Science Facing Aliens - Invasive Alien Species in Belgium - Belgian ...
Science Facing Aliens - Invasive Alien Species in Belgium - Belgian ... Science Facing Aliens - Invasive Alien Species in Belgium - Belgian ...
Research on biological invasions: a Belgian perspective Etienne BRANQUART, Barbara GONZALEZ, Dimitri BROSENS & Hendrik SEGERS Belgian Biodiversity Platform, Brussels Introduction Three years after the SOS invasion milestone meeting, the Science facing Aliens conference was a new opportunity to produce an overview on Belgian research dedicated to biological invasions. In preparation to the conference, we inventoried the Belgian research linked to the conference theme and assessed its performance relative to European research, the results of which we present here. Methodology Inventory of the Belgian research Research projects dealing with biological invasions were surveyed through the BioBel database (Belgian Biodiversity Platform, http://biobel.biodiversity.be, accessed April 30, 2009). Projects extracted from the database were sorted in two different categories. The first includes projects that focus on biological invasions and involve at least 1 full- time scientist. The second includes projects that deal with invasion ecology incidentally. Several attributes were assigned to the projects. This includes starting and ending date of the project, taxonomic affiliation, habitat type, research topic, and funding source. Five main research topics were considered based on the session themes of the last Neobiota conference (Prague, September 2008) : invasion and dispersion patterns, mechanisms and evolution of invasions, impacts of invasions, prediction and risk assessment and management practices. These topics are supposed to encompass the full spectrum of research activities linked to biological invasions. For all the analyses presented below, individual projects were weighted based on the number of research teams involved with a least 1 full-time scientist. This implies that more weight was attributed to large networks than to individual PhD theses. Although we made a great effort to include all invasion-related research projects in BioBel, some may have escaped our attention. The following results need to be interpreted with this caveat in mind. Performance of Belgian research compared to European research Bibliometric analyses were performed to compare Belgian with European research dedicated to invasion ecology. We used the terms “biological invasion*” or “invasive species” or “alien species” or “non-indigenous species” or “non-native species” or “exotic species” or “invader*” to search papers published between 1990 and 2008 included in Web of Science ® (WoS) . Then, we extracted those papers to which at least one European author contributed. This yielded 2796 papers, among which 88 were produced by Belgian authors, alone or in collaboration with international authors. Two different performance indicators were calculated using this information. Our first indicator intends to reflect the research attention dedicated to invasion-related issues in a 85
- Page 39 and 40: Unidentified (9/20) Propylea 14-pun
- Page 41 and 42: Comparing Fallopia japonica, F. sac
- Page 43 and 44: SLA (m²/kg) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 SLA
- Page 45 and 46: Mediterranean container plants and
- Page 47 and 48: All species from our survey have in
- Page 49 and 50: dangers of uncritically using the t
- Page 51 and 52: Water frogs in Wallonia: genetic id
- Page 53 and 54: • the distinction between the nat
- Page 55: References Berger, L., 1988. On the
- Page 58 and 59: 52 # crabs fyke -1 day -1 150 100 5
- Page 60 and 61: 54 Ring-necked parakeets in Belgium
- Page 62 and 63: 56 Our models predict a mean number
- Page 64 and 65: 58 Strubbe D. & Matthysen E., 2009c
- Page 66 and 67: 60 Study area & data collection Lie
- Page 68 and 69: 62 cm) and age of the tree and comp
- Page 71 and 72: Soil arthropods associated to the i
- Page 73 and 74: Table 1. Abundance of soil fauna ex
- Page 75: References Armbrecht I., Perfecto I
- Page 78 and 79: 72 Status of non-indigenous fish sp
- Page 80 and 81: 74 Trends At 487 site-specific surv
- Page 83 and 84: Non-indigenous species of the Belgi
- Page 85 and 86: 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 cumulative #
- Page 87 and 88: Brussels Psittacidae: impacts, risk
- Page 89: References Anonymous 2005. UK non-n
- Page 93 and 94: Frequency 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 19
- Page 95 and 96: Residuals (N x HAB) Times Cited cou
- Page 97: The Science Facing Aliens conferenc
Research on biological <strong>in</strong>vasions: a <strong>Belgian</strong> perspective<br />
Etienne BRANQUART, Barbara GONZALEZ, Dimitri BROSENS & Hendrik SEGERS<br />
<strong>Belgian</strong> Biodiversity Platform, Brussels<br />
Introduction<br />
Three years after the SOS <strong>in</strong>vasion milestone meet<strong>in</strong>g, the <strong>Science</strong> fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong><strong>Alien</strong>s</strong> conference<br />
was a new opportunity to produce an overview on <strong>Belgian</strong> research dedicated to biological<br />
<strong>in</strong>vasions. In preparation to the conference, we <strong>in</strong>ventoried the <strong>Belgian</strong> research l<strong>in</strong>ked to the<br />
conference theme and assessed its performance relative to European research, the results of<br />
which we present here.<br />
Methodology<br />
Inventory of the <strong>Belgian</strong> research<br />
Research projects deal<strong>in</strong>g with biological <strong>in</strong>vasions were surveyed through the BioBel<br />
database (<strong>Belgian</strong> Biodiversity Platform, http://biobel.biodiversity.be, accessed April 30,<br />
2009). Projects extracted from the database were sorted <strong>in</strong> two different categories. The first<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes projects that focus on biological <strong>in</strong>vasions and <strong>in</strong>volve at least 1 full- time scientist.<br />
The second <strong>in</strong>cludes projects that deal with <strong>in</strong>vasion ecology <strong>in</strong>cidentally.<br />
Several attributes were assigned to the projects. This <strong>in</strong>cludes start<strong>in</strong>g and end<strong>in</strong>g date<br />
of the project, taxonomic affiliation, habitat type, research topic, and fund<strong>in</strong>g source. Five<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> research topics were considered based on the session themes of the last Neobiota<br />
conference (Prague, September 2008) : <strong>in</strong>vasion and dispersion patterns, mechanisms and<br />
evolution of <strong>in</strong>vasions, impacts of <strong>in</strong>vasions, prediction and risk assessment and management<br />
practices. These topics are supposed to encompass the full spectrum of research activities<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked to biological <strong>in</strong>vasions.<br />
For all the analyses presented below, <strong>in</strong>dividual projects were weighted based on the<br />
number of research teams <strong>in</strong>volved with a least 1 full-time scientist. This implies that more<br />
weight was attributed to large networks than to <strong>in</strong>dividual PhD theses.<br />
Although we made a great effort to <strong>in</strong>clude all <strong>in</strong>vasion-related research projects <strong>in</strong> BioBel,<br />
some may have escaped our attention. The follow<strong>in</strong>g results need to be <strong>in</strong>terpreted with this<br />
caveat <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d.<br />
Performance of <strong>Belgian</strong> research compared to European research<br />
Bibliometric analyses were performed to compare <strong>Belgian</strong> with European research dedicated<br />
to <strong>in</strong>vasion ecology. We used the terms “biological <strong>in</strong>vasion*” or “<strong>in</strong>vasive species” or “alien<br />
species” or “non-<strong>in</strong>digenous species” or “non-native species” or “exotic species” or<br />
“<strong>in</strong>vader*” to search papers published between 1990 and 2008 <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Web of <strong>Science</strong> ®<br />
(WoS) . Then, we extracted those papers to which at least one European author contributed.<br />
This yielded 2796 papers, among which 88 were produced by <strong>Belgian</strong> authors, alone or <strong>in</strong><br />
collaboration with <strong>in</strong>ternational authors.<br />
Two different performance <strong>in</strong>dicators were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>formation. Our first<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>in</strong>tends to reflect the research attention dedicated to <strong>in</strong>vasion-related issues <strong>in</strong> a<br />
85