Science Facing Aliens - Invasive Alien Species in Belgium - Belgian ...

Science Facing Aliens - Invasive Alien Species in Belgium - Belgian ... Science Facing Aliens - Invasive Alien Species in Belgium - Belgian ...

ias.biodiversity.be
from ias.biodiversity.be More from this publisher
30.01.2013 Views

Research on biological invasions: a Belgian perspective Etienne BRANQUART, Barbara GONZALEZ, Dimitri BROSENS & Hendrik SEGERS Belgian Biodiversity Platform, Brussels Introduction Three years after the SOS invasion milestone meeting, the Science facing Aliens conference was a new opportunity to produce an overview on Belgian research dedicated to biological invasions. In preparation to the conference, we inventoried the Belgian research linked to the conference theme and assessed its performance relative to European research, the results of which we present here. Methodology Inventory of the Belgian research Research projects dealing with biological invasions were surveyed through the BioBel database (Belgian Biodiversity Platform, http://biobel.biodiversity.be, accessed April 30, 2009). Projects extracted from the database were sorted in two different categories. The first includes projects that focus on biological invasions and involve at least 1 full- time scientist. The second includes projects that deal with invasion ecology incidentally. Several attributes were assigned to the projects. This includes starting and ending date of the project, taxonomic affiliation, habitat type, research topic, and funding source. Five main research topics were considered based on the session themes of the last Neobiota conference (Prague, September 2008) : invasion and dispersion patterns, mechanisms and evolution of invasions, impacts of invasions, prediction and risk assessment and management practices. These topics are supposed to encompass the full spectrum of research activities linked to biological invasions. For all the analyses presented below, individual projects were weighted based on the number of research teams involved with a least 1 full-time scientist. This implies that more weight was attributed to large networks than to individual PhD theses. Although we made a great effort to include all invasion-related research projects in BioBel, some may have escaped our attention. The following results need to be interpreted with this caveat in mind. Performance of Belgian research compared to European research Bibliometric analyses were performed to compare Belgian with European research dedicated to invasion ecology. We used the terms “biological invasion*” or “invasive species” or “alien species” or “non-indigenous species” or “non-native species” or “exotic species” or “invader*” to search papers published between 1990 and 2008 included in Web of Science ® (WoS) . Then, we extracted those papers to which at least one European author contributed. This yielded 2796 papers, among which 88 were produced by Belgian authors, alone or in collaboration with international authors. Two different performance indicators were calculated using this information. Our first indicator intends to reflect the research attention dedicated to invasion-related issues in a 85

Research on biological <strong>in</strong>vasions: a <strong>Belgian</strong> perspective<br />

Etienne BRANQUART, Barbara GONZALEZ, Dimitri BROSENS & Hendrik SEGERS<br />

<strong>Belgian</strong> Biodiversity Platform, Brussels<br />

Introduction<br />

Three years after the SOS <strong>in</strong>vasion milestone meet<strong>in</strong>g, the <strong>Science</strong> fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong><strong>Alien</strong>s</strong> conference<br />

was a new opportunity to produce an overview on <strong>Belgian</strong> research dedicated to biological<br />

<strong>in</strong>vasions. In preparation to the conference, we <strong>in</strong>ventoried the <strong>Belgian</strong> research l<strong>in</strong>ked to the<br />

conference theme and assessed its performance relative to European research, the results of<br />

which we present here.<br />

Methodology<br />

Inventory of the <strong>Belgian</strong> research<br />

Research projects deal<strong>in</strong>g with biological <strong>in</strong>vasions were surveyed through the BioBel<br />

database (<strong>Belgian</strong> Biodiversity Platform, http://biobel.biodiversity.be, accessed April 30,<br />

2009). Projects extracted from the database were sorted <strong>in</strong> two different categories. The first<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes projects that focus on biological <strong>in</strong>vasions and <strong>in</strong>volve at least 1 full- time scientist.<br />

The second <strong>in</strong>cludes projects that deal with <strong>in</strong>vasion ecology <strong>in</strong>cidentally.<br />

Several attributes were assigned to the projects. This <strong>in</strong>cludes start<strong>in</strong>g and end<strong>in</strong>g date<br />

of the project, taxonomic affiliation, habitat type, research topic, and fund<strong>in</strong>g source. Five<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> research topics were considered based on the session themes of the last Neobiota<br />

conference (Prague, September 2008) : <strong>in</strong>vasion and dispersion patterns, mechanisms and<br />

evolution of <strong>in</strong>vasions, impacts of <strong>in</strong>vasions, prediction and risk assessment and management<br />

practices. These topics are supposed to encompass the full spectrum of research activities<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ked to biological <strong>in</strong>vasions.<br />

For all the analyses presented below, <strong>in</strong>dividual projects were weighted based on the<br />

number of research teams <strong>in</strong>volved with a least 1 full-time scientist. This implies that more<br />

weight was attributed to large networks than to <strong>in</strong>dividual PhD theses.<br />

Although we made a great effort to <strong>in</strong>clude all <strong>in</strong>vasion-related research projects <strong>in</strong> BioBel,<br />

some may have escaped our attention. The follow<strong>in</strong>g results need to be <strong>in</strong>terpreted with this<br />

caveat <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d.<br />

Performance of <strong>Belgian</strong> research compared to European research<br />

Bibliometric analyses were performed to compare <strong>Belgian</strong> with European research dedicated<br />

to <strong>in</strong>vasion ecology. We used the terms “biological <strong>in</strong>vasion*” or “<strong>in</strong>vasive species” or “alien<br />

species” or “non-<strong>in</strong>digenous species” or “non-native species” or “exotic species” or<br />

“<strong>in</strong>vader*” to search papers published between 1990 and 2008 <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Web of <strong>Science</strong> ®<br />

(WoS) . Then, we extracted those papers to which at least one European author contributed.<br />

This yielded 2796 papers, among which 88 were produced by <strong>Belgian</strong> authors, alone or <strong>in</strong><br />

collaboration with <strong>in</strong>ternational authors.<br />

Two different performance <strong>in</strong>dicators were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>formation. Our first<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>in</strong>tends to reflect the research attention dedicated to <strong>in</strong>vasion-related issues <strong>in</strong> a<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!