Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council
Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council
CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL – PLANNING AUTHORITY MATTERS- 4 JUNE 2012 74 � Comment There is sufficient area for development to occur on Lot 2 and be wholly located outside of a frontal dune system within the Coastal Management Overlay. Any future Development Application on the vacant lot would be required to demonstrate that any development within the Coastal Management Overlay is not within a frontal dune system, as this is Prohibited development under the Scheme. Any development within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Overlay will require an engineering report showing erosion hazards can be mitigated through structural or siting methods and that the development will not increase the level of risk to the life of the users of the site or hazard for adjoining properties. 5.2. Risk Associated with Future Tidal Events Based upon past events, concern is raised that any future building on the site will become a victim of the sea as the dunes continue to retreat. It is said that the 50m distance from high water mark is very subjective and if it was based upon the highest event last year, the 50m distance would reach behind the shed in the north-eastern rear corner. � Comment The site is subject to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Overlay which identifies that the site may be subject to erosion, recession or wave runup related to coastal processes. The purpose of this Overlay is to control impacts on development from coastal hazards, so any future development will have to be appropriately designed to mitigate this risk. 5.3. Development of Adjoining Properties Concern is raised that an application to build on the adjacent property at 10 Jetty Road, South Arm was refused by Council within the last 5 years as a result of the many conditions of building on sand dunes adjacent to the sea.
CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL – PLANNING AUTHORITY MATTERS- 4 JUNE 2012 75 � Comment A Development Application (D-2004/135) was made upon 12 Jetty Road in 2004 proposing to develop a Single Dwelling requiring variation to the high water mark and side setbacks under the Eastern Shore (Area 2) Planning Scheme 1986. The application was never determined by Council as the application was withdrawn at the request of the applicant. 5.4. Wastewater Disposal Concern is raised that the wastewater from any future building will enter the beach and put the public at risk. � Comment A wastewater report was submitted with the application demonstrating that all wastewater can be disposed of appropriately within the site boundaries. 5.5. Property Boundaries on the Beach Concern is raised that over time the dune face to the beach will break down to a manageable slope and will result in the western boundary of the subdivision being on the beach. � Comment The current Title has boundaries extending to the dune face at the beach. This situation may occur as a result of coastal processes even if the subject subdivision never proceeds and the Title boundaries remain as existing. The covenant agreed to by the developer will Prohibit further development within this area of the site. 6. STATE POLICIES AND ACT OBJECTIVES 6.1. The proposal is consistent with the outcomes of the State Policies, including those of the State Coastal Policy. 6.2. The proposal is consistent with the Objectives of Schedule 1 of LUPAA.
- Page 23 and 24: AUDIT COMMITTEE - 16 May 2012 3 3.1
- Page 25 and 26: AUDIT COMMITTEE - 16 May 2012 5 Bri
- Page 27 and 28: AUDIT COMMITTEE - 16 May 2012 7 REC
- Page 29 and 30: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - 4 JUNE 2012
- Page 31 and 32: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 33 and 34: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 35 and 36: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 37 and 38: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 39 and 40: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 41 and 42: Subject Site Attachment 1 Location
- Page 43 and 44: Attachments: 93 Tanundal Street Pag
- Page 45 and 46: Attachments: 93 Tanundal Street Pag
- Page 47 and 48: 93 Tanundal Street, HOWRAH Attachme
- Page 49 and 50: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 51 and 52: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 53 and 54: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 55 and 56: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 57 and 58: Attachment 1 Location Plan D 2012/2
- Page 59 and 60: Attachments: 465 & 465a Clifton Bea
- Page 61 and 62: Attachments: 465 & 465a Clifton Bea
- Page 63 and 64: Attachments: 465 & 465a Clifton Bea
- Page 65 and 66: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 67 and 68: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 69 and 70: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 71 and 72: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 73: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 77 and 78: Subject Site Attachment 1 Location
- Page 79 and 80: Attachment 3 Note: A-B-C-D = propos
- Page 81 and 82: Image 3: View of the hind dune loca
- Page 83 and 84: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 85 and 86: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 87 and 88: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 89 and 90: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 91 and 92: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 93 and 94: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 95 and 96: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING AU
- Page 97 and 98: Attachment 2 Attachments: 64 Kings
- Page 99 and 100: 64 Kings Road, CAMBRIDGE Attachment
- Page 101 and 102: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - CUSTOMER SE
- Page 103 and 104: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - FINANCIAL M
- Page 105 and 106: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - GOVERNANCE-
- Page 107 and 108: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - GOVERNANCE-
- Page 109 and 110: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - GOVERNANCE-
- Page 111 and 112: CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL - GOVERNANCE-
- Page 113 and 114: GOVERNANCE and COMMUNITY Communitie
- Page 115 and 116: Clarence City Council Annual Estima
- Page 117 and 118: Clarence City Council Annual Estima
- Page 119 and 120: Clarence City Council Annual Estima
- Page 121 and 122: Clarence City Council Annual Estima
- Page 123 and 124: Funding Attachment 2 Clarence City
CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL – PLANNING AUTHORITY MATTERS- 4 JUNE <strong>2012</strong> 74<br />
� Comment<br />
There is sufficient area for development to occur on Lot 2 and be<br />
wholly located outside of a frontal dune system within the Coastal<br />
Management Overlay. Any future Development Application on the<br />
vacant lot would be required to demonstrate that any development<br />
within the Coastal Management Overlay is not within a frontal dune<br />
system, as this is Prohibited development under the Scheme. Any<br />
development within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Overlay will require an<br />
engineering report showing erosion hazards can be mitigated through<br />
structural or siting methods and that the development will not increase<br />
the level of risk to the life of the users of the site or hazard for<br />
adjoining properties.<br />
5.2. Risk Associated with Future Tidal Events<br />
Based upon past events, concern is raised that any future building on the site<br />
will become a victim of the sea as the dunes continue to retreat. It is said that<br />
the 50m distance from high water mark is very subjective and if it was based<br />
upon the highest event last year, the 50m distance would reach behind the shed<br />
in the north-eastern rear corner.<br />
� Comment<br />
The site is subject to the Coastal Erosion Hazard Overlay which<br />
identifies that the site may be subject to erosion, recession or wave runup<br />
related to coastal processes. The purpose of this Overlay is to<br />
control impacts on development from coastal hazards, so any future<br />
development will have to be appropriately designed to mitigate this<br />
risk.<br />
5.3. Development of Adjoining Properties<br />
Concern is raised that an application to build on the adjacent property at 10<br />
Jetty Road, South Arm was refused by <strong>Council</strong> within the last 5 years as a<br />
result of the many conditions of building on sand dunes adjacent to the sea.