Paweł Olszczyński - Zak | Branicka

Paweł Olszczyński - Zak | Branicka Paweł Olszczyński - Zak | Branicka

zak.branicka.com
from zak.branicka.com More from this publisher

<strong>Paweł</strong> <strong>Olszczyński</strong>


front cover: Untitled (Sleeve), 2010, pencil on paper, 80x60 cm<br />

Untitled, 2010, pencil on paper, 40x30 cm<br />

<strong>Paweł</strong> <strong>Olszczyński</strong><br />

Fantôme Noir


Untitled (Overcoat), 2010, pencil on paper, 60x50 cm<br />

Untitled (Man), 2010, pencil on paper, 70x48 cm


Untitled (Small Purse), 2010, pencil on paper, 30x40 cm<br />

Untitled (Cuffs), 2010, pencil on paper, 40x30 cm<br />

Untitled, (Shirt), 2010, pencil on paper, 50x60 cm<br />

Untitled (Double Skirt), 2010, pencil on paper, 50x60 cm<br />

Untitled (Black-Portrait), 2010, pencil on paper, 40x30 cm<br />

Untitled (Hood), 2010, pencil on paper, 60x50 cm


Untitled (Wig), 2010, object, pencil on paper, 10x20x24 cm<br />

Untitled (Bag), 2010, object, pencil on paper, 7x20x12 cm<br />

Untitled (Shirt), 2011, object, pencil on paper, 8x20x16 cm<br />

Untited (Sheet of Paper), 2011, pencil on paper, 60x50 cm


French critic Nino Frank is often given credit for coining<br />

the term “film noir” to describe a group of American<br />

crime films that were shown in French theaters in the<br />

forties. He allegated that the novelty of film noir is<br />

that it shifts the burden from the action to creating<br />

expressive model characters e.g.: the detective in<br />

a trench coat or a demonic femme fatale in a satin dress<br />

with a cigarette in her hand. In his drawings <strong>Paweł</strong><br />

<strong>Olszczyński</strong> goes one step further—he abandons the<br />

characters and focuses on their props. These elements<br />

usually appear alone, without “ownership“—a glove<br />

moving along the railing waving limply, revealing<br />

that is empty, filled only with associations, Untitled<br />

(Empty Glove). In <strong>Olszczyński</strong>’s work items of clothing<br />

subjectively become phantoms of bodies. It is his<br />

private world – a fantôme noir. <strong>Olszczyński</strong>’s drawings<br />

are therefore the opposite of the classic study of the<br />

model. He is occupied only with what surfaces: drapes,<br />

folds, heels, hair styles and everything that fetishizes.<br />

For the artist fashion is language of Baudrillard<br />

pyramidal simulacrum. It is fetish and artificial. And it<br />

is the superficiality of fashion that fascinates him.<br />

The world of fashion has long reached far into areas of<br />

art. Many designers like Rei Kawakubo, Martin Maison<br />

Margiela or Gareth Pugh are inspired by artworks, and<br />

their collections are often reminiscent of collectable<br />

objects or sculptures. <strong>Olszczyński</strong> asks, however, what<br />

happens if we reverse the direction of fascination,<br />

if the art falls in love with the fashion? His paper<br />

sculptures are made up of wigs, purses and wallets<br />

and refer to haute couture in fashion. They are as fragile and as transitory as fashion trends. He plays with exclusivity of the handmade<br />

which in the art world is self-evident. He is fascinated by black and the possilibites of the ordinary pencil—sometimes deep black, soft and<br />

velvety, and at others dry, precise and thin as a hair. He also radically juxtaposes the texture of materials like skin, fur and hair. <strong>Olszczyński</strong><br />

pulls his favorite motif from fashion magazines which depict unnaturally styled hair–fetishes once again.<br />

He continually returns to this motif while at the same time consciously celebrating the ritual of the obsessive, compulsive repetition, which<br />

manifests itself in a pushy quest for perfected execution. The process of creating drawings is time consuming and laborious—physically<br />

and mentally exhausting. The hair on <strong>Olszczyński</strong>’s works is tangled, dominating the entire surface of the sheet. While repitition should<br />

satisfy, it provokes anxiety and a feeling of helplessness.<br />

In Freud’s Beyond the Pleasure Principle, the author writes (...) the compulsion to repeat stems from what has been denied and has<br />

appeared in the unconscious. (...) But what is the relation of the pleasure principles with the compulsion to repeat that reveals the power of<br />

denial? It’s obvious that most of what becomes revived as a result of forced repetition is unpleasant to our ego, as it actualizes the functions<br />

of the denied drives; it is however distress which we have already appreciated and which does not contradict the pleasure principle,<br />

a distress for one system, connected with a simultaneous satisfaction of another.<br />

<strong>Olszczyński</strong>’s strategy is to analyze the drawing medium. His works are a kind of visual tautology: on a piece of paper you see a piece of<br />

drawn paper, folded like a sheet of paper, Untitled (Sheet of Paper), or the drawing of hair that he shapes into the likeness of hair or a wig.<br />

The artist builds objects with his drawings. Ironically, this practice of repetition exposes the limits of mimesis. The more <strong>Olszczyński</strong> tries<br />

to convince us that a picture is reality, the more it is impossible. As a reward, however, he reveals the natural characteristics of the drawing<br />

medium.<br />

<strong>Paweł</strong> <strong>Olszczyński</strong> was born in 1985 in Cracow. He lives and works in Cracow, Poland.<br />

Untitled (Shoes), 2011, pencil on paper, 80x60 cm<br />

back cover: Untitled, 2010, pencil on paper, 50x43 cm<br />

Lindenstr. 35, 10969 Berlin | +49 30 61107375 | www.zak-branicka.com | mail@zak-branicka.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!