Paweł Olszczyński - Zak | Branicka
Paweł Olszczyński - Zak | Branicka Paweł Olszczyński - Zak | Branicka
Paweł Olszczyński
- Page 2: front cover: Untitled (Sleeve), 201
- Page 6: Untitled (Small Purse), 2010, penci
- Page 10: French critic Nino Frank is often g
<strong>Paweł</strong> <strong>Olszczyński</strong>
front cover: Untitled (Sleeve), 2010, pencil on paper, 80x60 cm<br />
Untitled, 2010, pencil on paper, 40x30 cm<br />
<strong>Paweł</strong> <strong>Olszczyński</strong><br />
Fantôme Noir
Untitled (Overcoat), 2010, pencil on paper, 60x50 cm<br />
Untitled (Man), 2010, pencil on paper, 70x48 cm
Untitled (Small Purse), 2010, pencil on paper, 30x40 cm<br />
Untitled (Cuffs), 2010, pencil on paper, 40x30 cm<br />
Untitled, (Shirt), 2010, pencil on paper, 50x60 cm<br />
Untitled (Double Skirt), 2010, pencil on paper, 50x60 cm<br />
Untitled (Black-Portrait), 2010, pencil on paper, 40x30 cm<br />
Untitled (Hood), 2010, pencil on paper, 60x50 cm
Untitled (Wig), 2010, object, pencil on paper, 10x20x24 cm<br />
Untitled (Bag), 2010, object, pencil on paper, 7x20x12 cm<br />
Untitled (Shirt), 2011, object, pencil on paper, 8x20x16 cm<br />
Untited (Sheet of Paper), 2011, pencil on paper, 60x50 cm
French critic Nino Frank is often given credit for coining<br />
the term “film noir” to describe a group of American<br />
crime films that were shown in French theaters in the<br />
forties. He allegated that the novelty of film noir is<br />
that it shifts the burden from the action to creating<br />
expressive model characters e.g.: the detective in<br />
a trench coat or a demonic femme fatale in a satin dress<br />
with a cigarette in her hand. In his drawings <strong>Paweł</strong><br />
<strong>Olszczyński</strong> goes one step further—he abandons the<br />
characters and focuses on their props. These elements<br />
usually appear alone, without “ownership“—a glove<br />
moving along the railing waving limply, revealing<br />
that is empty, filled only with associations, Untitled<br />
(Empty Glove). In <strong>Olszczyński</strong>’s work items of clothing<br />
subjectively become phantoms of bodies. It is his<br />
private world – a fantôme noir. <strong>Olszczyński</strong>’s drawings<br />
are therefore the opposite of the classic study of the<br />
model. He is occupied only with what surfaces: drapes,<br />
folds, heels, hair styles and everything that fetishizes.<br />
For the artist fashion is language of Baudrillard<br />
pyramidal simulacrum. It is fetish and artificial. And it<br />
is the superficiality of fashion that fascinates him.<br />
The world of fashion has long reached far into areas of<br />
art. Many designers like Rei Kawakubo, Martin Maison<br />
Margiela or Gareth Pugh are inspired by artworks, and<br />
their collections are often reminiscent of collectable<br />
objects or sculptures. <strong>Olszczyński</strong> asks, however, what<br />
happens if we reverse the direction of fascination,<br />
if the art falls in love with the fashion? His paper<br />
sculptures are made up of wigs, purses and wallets<br />
and refer to haute couture in fashion. They are as fragile and as transitory as fashion trends. He plays with exclusivity of the handmade<br />
which in the art world is self-evident. He is fascinated by black and the possilibites of the ordinary pencil—sometimes deep black, soft and<br />
velvety, and at others dry, precise and thin as a hair. He also radically juxtaposes the texture of materials like skin, fur and hair. <strong>Olszczyński</strong><br />
pulls his favorite motif from fashion magazines which depict unnaturally styled hair–fetishes once again.<br />
He continually returns to this motif while at the same time consciously celebrating the ritual of the obsessive, compulsive repetition, which<br />
manifests itself in a pushy quest for perfected execution. The process of creating drawings is time consuming and laborious—physically<br />
and mentally exhausting. The hair on <strong>Olszczyński</strong>’s works is tangled, dominating the entire surface of the sheet. While repitition should<br />
satisfy, it provokes anxiety and a feeling of helplessness.<br />
In Freud’s Beyond the Pleasure Principle, the author writes (...) the compulsion to repeat stems from what has been denied and has<br />
appeared in the unconscious. (...) But what is the relation of the pleasure principles with the compulsion to repeat that reveals the power of<br />
denial? It’s obvious that most of what becomes revived as a result of forced repetition is unpleasant to our ego, as it actualizes the functions<br />
of the denied drives; it is however distress which we have already appreciated and which does not contradict the pleasure principle,<br />
a distress for one system, connected with a simultaneous satisfaction of another.<br />
<strong>Olszczyński</strong>’s strategy is to analyze the drawing medium. His works are a kind of visual tautology: on a piece of paper you see a piece of<br />
drawn paper, folded like a sheet of paper, Untitled (Sheet of Paper), or the drawing of hair that he shapes into the likeness of hair or a wig.<br />
The artist builds objects with his drawings. Ironically, this practice of repetition exposes the limits of mimesis. The more <strong>Olszczyński</strong> tries<br />
to convince us that a picture is reality, the more it is impossible. As a reward, however, he reveals the natural characteristics of the drawing<br />
medium.<br />
<strong>Paweł</strong> <strong>Olszczyński</strong> was born in 1985 in Cracow. He lives and works in Cracow, Poland.<br />
Untitled (Shoes), 2011, pencil on paper, 80x60 cm<br />
back cover: Untitled, 2010, pencil on paper, 50x43 cm<br />
Lindenstr. 35, 10969 Berlin | +49 30 61107375 | www.zak-branicka.com | mail@zak-branicka.com