30.01.2013 Views

Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council

Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council

Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL – PLANNING AUTHORITY MATTERS- 4 JUNE <strong>2012</strong> 72<br />

The subject application is for subdivision only and does not propose any<br />

development at this point in time. Although the site has not been surveyed by<br />

a coastal expert to confirm the extent of any frontal dune system across the<br />

site, the proposal recognises the hazards associated with coastal development<br />

and proposes a covenant to Prohibit development on the western side of the<br />

site as marked A-B-C-D on the subdivision plan. The area marked A-B-C-D<br />

comprises the frontal dune and a further buffer area. Any proposal to develop<br />

a dwelling within the remaining area of the Coastal Management Overlay that<br />

is not covered by the no-build zone would be required to demonstrate that it is<br />

not located within any frontal dune system.<br />

“(b) The coastal environment should be protected, especially<br />

including water quality, shoreline change, erosion or areas<br />

of visual sensitivity”.<br />

Any future development proposals on either lot will be required to<br />

demonstrate compliance with the Overlay requirements of the Scheme and<br />

show appropriate treatment of the coastal environment.<br />

“(c) Public access to the coast is to be facilitated through<br />

applications where possible”.<br />

It is not necessary to facilitate public access through this site, however, a<br />

public open space contribution should be required in accordance with <strong>Council</strong><br />

Policy.<br />

“(d) The coastal area should be stabilised and made safe where<br />

necessary”.<br />

As discussed above, no works are currently proposed and therefore these<br />

measures are not necessary at this point in time.<br />

“(e) The use or development should be coastal dependent and<br />

appropriate to a coastal location”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!