30.01.2013 Views

Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council

Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council

Council meeting agenda - 4 June 2012 - Clarence City Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL – GOVERNANCE- 4 JUNE <strong>2012</strong> 105<br />

1.2. <strong>Council</strong> is required to adopt Estimates for each financial year.<br />

2. REPORT IN DETAIL<br />

2.1. The draft Estimates (refer Attachment 1) provide the high level financial<br />

framework within which <strong>Council</strong> will operate for the <strong>2012</strong>/2013 financial<br />

year. They are presented on a programme basis and meet <strong>Council</strong>’s statutory<br />

obligations under the Local Government Act, 1993. The draft Estimates are<br />

consistent with the detailed programme budgets discussed by <strong>Council</strong> at its<br />

series of Workshops on the issue, with minor adjustments made as definite<br />

amounts (eg final rates growth) become known.<br />

2.2. The draft Estimates require a net increase in rating income of 3.9% on<br />

2011/<strong>2012</strong> levels net of growth. Growth had been estimated at 2.1% during<br />

<strong>Council</strong>’s budget deliberations, however, final supplementary valuations<br />

received resulted in actual growth of 2.2%. This is a strong result when<br />

compared to the long term average (1.6% over 15 years).<br />

2.3. The net increase excludes the effects of the State Government’s Fire Services<br />

Contribution, which had an increase of 1.4%. The relatively small movement<br />

in this levy has the effect of reducing the overall percentage rate increase (ie<br />

including <strong>Council</strong>’s requirements and the Fire Levy) so that the aggregate shift<br />

is 3.4%. It is this lower amount which will be reflected on rate notices,<br />

although clearly varying from property to property.<br />

2.4. The increase in required total rating effort is above the March Consumer Price<br />

Index (Hobart) of 2.1%, against which <strong>Council</strong> rate movements are frequently<br />

compared. However, a range of issues needs to be taken into account in<br />

considering this comparison. Most significantly, the CPI is predominantly<br />

made up of goods and services which are irrelevant in considering <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />

cost structure. In particular, the low CPI figure was driven by a 30% reduction<br />

in fruit prices for the quarter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!