Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council

CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL – PLANNING AUTHORITY MATTERS- 4 JUNE 2012 94
5.3. Future Subdivision Opportunities
Comments were made in terms of this subdivision being allowed and what
opportunities may open for other landowners in the Kings Road area.
� Comment
As discussed in detail, the proposal is not possible in terms of the
frontage requirements of the Scheme. The subdivision of any lots must
satisfy the requirements of the Scheme and any proposal would be
considered as such.
5.4. Width of Kings Road and Surface
Concern was expressed regarding the condition of Kings Road and the impact
of additional traffic on the road and safety of users.
� Comment
The condition of Kings Road is considered to be acceptable in terms of
the likely additional traffic to be generated by a further 2 dwellings,
should the proposal be supported by Council.
6. STATE POLICIES AND ACT OBJECTIVES
6.1. The proposal is consistent with the outcomes of the State Policies, including
those of the State Coastal Policy.
6.2. The proposal is consistent with the Objectives of Schedule 1 of LUPAA.
7. COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/POLICY IMPLICATIONS
As discussed above, the proposal is inconsistent with Council Policy C3.13 – Shared
Rights-of-Way. This Policy relates to the maximum number of rights-of-way
permissible and highlights 4 as the maximum number allowed. As the proposal
proposes access to a total of 5 properties, it would therefore be in conflict with this
Policy.