30.01.2013 Views

Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council

Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council

Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL – PLANNING AUTHORITY MATTERS- 4 JUNE <strong>2012</strong> 38<br />

The noise consultant’s report included with the application states that<br />

in addition to this, the cooling fans could be slowed, an appropriate<br />

door installed and (potentially) partial roofing of the enclosure.<br />

It is recommended that the proposed structure be approved subject to a<br />

condition requiring a follow up report be provided within 30 days from<br />

a suitably qualified person assessing the effectiveness of the structure<br />

and verifying that the noise levels do not exceed the Environmental<br />

Management and Pollution Control (Miscellaneous Noise) Regulations,<br />

2004. If the levels are still found to be excessive, <strong>Council</strong> may require<br />

further mitigation measures.<br />

With respect to the opening and closing of the door to the pool, <strong>Council</strong><br />

has previously required the pool door to be kept closed at all times to<br />

reduce noise and the chlorine odour coming from the pool. <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

Environmental Health Officer has reminded the owners of this<br />

requirement. Notwithstanding this, it is not relevant to the subject<br />

Development Application.<br />

5.2. Emissions<br />

Concern is raised that the condensation or mist expelled by cooling fans may<br />

drift over the fence onto adjoining properties.<br />

� Comment<br />

The heat pump creates condensation, which is directed to the ground,<br />

rather than vapour and this will not affect the adjoining property.<br />

5.3. Visibility<br />

It is observed that the structure being built around the heat pump is of a height<br />

which will be visible above the fence.<br />

� Comment<br />

The proposed “chimney” would be a minor protrusion above the<br />

structure housing the heat pump, setback approximately 3.5m from the<br />

rear boundary line and would reach a maximum height of 2.7m above<br />

natural ground level.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!