and or,<br />

• Cause high cost to the public purse<br />

• Who agree to work with the BDC team and allow the worker to meet<br />

with them on a pre-agreed basis (for example, once or twice a week)<br />

• Have basic self care skills of budgeting, cooking or cleaning or be<br />

willing to develop these with staff support<br />

4.8 The worker will complete a holistic assessment with the client which will<br />

include:<br />

• Parenting<br />

• Education<br />

• Housing<br />

Page 231


• Health and associated needs<br />

• Income and expenditure<br />

• Debts and loans<br />

• Life skills<br />

• Community activity<br />

Under these broad headings an action plan will be agreed between the<br />

worker and the family, prioritised by the family.<br />

4.9 Specific problems that have been identified include families<br />

experiencing and/or causing ASB, mental health, drug and alcohol<br />

issues, parenting skills and money management. Specific support<br />

services will focus on these issues and will link with local communities<br />

and other services.<br />

4.10 Therefore, this service has been identified as a key strategy to break<br />

the cycle of disadvantage by:<br />

� Directly delivering supportive services which will include referrals to<br />

appropriate agencies, practical assistance with life skills, welfare rights<br />

and ongoing support as agreed in a support contract with the family.<br />

� Enable the family to be able to disclose abuse situations (our<br />

experience in working with women experiencing Domestic Abuse will<br />

assist with this process) Latest figures suggest 77% of Leicestershire<br />

Supporting Families would have experienced domestic abuse.<br />

� Enable the family to benefit from our experience of multi-agency<br />

working and of being the ‘lynch pin’ in bringing services together.<br />

� Enable the family to make a successful transition to sustaining<br />

independent tenancies in the community.<br />

� To identify at an early stage families that are struggling to maintain<br />

their tenancy and to work with them to ensure they continue to live<br />

independently.<br />

� Maximise independence of clients including active encouragement to<br />

use and engage with local community facilities, services and groups.<br />

� Ensure that people are aware of and engage with relevant health<br />

provision such as GP, community health visitors, and specialist health<br />

providers.<br />

� Assist and work with Social Care and Health, Education and Probation<br />

services to ensure that those interventions are completed and<br />

supported.<br />

� Commit to and provide a quality service that is client focused and<br />

committed to developing good practice across statutory and voluntary<br />

agencies.<br />

4.11 Intensive work will be provided through joined-up relationships with<br />

other organisations in the area with the aim of forming effective links to:<br />

� Drug and alcohol treatment programme<br />

� General medical services<br />

� Peer support<br />

Page 232


� Encourage the family to develop social networks with the community<br />

e.g. through take up of life time learning<br />

� Basic skills development including literacy and numeracy<br />

� Money Management<br />

4.12 The development of the supporting families programme is in its early<br />

development and <strong>Blaby</strong> will form a key part of this development and<br />

ensure it fits into our wider strategy for supporting vulnerable people.<br />

Section 5 - Measuring outcomes<br />

5.1 Social Return on Investment is a framework for understanding,<br />

measuring and managing the outcomes of an organisation’s activities.<br />

SROI can include all types of outcomes, social, economic and<br />

environmental the key is that they are based on involving the service<br />

user in determining distance travelled. SROI is different from other<br />

performance measures as it places a monetary value on outcomes<br />

which can then be measured against investments made.<br />

5.2 <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> is committed to evidencing the difference our<br />

support services have made. We have already begun to collect SROI<br />

data for our support services within the Community Services Team<br />

which includes service users scoring themselves on several different<br />

elements such as accommodation, finance, safety, health and<br />

wellbeing. These scores are collected when they access support<br />

services and reviewed every three months.<br />

5.3 On closure of a case where support is no longer required the scores<br />

will be collected again and alongside data about changes within their<br />

lifestyle i.e. starting work will evidence the distance an individual or<br />

family have travelled during the support process. This will evidence the<br />

difference BDC and its partner agencies have made to the individual or<br />

the families lives.<br />

Section 6 - Conclusion & Summary<br />

6.1 <strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> acknowledges the strides that it has made to<br />

improve services to vulnerable people and recognises the need to<br />

make further progress. The development and roll out of Leicestershire<br />

Supporting families across the district will see an alignment of current<br />

support services to take forward this agenda. A vulnerability action plan<br />

has been developed which identifies key actions and lead officers to<br />

progress this work. The action plan will be reviewed quarterly.<br />

6.2 A report be brought back to Cabinet Board identifying progress made.<br />

on a regular basis.<br />

Page 233


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 234


Page 235<br />

Appendix 1 Identification of vulnerable people<br />

Identification Key Worker Process<br />

First Contact Coordinator One form completed, signpost to a range of agencies, provide support to<br />

Self Referral to<br />

Community Services<br />

Team<br />

Vulnerable People &<br />

Places Forum<br />

Internal referral from<br />

another team within<br />

BDC<br />

Domestic Abuse<br />

Children’s Worker<br />

Substance Use Officer<br />

Resident Support<br />

Officer<br />

Local Authority<br />

Police<br />

Social Services<br />

Housing Associations<br />

Community Action<br />

Partnership<br />

Youth Service<br />

Youth Offending Team<br />

Probation<br />

Integrated Offender<br />

Management<br />

Family Intervention<br />

Project<br />

Community Services<br />

Manager<br />

By external agency Community Services<br />

Manager<br />

individual/family, and provide feedback on work undertaken.<br />

Allocated to worker, assessment undertaken, action plan agreed with<br />

individual/family. Regular face to face contact undertaken to provide<br />

support. Regular recording of performance information to show social<br />

return on investment.<br />

All relevant agencies involved in managing a vulnerable individual or<br />

family. Monitor progress, reduce vulnerability and risk, case closed at<br />

agreement of all agencies.<br />

Consider case and decide on most appropriate worker, then rest of<br />

process as for a self referral.<br />

Consider case and decide on most appropriate worker, then rest of<br />

process as for a self referral.


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 236


Appendix 2— Map of Services<br />

Leicestershire Police<br />

Comprehensive Referral<br />

Desk<br />

DAIO’s (Domestic Abuse<br />

Specialist Officers)<br />

Vulnerability Identified /<br />

History markers on<br />

address<br />

Strategic Housing<br />

Gap analysis on housing<br />

provision.<br />

Provision of affordable<br />

housing.<br />

Benefits<br />

Advice<br />

Home visits<br />

Housing benefit<br />

<strong>Council</strong> tax benefit<br />

<strong>Council</strong> tax support<br />

Hardship funding<br />

Environmental<br />

Protection<br />

Noise Nuisance<br />

Fly tipping/litter<br />

Dog Warden<br />

Community Action<br />

Partnership<br />

Carers Forum<br />

Mental Health Forum<br />

Place to Grow<br />

Befriending<br />

Children’s Centre<br />

Range of support to<br />

parents with children<br />

aged 0-5<br />

Police Volunteers<br />

Memo Camera’s<br />

Service Users<br />

Page 237<br />

Children’s Social<br />

Services<br />

Safeguarding of children<br />

Community Services<br />

Resident Support<br />

First Contact<br />

Domestic Abuse<br />

Children’s Worker<br />

Anti Social Behaviour<br />

Youth Provision<br />

Probation<br />

Integrated Offender<br />

Management<br />

Mappon<br />

Mappa<br />

Health & Recreation<br />

Health Improvement<br />

Officer<br />

Positive Activities<br />

Referral Scheme<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> Staying<br />

Healthy Forum<br />

Housing Options<br />

Housing Advice<br />

Choice based letting<br />

Adult Social Services<br />

Safeguarding of adults<br />

Leicestershire County <strong>Council</strong><br />

Voluntary Sector<br />

<strong>Blaby</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

External Organisations


This page is intentionally left blank<br />

Page 238

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!