Science Facing Aliens - Invasive Alien Species in Belgium - Belgian ...

Science Facing Aliens - Invasive Alien Species in Belgium - Belgian ... Science Facing Aliens - Invasive Alien Species in Belgium - Belgian ...

ias.biodiversity.be
from ias.biodiversity.be More from this publisher
30.01.2013 Views

Non-indigenous freshwater fishes in Flanders: status, trends and risk assessment Hugo VERREYCKEN * , Gerlinde VAN THUYNE & Claude BELPAIRE Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Duboislaan 14, 1560 Hoeilaart *Corresponding author; tel. 02 658 04 26 & e-mail: hugo.verreycken@inbo.be Abstract At least eighteen non-indigenous freshwater fish species were reported to occur in the wild within the territory of Flanders. Nine are considered naturalized while the others are acclimatized and do not form self-sustaining populations. Nine of the introductions occurred prior to 1950, with the other nine species introduced since then. This contribution reviews the available information on these introductions, and evaluates a decade of data from fisheries surveys to assess the recent development of these non-indigenous populations. Gibel carp Carassius gibelio and topmouth gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva are the most widespread of the non-indigenous species in Flemish waters, and both continue to expand their ranges. A reduction in range has been observed in brown bullhead Ameiurus nebulosus only. Only four species occur in all eleven river basins while eight species are restricted to one or two basins and often only one specimen was found during fish stock assessments. We also discuss nonindigenous fish species that are likely to colonize Flanders inland waters in the near future. For all non-indigenous freshwater fish species present and expected to appear soon, different risk analysis tools (FISK and ISEIA) were used to screen these species for their possible invasiveness. Although scores from FISK and ISEIA differ for some species, gibel carp and topmouth gudgeon were in both assessments classified as ‘highest risk’ species in relation to their potential invasiveness. Introduction In 1995, the Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO) (then Institute for Forestry and Game Management) started a monitoring network on freshwater fishes. Fish stock assessments were performed on a regular basis at more than 800 locations all over Flanders. The data collected during these fish stock assessments were brought together in an online database VIS or Vis Informatie Systeem (Fish Information System) which can be consulted at http://vis.milieuinfo.be. At present, data of more than 200 000 native and non-native fishes with their individual lengths and weights are in this database. All these data are georeferenced. This paper discusses the presence and status of the non-indigenous fish species in Flanders (Belgium). Data of non-native fishes from the VIS-database were analysed for trends in numbers and biomass over the period 1996 - 2005. Potential invasiveness of all nonindigenous freshwater fish species present and expected to appear soon was assessed using the FISK tool by Copp et al. (2005a) and the ISEIA protocol by the Belgian Forum on Invasive Species (Branquart, 2007). Both tools classify the invasiveness of the species into low, medium or high, and results from both methods were compared. 71

Non-<strong>in</strong>digenous freshwater fishes <strong>in</strong> Flanders: status, trends and<br />

risk assessment<br />

Hugo VERREYCKEN * , Gerl<strong>in</strong>de VAN THUYNE & Claude BELPAIRE<br />

Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Duboislaan 14, 1560 Hoeilaart<br />

*Correspond<strong>in</strong>g author; tel. 02 658 04 26 & e-mail: hugo.verreycken@<strong>in</strong>bo.be<br />

Abstract<br />

At least eighteen non-<strong>in</strong>digenous freshwater fish species were reported to occur <strong>in</strong> the wild<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the territory of Flanders. N<strong>in</strong>e are considered naturalized while the others are<br />

acclimatized and do not form self-susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g populations. N<strong>in</strong>e of the <strong>in</strong>troductions occurred<br />

prior to 1950, with the other n<strong>in</strong>e species <strong>in</strong>troduced s<strong>in</strong>ce then. This contribution reviews the<br />

available <strong>in</strong>formation on these <strong>in</strong>troductions, and evaluates a decade of data from fisheries<br />

surveys to assess the recent development of these non-<strong>in</strong>digenous populations. Gibel carp<br />

Carassius gibelio and topmouth gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva are the most widespread of<br />

the non-<strong>in</strong>digenous species <strong>in</strong> Flemish waters, and both cont<strong>in</strong>ue to expand their ranges. A<br />

reduction <strong>in</strong> range has been observed <strong>in</strong> brown bullhead Ameiurus nebulosus only. Only four<br />

species occur <strong>in</strong> all eleven river bas<strong>in</strong>s while eight species are restricted to one or two bas<strong>in</strong>s<br />

and often only one specimen was found dur<strong>in</strong>g fish stock assessments. We also discuss non<strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

fish species that are likely to colonize Flanders <strong>in</strong>land waters <strong>in</strong> the near future.<br />

For all non-<strong>in</strong>digenous freshwater fish species present and expected to appear soon, different<br />

risk analysis tools (FISK and ISEIA) were used to screen these species for their possible<br />

<strong>in</strong>vasiveness. Although scores from FISK and ISEIA differ for some species, gibel carp and<br />

topmouth gudgeon were <strong>in</strong> both assessments classified as ‘highest risk’ species <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

their potential <strong>in</strong>vasiveness.<br />

Introduction<br />

In 1995, the Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO) (then Institute for Forestry and<br />

Game Management) started a monitor<strong>in</strong>g network on freshwater fishes. Fish stock<br />

assessments were performed on a regular basis at more than 800 locations all over Flanders.<br />

The data collected dur<strong>in</strong>g these fish stock assessments were brought together <strong>in</strong> an onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

database VIS or Vis Informatie Systeem (Fish Information System) which can be consulted at<br />

http://vis.milieu<strong>in</strong>fo.be. At present, data of more than 200 000 native and non-native fishes<br />

with their <strong>in</strong>dividual lengths and weights are <strong>in</strong> this database. All these data are<br />

georeferenced.<br />

This paper discusses the presence and status of the non-<strong>in</strong>digenous fish species <strong>in</strong><br />

Flanders (<strong>Belgium</strong>). Data of non-native fishes from the VIS-database were analysed for trends<br />

<strong>in</strong> numbers and biomass over the period 1996 - 2005. Potential <strong>in</strong>vasiveness of all non<strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

freshwater fish species present and expected to appear soon was assessed us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the FISK tool by Copp et al. (2005a) and the ISEIA protocol by the <strong>Belgian</strong> Forum on<br />

<strong>Invasive</strong> <strong>Species</strong> (Branquart, 2007). Both tools classify the <strong>in</strong>vasiveness of the species <strong>in</strong>to<br />

low, medium or high, and results from both methods were compared.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!