Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council
Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council
Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL – PLANNING AUTHORITY MATTERS- 4 JUNE <strong>2012</strong> 38<br />
The noise consultant’s report included with the application states that<br />
in addition to this, the cooling fans could be slowed, an appropriate<br />
door installed and (potentially) partial roofing of the enclosure.<br />
It is recommended that the proposed structure be approved subject to a<br />
condition requiring a follow up report be provided within 30 days from<br />
a suitably qualified person assessing the effectiveness of the structure<br />
and verifying that the noise levels do not exceed the Environmental<br />
Management and Pollution Control (Miscellaneous Noise) Regulations,<br />
2004. If the levels are still found to be excessive, <strong>Council</strong> may require<br />
further mitigation measures.<br />
With respect to the opening and closing of the door to the pool, <strong>Council</strong><br />
has previously required the pool door to be kept closed at all times to<br />
reduce noise and the chlorine odour coming from the pool. <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
Environmental Health Officer has reminded the owners of this<br />
requirement. Notwithstanding this, it is not relevant to the subject<br />
Development Application.<br />
5.2. Emissions<br />
Concern is raised that the condensation or mist expelled by cooling fans may<br />
drift over the fence onto adjoining properties.<br />
� Comment<br />
The heat pump creates condensation, which is directed to the ground,<br />
rather than vapour and this will not affect the adjoining property.<br />
5.3. Visibility<br />
It is observed that the structure being built around the heat pump is of a height<br />
which will be visible above the fence.<br />
� Comment<br />
The proposed “chimney” would be a minor protrusion above the<br />
structure housing the heat pump, setback approximately 3.5m from the<br />
rear boundary line and would reach a maximum height of 2.7m above<br />
natural ground level.